CBS Ignores Bush’s Bounce Back in Poll; Net Had Stressed Decline --10/23/2003-- Media Research Center

1. CBS Ignores Bush’s Bounce Back in Poll; Net Had Stressed Decline Three weeks ago, when a CBS News/New York Times poll found a new low approval rating for Bush of 51 percent, with those not confident in his ability to handle a foreign crisis having risen to 50 percent and Bush dropping to tied status, at 44 percent, with an un-named Democrat in a generic head-to-head race, the CBS Evening News led with the survey. But when a new CBS News poll released on Wednesday discovered that President Bush’s approval rating had rebounded by three points, to 54 percent, confidence in his ability to handle a foreign crisis had jumped by eight points and his margin over an un-named Democrat had soared to a healthy 12 points, 46 to 34 percent, Dan Rather didn’t mention any of those reversals of fortune for Bush as he allocated a mere 26 seconds to the fresh poll findings, stressing disillusionment with the Iraq war.

2. Morning Reporters Distance Themselves from “Partial-Birth” Term Just as they did on Tuesday night, on Wednesday morning network anchors and reporters distanced themselves from the term “partial-birth abortion,” either outright refusing to say the phrase or making sure viewers understood it is the preferred term of critics of the practice. ABC’s Robin Roberts and CBS’s Harry Smith referred to “so-called partial-birth abortions” while NBC’s Ann Curry cited “what critics call partial-birth abortions,” though at another point she was unable to mouth the term: “President Bush says he looks forward to signing a bill that bans certain late-term abortions.”

3. Ben Affleck Sees “Dangerous Right-Wing Agenda” in Bush and Media Receiving an award last week from the left-wing, anti-conservative group People for the American Way, actor Ben Affleck lashed out at “the right-wing media” for delivering a “strident and one-sided cry in defense of policies which are damaging and dangerous.” Affleck employed the same language as he claimed the Bush administration has also pushed “a dangerous right-wing agenda.” Affleck made fun of Arnold Schwarzenegger and of Rush Limbaugh’s plight as he suggested that Limbaugh is now “learning to appreciate the virtues of forgiveness and understanding and who, I am quite sure, is hoping the next judge he sees is a liberal.”

4. Gumbel to Host Another Sci-Fi Channel Look at a UFO Landing Bryant Gumbel goes alien. Eleven months after he narrated a Sci-Fi cable channel special on UFOs, The Roswell Crash: Startling New Evidence, Gumbel will return to the science fiction channel on Friday night for another special on a supposed UFO landing -- this time in Pennsylvania.

CBS Ignores Bush’s Bounce Back in Poll;
Net Had Stressed Decline

Bad poll news for President George W. Bush is the top news of the day to CBS, but when Bush bounces back CBS doesn’t consider it to be newsworthy. Three weeks ago, when a CBS News/New York Times poll found a new low approval rating for Bush of 51 percent, with those not confident in his ability to handle a foreign crisis having risen to 50 percent and Bush dropping to tied status, at 44 percent, with an un-named Democrat in a generic head-to-head race, the CBS Evening News led with the survey.

With “Declining Confidence” on screen beneath a picture of Bush, Dan Rather teased his October 2 broadcast: “Tonight in a new poll the American people indicate declining confidence in President Bush on the economy and Iraq.” Rather introduced his lead story: “A CBS News/New York Times poll out tonight indicates President Bush has increasing problems with public confidence in his leadership. With the economy struggling, jobs hard to come by and American soldiers in Iraq dying almost every day, support for the President, trust and belief in the job he's doing, are falling.” John Roberts provided a rundown of the declining numbers, including how in “looking ahead to the election, President Bush has lost what was a commanding lead. Voters are now evenly split [at 44 percent] between Mr. Bush and an un-named Democrat.”

But when a new CBS News poll released on Wednesday discovered that President Bush’s approval rating had rebounded by three points, to 54 percent, confidence in his ability to handle a foreign crisis had jumped by eight points and his margin over an un-named Democrat had soared to a healthy 12 points, 46 to 34 percent, Dan Rather didn’t mention any of those reversals of fortune for Bush as he allocated, on Wednesday’s CBS Evening News, a mere 26 seconds to the fresh poll findings.

Rather’s less than a half-minute-long item on the October 22 broadcast came after he led with the just-released video of the Columbine killers firing off shotguns, a story on how “the Defense Secretary privately predicts a long, hard slog in Iraq and Afghanistan” and a piece from Kimberly Dozier in Iraq on how “at the front lines of the war on terrorism, things don't seem to be getting any better.”

In the fourth slot, Rather read a short item in which he highlighted public disillusionment with the Iraq war and, while Rather pegged Bush’s approval level at 54 percent, he failed to note how that represented an up tick from the 51 percent approval level he treated as the top story of the day three weeks earlier when it had fallen just one point, from 52 percent, a number even more within the margin of error, in a poll taken two weeks earlier in mid-September. Rather announced on his October 22 newscast:
“A new CBS News poll indicates most Americans believe the results of the war in Iraq were not worth its costs. 42 percent said the war was worth it, 52 percent said it wasn't. In August, respondents were evenly split [at 46 percent]. 49 percent of those answering the new poll approve of President Bush's handling of Iraq. President Bush's overall approval rating is still a relatively strong 54 percent.”

It isn’t as if the rise in Bush’s approval rating, as well as in his ability to handle a foreign crisis, wasn’t noticed by someone at CBS News. The headline over the CBSNews.com posting of the poll: “Bush Job Approval Edges Back Up.” The Web story relayed what television viewers were not told about:
“President George W. Bush's overall job approval rating has risen slightly in the past few weeks, and as he travels through Asia discussing terrorism with leaders in the region, confidence in his ability to handle international crises has also risen.”

And the new survey found that while Bush’s approval level had risen by three points, within the four point margin of error, his disapproval level had fallen by six points since the previous poll three week ago, from 42 to 36 percent.

Specifically on his handling of Iraq, Bush’s approval jumped to 49 percent from 45 percent in the poll released on October 2.

While Rather highlighted how most felt the Iraq war was not worth it, he ignored how, as the Web story recounted, “54 percent of Americans believe things are going at least somewhat well for the U.S. in its efforts to bring order to Iraq; last month, 49 percent believed this was the case. The percent who say things are going badly in Iraq has dropped to 43 percent today from 47 percent last month.”

     For CBS’s posted rundown of its new poll released Wednesday: www.cbsnews.com

     For the rundown of its late September poll released October 2: www.cbsnews.com

     Now, a full recitation of the October 2 CBS Evening News story by John Roberts which followed the introduction from Rather quoted above: “With the election now just 13 months away, President Bush finds his ratings near the low-water mark of his presidency. His overall job approval hovers just above 50 percent -- almost back to where he was before 9/11, and way down from his stratospheric ratings following the attacks on America. White House officials say they expected the numbers to slide, but the dramatic drop has them troubled. The President's marks on foreign policy have hit new lows [44 percent approval], half of Americans [50 percent] don't have confidence in his ability to handle an international crisis, and the majority [53 percent] now believes the war in Iraq wasn't worth it -- a big change from the heady days after the swift defeat of Saddam.”
     James T. Smith, American University: "Landing on the carrier, declaring the conflict over, this Romanesque sort of victory parade, certainly did raise the stakes and now those expectations are falling because people are seeing that the Iraq situation is not going according to plan."
     Roberts: “And foreign policy had been President Bush's strong point. Now 56 percent of Americans now lack confidence in the President's economic decision-making, a reversal from six months ago -- a result of three-million lost jobs and sputtering economic growth.”
     Christian Weller, Economic Policy Institute: "Twenty-two months into the recovery, we still have fewer jobs than we had at the beginning of the recovery. That is a historical first. And the reason for that is that the economy is just not growing fast enough."
     Roberts: “And the mood of the nation is shifting: 56 percent now say the country is on the wrong track, a bad trend heading into an election year.”
     Weller: “I don't really see many policy options for the White House at this point to really boost the economy before election time."
     Roberts: “Looking ahead to the election, President Bush has lost what was a commanding lead. Voters are now evenly split [44 percent] between Mr. Bush and an un-named Democrat, though more voters believe the President will win re-election [50 to 35 percent]. Though his numbers have slipped, the President's strongest marks are on leadership. Nearly two-thirds of Americans think he is a strong leader. But in another troubling sign, the majority believes that leadership is not focused on priorities that are important to them.”

Morning Reporters Distance Themselves
from “Partial-Birth” Term

Just as they did on Tuesday night, on Wednesday morning network anchors and reporters distanced themselves from the term “partial-birth abortion,” either outright refusing to say the phrase or making sure viewers understood it is the preferred term of critics of the practice. ABC’s Robin Roberts and CBS’s Harry Smith referred to “so-called partial-birth abortions” while NBC’s Ann Curry cited “what critics call partial-birth abortions,” though at another point she was unable to mouth the term: “President Bush says he looks forward to signing a bill that bans certain late-term abortions.”

     As recounted in the October 22 CyberAlert, in October 21 coverage of the Senate vote to ban the procedure, network anchors and reporters resisted using the term “partial-birth abortion.” Jennings and Rather outright refused to utter the words. Jennings asserted: “The Senate has voted today to ban a certain abortion procedure which is most often used late in a pregnancy.” Rather similarly announced: “Congress tonight gave final approval to legislation making it a crime for doctors to perform certain types of late-term abortions.” NBC’s Tom Brokaw kept his distance from the phrase, though he at least mouthed the term as he teased at the top of the October 21 NBC Nightly News: “The Senate joins the House and votes to outlaw so-called partial-birth abortion, the first federal ban in the long struggle over Roe v Wade.” See: www.mediaresearch.org

     FNC’s Brit Hume picked up on the media’s dissembling, reciting on Wednesday’s Special Report with Brit Hume:
     “From some of the wording in news accounts of yesterday's Senate vote on abortion you might not have known that it was about banning a procedure in which a live fetus is partially pulled from the womb before its skull is punctured and its brains sucked out. This is commonly referred to as partial-birth abortion, but ABC's Peter Jennings called it quote, 'a certain abortion procedure.' The AP called it 'a type of middle and late term abortion.' CBS called it quote, 'the procedure generally performed between the 18th and 24th weeks of a pregnancy.' Today's Washington Post calls it quote, an 'abortion procedure' in a headline and then refers to it as a quote, 'what abortion foes call a 'partial-birth' procedure.' The New York Times refers to it as a quote, 'type of abortion' and then refers to a 'partial-birth method.'”

A rundown of how the procedure was described on the Wednesday, October 22 morning shows, none of which provided any description coming close to Hume’s recitation of collapsing the skull, as observed by MRC analysts Jessica Anderson, Brian Boyd and Geoffrey Dickens:

-- ABC’s Good Morning America. News reader Robin Roberts: "President Bush is expected to sign into law controversial new legislation banning so-called partial-birth abortions. The Senate passed the measure yesterday. Supporters say the bill ends a barbaric procedure. Abortion rights advocates vow a legal challenge."

-- CBS’s The Early Show. Harry Smith set up a slanted Elizabeth Kaledin story, which was nearly identical to what had run on the previous night’s CBS Evening News: “In Washington, Congress approved a ban on so-called partial-birth abortion. It is the first federal restriction on abortion since the Supreme Court made it legal in 1973. CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Kaledin reports."

Kaledin, who referred only to “the procedure generally performed between the eighteenth and twenty-fourth weeks of pregnancy,” warned that “doctors like Paul Blumenthal say combining the words 'never' and 'late term abortion' is risky."
Dr. Blumenthal, Johns Hopkins University: "There are situations in which we may have no choice but to provide a procedure that this bill will declare illegal."

Who is Blumenthal? Kaledin failed to point out how, as the MRC’s Tim Graham discovered, Blumenthal has been affiliated with Planned Parenthood, a group politically active in opposing a ban on partial-birth abortions. In a May 16 Now with Bill Moyers story about the supposed conspiratorial "assault" on abortion rights, PBS's Brenda Breslauer identified Blumenthal as “the former Medical Director of a Maryland Planned Parenthood chapter." See the May 20 CyberAlert for more on that story featuring Blumenthal: www.mediaresearch.org

A bio of Blumenthal on the Contraception Online Web site, on whose National Advisory Panel Blumenthal sits, specifies Blumenthal's years of service to Planned Parenthood: “He was Medical Director of Planned Parenthood in Maryland from 1994 to 2001 and has been a member of the National Medical Committee of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America since 1996. See: www.contraceptiononline.org

-- NBC’s Today. News reader Ann Curry, in news updates throughout the show:
# "President Bush says he looks forward to signing a bill that bans certain late-term abortions now that Congress has approved it. Opponents of the ban are about to fight it in court.”

# "A legal battle is about to begin over the new bill that bans what critics call partial-birth abortions. 17 Democrats joined the Republican party in the Senate to pass the bill which the House approved earlier this month. President Bush says he looks forward to signing the bill into law. Abortion rights advocates say they will go to court immediately to try to stop it."

# "The Senate joined the House Tuesday in passing a bill to ban what critics call partial-birth abortion. The President says he will sign it but opponents say they will go to court to try to block the measure."

Katie Couric actually managed to use the term without caveats, but not Tim Russert. Couric asked him: "Let's talk about what happened in the Senate yesterday. Opponents of partial-birth abortion scored a major victory. The debate though, as we saw earlier, was incredibly heated and emotional. Were you surprised by this decision and obviously the President will sign it into law?"
Russert: "No the vote has been pretty consistent even when President Clinton was President but then he would always veto it. The opponents of, as they say, partial-birth, the proponents say it's late term. It's a very emotional, controversial issue. Some people who are in favor of abortion rights in earlier terms, the first three months for example, crossed over and voted against this because it's in the last three months of a pregnancy. The President will sign this legislation. It will be immediately brought to courts and it will wind up in the Supreme Court relatively quickly."

Ben Affleck Sees “Dangerous Right-Wing
Agenda” in Bush and Media

Receiving an award last week in Los Angeles from the left-wing, anti-conservative group People for the American Way (PFAW), actor Ben Affleck lashed out at “the right-wing media” for delivering a “strident and one-sided cry in defense of policies which are damaging and dangerous.” Affleck employed the same language as he claimed the Bush administration has also pushed “a dangerous right-wing agenda.”

Affleck made fun of Arnold Schwarzenegger and of Rush Limbaugh’s plight as he suggested that Limbaugh is now “learning to appreciate the virtues of forgiveness and understanding and who, I am quite sure, is hoping the next judge he sees is a liberal.”

MSNBC’s Scarborough Country on Friday night played some clips of Affleck’s address at the October 14 People for the American Way event at the Beverly Hilton where Affleck was given a “Spirit of Liberty Award.” PFAW’s Web site listed Paul Begala, co-host of CNN’s Crossfire, as the emcee with Harrison Ford and Bill Maher as award presenters. See: www.pfaw.org

Affleck’s remarks at the event generated quite a bit of media attention, not for his political comments, but for how he referred to Jennifer Lopez as his “girlfriend” instead of as his fiancé.

On his October 17 program on MSNBC, Joe Scarborough played these clips of Affleck at a podium with a big PFAW banner behind him:

-- “The right wing media -- from Fox News to Bill O'Reilly to Rush Limbaugh, who is, now, I suspect, learning to appreciate the virtues of forgiveness and understanding and who, I am quite sure, is hoping the next judge he sees is a liberal -- have kept up the sustained and strident and one-sided cry in defense of policies which are damaging and dangerous.”

-- “The Bush administration has continued to push what I think is a dangerous right-wing agenda, which has included increasing encroachments on civil liberties.”

-- “Here we are now at the dawn of the Schwarzenegger Era in American politics. Does this seem like the decline of the Roman Empire, does that strike, like [deep announcer voice] 'and then a beast with eyes of fire will rise from the sea and [yelling] the Schwarzenegger will govern!' What's next?”

For a picture of the Berkeley, California-born Affleck, a picture of him and a rundown of his movie roles, which includes playing Tom Clancy’s “Jack Ryan” in the Sum of All Fears and, most recently, co-starring in the box office disaster Gigli, see the Internet Movie Database’s page on him: us.imdb.com

Gumbel to Host Another Sci-Fi Channel
Look at a UFO Landing

Bryant Gumbel goes alien. Eleven months after he narrated a Sci-Fi cable channel special on UFOs, The Roswell Crash: Startling New Evidence, Gumbel will return to the science fiction channel on Friday night for another special on a supposed UFO landing -- this time in Pennsylvania.

The veteran of the NBC and CBS morning shows, who now anchors HBO’s monthly Real Sports and co-hosts PBS’s quarterly Flashpoints USA, will host the Sci-Fi channel’s, “The New Roswell: Kecksburg Exposed.”

The two-hour special, complete with a town hall meeting hosted by Gumbel, will air Friday night, October 24, with feeds at 9pm and 11pm EDT and PDT. So, that means it will air at 9 and 11pm EDT, 8 and 10 pm CDT and 9 and 11pm PDT. For those in the Mountain Time Zone, it depends which feed you get. The eastern feed translates to 7 and 9pm MDT, the western feed to 10pm and 12am MDT.

The Sci-Fi channel’s Web site summary of the program:

On December 9, 1965, an object landed near Kecksburg, Penn. It was observed as a fireball in the sky across several U.S. states and Canada.

Witnesses provided signed statements and independent, corroborated descriptions of the object and its location. Firefighters, reporters and a radio news director described a military presence at the crash site -- and some saw a military truck quickly leaving with a large, tarpaulin-covered object.

At the scene, officials told residents a meteor crashed. But the next day, the U.S. government declared nothing fell ... or was found.

What really happened? What is the truth? No matter what fell that night, the public's right to know remains undiminished.

Now, with new witness accounts and a breakthrough forensic study done at the site by scientists, we reveal fascinating new scientific evidence in this exclusive SCI FI DECLASSIFIED special. We take viewers to the actual site, and to a town-hall meeting moderated by host Bryant Gumbel. And we update our The Roswell Crash: Startling New Evidence special, with the final analysis of our excavated Roswell artifacts.

END Excerpt from Web site

The page for the show: scifi.com

Sounds like Sci-Fi has stumbled upon a grand military coverup conspiracy. No wonder the show appealed to Gumbel.

-- Brent Baker

Sign up for CyberAlerts:
Keep track of the latest instances of media bias and alerts to stories the major media are ignoring. Sign up to receive CyberAlerts via e-mail.

questions and comments about CyberAlert subscription

You can also learn what has been posted each day on the MRC’s Web site by subscribing to the “MRC Web Site News” distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to: http://www.mrc.org/cybersub.asp#webnews