Home Page
  30-Day Archive
  CyberAlerts
  Notable Quotables
  Media Reality Check
  Press Releases
Media Bias Videos
  News
  Entertainment
  News
  Free Market Project
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
  Home
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
Contact the MRC
MRC Bookstore
Job Openings
Internships

Support the MRC


www.TimesWatch.org

top


From the April 1999 MediaWatch

They Would Indict Clinton?

Top Juror's Starr Defense Ignored

A silent but important figure in Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s Lewinsky investigation briefly broke her silence last month. Grand jury forewoman Freda Alexander revealed that she would have voted to indict President Clinton for perjury, if given the chance, and characterized attacks on Ken Starr as "grossly unfair." But the networks showed little interest in her revelations.

In an exclusive televised interview with the Washington, D.C. CBS affiliate, WUSA, aired on March 25 and March 26, Alexander told reporter Mark Lodato that Starr "was well within his right to investigate the President.... ‘His approval rating is the lowest of anyone. I don’t think Linda Tripp’s rating is as low as Ken Starr’s is and I think it’s grossly unfair because he didn’t have a job description.’" The Washington Post ran a front page story on Alexander and her comments on March 26. Reporter Susan Glasser detailed how even though Alexander admitted she "absolutely love[s] Clinton," she put her feelings aside and applied the law: "She was convinced he lied to the grand jury in his August 17 appearance. ‘I took offense to it.’...But Alexander...also reflected the ambivalence many Americans felt about Clinton’s behavior. ‘I believe he lied,’ she said. ‘But I also believe he had no other choice."

Only ABC’s Good Morning America and NBC’s Today included Alexander’s comments in their March 26 broadcasts, albeit very briefly during their 7am news updates. Both mentioned that she would have voted to indict Clinton and that she thinks his activities should never have become public. Neither mentioned her defense of Starr. That same evening, it was the networks’ turn to go silent, even on CBS, not bothering to show some of its own affiliate’s interview footage.

The day after the Post story ran, AP reported Alexander had her lawyers tell media outlets she would no longer talk to reporters. Just as well, since the networks did not show any interest anyway.

 

 

 

 

Tell a friend about this site

 

 

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314