News Columns
 
  Notre Dame Pacifier?
  Weak Knees at the White House
  Bias In Specter-Scope
  Archive
  Hollywood Buys "Antichrist"
  Country Music: Too Much Freedom-Loving?
  The Obscenity Blackout
  Archive
  Home
  CyberAlert
  Media Reality Check
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  30-Day Archive
  Dishonors Awards
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  NewsBusters Blog
 

Support the MRC


This column was reprinted by permission of L. Brent Bozell and Creators Syndicate. To reprint this or any of his twice weekly syndicated columns, please contact Creators Syndicate at (310) 337-7003 ext. 110


 

 

 

 

 L. Brent Bozell

 

Remembering Ted Koppel

by L. Brent Bozell III
November 30, 2005
Tell a friend about this site

It's easy to get sentimental when long-standing TV personalities bow out of the shows that made them a household name, whether it's an entertainer like Johnny Carson or a news man like Ted Koppel, who just pulled the curtain on a 26-year career as host of ABC's "Nightline." His timing seemed perfect: after the retirement of Tom Brokaw, the self-immolation of Dan Rather, and the cancer death of Peter Jennings, the loss of Koppel's nightly presence drew on fond memories of the so-called glory days of TV news. An era is finished.

Koppel is especially beloved in journalism circles as a symbol and a spokesman for substance in TV news. Saying goodbye on "Good Morning America," Koppel declared, "I think the mission statement would be that our responsibility is to tell people what's important, not to stick our finger up in the air and test the winds to see what the public thinks is, is important."

That's a hugely important point. Today's news has become infotainment, with the focus on Nielsen-ratings bait like missing girls in Aruba. Not one network is immune from the pull: business is business. Koppel's "Nightline" resisted that tug (yes, there was the occasional exception) with the mission to go beyond the headlines and into real substance, something sorely lacking in the McNews era.

A lack of hard news - with substance - has been a constant complaint about the press. In the Clinton years, we conservatives fussed that the Clinton scandals were constantly buried under an O.J. Simpson trial, the death of Princess Diana, or the JonBenet Ramsey murder mystery. Liberals today might feel similarly: what is more important than a serious analysis of Bush's war on terror? Answer: Aruba. Is it any wonder, when you try to talk politics today with young people, you just wish they knew who the president was?

So by all means, it's right to praise Koppel for being pro-substance. But once the superiority of substance over fluff is established, let's not assume that all substantive journalism on public issues equals fair and balanced. The wave of nostalgic tributes to Koppel and his farewell interviews never touched on his biases, or his worst journalistic mistakes.

For example: several "October Surprise" shows charging that Ronald Reagan's 1980 campaign deliberately delayed the release of American hostages in Iran for political gain, a story which crumbled under scrutiny. Or Koppel using anonymous sources during the 1996 primaries to charge candidate Pat Buchanan's brothers beat up Jewish kids in their neighborhood, and that Buchanan's father listened to anti-Semitic Father Coughlin radio broadcasts. He had to retract that. Or sending a crew to Vietnam to interview communist leaders to denounce the Swift Boat vets for opposing the candidacy of John Kerry. You can even argue Koppel had low moments of fluff, like the five shows devoted to Tonya Harding's knee-whacking job on fellow Olympic figure skater Nancy Kerrigan in 1994.

But this was his goodbye party, so the negatives were overlooked. Instead, CNN's "Reliable Sources" had an all-"mainstream media" panel to offer heartfelt hosannas to Koppel, with former ABC colleague Jeff Greenfield (Koppel was "not a showboat," with "a wonderful BS detector"), Philadelphia Inquirer TV writer Gail Shister ("the beauty of Koppel was that less was more") and former Boston Globe TV writer Mark Jurkowitz (Koppel and Jennings were "both smart...both urbane and cool....both very knowledgeable about the world"). The only negative issue with Koppel was how his ratings declined, in part because of his spotty record of attendance in the last few years.

Some went too far. Koppel gave two long interviews to public broadcasters before he retired from ABC. He appeared on "Charlie Rose" on PBS, where the two late-night interviewers schmoozed over their interviewing styles, and how much they love peacemaking and hate racism. Rose could only vaguely ask Koppel if he had any regrets or low moments of "Nightline," touching briefly on how they had supposedly failed to question the Iraq war aggressively enough before it began. He then led Koppel through what he would have done if he were President Koppel. Yikes.

On NPR's "Fresh Air," interviewer Terry Gross fawned all over Koppel (her attack interview with Fox's Bill O'Reilly stands in jarring contrast once again). She discussed how tough he was on embarrassing figures, almost straw men, both recent (FEMA director Michael Brown), and ancient (disgraced Arizona governor Evan Mecham). Gross played a triumphant clip of Koppel shaming Brown for being out of the loop. Gross couldn't find a tougher interview, a more difficult controversy, for Koppel to discuss. Only his slam dunks were the subject.

Oh well. Let's overlook those, and overlook the demerits. All in all, Ted Koppel did a fine job, and "Nightline" was a real contribution. Godspeed with his retirement.

 

Voice Your Opinion!
 Write to Brent Bozell

 

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314