The Wild Swings in Hubbell's Relevance
Networks That Hyped Starr Loss Downplayed Starr Win
Here’s
a crystal-clear presentation of TV news bias against Ken Starr. On July
1, 1998, federal Judge James Robertson threw out an indictment against
disgraced Clinton pal Webster Hubbell for failing to pay taxes on
suspected hush money, harshly criticizing Starr’s tactics and claiming
he exceeded his mandate.
The anti-Starr decision led
ABC’s World News Tonight, CBS Evening News and CNN’s
The World Today. FNC’s Fox Report and NBC Nightly News
gave it a brief mention. ABC’s Jackie Judd relayed the White House claim
that "this further weakens Starr’s image as a man of justice." Dan
Rather proclaimed: "The judge sharply criticized the tactics Starr used
against Hubbell" and CNN’s John King examined how the decision raised
"new questions about the independent counsel and his hardball tactics."
The next morning, it was the lead story on CBS’s This Morning,
the second report on NBC’s Today and the third story on ABC’s
Good Morning America.
But on January 26, 1999, a
federal appeals court overturned Robertson’s decision and reinstated the
indictment, deciding it was within Starr’s jurisdiction. The Starr
victory was ignored by ABC’s World News Tonight and NBC
Nightly News. CBS Evening News gave it these 12 seconds from
Dan Rather: "A federal appeals court in Washington today reinstated tax
evasion charges against Clinton friend Webster Hubbell. Hubbell insists
special prosecutor Ken Starr is just trying to squeeze him for
information damaging to the Clintons." CBS failed to correct the record
on how Starr did not abuse his power. CNN’s The World Today
devoted just 70 words to the reversal. And on the morning shows? Not a
syllable on January 27.
FNC’s Special Report with
Brit Hume on January 26 aired a full story by David Shuster, the
only show to take the appeals court ruling seriously. After explaining
the background of the case and how the appeals court decided that to
avoid Hubbell’s claims of self-incrimination, Starr must show he had
independent knowledge of what Hubbell’s tax records would show before
Hubbell turned them over, Shuster reported: "But the rest of the ruling
validated Starr’s contention that the charges are related to possible
obstruction of the Whitewater investigation and, therefore, within his
jurisdiction."
For a visual illustration of
the lack of media interest, FNC’s story showed all two members of the
media outside of Hubbell’s home as he and his wife stood before two
microphones.
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
|