NBCís Florida Recount Disparity; Cokie and Steve Roberts Disagreed on Popularity of Tax Cut; Lack of Bi-Partisanship Rued; Byrd Cited
1) NBC Nightly News highlighted a Palm Beach Post review
which claimed that about 6,000 who voted for more than one candidate
intended for vote for Al Gore, but last month NBC ignored a story about
how if Gore had gotten the recount he wanted in four Democratic counties
he still would have come up short.
2) A split in the Roberts household. Cokie Roberts on ABC:
"Itís a popular tax bill." Steve Roberts on CNN: "The
polls still show Americans are not wild about this tax bill."
3) ABCís Sam Donaldson complained about how Republicans
failed to show "bi-partisanship" in passing the tax cut bill,
but on Fox News Sunday Brit Hume suggested the sudden concern with
bi-partisanship was absent eight years ago when Democrats pushed through
Clintonís economic package.
4) A couple earning $112,000 is not "rich" to
Sam Donaldson, even though those at that level are in the top six percent
skewered as undeserving of a tax cut by liberals and the media. Maybe
Donaldsonís view is skewed by the fact that he pays $47,500 a year in
property tax on his $3.8 million house.
5) Gun owners tend to vote Republican, a trend which
upsets ABC News reporter George Stephanopoulos. "Most Americans have
a gun in the house," observed Cokie Roberts, to which Stephanopoulos
6) Tim Russert on Sunday became the first and only
broadcast network reporter to mention Democratic Senator Robert Byrdís
use of the term "white nigger." Russert asked Attorney General
John Ashcroft to speculate about "what would have happened to you if
you had said that?"
when a Miami Herald/USA Today count of even "dimpled chads" in
Miami-Dade County only gave Al Gore a net pick up of 49 votes, still
leaving him 140 short of what he would have needed to tie Bush when adding
up the recounts in all four Democratic counties in which he had wanted
recounts, NBC Nightly News ignored the development. But on Sunday night,
NBC aired a report about a Palm Beach Post review, of discarded "overvotes"
in Palm Beach County, which claimed the butterfly ballot cost Gore over
In short, NBC skipped a story about the results of
an effort to accurately discern votes from those who followed the rules
and voted for one candidate, and yet did not successfully fully dislodge
the chad, but jumped on a report about an effort to divine the intent of
those who were so stupid or careless that they voted for more than one
ABCís World News Tonight ran a short item on the
new count, just as they did back on the night of February 26 about the
Miami Herald story. (The NCAA basketball tournament selection show bumped
the CBS Evening News on Sunday night. CBS had also aired a short item
about the February 26 assessment.)
NBC Nightly News anchor John Seigenthaler intoned on
the March 11 newscast: "The ongoing analysis of the Florida
presidential election produced new information today. According to the
Palm Beach Post, confusion over the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach County
cost Al Gore 6,600 votes, more than enough to win Florida and the
presidency. The analysis concluded that many punched twice for President,
once for Gore and once for Pat Buchanan, whose ballot position was across
from Goreís. The double-punch invalidated those votes."
Only 28 seconds, but 28 seconds longer that NBC
Nightly News allocated to the story about how if Gore got what he wanted
last fall he would not have overtaken Bush.
An excerpt from the March 11 Palm Beach Post story
by Joel Engelhardt and Scott McCabe:
Confusion over Palm Beach County's butterfly ballot cost Al Gore about
6,600 votes, more than 10 times what he needed to overcome George W.
Bush's slim lead in Florida and win the presidency, The Palm Beach Post's
ballot-by-ballot review of discarded over-votes reveals.
The ballots show 5,330 Palm Beach County residents, many of them in
Democratic strongholds, invalidated their ballot cards by punching chads
for Gore and Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan, whose hole on the punch
card appeared just above Gore's.
The ballots also show another 2,908 voters punched Gore's name along
with Socialist David McReynolds, the candidate whose hole on the card
appeared just below Gore's. Both Buchanan's and McReynolds' names appeared
on the right page of the two-page ballot, while Gore's was on the left.
The butterfly ballot confusion didn't hurt just Gore: 1,631 people punched
both for Bush and the candidate whose hole was below his on the ballot,
The two Gore combinations, minus the Bush-Buchanan votes, add up to
6,607 lost votes for Gore and an indictment of the butterfly ballot,
political experts and partisan observers agree....
Even allowing that 1 percent of the 6,607 votes were intended for
Buchanan or McReynolds -- which is more than their combined portion of
Palm Beach County's total vote -- that would still leave Gore with 6,541
additional votes, more than enough to overcome Bush's statewide victory
margin of 537 votes....
The over-votes can be divided into two types. Three-fourths of them
were punches for two candidates, most of which experts say can be
attributed to the ballot design. The rest were for three or more
candidates, which experts called voter error, not a design problem....
Talk about voter stupidity, the Palm Beach Post also
relayed that 5,062 "voters" punched "three or more choices
for President. Twenty-eight voters selected all 10 presidential
candidates. These errors, which were disproportionately high in
black-majority precincts, appear to be made by people who don't know how
to vote, said Anthony Salvanto, a University of California-Irvine
researcher who has studied a computer database that recorded every clear
punch on the ballots cast in Palm Beach County Nov. 7."
The Web address for this story appears to be one
thatís only valid for one day since its date slot is "today,"
but the main address for the paper is: http://www.gopbi.com/partners/pbpost/epaper/
Back on February 26 the NBC Nightly News skipped the
Miami Herald story which reported: "Al Gore would have netted no more
than 49 votes if a manual recount of Miami-Dade's ballots had been
completed, according to the review, which was sponsored by The Herald and
its parent company, Knight Ridder. That would have been 140 too few to
overcome Bush's lead, even when joined with Gore gains in Volusia, Palm
Beach and Broward counties -- the three other counties where Gore had
requested manual recounts."
An accounting firm hired by the paper found that in
counting missed "clean punches" Gore gained 4 votes, adding
those plus "hanging chads" gave Bush a net gain of 30, adding
those two categories plus "pinpricks" put Bush up by 61 and only
by adding up those three categories plus "dimpled chads" did
Gore gain a net 49 votes.
For more on that ballot review and network TV
coverage of it, go to: http://archive.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010227.asp#1
be sleeping together, but they donít think alike when it comes to
analyzing polling data. On two Sunday interview shows one of
Washingtonís prominent media power couples offered conflicting
assessments of whether or not the public is behind President Bushís tax
On ABCís This Week, co-host Cokie Roberts
declared: "Itís a popular tax bill." But a bit later on
CNNís Late Edition her husband, New York Times veteran Steve Roberts,
now with U.S. News & World Report, argued during the panel segment:
"The polls still show Americans are not wild about this tax
Here are their appraisals in full context. First,
Cokie Roberts during the This Week roundtable. She stumbled mid-thought
and made her declarative comment, seemingly in response to some kind of
disagreeing facial expression the camera did not show from George
Stephanopoulos across the table:
"Thereís some feeling on the part of Republicans
in the House that the Democrats are going to regret their vote on this tax
bill, that they will have, that they will-. [then, seemingly reacting to
Stephanopoulos across table] Itís a popular tax bill, you look at every
poll thatís out there."
Stephanopoulos: "Theyíll have a chance to vote
on a tax bill later."
Roberts: "And that in the end will get their vote
for the final passage because theyíre going to need to vote for a tax
Asked at the start of the panel segment by CNN Late
Edition host Wolf Blitzer if President Bushís campaign-like trips to
sell his tax cut are working, Steve Roberts answered in the affirmative:
"It shows us, yet again, the importance of the
presidency as a factor in American politics. Bush has the megaphone that
Bill Clinton had for eight years and he has the veto power that Bill
Clinton had for eight years. And you donít necessary need a lot of
national coverage to make an impact. You go to South Dakota, you go to
Louisiana, you get a lot of coverage. And so I do think it is a smart
tactic and I think that it is helping even out the playing field, because
the polls still show Americans are not wild about this tax bill. He is
putting pressure on Democrats, though, I think shrewdly."
Donaldson on Sunday continued ABCís policy of bemoaning how Republicans
failed to show "bi-partisanship" in passing the tax cut bill in
the House on Thursday, but on Fox News Sunday, Brit Hume suggested concern
with bi-partisanship was absent eight years ago when Democrats pushed
through Clintonís economic package.
As quoted in the March 9 CyberAlert and CyberAlert
Extra, on the March 8 World News Tonight, ABCís Linda Douglass deplored
the House vote to anchor Charles Gibson: "So much for
bi-partisanship, Charlie. The Republicans rammed through this tax cut, and
all but ten Democrats voted against it, and the Democrats are accusing
President Bush of reneging on his promise to change the tone in
Matching that theme, on This Week Donaldson set up
an interview segment: "President Bush came to Washington promising to
change the tone of the political debate, to make it more civil and, above
all, make the results more bi-partisan. But the way Republicans handled
the opening round of the tax cut legislation left some wondering whether
the President really meant it."
Over on Fox News Sunday, Washington Post reporter
Ceci Connolly, who has been on leave at Harvard University for a few
months, wondered: "Can you tell me when bi-partisanship began? It
might have been while I was out of town."
Brit Hume reminded her: "Iíll tell you when it
didnít begin was when Bill Clinton passed his budget without a single
Republican vote. All Democrats voted for it. There was not a lot of
hand-wringing in Washington about Democratic bi-partisanship eight years
ago, or lack of bi-partisanship. Now, weíre hearing it because lo and
behold Democrats are losing and the Republicans are winning even when as
in the House they picked some Democratic votes."
and Democrats consider anyone who makes over $100,000 to be amongst the
"rich" who donít deserve a tax cut, but ABCís Sam Donaldson
argued those at that income level are not rich, though George Will pointed
out they are in the top six percent targeted in Democratic rhetoric. Maybe
Donaldsonís perspective is skewed by the fact that he lives in a home
assessed at about $3.8 million.
On Sundayís This Week Will suggested that
Democratic arguments against Bushís tax cut wonít succeed because even
those in jobs not considered high-paying are labeled as "rich"
by liberals. He proposed a hypothetical couple: A Chicago police officer
making $57,888 after ten years of service and his wife, a school teacher,
pulling in $54,724 after 20 years. Their combined income: $112,612. Will
asserted: "They are in the top six percent of income earners in a
rich country. They are by yours and Dick Gephardtís and everyoneís
Donaldson rejected the notion: "May I say for
the record that I donít believe $100,000 is rich....because if youíre
going to put kids schools, particularly, $100,000 today is really not
Indeed, $100,000 is not very rich for someone living
in an urban area where an average house sells for $300,000 and perhaps
Donaldson is keenly aware of this since heís so much wealthier. This
year heíll pay $47,850 in property taxes to Fairfax County, Virginia.
The "Fairfax Weekly" section in the March 8 Washington Post
listed his home on Crest Lane in McLean, which overlooks the Potomac
River, as the tenth most highly assessed property in Fairfax County. But
Donaldson may be getting a $75,000 break since the Post noted that
assessments are often well below market value. Another home on his street
assessed at a mere $3.5 million, the Post observed, is now on the market
for $10 million. At the tax rate of $1.23 per thousand, that would mean if
Donaldsonís house is really worth a similar amount heís being
under-taxed by about $75,000.
As a good liberal Donaldson should volunteer to send
in the additional money since the "rich" like him, by the
liberal reasoning he spews, donít deserve any tax cut. After all, his
$75,000 break is more than virtually anyone in the county pays in total in
might be dubbed an "excited utterance," on Sundayís This Week
ABC News reporter and analyst George Stephanopoulos revealed that at heart
heís still a Democratic Party partisan upset by anything which hurts
Democrats. In a discussion about how those who own guns voted
overwhelmingly for George W. Bush, Cokie Roberts noted how "most
Americans have a gun in the house," prompting Stephanopoulos to
spontaneously react by sighing "unfortunately."
During a roundtable discussion on how Democrats are
not pushing gun control in response to the latest school shooting because
the issue backfired on them in November, Stephanopoulos countered:
"But I do think the Democrats are over-reading the
politics on this. Now thereís no question the single best predictor of
how someone was going to vote in the last election was did you have a gun
in the house -- by 40 points they went for Bush. But if you look at the
Cokie Roberts jumped in: "And most Americans have
a gun in the house."
Stephanopoulos: "Unfortunately, yeah. If you look
at the three states where the NRA spent the most money -- Michigan,
Wisconsin and Pennsylvania -- Gore won all three of those..."
Russert on Sunday became the first and so far only broadcast network
reporter beyond Fox to mention Democratic Senator Robert Byrdís use of
the term "white nigger" during a taped interview on the March 4
Fox News Sunday, a remark for which Byrd later apologized. Russert asked
Attorney General John Ashcroft to speculate about "what would have
happened to you if you had said that?"
As detailed in the March 7 CyberAlert, on the March
6 Special Report with Brit Hume the FNC panel ruminated about what kind of
media play the racially-derogatory language would have generated if
uttered by Jesse Helms or another conservative. For more about FNCís
discussion and Byrdís original comment, go to:
Russert asked Ashcroft: "One of your former
colleagues, Robert Byrd, got in some trouble last weekend and this is what
he had to say: ĎMy old mom told me, ĎRobert, you canít go to heaven
if you hate anybody.í We practice that. There are white N words. Iíve
seen a lot of white N words in my time; Iím going to use that word.í
What should Robert Byrd do after having said that and what would have
happened to you if you had said that?"
(The on-screen text which Russert read aloud had
"white niggers" where Russert substituted "white N
words." A nice compromise. NBC conveyed the actual word usage without
uttering it aloud.)
Ashcroft replied: "Well, I wouldnít have said
it and Iíll not advise Robert Byrd in terms of his own conduct..."
Iíll also suggest an answer to Russertís
question of what would have happened if Ashcroft had said it, even if back
when he was just a Senator: It would have taken less than a week for NBC
News to mention it and it would have been immediately highlighted in
condemnatory stories by all the broadcast networks.