Conventions 2000: Media Reality Check, Monday PM Edition
      -- Visit Convention 2000 Media Bias (More) --
  
  
  1) Invisible Donna Brazile
  Reappears on Morning Shows; CBS Host Praises Political Ascent of
  "Unapologetic Liberal"
  2) Gumbel Deplores Democratic
  "Centrism;" Early Show Anchor Pleads for Return to Kennedy Era
  3) Democrats Embrace
  "Centrist Policies;" Morning Shows Have Little to Say About
  Democratic Platform
  4) Clinton Gains From Time's
  Distorted History; Who Deserves Credit for Longest Economic Boom Ever in U.S.?
  Time's Eric Pooley claimed the boom did not begin before Clinton took office.
  5) CNN: Business-Bashing Delegates
  "Principled"; Democrats "Have the Interests of the Workers In
  Their Souls"
  6) Sidebars: GOP Response to
  Lieberman; No Sense of Humor?; CBS: "Least Liberal Convention";
  Russert: "Very Liberal" Convention
  7) Quote of the Morning.
      
      
  
           1
       Front
      page story. Invisible Donna Brazile Reappears on Morning Shows; CBS Host
      Praises Political Ascent of "Unapologetic Liberal"
Front
      page story. Invisible Donna Brazile Reappears on Morning Shows; CBS Host
      Praises Political Ascent of "Unapologetic Liberal"
           Gore campaign
      chief Donna Brazile suddenly appeared today on the networks' morning
      shows, but faced mostly soft questioning. No one was rude enough to
      mention that she hasn't been interviewed on network TV in seven months,
      since she implied in January that Gen. Colin Powell was a token:
      "Republicans bring out Powell because they have no program, no
      policy. They would rather take pictures with black children than feed
      them." By contrast, her white subordinate, consultant Bob Shrum, has
      appeared for six network interviews, including four Sunday morning shows.
           -- On CBS, Bryant
      Gumbel complained to Brazile, "You're an unapologetic liberal. Al
      Gore is a self-described centrist. Why doesn't that disconnect disturb
      you?" He praised her political ascent: "You were a story in and
      of yourself, the first African-American woman to head a major presidential
      campaign. What's the significance of that for you?" He added:
      "At the risk of embarrassing you, you're a more considerable story
      than that. Your mother was a maid, your father was a janitor, yet here you
      sit running a presidential campaign. What's that say about you?"
      Without citing examples, Gumbel did tell Brazile that "you have
      gained a reputation as someone who leads with their mouth. Do you regret
      some of the things you've said?" 
           -- On ABC, Charles
      Gibson trumpeted Gore's strengths, asking: "Here's a guy running with
      an economy that's humming along, a foreign policy that's in great shape,
      no foreign crises, and you're down significantly in the polls. Why hasn't
      he been able to connect?" Then he gave Brazile the chance to run down
      the opposition: "Your sense about the Republican convention and its
      image of inclusiveness."
           -- At 7:30 a.m.,
      CNN's Carol Lin asked Brazile a pile of puffy questions, except for one
      about CNN's latest poll: "Nearly half of the likely voters polled say
      that there is no chance whatsoever...that they would vote for Gore under
      any circumstances...What creates that resistance?"
           Two Mondays ago,
      CBS ‘s Jane Clayson pressed GOP Reps. J.C. Watts and Henry Bonilla about
      how "the [GOP] delegate count still reflects a very white
      population," but this morning none of Brazile's interviewers pressed
      her about the rigid quotas for Democratic delegates.
      
 
 
      2
       Top of page two article. Gumbel Deplores Democratic "Centrism;"
      Early Show Anchor Pleads for Return to Kennedy Era.
      Top of page two article. Gumbel Deplores Democratic "Centrism;"
      Early Show Anchor Pleads for Return to Kennedy Era.
           CBS's Bryant
      Gumbel showed just how much he admires the Democrats' old liberal roots.
      In an interview this morning with Maryland Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy
      Townsend on The Early Show this morning, he pressed her as to whether the
      modern Democrats  have lost the faith. "Is this your father's
      party, your uncle's party philosophically?" he asked. "Is this
      the same party?" 
           When Townsend said
      the Democrats were offering new solutions, Gumbel seemed mournful.
      "It's much more of a, we're using labels here, much more of a
      centrist party than it was," Gumbel said, "which begs the
      question, why is it more of a centrist party when the needs are just as
      great as they ever were?"  
           In contrast to
      media grumblings that George W. Bush's nomination was rooted in nepotism,
      Gumbel summoned positive images of the liberal Kennedy dynasty: "The
      Kennedy name will be front and center here. You'll be speaking on Tuesday,
      your cousin Caroline will be speaking Tuesday night. Your Uncle Ted will
      be speaking. Is it just for nostalgia purposes?" He asked Townsend
      whether it was "a burden" to be viewed "as the most
      promising of a new generation of Kennedys." 
           Three times Gumbel
      pushed Townsend about her political future. "[DNC Chairman] Ed
      Rendell said ten years from now he could see himself being chief of staff
      to President Kathleen Kennedy Townsend," Gumbel told his guest.
      "Possible?" 
           Bryant Gumbel --
      always subtle. 
      
 
 
      3
       Bottom half of page twp story. Democrats Embrace "Centrist
      Policies;" Morning Shows Have Little to Say About Democratic Platform
      Bottom half of page twp story. Democrats Embrace "Centrist
      Policies;" Morning Shows Have Little to Say About Democratic Platform
           In contrast to
      their negative comments about the "hard line" GOP platform, none
      of the morning shows paid much attention to the Democratic platform,
      although both the New York Times and Los Angeles Times labeled it a
      "centrist" document.
           According to Janet
      Hook, writing in today's Los Angeles Times, "The Democratic platform,
      the party's election-year statement of its agenda for the nation, this
      year continues a march from liberal orthodoxy to the political center that
      has been the hallmark of the Clinton era. Despite some modest concessions
      to the party's traditional liberal interests, the platform that will be
      approved by the convention Tuesday is a monument to how much the Clinton
      administration has shifted the party on key issues."
           The headline on
      Hook's story: "Democratic Platform Set in the Middle of the
      Road," while this morning's New York Times carried a similarly-titled
      story, "Platform is Centrist, Like GOP's, but Differs in
      Details," in which James Dao wrote that the Democratic document
      "warmly embraced the centrist policies of the Clinton administration
      and lavishly credits them for the prosperity of the last seven
      years."
           Odd that today's
      headline would label the GOP platform as "centrist." On July 28,
      the New York Times's subhead on its GOP platform story stressed that
      "Influence of Rightists Holds Firm."  
      
 
 
      4
       Top of page three story. Clinton Gains From Time's Distorted History; Who
      Deserves Credit for Longest Economic Boom Ever in U.S.?
      Top of page three story. Clinton Gains From Time's Distorted History; Who
      Deserves Credit for Longest Economic Boom Ever in U.S.?
           In the August 14
      edition of Time, Eric Pooley scolded George W. Bush for allegedly
      tampering with history. "To deny Democrats credit for the prosperity
      and accuse them of driving the country ‘downhill,' he backdates the boom
      and pretends it began before Clinton took office," Pooley wrote.
           But Pooley's the
      one fooling around with history -- not even the liberal New York Times
      buys into the idea that economic prosperity began on Jan. 20, 1993.
      "Though unrecognized at the time, the current recovery began in March
      1991, long before Bill Clinton defeated President George Bush on the
      assertion that he did not know how to manage the economy, concluded the
      Times in a February 7, 2000 editorial. 
           Actually, as Rich
      Noyes, Director of MRC's Free Market Project wrote in the August 11
      edition of MediaNomics, the positive growth "was recognized at the
      time -- President Bush tried to draw attention to that fact, but few in
      the media noticed."
           The MediaNomics
      article also noted "The Times, not normally considered a conservative
      newspaper, also pointed out in February that ‘except for a mild
      recession at the beginning of the 1990s, the American economy has enjoyed
      uninterrupted growth for almost 18 years.'" Let's see if the networks
      point any of this out tonight, as the Democrats attempt to claim credit
      for historic growth that began 21 months before they arrived in the White
      House.
           To read the entire
      report from the MRC's MediaNomics, "Be Wary of the News Media's
      Election-Year Economic Lessons," go to:
      http://archive.mrc.org/medianomics/2000/mn20000811.asp 
      
 
  
      
      
      5
       Bottom
      of page three article. CNN: Business-Bashing Delegates
      "Principled"; Democrats "Have the Interests of the Workers
      In Their Souls"
Bottom
      of page three article. CNN: Business-Bashing Delegates
      "Principled"; Democrats "Have the Interests of the Workers
      In Their Souls"
           There wasn't a
      trace of skepticism in a report from CNN's Maria Hinojosa this morning
      about Democratic delegates who joined in anti-business protests in Los
      Angeles. Instead, the delegates were given free airtime to promote their
      party as a haven for workers' rights.
           "From
      politics to protests," introduced anchor Daryn Kagen at 10:35 this
      morning, "some delegates to the Democratic convention join street
      demonstrations protesting corporate excesses. CNN's Maria Hinojosa says
      that for some delegates, it's a matter of principle." Of course, if
      GOP delegates embraced a leftist cause, CNN might say they were
      principled, too. 
           Hinojosa quoted
      four Democrats who were part of a protest targeting what she termed
      "the excesses of the corporate establishment." The delegates all
      relayed positive comments about their party and the cause of workers'
      rights, one saying, "We need a counterweight to the privileged and
      the powerful in this country." 
           "Some of the
      Democratic delegates may have the interests of the workers in their
      souls," Hinojosa applauded. Balance? Her story included no quotes
      from business sources -- not even from the hotel targeted by the protests
      -- nor did it include any hint that the Democrats' embrace of the
      protesters strategically echoes the recent Gore campaign theme of
      "whose side are you on?"
      
 
  
      
      
      6
       Sidebar
      stories along the sides of pages two and three. GOP Response to Lieberman;
      No Sense of Humor?; CBS: "Least Liberal Convention"; Russert:
      "Very Liberal" Convention
Sidebar
      stories along the sides of pages two and three. GOP Response to Lieberman;
      No Sense of Humor?; CBS: "Least Liberal Convention"; Russert:
      "Very Liberal" Convention
           No GOP Response to
      Lieberman
           On the Sunday before the GOP convention, Meet the
      Press's Tim Russert followed up an interview with VP choice Dick Cheney
      with a panel that included Gore partisan James Carville, who laid into
      Cheney. "I think Mr. Cheney went a long way toward dispelling any
      questions about his health," Carville crowed. "He was running so
      fast from his record...,it looked like Maurice Greene going 100 meters or
      something."
           But yesterday,
      Russert had no Republican around to talk about Lieberman running from his
      record.  
           Two weeks ago,
      Carville also claimed that military service was important: "Look at
      what Al Gore was doing during the Vietnam War and what Dick Cheney and
      George W. Bush were doing during the Vietnam War....Where was Dick Cheney
      during the Vietnam War?" Yesterday, Russert did not ask Lieberman
      about his lack of military service.
           No Sense of Humor?
           On Monday's Imus in the Morning, Don Imus
      protested MSNBC's decision to not pay for Imus sidekick Bernard McGuirk
      and a camera crew to go to Los Angeles. McGuirk, who conducts humorous
      interviews and created the whimsical "Gumbel Aid" to help pay
      for Bryant Gumbel's divorce, is perhaps too loose a cannon, but Imus
      pledged to help his radio station WFAN pay for the camera crew if MSNBC
      continues to refuse.
           "Least
      Liberal Convention"
           On Sunday night's CBS Evening News, Dan Rather
      found another sign of Democratic centrism: "And the torch being
      passed to Gore also highlights a shift in the views of the delegates to
      this Democratic convention. This is reflected in new findings from a CBS
      News/New York Times survey of the delegates. Bob Schieffer is down on the
      convention floor. Bob, what's the difference in the delegates this
      time?"
           Schieffer
      reported: "Dan, the main difference is this is the least liberal
      collection of Democrats that's been assembled in almost a quarter of a
      century. CBS News/New York Times started polling these delegates back in
      1976. Well, for the first time, a clear majority -- 56 percent -- call
      themselves moderates. Only 36 percent call themselves liberals -- that's
      the smallest number ever."
           "Very
      Liberal" Convention
           On NBC's Today program this morning, Tim Russert
      offered a totally opposite view of the delegates than had been pushed by
      CBS's Schieffer.
           "Much more
      liberal than the average American," Russert told host Matt Lauer.
      "These are very liberal activists, Matt. Half the group are women,
      more than a third minority. They are very much anti-death penalty,
      anti-voucher schools [sic]. It's a very liberal constituency." 
           Makes you wonder
      if they're at the same convention. 
      
 
  
      
      
      7
       Quote
      of the Morning: "You talked about Hollywood squares. You could have
      been talking about Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. They don't really fit. How's
      Hollywood viewing the ticket?" -- CBS's Bryant Gumbel to the
      Hotline's Craig Crawford, The Early Show, August 14.
Quote
      of the Morning: "You talked about Hollywood squares. You could have
      been talking about Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. They don't really fit. How's
      Hollywood viewing the ticket?" -- CBS's Bryant Gumbel to the
      Hotline's Craig Crawford, The Early Show, August 14.
           END Reprint of
      Media Reality Check newsletter
           This
      "Conventions 2000: Media Reality Check" compiled by Rich Noyes
      and Tim Graham with the assistance of daytime shift analysts Brian Boyd,
      Ken Shepherd and Ted King. Plus, Kristina Sewell sending the fax and
      taping the coverage with Eric Pairel and Brandon Rytting loading up the
      Web page. -- Brent Baker
      
       