top
|
1. Gibson Cues Up Obama to Refute Ayers, Makes McCain Justify Topic For ABC's World News on Wednesday and Thursday, Charles Gibson conducted interviews with Barack Obama and John McCain aboard the ABC News bus, but on McCain's "line of attack" against Obama he shared Obama's annoyance ("Are you going to have to address that again?") while he pushed McCain to justify the criticism: "You're comfortable that this should be a focus in the last days of the campaign?" With Obama in Indianapolis on Wednesday, Gibson noted how "John McCain has unloaded on you in the last 72, 96 hours, as has Sarah Palin" about how "we don't know who Barack Obama is," but "were you surprised that he didn't bring it up last night at the debate and use that line of attack?" Gibson next cued up Obama, as if it's an unfair burden for Obama to "again" have to address Ayers: "Sarah Palin has come at you because of the Bill Ayers connection. Are you going to have to address that again?" When McCain, on Thursday in Milwaukee, brought up Obama's level of "knowledge and judgment," a befuddled Gibson pressed: "You don't think he's been thoroughly vetted, having gone through all the primaries he did, all the campaigning, running for President as long as you have -- two years?" 2. ABC's Wright Rages at 'Full-Bore Attack on Obama's Character' For the second time inside a week, on Thursday's Good Morning America ABC reporter David Wright railed against John McCain and his "full-bore attack on [Senator Barack] Obama's character." Speaking of the McCain/Palin campaign's references to Obama's relationship with unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers, the network journalist complained that the Republicans were suggesting Obama is "yellow, disloyal and doesn't belong." After asserting that the strategy of talking about an opponent's character has "been around more than 2,000 years" Wright darkly intoned: "But in the past couple of days, the Republicans have been laying it on thick. Chumming the waters. And, not surprisingly, ugly reactions are beginning to surface." Of course, no where in Wright's segment did he mention any of Obama's negative attacks, such as the nasty ad by the Illinois Senator which implied that McCain is old and out of touch because he doesn't use the Internet. Perhaps previewing the media's next line of attack, Wright closed: "For now, the Obama campaign is pointedly not accusing the McCain team of racism. Though, they did cock an eyebrow when McCain referred to Obama as 'that one.'" For now? 3. CNN Omits ACORN's Name From Brief on Voter Fraud Raid in Vegas On Thursday's American Morning program on CNN, co-anchor Kiran Chetry failed to mention ACORN's name during a news brief about the law enforcement raid on the liberal organization's local headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada, as part of an investigation into allegations of voter fraud. Chetry called ACORN a "non-profit group" that was "disputing claims it committed voter registration fraud." She also referred to the group, which is linked to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, as a "community organization that helps organize voter outreach." The only indication that the brief was about ACORN was a file video that was displayed for 5 seconds that showed the organization's name written on a form. 4. Tina Brown: Dishonorable McCain Should Be a Better Loser Former New Yorker editor Tina Brown appeared on Thursday's Good Morning America to plug her new Web site and asserted that "what people are really interested in" is whether Senator John McCain is losing in a dishonorable manner. While describing "The Daily Beast," a Huffington Post-style blog site, she whined that "what I feel strongly is a sense that people are regretting [sic] the old John McCain" and complained: "Like, what happened to this man who was such, a kind of, honorable, great American? The campaign doesn't seem to live up to his sense of honor in any way. And he's really changing." Is that what "people" are really interested in or just people in New York City? With condescending sympathy, Brown blogged: "This is all horrible to those of us who once fell in love with McCain's flinty heroism and independence. It's as if he when he made the decision that fateful day on August 10th, 2004 in Pensacola, Florida to grit his teeth and bear hug Bush, he contracted a political virus that ate away at the nobility of his soul." 5. FNC Features Ayers Bombing Victim Rest of Media Ignore While the networks and much of the mainstream media channel their outrage at Sarah Palin for daring to mention Barack Obama's ties to terrorist Bill Ayers, Thursday's Fox and Friends featured a victim of Ayers, John Murtagh, whose home was bombed at the age of nine. Murtagh claimed that the Obama-Ayers relationship goes back to the 1980s, when they met at a law firm. Further elaborating on the activities of a Weather Underground splinter group when Obama was attending college in New York City, Murtagh charged: "For Barack Obama to attend Columbia shortly after these events, being in New York at that time and not know who the Weather Underground was, frankly, makes him the dumbest man that ever graduated from Columbia and Harvard Law School." When Brian Kilmeade replied "we know he' not," the terrorism victim agreed. Gibson Cues Up Obama to Refute Ayers, Makes McCain Justify Topic For ABC's World News on Wednesday and Thursday, Charles Gibson conducted interviews with Barack Obama and John McCain aboard the ABC News bus, but on McCain's "line of attack" against Obama he shared Obama's annoyance ("Are you going to have to address that again?") while he pushed McCain to justify the criticism: "You're comfortable that this should be a focus in the last days of the campaign?" With Obama in Indianapolis on Wednesday, Gibson noted how "John McCain has unloaded on you in the last 72, 96 hours, as has Sarah Palin" about how "we don't know who Barack Obama is," but "were you surprised that he didn't bring it up last night at the debate and use that line of attack?" Gibson next cued up Obama, as if it's an unfair burden for Obama to "again" have to address Ayers: "Sarah Palin has come at you because of the Bill Ayers connection. Are you going to have to address that again?" Talking to McCain on Thursday in Milwaukee, Gibson raised the obvious ("Does this almost monolithic focus on the economy, in the news, and in people's minds in recent weeks, hurt your campaign?") before then treating McCain's efforts to change the subject as odd: "Why...have you focused so in what you've had to say on Senator Obama's character?" When McCain brought up Obama's level of "knowledge and judgment," a befuddled Gibson pressed: "You don't think he's been thoroughly vetted, having gone through all the primaries he did, all the campaigning, running for President as long as you have -- two years?" As for Ayers, Gibson pushed McCain to show his own better judgment, posing the question cited above about being "comfortable" with making Obama's character an issue. [This item, by the MRC's Brent Baker, was posted Thursday night on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ] As for Obama's being "thoroughly vetted," two Media Research Center studies released in August proved otherwise: For "Editing Reverend Wright's Wrongs: How the Networks Censored and Manipulated Jeremiah Wright Soundbites and Glorified Barack Obama's Race Speech," go to: www.mrc.org "Obama's Margin of Victory: The Media; How Barack Obama Could Not Have Won the Democratic Nomination Without ABC, CBS and NBC," determined: Barack Obama had a crucial advantage over his rivals this year: the support of the national media, especially the three broadcast networks. At every step of his national political career, network reporters showered the Illinois Senator with glowing media coverage, building him up as a political celebrity and exhibiting little interest in investigating his past associations or exploring the controversies that could have threatened his campaign. For the full report: www.mrc.org Gibson's first questions to set up the two segments weren't exactly equal as Gibson prompted Obama to expound, but pressed McCain to explain a supposed failure: For Obama: "And we asked him about what we've been hearing on this trip." For McCain: "And, we asked Senator McCain why at the debate the other night, there weren't more new ideas about how to solve the current economic crisis." An example of similar questions to both: To Obama: "Somebody said to us, where is the passion in these guys? Where is the anger? People have lost trillions of dollars in their stock accounts, in their pension plans, in their 401 (k) s. You said out there to this rally, fear and panic cannot pervade us. And yet, fear does right now. And people look to leaders to turn that around or to counter that." To Mccain: "We've talked to a lot of folks as we've taken this bus around the battleground states in the Midwest, and somebody said to us: 'I don't see the passion and I don't see the anger in either one of these guys.'" # Gibson's queries to Obama, from their interview on the ABC News bus parked in Indianapolis, as aired on the Wednesday, October 8 World News: CHARLES GIBSON: All along our Midwest bus tour, the economy has been the first topic of conversation with people we've been meeting along the way. After two days in Ohio, we drove through an early fall rainstorm this morning across the border to Indiana and the Indiana State Fairgrounds here in Indianapolis. Barack Obama held a rally here where he focused on the economy, and he focused on people's fears. Those were the primary topics of our conversation with the Senator as he came on board to visit. And we asked him about what we've been hearing on this trip.
CHARLES GIBSON, TO OBAMA: Somebody said to us, where is the passion in these guys? Where is the anger? People have lost trillions of dollars in their stock accounts, in their pension plans, in their 401 (k) s. You said out there to this rally, fear and panic cannot pervade us. And yet, fear does right now. And people look to leaders to turn that around or to counter that. ....
GIBSON: In recent days, John McCain at his rallies has been talking a lot about Barack Obama the man, saying America doesn't really know Obama. So we asked Barack Obama about that in our conversation today.
ABC's Wright Rages at 'Full-Bore Attack on Obama's Character' For the second time inside a week, on Thursday's Good Morning America ABC reporter David Wright railed against John McCain and his "full-bore attack on [Senator Barack] Obama's character." Speaking of the McCain/Palin campaign's references to Obama's relationship with unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers, the network journalist complained that the Republicans were suggesting Obama is "yellow, disloyal and doesn't belong." After asserting that the strategy of talking about an opponent's character has "been around more than 2,000 years" Wright darkly intoned: "But in the past couple of days, the Republicans have been laying it on thick. Chumming the waters. And, not surprisingly, ugly reactions are beginning to surface." Of course, no where in Wright's segment did he mention any of Obama's negative attacks, such as the nasty ad by the Illinois Senator which implied that McCain is old and out of touch because he doesn't use the Internet. [This item, by the MRC's Scott Whitlock, was posted Thursday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ] Instead, Wright referenced "conservative" New York Times columnist David Brooks, someone who makes a habit out of bashing other right-wingers. Before playing a clip of Brooks calling Governor Sarah Palin a "cancer," Wright recited that the columnist is "troubled by Sarah Palin's anti-intellectualism, which he fears could embolden the know-nothing wing of his party." Perhaps previewing the media's next line of attack, Wright closed: "For now, the Obama campaign is pointedly not accusing the McCain team of racism. Though, they did cock an eyebrow when McCain referred to Obama as 'that one.'" For now? On Tuesday's GMA, Wright compared McCain's attacks on Ayers to the Obama camp's new ads about the Arizona senator and the Keating 5 savings and loan scandal. He asked: "Which is worse, a radical terrorist who wanted to blow up the Pentagon 40 years ago or a crooked banker whose failed savings and loan had to be bailed out by the taxpayers 20 years ago?" A transcript of the October 9 segment, which aired 7:08am: ROBIN ROBERTS: Now, we're going to move on to America votes and the presidential campaign that began with the candidates pledging to be respectful toward one another. Now that we're in the home stretch, are those promises falling by the wayside? Our David Wright in Washington with more. Good morning, David.
DAVID WRIGHT: Good morning, Robin. Attacking your opponent's character, nothing new in politics. It's a strategy that's been around more than 2,000 years. But in the past couple of days, the Republicans have been laying it on thick. Chumming the waters. And, not surprisingly, ugly reactions are beginning to surface. Asked by Sean Hannity whether he believes Obama is prepared to be president, John McCain gave a blunt, two-word answer.
CNN Omits ACORN's Name From Brief on Voter Fraud Raid in Vegas On Thursday's American Morning program on CNN, co-anchor Kiran Chetry failed to mention ACORN's name during a news brief about the law enforcement raid on the liberal organization's local headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada, as part of an investigation into allegations of voter fraud. Chetry called ACORN a "non-profit group" that was "disputing claims it committed voter registration fraud." She also referred to the group, which is linked to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, as a "community organization that helps organize voter outreach." The only indication that the brief was about ACORN was a file video that was displayed for 5 seconds that showed the organization's name written on a form. During the 28-second brief, which aired at the bottom-half of the 6 am Eastern hour of the CNN program, Chetry also stated how the raid occurred after authorities in Sin City noticed "some names did not match addresses" with some of the voter registration forms submitted by ACORN. She then continued that "[t]hey [local authorities] also say some of the forms included names of Dallas Cowboys players. The group's regional director claims they were the ones who tipped off election officials about fake or duplicate forms." [This item, by the MRC's Matthew Balan, was posted Thursday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ] An article by Molly Ball in Thursday's Las Vegas Review-Journal expanded on the story surrounding ACORN and this raid: "A community activist group under fire for fraudulent voter registration defended itself Wednesday, saying it tried in vain to work with officials to get rogue canvassers prosecuted months before Tuesday's surprise raid on its office by state authorities.... Secretary of State Ross Miller, whose office is spearheading the probe, said it was necessary to collect evidence about serious problems that could prompt felony charges. 'It's very disappointing to think ACORN would minimize the importance of maintaining integrity in the (election) system,' he said." Ball later mentioned Miller's party affiliation: "'The investigation into potential registration fraud should not diminish Nevada voters' confidence that only eligible voters will be able to cast ballots on November 4th,' Miller, a Democrat, said." For more on the law enforcement raid on ACORN's headquarters in Los Vegas, see the October 9, 2008 article by Molly Ball in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "Voter Registration Fraud: Activists Defend Actions," at: www.lvrj.com Ball's article also accurately reported on ACORN's liberal background and ties to Obama: "ACORN is a nonpartisan organization, but it has a liberal political agenda and ties to Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama. The low-income people it seeks to enfranchise are a group that tends to vote Democratic." Chetry didn't mention any of this during her brief. The full transcript of Kiran Chety's brief from Thursday's American Morning: CHETRY: A non-profit group is disputing claims it committed voter registration fraud. Authorities in Las Vegas raided a community organization that helps organize voter outreach, Tuesday, after noticing some names did not match addresses. They also say some of the forms included names of Dallas Cowboys players. The group's regional director claims they were the ones who tipped off election officials about fake or duplicate forms.
Tina Brown: Dishonorable McCain Should Be a Better Loser Former New Yorker editor Tina Brown appeared on Thursday's Good Morning America to plug her new Web site and asserted that "what people are really interested in" is whether Senator John McCain is losing in a dishonorable manner. While describing "The Daily Beast," a Huffington Post-style blog site, she whined that "what I feel strongly is a sense that people are regretting [sic] the old John McCain" and complained: "Like, what happened to this man who was such, a kind of, honorable, great American? The campaign doesn't seem to live up to his sense of honor in any way. And he's really changing." Now, is that what "people" are really interested in or just people in New York City? Brown's chiding continued as she questioned: "If McCain loses, will he feel a great regret that he didn't lose this time with as much honor as he lost last time?" Agreeing that the former Vanity Fair editor had hit on a hot topic, co-host Robin Roberts fretted, "That's what some people are talking about." On a blog for her site, Brown was even nastier. She mused that after McCain referred to Obama as "that one" during the presidential debate, the Democrat "watched him from his Frank Sinatra stool with the look of a family visitor marveling at the antics of the household's resident crazy uncle." [This item, by the MRC's Scott Whitlock, was posted Friday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ] With condescending sympathy, Brown also blogged: "This is all horrible to those of us who once fell in love with McCain's flinty heroism and independence. It's as if he when he made the decision that fateful day on August 10th, 2004 in Pensacola, Florida to grit his teeth and bear hug Bush, he contracted a political virus that ate away at the nobility of his soul." See: www.thedailybeast.com In comparison, Brown appeared on Good Morning America on August 9, 1999 to embarrassingly gush over the marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton: "What you feel is this is a couple who share the passion for the world, for doing good for politics, for making life better for other people. This is their great bond, and it really has brought them together with almost a sort of spiritual intensity." See an August 10, 1999 column by MRC President Brent Bozell: www.mrc.org A transcript of the October 9 exchange between Roberts and Brown, which occurred at 8:43am:
ROBIN ROBERTS: And now, magazine guru- you like that? Tina Brown, is here this morning. The former editor of Vanity Fair and the New Yorker is set to conquer a whole new medium, the internet. She is launching a website. It's called the Daily Beast. The motto is read this, skip that. Because they carefully choose their content to give you only the hottest, most interesting stories, such as yourself.
FNC Features Ayers Bombing Victim Rest of Media Ignore While the networks and much of the mainstream media channel their outrage at Sarah Palin for daring to mention Barack Obama's ties to terrorist Bill Ayers, Thursday's Fox and Friends featured a victim of Ayers, John Murtagh, whose home was bombed at the age of nine. Murtagh claimed that the Obama-Ayers relationship goes back to the 1980s, when they met at a law firm. Further elaborating on the activities of a Weather Underground splinter group when Obama was attending college in New York City, Murtagh charged: "For Barack Obama to attend Columbia shortly after these events, being in New York at that time and not know who the Weather Underground was, frankly, makes him the dumbest man that ever graduated from Columbia and Harvard Law School." When Brian Kilmeade replied "we know he' not," the terrorism victim agreed. [This item, by the MRC's Justin McCarthy, was posted Thursday on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ] From the October 9 Fox & Friends:
STEVE DOOCY: This headline from 1970 says it all, four bombs at Murtagh home. The notorious terror group the Weather Underground claiming responsibility for an attack on the family of a New York state Supreme Court justice. The bombing was lead by radical Bill Ayers, the same guy screen right who eventually formed a relationship of some sort with Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama. -- Brent Baker
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts |
|