Complaining About Budget Cuts; Bush "Conjuring Up an Enemy" to Justify Missile Defense; Refurbished Greta; Prime Time Stem Cells
1) On This Week ABC’s Sam Donaldson lamented to Donald
Rumsfeld that the proposed Bush budget raises "the old question of
guns versus butter" as it cuts domestic programs "all to pay for
an expanded defense budget." After Rumsfeld insisted "our
soldiers don’t go around killing innocent people," Donaldson
retorted: "Except you’ve just launched an investigation to see
whether in fact we did."
2) To the Washington press corps "sacrifice"
means no tax cut, not slowed spending hikes. Newsweek’s Evan Thomas
promised "I would happily pay more in taxes." Al Hunt complained
on CNN that "there is no shared sacrifice" in Bush’s budget
since the administration proposes "lots of guns, lots of tax cuts for
the very wealthy, and to cut back on job training and health care. In
other words, they want to have guns, caviar and no margarine."
3) The Clift-Stephanopoulos axis. Newsweek’s Eleanor
Clift asserted that President Bush’s "axis of evil" listing or
Iraq, Iran and North Korea was really about "conjuring up an
enemy" in order to justify missile defense. On ABC’s This Week,
George Stephanopoulos pointed to the same reason for Bush’s
"axis" as he called the policy "deeply incoherent."
4) Repeating the same complaint she lodged Tuesday night
after the State of the Union address, on Fox News Sunday’s roundtable
Washington Post reporter Ceci Connolly bemoaned how President Bush ignored
Enron, "the uninsured, the homeless, many elderly who are hurting out
there."
5) Interviewing OMB Director Mitch Daniels on Fox News
Sunday, Brit Hume uniquely pointed out how the Bush budget calls for huge
spending hikes for farm subsidies: "Aren’t you vulnerable though to
the charges you’re going along with some very serious spending of the
very kind Republicans used to stand against?"
6) On NBC’s Today, Matt Lauer prompted former Secretary
of State Madeleine Albright to denounce Bush’s "axis of evil"
concept and then prodded her: "And does he run the risk of alienating
some of our allies by making statements like that?"
7) Expect to see a refurbished Greta Van Susteren when her
new show debuts tonight on the Fox News Channel. USA Today’s Peter
Johnson revealed that Van Susteren had cosmetic surgery to eliminate bags
under her eyes.
8) CNN’s world: "Abortion rights supporters"
versus "abortion rights opponents." Reporting on the Bush
administration decision to allow states to provide health care coverage to
the unborn, CNN, like CBS the same night, ran a story based upon the
complaints of those opposed to the coverage expansion.
9) Prime time "ripped from the headlines." On
Monday, CBS’s Family Law looks at embryonic stem cells as a life-saver.
On Tuesday, CBS’s JAG takes up the imposition of Saudi Arabia’s dress
code on women in the U.S. Navy. On Wednesday, NBC’s Law & Order
revolves around a plot inspired by Chandra Levy’s disappearance.
Corrections: As
several readers noted in pointing me to various Navy ship Web sites, the
name of the destroyer, whose crew members read a "Top Ten" list
on the Late Show on Thursday night, was misspelled in the February 1 CyberAlert.
It’s the Thorn, not the Thorne. The January 30 CyberAlert
at one point misquoted Bush’s "axis of evil" as "access
of evil."
1
Sam
Donaldson lamented to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on This Week
about how the administration’s new budget raises "the old question
of guns versus butter" as it cuts domestic programs "the critics
will say, all to pay for an expanded defense budget." At another
point in the interview, after Rumsfeld maintained that "our soldiers
don’t go around killing innocent people," Donaldson retorted:
"You said we do not go around killing innocent people. I take your
point, except you’ve just launched an investigation to see whether in
fact we did."
On Sunday’s show, Rumsfeld reiterated to
Donaldson his warning that the U.S. remains under the threat of a
terrorist attack. Donaldson countered: "Some cynics believe, of
course, when you were saying that you were tying it to the increase in the
defense budget."
Rumsfeld:
"Oh, that’s-"
Donaldson:
"I understand these people in Washington, they say the darndest
things."
Rumsfeld:
"There’s the understatement."
Donaldson
contended: "Let me just say that you requested, the President, a $48
billion increase in defense budget in the next fiscal year and over a five
year period up to $51 billion, that’s where it would be. That’s a $120
billion increase. Now the old question of guns versus butter then arises.
Let me just show a chart of some of the cuts we understand the President
is asking in domestic programs: $9 billion cut in highway programs, a
freeze in the Army Corps of Engineers projects, a cut of $180 million from
a youth jobs program, perhaps a cut of an additional $620 million in state
grants for training and education. And, the critics will say, all to pay
for an expanded defense budget."
Rumsfeld
explained: "The reality is that the United States is now spending
about three percent of our gross national product on defense. Back in the
Kennedy and Eisenhower period it as closer to ten percent, in the Ford
period it was around five percent of our gross national product. Today it
is about three percent..."
What happened to the media desire for
"sacrifice." I guess that only applies to dumping the tax cut.
(ABC’s on-screen graphic credited the budget
cut numbers to a story in Sunday’s Washington Post. But in that article
reporter Eric Pianin noted that even after excluding hikes for defense, homeland security and the economic stimulus,
the Bush budget calls for budget growth of two percent. Pianin also
reported that the "proposal to eviscerate spending for a youth job
training program, from $225 million this year to $45 million next
year," comes in a program which passed "Congress with
overwhelming bipartisan support under the Clinton administration in
1998." So, the nation survived without one cent spent on it until
1999.)
Back to This Week, Donaldson raised concerns
about the treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, asking about how the
detainees will be classified. Rumsfeld explained that Al Qaeda terrorists
were not uniformed members of a nation’s army and therefore will not be
considered prisoners of war.
He pointed out the differences between Al
Qaeda and U.S. soldiers: "Our soldiers don’t go around killing
innocent people, nor do our soldiers go around pretending they are
civilians and blurring that distinction between a combatant and a
non-combatant. That’s what puts civilians at risk."
Donaldson
fired back: "You’re examining right now the case of Hazam Khadan
(sp?), in which it is said that our special forces went in and through a
horrible mistake killed 15 to 21 people who were not Taliban, but in fact
supporters of the new government."
Following
three full seconds of dead air, Rumsfeld wondered: "Is that a
question?"
Donaldson
maintained: "Yes, because you said we do not go around killing
innocent people. I take your point, except you’ve just launched an
investigation to see whether in fact we did."
A mistake is a little different from purposely
doing so.
2
Regretting
President Bush’s lack of a call for "sacrifice" in his State
of the Union address, Newsweek’s Evan Thomas proclaimed on Inside
Washington that he wished "they’d asked for a tax increase" as
he promised "I would happily pay more in taxes." On CNN’s
Capital Gang, Al Hunt complained "there is no shared sacrifice"
since the administration proposes "lots of guns, lots of tax cuts for
the very wealthy, and to cut back on job training and health care. In
other words, they want to have guns, caviar and no margarine."
How about a little sacrifice from the
recipients of money taken from hard working Americans who pay all the
taxes.
On Inside Washington, host Gordon Peterson
asked: "The call for volunteerism. What did you think of that?"
Evan Thomas,
Assistant Managing Editor of Newsweek, replied: "I think it’s
great. One of the things that bothered me about all of this actually is
they never call for sacrifice. The only sacrifice so far has been to give
us a tax cut, you know, I mean it’s so not in the political rhetoric of
our day to ask for a sacrifice that I’m glad for anything. I wish
they’d asked for a tax increase. I know that’s suicide and every
political consultant would laugh at me, but I would happily pay more in
taxes for this particular purpose of strengthening the United
States."
On CNN’s Capital Gang on Saturday evening,
Wall Street Journal Executive Washington Editor Al Hunt denounced Bush’s
budget priorities: "There is no shared sacrifice. If there's a war,
the first priority must be the men and women in uniform. And certainly
that is President Bush's first priority. History, Vietnam in particular,
has shown us you can't have guns and butter over a sustained period of
time. And what this administration proposes are lots of guns, lots of tax
cuts for the very wealthy, and to cut back on job training and health
care. In other words, they want to have guns, caviar and no margarine.
That's the objection."
3
Great
liberal minds think alike? On the McLaughlin Group taped on Friday,
Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift asserted that President Bush’s "axis of
evil" listing or Iraq, Iran and North Korea was really about
"conjuring up an enemy" in order to justify missile defense. Two
days later, on ABC’s This Week, George Stephanopoulos pointed to the
same reason for Bush’s "axis of evil" as he called the policy
"deeply incoherent" since "if you have a strategy of
preemption, if you’re going to go knock out the missiles before
they’re built."
On the McLaughlin Group, shown Saturday
afternoon in Washington, DC, Clift argued: "What he has done is made
for the first time a clear connection between nuclear proliferation and
bio-terrorism and his war on terrorism. He may be trying to lay the
predicate for some pinpoint strikes. What this is really about is about is
conjuring up an enemy so he can get money for his-"
Tony Blankley:
"He’s not conjuring up the enemy!"
Clift:
"Excuse me. Conjuring up an imminent threat so when he releases his
budget next week and he goes to Congress he can get money for the missile
defense shield. This is more about domestic politics and keeping the
country focused on war instead of red ink and recession."
Sunday morning, during the roundtable on
ABC’s This Week, George Stephanopoulos reasoned: "I think what you
really have to look at here is this is really about his agenda for
national missile defense. The one thing that holds these nations together
-- Iran Iraq and North Korea -- is they’re all trying to build ballistic
missiles, they’re all trafficking in ballistic missiles and that’s
what he’s trying to get at."
Cokie Roberts:
"Of course he doesn’t mention China, which has them."
Stephanopoulos:
"Exactly. It’s deeply incoherent. If you have a strategy of
preemption, if you’re going to go knock out the missiles before
they’re built or as they’re being trafficked, then you don’t have to
spend $238 billion on a missile defense plan that’s not going to work
anyway."
4
Ceci
Connolly’s liberal mantra. Repeating the same complaint she lodged
Tuesday night after the State of the Union address, on Fox News Sunday’s
roundtable Washington Post reporter Ceci
Connolly bemoaned how President Bush ignored Enron, "the uninsured,
the homeless, many elderly who are hurting out there."
Connolly rued: "A couple of interesting
things missing from that speech. No mention of Osama bin Laden. Remember
him? ‘Dead or alive’? No mention of Enron and no mention of, I would
say, lesser groups in this society, whether you’re talking about the
uninsured, the homeless, many elderly who are hurting out there."
Five days earlier, during Fox’s post-speech
coverage, Connolly packed five liberal agenda issues into one sentence:
"I have to say that part of what also struck me, aside from how
frightening much in this speech was, were the things that were missing.
Very little with respect to minorities, the uninsured, the homeless, the
elderly, Enron workers who have lost their life savings."
Such sentiment probably fits right in with the
liberal culture of the Washington Post newsroom and should tell you the
prism through which the Washington press corps assess speeches.
5
Hitting
the Bush administration from the right. While Washington reporters like
Sam Donaldson, Evan Thomas, Al Hunt and Ceci Connolly are disturbed by
Bush’s insistence on tax cuts and slight reductions in spending on a few
domestic programs, Fox’s Brit Hume uniquely pointed out how the Bush
budget calls for huge spending hikes in at least one domestic area.
Interviewing OMB Director Mitch Daniels on Fox
News Sunday, Brit Hume proposed: "The President has agreed to a farm
bill that is said will, over a ten year period, will add something of the
order of $73 billion to the spending on farm subsidies, something that a
few years ago we thought we were weaning the farm economy away from.
Aren’t you vulnerable though to the charges you’re going along with
some very serious spending of the very kind Republicans used to stand
against?"
6
Today’s
Matt Lauer on Friday prompted former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
to denounce Bush’s "axis of evil" concept and then prodded
her: "And does he run the risk of alienating some of our allies by
making statements like that?"
MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens caught this
exchange on the February 1 show after the two discussed the case of
kidnaped Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.
Lauer: "While I have you here let me ask
you about something the President said in his State of the Union address
this week. He called, he, he, used the term 'axis of evil,' in referring
to North Korea, Iran and Iraq. It seemed like he was preparing the
American people for possible action in the war on terrorism against those
countries. What was your response?"
Albright:
"Well I, all of us know that fighting terrorism is the major
priority. I think it was a big mistake to lump those three countries
together. They are-"
Lauer:
"Why?"
Albright:
"Well first of all they're very different from each other. Clearly
with Iraq we have been trying to contain Saddam Hussein since 1991. And I
wish the job then had been finished. But we really do need to take strong
action. Not necessarily military, but we know that he is dangerous. Iran
is a much more complicated country at this stage. If they, in fact, were
involved in the arms shipment to Israel that is bad. Supporting terrorism
is bad. But they're factions in Iran and I'm sure that the statements that
were made lumping everybody in Iran together is a mistake and we need
their help in terms of dealing with Afghanistan. On North Korea, when we
left office I think we left the potential of an agreement, a verifiable
agreement to stop the export of missile and missile technology abroad on
the table. And I think it was a mistake to walk away from that. We know
that North Korea is dangerous but, so lumping those three countries
together that way, I think, is a mistake."
Lauer pushed
her to elucidate: "And does he run the risk of alienating some of our
allies by making statements like that?"
Albright:
"Absolutely and, because we know that they are not supportive of what
we are doing in Iraq or Iran or North Korea and so I don't know what the
value is. But I don't disagree with the fact that we have to fight
terrorism internationally and that it's a strong priority."
Glad she’s come to that realization.
7
Expect
to see a refurbished Greta Van Susteren when her new show, On the Record,
debuts tonight at 10pm and 3am EST on the Fox News Channel. Last Thursday
USA Today’s Peter Johnson revealed that on January 14 Van Susteren had
cosmetic surgery to eliminate bags under her eyes.
Johnson quoted Van Susteren in a January 31
article: "I was sitting around thinking, 'I've got four weeks off
and, by God, I've got my 30th high school reunion this year. I've got to
make all those guys who wouldn't go out with me jealous.' So I had the
bags taken off."
Johnson added: "On the Record kicks off
Monday at 10 p.m. ET/7 PT, and Van Susteren says her boss, Fox News chief
Roger Ailes, ‘almost had a stroke’ when she told him right before the
surgery. ‘I wouldn't go that far,’
Ailes says. ‘But I was worried that it would delay the launch. She
assured me it wouldn't, and I said, 'Hey, great, if your guy is that good,
I'll go to him and have my whole body done.’"
If you’ve seen any of the promos FNC has
been running for Van Susteren’s new show you’ve surely noticed that
she is also sporting new hair style.
8
CNN’s
world: "Abortion rights supporters" versus "abortion rights
opponents." Reporting on the Bush administration decision to allow
states to provide health care coverage to the unborn under a federal
program, CNN, like the CBS Evening News the same night as detailed in the
February 1 CyberAlert, ran a story based upon the complaints of those
opposed to the coverage expansion, without any consideration for the
hypocrisy of feminists now denouncing what for years they called for: More
federal money for pre-natal care.
(For how CBS’s John Roberts noted the
decision would "play well with conservatives," but that
"abortion rights advocates" call it "an assault on
women’s rights under the guise of compassion," go to:
http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020201.asp#3)
CNN anchor Aaron Brown set up the January 31
story observed by MRC analyst Ken Shepherd: "This one's stirring up a
fuss even though at first blush you may wonder why. The administration
today proposed changing a few lines of a federal regulation. Pretty wonky
stuff, perhaps. It could free up billions of dollars for low-income
mothers-to-be. It centers, though, on redefining when childhood begins. If
it begins at birth, as the current regulations say, those billions of
dollars can't be used. But if -- but they can, rather, if the language is
altered to say that childhood, that life, begins at conception. So now you
know where we're heading with this, and why there's all the fuss."
Kelly Wallace began by introducing a soundbite
from HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson: "It doesn't sound controversial at
first, using extra federal dollars to provide prenatal care to low-income
pregnant women."
After Thompson, Wallace warned: "But
here's where the debate begins. Tommy Thompson, the Health and Human
Services secretary, wants to change a federal regulation governing the
state program that provides health care coverage to children. In a
statement, his department said it wants to, quote, 'clarify the definition
of ‘child,’ allowing states to provide health care to children, quote,
'from conception to age 19.' Currently, coverage starts after birth. But
abortion rights supporters argue this is a thinly veiled attempt to
undermine a woman's right to choose."
CNN played a clip from NARAL’s Kate
Michelman before Wallace noted how "Thompson fired back, saying this
is not about abortion rights, but health care."
Wallace elaborated: "Bush advisers say
there was no political calculation here, just a way to use some of the
more than $3 billion that was available but not spent last year on
children's health care. The move, though, is delighting abortion rights
opponents, who call it a way to value and protect human life."
Following a comment from Laura Echevarria of
the National Right to Life Committee, Wallace concluded: "After a
60-day public comment period, the new policy would take effect. States
could choose to participate, or they could opt out. And federal officials
say there is a precedent here. They say up until 1981, developing fetuses
were eligible under Medicaid."
9
Speaking
of abortion policy in the news, tonight CBS’s Family Law takes up
embryonic stem cells as a life saver. This week several prime time shows
address real-life controversies as CBS’s JAG has a plot line around how
female U.S. soldiers must dress in Saudi Arabia and NBC’s Law &
Order has a case inspired by the Chandra Levy disappearance.
Friday’s National Review "Washington
Bulletin" e-mailed newsletter noted that on Thursday’s E.R. last
week on NBC the victim of a bombing was identified as an embryonic stem
cell researcher.
-- Tonight, February 4, on CBS’s Family Law
at 10pm EST/PST, 9pm CST/MST, as described in today’s Washington Post:
"A pregnant woman wants to induce early delivery to use the stem
cells to save her 8-year-old son."
-- Tuesday night, February 5, on CBS’s JAG,
at 8pm EST/PST, 7pm CST/MST, as summarized in the Washington Post’s TV
Week: "Harm and Mac are dispatched to Saudi Arabia to defend a female
Navy pilot who refuses to follow local laws and wear traditional dress and
veils." That may be a repeat.
-- Wednesday night on NBC’s Law & Order
at 10pm EST/PST, 9pm CST/MST: "Frantic parents urge detectives to
find their missing 24-year-old daughter, who worked as an aide to a state
senator."
A whole week of
shows "ripped from the headlines."