Home Page
  30-Day Archive
  CyberAlerts
  Notable Quotables
  Media Reality Check
  Press Releases
Media Bias Videos
  News
  Entertainment
  News
  Free Market Project
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
  Home
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
Contact the MRC
MRC Bookstore
Job Openings
Internships

Support the MRC


www.TimesWatch.org

top


From the February 1999 MediaWatch

The Wild Swings in Hubbell's Relevance

Networks That Hyped Starr Loss Downplayed Starr Win

Hereís a crystal-clear presentation of TV news bias against Ken Starr. On July 1, 1998, federal Judge James Robertson threw out an indictment against disgraced Clinton pal Webster Hubbell for failing to pay taxes on suspected hush money, harshly criticizing Starrís tactics and claiming he exceeded his mandate.

The anti-Starr decision led ABCís World News Tonight, CBS Evening News and CNNís The World Today. FNCís Fox Report and NBC Nightly News gave it a brief mention. ABCís Jackie Judd relayed the White House claim that "this further weakens Starrís image as a man of justice." Dan Rather proclaimed: "The judge sharply criticized the tactics Starr used against Hubbell" and CNNís John King examined how the decision raised "new questions about the independent counsel and his hardball tactics." The next morning, it was the lead story on CBSís This Morning, the second report on NBCís Today and the third story on ABCís Good Morning America.

But on January 26, 1999, a federal appeals court overturned Robertsonís decision and reinstated the indictment, deciding it was within Starrís jurisdiction. The Starr victory was ignored by ABCís World News Tonight and NBC Nightly News. CBS Evening News gave it these 12 seconds from Dan Rather: "A federal appeals court in Washington today reinstated tax evasion charges against Clinton friend Webster Hubbell. Hubbell insists special prosecutor Ken Starr is just trying to squeeze him for information damaging to the Clintons." CBS failed to correct the record on how Starr did not abuse his power. CNNís The World Today devoted just 70 words to the reversal. And on the morning shows? Not a syllable on January 27.

FNCís Special Report with Brit Hume on January 26 aired a full story by David Shuster, the only show to take the appeals court ruling seriously. After explaining the background of the case and how the appeals court decided that to avoid Hubbellís claims of self-incrimination, Starr must show he had independent knowledge of what Hubbellís tax records would show before Hubbell turned them over, Shuster reported: "But the rest of the ruling validated Starrís contention that the charges are related to possible obstruction of the Whitewater investigation and, therefore, within his jurisdiction."

For a visual illustration of the lack of media interest, FNCís story showed all two members of the media outside of Hubbellís home as he and his wife stood before two microphones.

 

 

 

 

Tell a friend about this site

 

 

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314