| top 
 
        
      
        
          | Clinton’s Greatness "Crippled"; Afghanistan = Vietnam; Bill Simon "Anti-Everything"; Florida Vote More Damaging Than Terrorism 1) "There really was a conspiracy against Bill
      Clinton on the right," former Newsweek reporter Joe Klein told Tim
      Russert. Klein claimed that "Republican extremists," who
      bordered "on being unpatriotic," would have inhibited
      Clinton’s reaction to the September 11 attacks: "Clinton’s
      ability to move us through a war or a crisis would have been crippled by
      that kind of unrelenting opposition." 2) Vietnam analogy raised by New York Times reporter Rick
      Berke. On PBS Friday night, he asserted: "Not long ago, we were
      practically declaring victory. How did we suddenly end up with troops on
      the ground, and are we stuck there? Is this, dare I mention,
      Vietnam?" 3) Rick Berke of the New York Times eagerly highlighted
      how "Gray Davis is just salivating at the opportunity to paint"
      the "very conservative" California Republican gubernatorial
      candidate Bill Simon "as anti-abortion, anti-environment, anti-gun
      control, anti-everything, which just doesn’t sit well with the
      California electorate." 4) Time magazine’s Jack White aligned himself with
      Senate liberals. On ABC’s This Week he denounced the judicial nomination
      of Charles Pickering: "I think Judge Pickering is a terrible choice
      and that he should not be confirmed." 5) Actress/comedian Sandra Bernhard: "I think Bush is
      amateurish and self-serving, and frankly it's disgusting. I think
      everybody is covering their [posteriors] with the Enron scandal and it was
      very convenient that Sept. 11 came along to deflect the fact that they
      should never have been in the White House in the first place. What
      happened in the election was completely corrupt." 6) Actor Alec Baldwin claimed the Florida recount
      "has done as much damage to our country as any terrorist attack could
      do." He argued that the Bush team’s talk about a "long
      war" is a "euphemism" for how the "moratorium on
      criticizing the government must be extended...beyond the 2002
      election." In 1998 Baldwin urged: "If we were in other
      countries, we would all right now, all of us together, all of us together
      would go down to Washington and we would stone Henry Hyde to death!" 
 
      1
        Former
      Newsweek Senior Writer Joe Klein, whose book, The Natural: The
      Misunderstood Presidency of Bill Clinton, was described by CNN’s Aaron
      Brown as "very balanced," told Tim Russert on CNBC that
      "there really was a conspiracy against Bill Clinton on the
      right" and that "Republican extremists," who bordered
      "on being unpatriotic," would have inhibited President
      Clinton’s ability to have dealt with the September 11 terrorist attacks.
      Klein contended: "Clinton’s ability to move us through a war or a
      crisis would have been crippled by that kind of unrelenting
      opposition."
      On Russert’s Saturday night CNBC show Klein,
      who is now with the New Yorker, maintained that "50, 75 years out
      from now I think that we in the media and the Republicans are going to be
      judged every bit as harshly as Bill Clinton for creating the atmosphere
      where things got so out of control in the ‘90s."      Claiming that Clinton would have replaced the
      incompetent Louis Freeh as FBI Director if not for fear of it being seen
      as a move related to he Lewinsky scandal, Klein lamented: "We might
      have had a more successful efforts against Osama bin Laden but for Monica
      Lewinsky."      As for the suggestion Clinton should have been
      held accountable for lying about Monica Lewinsky, Klein equated
      Clinton’s dissembling with how FDR lied about national security policy
      in reaction to Nazi Germany invading other nations: "So Franklin
      Roosevelt too, huh? You think he should have been penalized for lying
      about lend-lease?"      For more on Aaron Brown’s CNN interview with
      Klein and Klein’s point about the FBI, refer to the March 8 CyberAlert: http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020308.asp#2      Klein propounded on the March 9 Tim Russert:
      "The ‘90s will be remembered more for the ferocity of their
      prosecutions than for the severity of their crimes. I think we all went a
      little bit berserk during that time. I think that there really was a
      conspiracy against Bill Clinton on the right. And I think that, you know,
      he did some terrible things. But there is such a thing as balance and, you
      know, I was accused in the Washington Post of trying to defend Bill
      Clinton and James Carville said to me, ‘all you have to do is say is one
      sentence in favor of Bill Clinton and you’re an apologist.’ It
      shouldn’t be like that. It shouldn’t be like that. We should be able
      to acknowledge the fact that he made life a lot better for a lot of people
      in this country."Russert
      suggested: "And yet many people will say, if he’s the President of
      the United States, the chief law enforcement officer, and he breaks the
      law he should be penalized."
 Klein
      retorted: "So Franklin Roosevelt too, huh? You think he should have
      been penalized for lying about lend-lease?"
      Russert wondered if Klein thought Bill Clinton
      would have reacted as "vigorously and effectively" to the
      September 11th attacks as have President Bush and his cabinet. Klein
      argued that conservatives wouldn’t have let him:"One of
      the reasons why it would have been much more difficult for him is that the
      Democrats last fall gave Bush weeks and weeks to prepare his plan and to
      execute it. Bill Clinton would have never gotten that space from the
      Republicans. The next day, two days later they would have been screaming,
      ‘Mr. President, why aren’t we attacking in Afghanistan? Why aren’t
      we going after Osama bin Laden?’ And he would have responded, and he
      would have responded, I think, too quickly and in a not well thought
      through way, which I think is a real sad commentary. And I hate to say
      this because you and I both know very many honorable Republicans, but the
      behavior of the Republican extremists in the ‘90s, who did not accept
      his legitimacy from day one, borders on being unpatriotic. You cannot run
      a country in a circumstance like that. You just can’t. Democracy
      suffers. And therefore Clinton’s ability to move us through a war or a
      crisis would have been crippled by that kind of unrelenting
      opposition."
      Will any of those of those on the left, who
      have attacked conservatives for serving as "patriotism police"
      since September 11, rebuke Klein for impugning conservatives as
      "unpatriotic" for criticizing Bill Clinton?   2  One
      battle goes badly for U.S. forces and New York Times reporter Rick Berke
      immediately thought of Vietnam and a NPR reporter to read great meaning
      into a slip of he tongue by General Tommy Franks who used the word
      "Vietnam" instead of Afghanistan.
      Friday night on PBS’s Washington Week, Berke
      asked Gjelten: "Tom, not long ago, we were practically declaring
      victory. How did we suddenly end up with troops on the ground, and are we
      stuck there? Is this, dare I mention, Vietnam?"Gjelten
      responded, as transcribed by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth, by highlighting a
      slip of the tongue: "Well, it’s interesting, Rick. You can mention
      Vietnam because you would not be the first one to mention Vietnam. First
      of all, General Franks in briefing about this operation this week had a
      sort of a slip of the tongue and mentioned, ‘I’d like to thank all the
      people serving in Vietnam.’ But not just him, the commanding general of
      the 101st Airborne Division, which is the, one of the two big divisions
      involved in this operation, said that his troops have not been involved in
      as heavy and intense infantry combat since Vietnam.
 "So
      that’s what makes this really notable. And, you know, we, in Kosovo, we
      fought from 16,000 feet. Even in the early stages of this war, we fought
      using mostly Special Forces and Afghan allies. But what happened,
      apparently, in this case is that because this was possibly a last stand,
      U.S. commanders wanted to make really sure that the al-Qaeda didn’t get
      away, and in the end they trusted American soldiers more. That’s sort of
      the tactical thing. The symbolic thing is I think that they wanted to
      emphasize that for all this idea that we’re risk averse and we’re not
      going to let soldiers get, take heavy casualties, they’re willing to
      send in old-fashioned infantry troops, light infantry troops. These are
      guys that basically fight with the weapons they carry in. And I think
      there was a symbolic importance to making that stand."
   3  "Gray
      Davis is just salivating at the opportunity to paint" the "very
      conservative" California Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill
      Simon "as anti-abortion, anti-environment, anti-gun control,
      anti-everything, which just doesn’t sit well with the California
      electorate." So argued New York Times reporter Rick Berke Friday
      night on PBS.
      Gebe Martinez of Congressional Quarterly piled
      on: "And isn’t that also, I mean, there’s a history here that
      every time the Republicans have nominated a conservative, the Democrats
      have won because the state is moderate."      Or so most journalists assume. And probably
      hope.      On the March 8 Washington Week, host Gwen
      Ifill set up a segment on the California primary: "Well, moving on to
      more politics, leave it to California to bring us back to the kind of
      politics where the winners and the losers are clear. This week’s
      Republican primary elevated a little known conservative businessman and
      derailed the White House-backed candidacy of the well-known former mayor
      of Los Angeles. So the White House bet on the wrong horse. What difference
      does that make, Rick?"      Berke maintained that a conservative cannot
      win a general election: "It makes a big difference, Gwen. It’s not
      just egg on the face of the White House or the face of the President or
      whoever is over there. It’s also, it was very important for the White
      House to have a candidate that they thought could win in November because
      California is largely Democratic state. Their only hope was to have a
      candidate who they saw as more of a moderate, who could appeal to other
      segments of the base beyond the Republican conservative base."Instead,
      Gray Davis essentially picked his own opponent. Gray Davis, the governor,
      spent $10 million in ads attacking Dick Riordan, who was the moderate in
      the race. He lost to the surprise of the White House, to the surprise of
      even Gray Davis himself who told me he thought he was just going to rough
      him up, he didn’t think that this would be as successful as it was. So
      now they’re left, the Republicans, with a candidate who is a political
      neophyte, Bill Simon, never run for office before, has no political
      experience, and is very conservative. And Gray Davis is just salivating at
      the opportunity to paint him as anti-abortion, anti-environment, anti-gun
      control, anti-everything, which just doesn’t sit well with the
      California electorate."
 Gebe Martinez
      of Congressional Quarterly: "And isn’t that also, I mean, there’s
      a history here that every time the Republicans have nominated a
      conservative, the Democrats have won because the state is moderate."
 Berke agreed:
      "The state is moderate, and that’s going to be a problem. I think
      what the White House is hoping now, the President is trying to make amends
      and say, you know, we’re going to back you, Bill Simon, he’s gonna
      come in and make appearances for him."
 Ifill:
      "The President is."
 Berke:
      "The President is. Giuliani is an old friend of Simon’s. He’s
      going to come in and make appearances. Giuliani’s going to put his arm
      around Simon and say this guy is not as right-wing as you think. But the
      question is, is that gonna be enough?"
      Does he mean "enough" to overcome
      the media’s distorted characterization of Simon as symbolized by
      Berke’s eagerness to paint Simon as "anti-everything"?   4  Put Time
      national correspondent Jack White on the list of liberals who oppose the
      judicial nomination of Charles Pickering.
      Appearing during the roundtable portion of
      Sunday’s This Week on ABC, White opined: "I think Judge Pickering
      is a terrible choice and that he should not be confirmed. I think that if
      you look at if you look back at his record the civil rights organizations
      have compiled that there are good questions about his commitment to equal
      right and voting rights."   5  The
      Enron scandal is deflecting "from the fact" that George W. Bush
      should not be in the White House since "what happened in the election
      was completely corrupt," semi-famous actress/comedian Sandra Bernard
      complained in an interview with the Washington Post last week. Bernard
      insisted: "Any thinking person who lives in the world would be
      disturbed at what's going on right now. I think Bush is amateurish and
      self-serving, and frankly it's disgusting."
      A couple of weeks ago she declared: "The
      real terrorist threats are George W. Bush and his band of brown-shirted
      thugs." That outburst came during a February 25 chat session on
      washingtonpost.com to plug her then-upcoming March 9 comedy show
      appearance in Washington, DC.      To promote her gig, she talked with the
      Washington Post’s Lloyd Grove, author of the paper’s "Reliable
      Sources" column.      In his March 8 summary of heir conversation,
      Grove reminded readers of how Bernhard’s "comic performances --
      whether playing Robert De Niro's addled sidekick in the 1983 Martin
      Scorsese movie The King of Comedy or belting out a torch song totally
      naked -- tend to push the envelope beyond quirky into the genuinely weird.
      As if to prove that she remains as edgy as ever, she had this to say about
      President Bush and his performance post 9-11:"‘It's
      pretty dismal and pretty scary.’
 "Of course, we suggested, Bernhard would say
      that as a liberal person from New York City.
 "‘I'm
      an intelligent person from America,’ she riposted, and launched a heated
      blast. ‘I was born in Michigan and raised in Arizona, and while I do
      reside in New York, I travel the country extensively. Any thinking person
      who lives in the world would be disturbed at what's going on right now. I
      think Bush is amateurish and self-serving, and frankly it's disgusting. I
      think everybody is covering their [posteriors] with the Enron scandal and
      it was very convenient that Sept. 11 came along to deflect the fact that
      they should never have been in the White House in the first place. What
      happened in the election was completely corrupt.’"
      For Grove’s mini-article in full:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58340-2002Mar7.html
      For more about Bernhard’s charge that Bush
      represents the "real Terrorist threat," refer back to the
      February 28 CyberAlert:http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020228.asp#5
      For a complete listing of Bernhard’s TV and
      movie roles, and a photo of her, check out her data recited by the
      Internet Movie Database: http://us.imdb.com/Name?Bernhard,+Sandra   6  Actor
      Alec Baldwin told Florida A&M students last Thursday that the Florida
      recount outcome "has done as much damage to our country as any
      terrorist attack could do." Baldwin argued: "I believe that what
      happened in 2000 did as much damage to the pillars of democracy as
      terrorists did to the pillars of commerce in New York City." The
      Tallahassee Democrat reported that he also suggested that Bush
      administration talk about a "long war" is a
      "euphemism" for how the "moratorium on criticizing the
      government must be extended longer and longer and longer -- ideally,
      beyond the 2002 election."
      An excerpt from the March 8 Tallahassee
      Democrat story by Bill Cotterell, which James Taranto highlighted on
      Friday in his "Best of the Web" column for OpinionJournal.com(http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/)
      The excerpt:
 Florida's 2000 presidential election fiasco damaged democracy as badly
      as the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks hurt the nation, actor Alec Baldwin said
      Thursday. Baldwin told a Florida A&M University audience that President Bush
      and his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush, are hoping that a wartime "moratorium
      on criticizing the government" will help Republicans in the fall
      elections. Baldwin, a New Yorker, said memories of Sept. 11 have overshadowed
      public doubts about the 36-day recount of Florida presidential ballots. He
      said the war makes it hard for Bush critics to remind voters of "this
      other disaster that we faced in this country -- a disaster that...has done
      as much damage to our country as any terrorist attack could do, in some
      ways. "I know that's a harsh thing to say, perhaps, but I believe that
      what happened in 2000 did as much damage to the pillars of democracy as
      terrorists did to the pillars of commerce in New York City," Baldwin
      said, drawing applause from the breakfast audience of about 200.... Baldwin is a board member of People for the American Way, a liberal
      lobbying group that sponsored the two-day observation ofthe
      second anniversary of a mass march on Tallahassee. The march protested the
      governor's 1999 executive orders that supplanted affirmative action in
      university admissions and state contracting. As in a rally at St. Mary's Primitive Baptist Church on Wednesday
      night, speakers at the FAMU prayer breakfast focused more on the disputed
      2000 presidential election than the One Florida protests they were
      commemorating. Baldwin and other speakers warned that voters will face new
      challenges this year because legislative and congressional redistricting
      is changing political boundaries. He said the White House and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, along
      with the governor and other Republican leaders, arebanking
      on the news media and voters staying distracted by the war on terrorism. "When Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon spokespeople say to you,
      'Well, this is going to be a long war, we're going to be in Afghanistan
      for the long haul,' what that euphemism means is that the moratorium on
      criticizing the government must be extended longer and longer and longer -
      ideally, beyond the 2002 election," Baldwin said....      END of Excerpt http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/news/local/2815697.htm      For a photo of Baldwin and a rundown of his
      movie and TV roles, check the Internet Movie Database’s page on him:http://us.imdb.com/Name?Baldwin,+Alec      Baldwin’s said a lot of silly and/or liberal
      things over the years, but perhaps his most famous mean-spirited outburst
      occurred back in December of 1998, during the House impeachment
      proceedings, when he went on NBC’s Late Night with Conan O’Brien and
      let loose: "If we were in other countries, we would all right now,
      all of us together, [starts to shout] all of us together would go down to
      Washington and we would stone Henry Hyde to death!...We would stone Henry
      Hyde to death and we would go to their homes and we’d kill their wives
      and their children."      Long time CyberAlert readers should be quite
      familiar with this incident, which led NBC to promise to never re-run the
      particular show. But since I know many current readers were not getting
      CyberAlert back in 1998 (tsk, tsk), below is a transcript of the exchange
      on the December 11, 1998 Late Night with Conan O’Brien during which
      Baldwin advocated some small-scale terrorism against Bill Clinton’s
      adversaries:      O’Brien: "Before we leave, I gotta ask
      you. It’s no secret that you are very political. You are a very
      political person. It’s no secret that you have actually had some
      associations with the Clintons. That you’re a liberal man and I thought
      you know today, this is a historic day and you’re one of the most
      politically active actors out there. What do you think?"Baldwin:
      "I was in Africa. I go to Africa. I mean ladies and gentlemen I am in
      Africa. For three months I am in the bush and I come back. I come back
      here and I come back to what? I mean what is happening right now as we
      speak? Right now the Judiciary Committee,
      the President has an approval rating of 68 percent. The President is very
      popular and things are going pretty good and they are voting to impeach
      the President. They voted on one article of impeachment already. And I
      come back from Africa to stained dresses and cigars and this and
      impeachment. I am thinking to myself in other countries they are laughing
      at us twenty four hours a day and I’m thinking to myself if we were in
      other countries, we would all right now, all of us together, [starts to
      shout] all of us together would go down to Washington and we would stone
      Henry Hyde to death! We would stone him to death! [crowd
      cheers] Wait! Shut up! Shut up! No shut up! I’m not finished. We would
      stone Henry Hyde to death and we would go to their homes and we’d kill
      their wives and their children. We would kill their families. [stands up
      screaming] What is happening in this country? What is happening? UGHHH
      UGHHH!!!!"
      To view a RealPLayer clip of the above
      incident:http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/1998/cyb19981215.asp#5
      As I recall, our tape of the show wasn’t
      very good and so the volume is a somewhat low, but if you turn up your
      RealPlayer volume control as well as your speaker volume, you should be
      able to hear it.      Judge for yourself whether you think Baldwin
      was acting out a gag bit, and even if he was, whether it was more humorous
      or scary.-- Brent Baker    
    
   
 
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
 |  |