Hollywood Buys "Antichrist"
  Country Music: Too Much Freedom-Loving?
  The Obscenity Blackout
News Columns
  Notre Dame Pacifier?
  Weak Knees at the White House
  Bias In Specter-Scope
  Media Reality Check
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  30-Day Archive
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  News Division
  Business & Media Institute
  NewsBusters Blog

Support the MRC

This column was reprinted by permission of L. Brent Bozell and Creators Syndicate. To reprint this or any of his twice weekly syndicated columns, please contact Creators Syndicate at (310) 337-7003 ext. 110





 L. Brent Bozell


Teens, Self-Image, and the Media
by L. Brent Bozell III
April 17, 2001

In spring, a modern teenage girl's fancy turns to thoughts of...actually, she may not have time for reveries after all. Listen to Annemarie Iverson, who's in her thirties and edits the teen-girl-oriented magazine YM: "Whenever I talk to girls, I am just amazed at how their lives parallel mine. They are so stressed out. They need help more than you can imagine."

What Iverson doesn't appear to realize is that YM and similar magazines are contributing to that stress. One of the major points Alex Kuczynski makes in her April 2 New York Times story about these publications is that "underlying many articles is the guiding premise that teenage girls are swiftly becoming miniaturized versions of grownups...Magazines for teenagers have reached a new level of adult frankness."

The innocence of youth is no longer an ideal to be cherished. It is the stuff of dreams for daydreamers.

It is standard fare for YM, published since 1932 under a succession of names, to run the sort of material, such as the advice-column question "Why do boys' testicles change color?", that would have caused its readers to faint back when the magazine was called Polly Pigtails.

Forgive me for stating the obvious: Teens aren't adults. They don't, and can't, and shouldn't, know everything that adults know. More to the point, they shouldn't feel as if they need to. Sadly, at least some of those who run these tawdry magazines openly champion the opposite. Atoosa Rubenstein, editor-in-chief of the Cosmopolitan offshoot CosmoGirl!, declares, "We have to give girls tools that they have not needed in past generations...[CosmoGirl!] is everything we finally learned at twenty-five [that] we wished we had known when we were fifteen."

It's not new for the young occasionally to see their youth as, in certain senses, confining. It is confining, if a parent worthy of that title has done his or her job. What fifteen-year-old doesn't wish he were sixteen and old enough to drive? But this incessant hankering by adults to have a child leave his entire childhood behind is new. And it's a perversion of the natural order. 

"I think the fact that most of their parents worked is an enormous influence," remarks Iverson, adding that under those circumstances, children "have been sort of left to their own devices." The media have filled that vacuum. Iverson believes, in Kuczynski's paraphrase, that "MTV has had the most profound influence on transforming children into sophisticated consumers." 

That MTV might have "the most profound influence" on anyone is the most troubling idea I've heard lately.

And the stress begins well before a girl's thirteenth birthday. The Sunday supplement Parade recently reported that a Girl Scout-sponsored survey found that "girls aged eight to twelve...feel pressure to be teenagers before their time." But why draw the line there? Why not make five-year-olds feel pressure to be eight before their time? Or would that - somehow - be unnatural? 

Girls and boys, teen and pre-teen, are susceptible to the pressures of pop-culture poison. In the April 12 issue of Rolling Stone, the magazine's thirtysomething music editor, Joe Levy, reminisces about the music of his early childhood. In so doing, he illuminates part of the difference between Growing Up Then and Growing Up Now.

Levy remembers that the "first song I ever remember hearing on the radio was 'Hey Jude,'" released in 1968 when he was four. "Right now," he adds, "there's a [four-year-old] out there who's having that exact same experience with [rapper] Jay-Z, and what he's gonna do or she's gonna do [musically] at age seventeen is gonna be pretty weird. And it will probably involve the word 'pimpin'.' And I hope it's gonna be exciting."

Yes, Virginia, you can have the mental acumen of a tomato and grow up to be the music editor of Rolling Stone.

The flaw in Levy's statement is that a listener simply cannot have the "exact same experience" with the Beatles' classic as with the Jay-Z tracks to which he seems to be alluding, any more than one can have the same eating experience with crème brulee as with dirt.

You're familiar with "Hey Jude." By way of contrast, a few lines from "Parking Lot Pimpin'," a cut from Jay-Z's latest album: "Big trucks when I wanna f---/And it's time to get ass/I turn automobiles/To hotels on wheels/...Bitches love when I cruise up the boulevard." 

And here's a bit of last year's Jay-Z hit "Big Pimpin'": "I thug 'em/F--- 'em/Love 'em/Leave 'em/'Cause I don't f---in' need 'em/Take 'em out the hood/Keep 'em lookin' good/But I don't f---in' feed 'em."

Bringing up children has always been hard. If there's a truly compelling reason for the popular culture's insistence on making it a thousand times more difficult, it'd be the first I've ever heard.

Voice Your Opinion!
 Write to Brent Bozell


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314