Trumpeting McCain, Bush Hypocrisy;
But Bush Loans “Completely Legal”; Big Business-Bashing; Even ABC News
Surprised by Attention Given Judicial Watch; 20/20 on Media
Distortions
1) The CBS Evening News
trumpeted the latest instance of Republican Senator John McCain taking on
President Bush from the left. ABC’s Peter Jennings highlighted how Bush
“is accused of indulging as a businessman in the same corporate excesses
that he is now condemning.” But ABC also ran a story about how an expert
believes the loans from 15 years ago “were completely legal and
proper.”
2) Text of a new Media Reality
Check: “Pushing Bush to Become Business Basher; Networks: Big Business
Is Bad, Reform Means New Regulations, Stale Harken Charges Are
Newsworthy.”
3) In the midst of all the big
business-bashing, a couple of contrarian moments occurred this week on the
morning shows. On Today, CNBC’s Ron Insana warned that a “bidding war
between Democrats and Republicans over how harshly to regulate business”
could cause investors to get “scared.” On Good Morning America, Diane
Sawyer acknowledged that more regulation may not work: “So the President
proposing still more legal statutes doesn't mean necessarily you're going
to get more ethical behavior.”
4) Even the ABC News political
unit found sudden network interest in Judicial Watch remarkable: “If you
had told us that within a year of the September 11 attacks, Larry Klayman
would lead one of the newscasts, we would have been dubious. But there he
was leading the CBS Evening News with Dan Rather last night, and playing
big in the first blocks of WNTWPJ and TNBCNNWTB.” And FNC’s Brit Hume
picked up on a CyberAlert item about the coverage.
5) Media manipulation and
distortion is the sole focus of Friday night’s 20/20 on ABC hosted by
John Stossel. He promised: “This Friday's 20/20 about us...fooling YOU.
I'll use the hour to look at the how we (the media) may mislead you.”
1
The CBS
Evening News on Thursday night trumpeted the latest instance of Republican
Senator John McCain taking on President Bush from the left while ABC’s
World News Tonight actually ran a story about how in the latest
media-hyped accusation against Bush, that it is hypocritical for him to be
calling for an end to low-interest loans by companies to their directors
when he took some himself 15 years ago, Bush’s loans “were completely
legal and proper.”
CBS’s Bill
Plante heralded: "A day after the Senate voted 97 nothing for a
Democrat bill to put more teeth in corporate fraud prosecutions,
Republican Senator John McCain, who has challenged Mr. Bush in the past,
today called for new restrictions on corporations."
Plante also
highlighted how “Democrats were also delighted by this 1996 Arthur
Andersen video. Dick Cheney was then President of Halliburton, the company
now being sued for alleged fraudulent accounting. He praised Andersen's
creativity." Check out what Cheney really said. It would be hard to
call it praising Andersen’s “creativity.”
ABC’s Jennings
acknowledged the “partisan” nature of attacks on Bush as he introduced
a piece on how “he is accused of indulging as a businessman in the same
corporate excesses that he is now condemning.”
Like ABC and CBS,
NBC’s Lisa Myers also highlighted the latest charge against Bush:
“Today the White House was busy trying to explain why, as a businessman,
Bush engaged in one of the very practices he now condemns -- insider loans
to corporate officers. At issue, two low interest loans totaling $180,000
that Bush received in the 1980s from an oil company -- Harken Energy --
while he was on the board of directors.”
-- CBS Evening
News, July 11. Following the opening story on the falling stock market,
CBS went to Bill Plante who focused on John McCain’s proposals outlined
at a National Press Club speech. Plante began, as taken down by MRC
analyst Brad Wilmouth:
"As shaky markets fuel loss of confidence
and voter outrage, Washington politicians raced to show they can be even
tougher on corporate wrongdoers than the President."
John McCain: "We must make fundamental
changes in corporate oversight-"
Plante: "A day after the Senate voted 97
nothing for a Democrat bill to put more teeth in corporate fraud
prosecutions, Republican Senator John McCain, who has challenged Mr. Bush
in the past, today called for new restrictions on corporations."
McCain: "Unless Congress and the President
move rapidly and boldly, the damage done by these scandals will outlive
most of us in this room."
Plante segued from McCain to the Bush loans:
"Going far beyond what the President outlined earlier this week,
McCain calls for the resignation of SEC head Harvey Pitt. He would also
forbid executives from selling their holdings while in office, force
companies to report stock options as an expense, and would not allow
corporate directors to own stock of the company they serve. That seemed
aimed at the kind of low-interest loans, totaling $180,000, which Mr. Bush
took more than a decade ago while he was a director of Harken Energy --
loans which the President himself this week called on corporations to end.
Mr. Bush used the loans to buy Harken Energy stock which he gave back in
1993, paying off the debt and receiving stock options of equal value in
exchange, which he never exercised. Democrats were quick to contrast the
President's call for reform with his actions as a director."
Rep. Richard Gephardt, House Minority Leader:
"It is hard to lead when you haven't done the things that you're
asking others to do."
Plante: "The administration, clearly
concerned, says that unlike current abuses, what the President did was not
only legal but encouraged, to get directors to invest in the companies
they served.”
After a clip of
Ari Fleischer, Plante highlighted another Democratic spin point:
“Democrats were also delighted by this 1996 Arthur Andersen video. Dick
Cheney was then President of Halliburton, the company now being sued for
alleged fraudulent accounting. He praised Andersen's creativity."
Dick Cheney: "I get good advice, if you
will, from their people based upon how we're doing business and how we're
operating over and above just sort of the normal by the books."
That’s praise of
“creativity”?
Plante concluded:
"Some of this may seem trivial, but with an election approaching, the
stakes for Republicans are huge. As one party operative put it, unless
there is a turnaround, there could be real fallout. If the stock market
improves, fine. But otherwise they've got to put somebody in jail."
-- ABC’s World
News Tonight. Peter Jennings teased Thursday’s show by asking:
“President Bush's corporate past. Is he preaching what he didn't
practice?” But ABC’s Dan Harris also outlined how an expert “says
the loans Mr. Bush received while serving on the board of Harken were
completely legal and proper. They simply don’t compare, he says, to the
loans given to executives, such as former Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski who
borrowed $23 million from his company, or former WorldCom CEO Bernard
Ebbers who borrowed $408 million.”
Like CBS, ABC also
led with the plunging stock marker before
Jennings acknowledged the “partisan” nature of attacks on Bush as he
introduced a piece by John Cochran: “President Bush is being criticized
again today -- much of it is partisan -- for his business past. He is
accused of indulging as a businessman in the same corporate excesses that
he is now condemning.”
Following
Cochran’s rundown of the latest media-created controversy, ABC focused a
story on how what Bush did in 1986 may not be very relevant. Jennings set
up the piece:
“Well, there is, as you all know, in the
country, widespread comment about the President’s dealings with Harken
ten years ago. If this is a question of leadership, is it a real issue or
is it not? Are these actually legitimate questions? ABC’s Dan Harris
points out tonight that different people have different bottom lines.”
Harris explained:
“There is a diversity of opinion as to whether the dealings of George W.
Bush, the business executive, should have any bearing on the policy
initiatives of George W. Bush, the chief executive. Pete Peterson, who is
a banker and former Commerce Secretary, says the daily drumbeat of
headlines do damage the President, but he’s not sure that’s fair.”
Peter Peterson, The Blackstone Group: “It
happened ten years ago. The amounts of money are trivial compared to
anything that, you know, we’re talking about now.”
Harris: “Columbia law professor John Coffee, a
specialist in white collar crime, says the loans Mr. Bush received while
serving on the board of Harken were completely legal and proper. They
simply don’t compare, he says, to the loans given to executives, such as
former Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski who borrowed $23 million from his
company, or former WorldCom CEO Bernard Ebbers who borrowed $408
million.”
Prof. John Coffee, Columbia Law School: “I
don’t think there is any violation of law here, but I can see how the
collection of these incidents begins to undercut his moral authority to
call for stronger corporate governance.”
Harris then gave time to a Bush critic: “David
Gergen, who has served as an advisor to four presidents, says Mr. Bush has
damaged his own moral authority by not being sufficiently forthright about
his business dealings. Here’s what Gergen would have had the President
say during Tuesday’s speech.”
David Gergen: “I got some of these kind of
insider loans back then when it was perfectly, when it was seen as
perfectly okay by most people. And so I understand that. But I think times
have change and we really need to tighten up here. I think that would have
been a smarter way to go.”
Harris concluded: “Until the President gets all
the facts out there, say Gergen and many other observers, this story will
continue to distract him from the nation’s business.”
-- NBC Nightly
News featured the loan story, but not until well into a Lisa Myers story
on Senate actions on corporate regulations bills: "Also approved,
most reforms unveiled by the President this week. But today the White
House was busy trying to explain why, as a businessman, Bush engaged in
one of the very practices he now condemns -- insider loans to corporate
officers. At issue, two low interest loans totaling $180,000 that Bush
received in the 1980s from an oil company -- Harken Energy -- while he was
on the board of directors. The President's spokesman said the loans to
Bush were entirely proper, but the practice has since gotten out of
hand."
Ari Fleischer, White House Spokesman: "In
the last of couple years, that has become abused. People are not reporting
these loans unlike President Bush, who reported his."
Myers: "Democrats were quick to
pounce."
Rep. Richard Gephardt, House Minority Leader:
"It is hard to lead when you haven't done the things that you're
asking others to do."
Myers concluded: "Over the last decade, both
parties have taken a billion dollars in campaign money from corporate
America. Despite that, both parties have now decided that in the current
climate, there is no political down side to bashing corporate greed."
2
Text
of a new Media Reality Check: “Pushing Bush to Become Business Basher;
Networks: Big Business Is Bad, Reform Means New Regulations, Stale Harken
Charges Are Newsworthy.”
On Thursday
afternoon the MRC distributed by fax the text of a Media Reality Check
compiled by Rich Noyes, the MRC's Director of News Analysis.
Virtually
everything in this report should be fresh to CyberAlert readers since it
has not appeared earlier in any CyberAlert.
The MRC's Mez
Djouadi has posted it online at: http://archive.mrc.org/realitycheck/2002/fax20020711.asp
To access the
Adobe Acrobat PDF version which matches the format distributed by fax: http://archive.mrc.org/realitycheck/2002/pdf/fax0711.pdf
Now, the text of
the July 11 Media Reality Check:
When journalists are under attack, they
scorn broad-brush terms like “the media” that lump good and bad
reporters into just one category. Sometimes this is comical, as when CBS
anchor Dan Rather pulled out his 12-foot pole in the face of charges his
CBS Evening News unethically publicized claims of drug use by candidate
George W. Bush in 1999. FNC’s Bill O’Reilly confronted him in May 2001
with transcripts of those smarmy Evening News stories, but Rather seized
on the fact that they aired while he was on vacation and on weekends when
Russ Mitchell anchored the broadcast.
“Let me stop you right there. You're
talking about Russ Mitchell's program, not Dan Rather's program,” Rather
slyly argued. “I did not want to run it on my show.” (And CBS News
condemned Bernie Goldberg for lacking team spirit.)
Contrast Rather’s meticulous parsing with
the denigrating one-size-damns-all coverage that Big Business has received
from Big Media. “The scandals in corporate America just seem to keep
coming,” ABC’s Cokie Roberts argued on Sunday’s This Week. “Just
how bad a black eye does corporate America have right now?” Katie Couric
chirped on Tuesday’s Today, lumping law-abiding firms with Enron, Global
Crossing and WorldCom.
Liberal journalists demanded that Bush
attack this axis of evil with government regulations: “This is a
President who has made no bones about the fact that he is not a great fan
of regulation, he talks about cooperation, not regulation. Does he have a
credibility problem?” CNN’s Aaron Brown wondered on Monday before
Bush’s speech. That same evening, July 8, CBS’s Wyatt Andrews pushed
Bush even harder, branding him the “President who, for most of his term,
has been 'partner-in-chief' with big business.” He didn’t mean that as
a compliment.
All three evening newscasts showcased Bush
critics who faulted him for not being “tough enough” on U.S. business
even as he was fulfilling liberal wishes by agreeing to more regulations.
At the same time, the networks revived charges that Bush greedily tried to
hide a 1990 stock sale, allegations which have been repeatedly explored by
national reporters beginning in 1991.
After the White House press corps extracted
new quotes from Ari Fleischer on July 3, NBC Nightly News substitute
anchor (and heir-apparent) Brian Williams had the hook he needed to assert
that Bush “ran afoul” of the law, despite being investigated and
cleared more than once: “The White House today insisted there is a very
simple explanation for why President Bush ran afoul of federal law when he
sold stock in a Texas oil company at a time when he was a corporate
director of that company.”
On CBS, Andrews argued that the absence of
wrongdoing wasn’t important: “Never mind that Mr. Bush was cleared.
His opponents will charge this champion of personal responsibility once
failed that standard himself,” he knowingly predicted on July 9.
Mean-while, CNN’s Brown, who likes to begin each NewsNight show by
listening to the sound of his own views, rationalized that he had to cover
the Harken story because talk radio often focused on Clinton scandals (see
box).
The text in the
box:
Is Harken Story Payback For Whitewater?
“My gut says if the President were Clinton, this decade-old story would
be hyped to death all over the radio, through at least half the Congress,
probably around more than a few water coolers, and maybe, just maybe, the
Justice Department....Would the same people who now urge reporters to drop
the Harken story have said the same thing three years ago, a different
President from a different party, different times? Does consistency count
more than politics?”
-- Aaron Brown opening CNN's NewsNight, July 9.
Resume Media
Reality Check text:
Liberal sniping was touted as proof of a
Bush credibility gap, not of Democrats’ unceasing partisanship: “There
are a lot of questions about the President's own dealings in Harken oil
stock, where he made much of his own personal fortune. Do you think he has
credibility with the public on this issue?” ABC’s Charles Gibson
challenged Commerce Secretary Don Evans on the July 9 Good Morning
America.
The point of all this is to either push
Bush to adopt liberal business-bashing policies or, if he resists, condemn
him for his coziness with corporations. It promises to be an election year
filled with liberal media bias.
END Reprint of
Media Reality Check
3
In
the midst of all the big business-bashing documented in item #2 above, a
couple of contrarian moments occurred this week on the morning shows when
a reporter or a host raised a conservative point.
On Thursday’s
Today, CNBC’s Ron Insana warned that a “bidding war between Democrats
and Republicans over how harshly to regulate business” could cause
investors to get “scared that the climate could turn inordinately
hostile and chill the economy and the business environment." On
Wednesday’s Good Morning America, Diane Sawyer acknowledged that more
regulation may not change unethical behavior: “So the President
proposing still more legal statutes doesn't mean necessarily you're going
to get more ethical behavior.”
-- NBC’s Today,
July 11. The MRC’s Rich Noyes caught this exchange over why the stock
market is declining:
Matt Lauer:
"You hear people throwing out a lot of reasons, one, we’’re still
getting over the dot com failures, another is the corporate scandals,
another is 9-11 and fear of terrorism. Rank those for me, and add some
others if you want."
CNBC’s Ron Insana, after agreeing with
Lauer’s list, cautioned: “There’s one other thing I would add, that
in this environment, it’s possible we will see a bidding war between
Democrats and Republicans over how harshly to regulate business, and I
think professional investors are getting scared that the climate could
turn inordinately hostile and chill the economy and the business
environment."
Lauer: "So what you’re saying is when the
government jumps in here, it can get very messy."
Insana: "Yeah, particularly if they overdo
it and then over-regulate or over-legislate, yes."
-- ABC’s Good
Morning America, July 10. MRC analyst Jessica Anderson noticed that during
an interview with David Faber of CNBC, Sawyer proposed:
"I want to talk a little about the human
beings involved. You spend your life interviewing CEOs and talking with
these guys, you really know them. And I was reading this morning one of
the op-ed pieces in The New York Times that we now have 300 criminal codes
for fraud and misrepresentation. So the President proposing still more
legal statutes doesn't mean necessarily you're going to get more ethical
behavior. What really would keep the people you know from cashing in their
options and leaving the little pension holders with no life savings at the
end of a company's collapse? What would really stop that?"
4
Even
the ABC News political unit took note of how remarkable it was for all
three broadcast network evenings news shows to have prominently featured,
on Wednesday night, a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch. ABC didn’t
mention that it probably helped that the target was a Republican Vice
President and not a Democratic President’s administration.
And, another
example of a network reporter simply calling Judicial Watch a
“watchdog” group after the networks always tagged it as
“conservative” during the Clinton years.
MRC analyst
Jessica Anderson alerted me to the content in Thursday’s edition of
“The Note,” a daily column on the ABCNews.com Web site put together by
the ABC News political unit of Mark Halperin, Elizabeth Wilner and Marc
Ambinder.
The July 11
edition included this passage:
“Here in the Greater Noteland Metroplex, two of
our grand and glorious pasttimes are these: checking at 6:30 p.m. ET to
see what the three network flagship newscasts are leading with, and seeing
how many of the all-news cable channels carry a given event live.
“If you had told us that within a year of the
September 11 attacks, Larry Klayman would lead one of the newscasts, we
would have been dubious. But there he was leading "The CBS Evening
News with Dan Rather" last night, and playing big in the first blocks
of "WNTWPJ" and "TNBCNNWTB."
To read “The
Note,” go to: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/dailynews/thenote.html
You’ll have to
register to see it.
For more on the
media’s sudden interest in a Judicial Watch lawsuit, see the July 11
CyberAlert: http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020711.asp#2
In referring to
Judicial Watch but not naming it on Thursday’s The Early Show on CBS,
MRC analyst Brian Boyd noticed that business news anchor Susan McGinnis
asserted: "The confidence crisis is worsened by the fact that
President Bush himself has been under scrutiny for questionable accounting
practices while he was an oil executive in Texas. And Vice President
Cheney, already facing an SEC investigation, is now being sued by a
watchdog group alleging investor fraud while he was CEO of Halliburton oil
company."
Thursday’s
CyberAlert featured an extensive look at how when it was suing Clinton
officials to disclose information Judicial Watch was always tagged as
“conservative.” But when it sued Vice President Cheney on Wednesday,
the networks changed their tune as all described it as a non-ideological
“watchdog group,” “legal group,” “legal activist group” or
“legal advocacy group.” For a rundown of contrasts for ABC, CBS, CNN
and NBC: http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020711.asp#1
On Thursday night,
July 11, FNC’s Special Report with Brit Hume picked up on the CyberAlert
item. During the “Grapevine” segment, Hume relayed:
"Washington gadfly Larry Klayman of Judicial
Watch, who filed numerous lawsuits against the Clinton administration,
managed last night to do something he'd never done before: He made all
three broadcast network evening newscasts. This time, of course, he was
filing a shareholder lawsuit charging Vice President Cheney with fraud
when he was running Halliburton corporation. The conservative Media
Research Center reports that last night was actually the first time Peter
Jennings of ABC News had ever spoken the name 'Judicial Watch.'"
(That reminds me
of a small point I should have made in the July 11 CyberAlert which cited
an example of a reporter on World News Tonight referring to Judicial
Watch, but the CyberAlert item did not note what the anchor said. In that
only instance I could find during the Clinton years when World News
Tonight cited Judicial Watch (an October 24, 1996 story on the
disappearance of John Huang in which reporter Brian Ross set up a
soundbite by referring to: “Larry Klayman, a conservative lawyer who
filed the lawsuit...”), came on a night when Jennings did not anchor.
That evening Diane Sawyer handled the anchor duties and her introduction
for the Ross piece did not refer to the lawsuit.)
5
The
entirety of tonight’s 20/20 on ABC will be devoted to an examination by
John Stossel of media manipulation and distortion.
An excerpt from
his memo on the ABCNews.com Web site about the Friday, July 12 edition of
20/20:
This Friday's 20/20 about us...fooling YOU.
I'll use the hour to look at the how we (the media) may mislead you.
Sometimes the media distort pictures. I'll
show you how. The Communists killed Trotsky and then removed him from
Soviet photographs. Now computers make it easier. Remember when some
people booed Hillary Clinton at a fund-raising concert after September
11th? MTV replayed the concert, but changed the boos to applause. TV Guide
put Oprah Winfrey on its cover, but gave her Ann-Margret's body. Steven
Spielberg took guns out of the remake of ET.
Of course, that's just entertainment. It's
worse if NEWS organizations distort. I'll tell you what ABCNEWS has done.
And what I did.
Even when we don't distort, we can still
mislead by hyping tiny risks. You heard about "road rage," but
did you know there's no evidence of road rage increasing? The media
reports were mostly based on -- get this: a study of MEDIA REPORTS of road
rage. It was circular logic.
And the reason for all those shark attack!
reports last year was NOT an increase in the number of attacks, it was
just hype! We'll show you how, and why....
And did you hear about the dog brothel (a
cathouse for dogs!), and the cockroach that cured colds? All were hoaxes,
OBVIOUS hoaxes, that nevertheless fooled the gullible media. I'll
introduce you to the hoaxer, who tricks the media, he says, because he
wants to show how intellectually lazy we are.
He has a point. Journalists work hard, but
we are intellectually lazy when we focus on sharks rather than undertows;
road rage, or car-jackings, rather than drunken driving. It's bad
journalism, and as Bob Lichter of the Statistical Assessment Service puts
it, bad journalism is worse than no journalism, because it leads people to
think they know things, when they don't.
END of Excerpt
This page is
online at: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/2020/2020_email_main.html
Thursday’s USA
Today “Media Mix” column by Peter Johnson previewed the show. To read
his July 11 piece:
http://www.usatoday.com/life/columns/media-mix.htm
20/20 airs on ABC
at 10pm EDT/PDT, 9pm CDT/MDT.
With so much media
distortion from which to choose, Stossel must have had a tough time
winnowing his material to squeeze it into an hour.
