The Washington Monthly, Liberal Media Farm Club
by L. Brent Bozell III
December 12, 1996
The Washington Monthly, the 28-year-old repository of "neoliberalism"
founded by Charles Peters, has discovered conservative student journalism --
and its wealthy backers.
Moonlighting U.S. News & World Report Senior Editor
Thomas Toch notes that past editors of conservative college newspapers are
taking jobs at prominent spots in what liberals like to call "the
right-wing attack machine." Among the conservative journalistic
up-and-comers are Rich Lowry at National Review, Matt Rees at the Weekly
Standard, and Dave Mastio with USA Today's editorial page.
Toch identifies some of the venerable organizations behind
this journalistic jihad: the Intercollegiate Studies Institute's Collegiate
Network, the National Journalism Center, and the Leadership Institute, and
funders like the John M. Olin Foundation. He concludes: "Conservatives
may grouse about the hurdles they face in getting their perspectives heard in
the media. But if the swelling ranks of influential alumni of the student
newspaper network are a measure, conservatives don't need to be pitied so much
There are some problems with all of this. Surely,
conservatives have been training young journalists for decades now; outlets
like National Review have been hiring them for forty years. So where is the
story here? Isn't the real story that after decades of trying, conservatives
still can't get jobs in the "objective" news media, and continue to
be relegated to the role of commentators -- as Toch's examples clearly
It's a subject no one knows more about than Charlie Peters
-- because The Washington Monthly itself is the model, a farm club training
liberal journalists for the big time in the "objective" media.
Peters' own autobiography, "Tilting at Windmills," includes the
blurb from writer J. Anthony Lukas: "Charlie Peters is a pivotal figure
in American journalism, an editor who has transformed the way the press covers
government, a mentor who has spawned a whole generation of discerning proteges."
National Journal magazine recently noted "back in the 1970s and '80s, a
number of journalists joined big-time news organizations such as Newsweek from
the ranks of the neoliberal Washington Monthly."
In his book, Peters tells of the early years at the
magazine: The newest top editor of U.S. News & World Report, James
Fallows, then "had just turned 22 and had been working for Ralph Nader
that summer." Time reporter turned USA Today columnist Walter Shapiro was
"a just-defeated 25-year old congressional candidate...he had run as a
liberal Democrat." Peters notes the Harvard alums helped each other
out: "Fallows recommended [current Washington Post business editor] David
Ignatius, who recommended [former Newsweek and current New Republic writer
Mickey] Kaus, who recommended [Newsweek and NBC pundit] Jonathan Alter, and so
The Washington Monthly's board of contributing editors
includes not only Alter and Fallows, but Newsweek's Matthew Cooper and Gregg
Easterbrook, Wall Street Journal reporter Christopher Georges, Washington Post
reporter David Segal, U.S. News Moscow bureau chief Paul Glastris and former
national reporters Arthur Levine (U.S. News), Jonathan Rowe (Christian
Science Monitor), and Joseph Nocera and Steven Waldman (Newsweek).
In fact, The Washington Monthly has served as a favorite
freelancing spot for reporters. A few years ago, the newsletter MediaWatch
examined three and a half years of opinion journals, and found
"objective" reporters wrote 98 articles for the Monthly (versus just
three in National Review), outdone only by 112 in The New Republic.
But isn't neoliberalism something significantly to the right
of liberalism? Peters doesn't think so: "Many people also confuse
neoconservatism and neoliberalism and assume that we are considerably further
to the right than we really are." That's the real danger for the
conservative movement. Peters-style neoliberalism isn't in any way opposed to
large-scale government interventions (indeed, the Monthly cheered massive
Clinton health care reform); like Bill Clinton, its standard-bearer, the
socialist ends are the same, only the means are different.
Jon Meacham left his perch as a Monthly editor at the
beginning of 1995, but ended with a thoughtful essay on where young
conservatives and young liberals were making the same mistakes: "The
current crop of twentysomethings believes, almost universally, that small,
locally-based community groups can do more good than large-scale federal
action." Meacham echoed Peters in asserting that both sides had
"mental blocks" of squeamishness, putting their own self-interest
before federal power: "Once those blocks are broken -- once people
understand that government is a way to solve problems we all want solved, not
just an automatic evil -- then the fog may lift, and perhaps -- just perhaps
-- it will once again be cool to believe."
That's what gets you hired in the "objective"
media these days. Mr. Meacham became national affairs editor at Newsweek.
Conservatism may be running rampant in America, but the news media door
remains shut and bolted, manned by a liberal journalistic community that
continues to flower while its ideas wither on the vine.
Voice Your Opinion!
Write to Brent Bozell
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe