05/18: Republican Party = A Bunch of Extremely Conservative Extremists
  05/04: Saluting Obama’s “Stupendous” 100 Days
  04/20: Reporter Derides Anti-Tax Tea Parties: “Not Family Viewing”

  Media Reality Check
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  30-Day Archive
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  Culture and Media Institute

Support the MRC

Free Adobe Acrobat Reader software required to view PDF files.





A bi-weekly compilation of the latest outrageous, sometimes humorous, 
quotes in the liberal media.

October 28, 1991

Tell a friend about this site

(Vol. Four; No. 22)

Special Sore Losers Edition


Editor's Note: Supporters of Clarence Thomas considered the leaking of last-minute charges by Thomas opponents the sleaziest kind of gutter politics, and the logical outcome of a 100-day search for any "dirt" that would deny him the nomination. After the public watched the hearings and believed Thomas, Democrats supported Hill and accused the Republicans of dirty politics. Which view did the media advocate? Read on:

Anita's Allies

"Given the detail and consistency of her testimony, it was almost inconceivable that Hill, rather than describing her own experiences, was fabricating the portrait of a sexual-harassment victim....Thomas' two sessions of angry rebuttal were compelling. But even so riveting an appearance could not mitigate the impact of Hill's own eight hours of virtually uninterrupted testimony....her tale struck a resonant chord with countless women across America."
-- Time Associate Editor Jill Smolowe, October 21 issue.

"And then there was Anita Hill, the poised daughter of so many generations of black women who have been burned carrying torches into the battle for principle. The cause of civil rights and social justice has so often fallen to them to defend. Harriet Tubman and Sojourner Truth were slaves by birth, freedom fighters by temperament. Rosa Parks was a tired seamstress who shoved history forward by refusing to give up her seat on the bus....The latest to claim her place in line is Anita Hill, a private, professional woman unwilling to relinquish her dignity without a fight."
-- Time Associate Editor Nancy Gibbs, October 21 issue.

"Thus did Rita Braver look ridiculous on CBS when she told Rather, earlier, that there'd been nothing said by Hill that was likely to have changed the mind of any Senator who'd been watching. Hey -- what about the Coke can? And what about the fact that Hill maintained such dignity and stamina in such sordid and sleazy surroundings? It had to occur to some viewers as they watched the way she handled herself that she would have made a much better Supreme Court nominee than Thomas does."
-- Washington Post television critic Tom Shales, October 12.

"At the end of the hearing, her version may have been more plausible, and she seemed to have less to gain from lying than Thomas."
-- Washington Post reporters Marjorie Williams and Joel Achenbach, October 15.

"Well, it seems that women have lost yet again....Here we have an example of, everyone in America got to see what happens when one woman stands up to a man in an all-male tribunal. She was humiliated."
-- Wall Street Journal reporter Susan Faludi on Today, October 16.


How Many?

"No Evidence of Thomas Harassment, 9 Women Say"
-- Washington Post headline, October 11

"Seventeen women who have worked with Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas appeared at a Capitol Hill news conference yesterday in a show of support for their former colleague, with nine of them taking the microphone to say they had never seen, nor heard rumors of, any improper behavior on his part."
-- First paragraph of the Post story.


Clubbing Clarence

"There was plenty of reason to vote against him without this. It seems to me that if he were an experienced jurist, if he'd ever written an opinion that was notable, that we wouldn't be so obsessed with what is a marginal issue. But senators who want to vote against him have plenty of reasons. They don't have to hang it on sexual harassment....

"Using racism when civil rights organizations oppose him, when his accuser is black, and when he himself has walked away from the civil rights movement and affirmative action is really intellectual dishonesty....[Anita Hill] has done nothing to suggest she has a credibility problem, whereas Clarence Thomas has done a lot to suggest that he can lie pretty easily."
-- Newsweek's Eleanor Clift, October 12 McLaughlin Group.

"I've despised how some nonthinking African-Americans -- who once loudly disagreed with every personal and legal decision Clarence Thomas ever made -- decided that his merely leveling the charge of racism made him a man worth supporting....What else do I hate? The warp speed with which bootstrapper extraordinaire Clarence Thomas adopts the pose of black victim whenever it suits him. If anyone had told me that a black man defended by President Bush, Sens. Strom Thurmond and Orrin Hatch, his loyal white wife and statesmanlike white sponsor would cry `Racism!' after an accusation by a black woman, I'd have busted a gut....There was so much more to hate. The flowing pro-Thomas speeches by committee Republicans that Chairman Joe Biden seldom stanched."
-- Washington Post reporter Donna Britt in a "Style" section essay, October 15.

"Judge Thomas has consistently played the race card, in the tradition of his patron, George Bush, whose Willie Horton commercial in 1988 touched a low point in political campaigns....Clarence Thomas has always benefitted from his race and victimization. It's just that he has made his case slyly, in subtext, most recently with his sharecropper grandfather in the starring role....Who lynched whom? Judge Thomas's appeal to that brutal imagery was at once his shrewdest and most deplorable tactic."
-- New York Times editorial writer Brent Staples, October 17.


Conventional Wisdom or Liberal Perceptions?

"C. Thomas He's Lying! (Isn't he?) Effective denials, but stop crying racism."

"A. Hill She's a brave truth teller. (Isn't she?) Her details, lack of motive tip the balance."
-- Newsweek, October 21

"Whom do you believe is telling the truth?

[Pie chart showing] Thomas 47%

Hill 24%

Both 5%

Neither 5%

Don't Know 19%"

-- USA Today poll, October 14


Dirty White House Politics

"Just as they did in the 1988 campaign, the Republicans battered the other side by going ugly early with nasty, personal attacks, by successfully linking the Democrats with liberal advocacy groups and by using volatile images of race."
-- New York Times reporter Maureen Dowd in a page 1 news story, October 15.

"I think that he [Thomas] had the advantage of prime time on Friday night. He had everything going for him. The Democrats did not ask him tough questions about the facts of her charge and they did, the Republicans did a great job of hammering her. It's basically what happened in the '88 campaign. The Republicans know how to fight dirty."
-- NBC congressional reporter Andrea Mitchell, October 15 Today.

"The White House went into those hearings with a clear strategy: they were going to get Clarence Thomas confirmed. And the Democrats came in, having been under a lot of heavy criticism for trying to cover up this whole story or whitewash it, and they said `we're going to be the seekers of the truth.' And so, Clarence Thomas has lawyers sitting on that committee who were working for him, and Anita Hill didn't have any, and in the end, the strategy worked for the Republicans."
-- U.S. News & World Report Assistant Managing Editor Gloria Borger, October 18 Washington Week in Review.

"Isn't this the irony, that the White House that came in with Willie Horton, that has been against affirmative action and quotas, has now been able to trump with race and is even looking to the next elections as a way to perhaps induce or lure more black votes?"
-- Time reporter Julie Johnson, same show.


Arlen Specter: Source of All Evil

"The lowest point on the first day of the hearing came when Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter implied that Hill had simply fantasized Thomas' asking for dates and his lurid remarks about pornography. It is all but inconceivable that a similarly qualified man, black or white, would be accused not merely of lying but of imagining things."
-- Time Senior Editor Jack E. White, October 21.

"Arlen Specter took on this role as the Great Inquisitor. Some people [feminists] think he pilloried Anita Hill, that with his sort of low-blow hit on perjury, they're saying to a friend in Pennsylvania, who's been pro-choice, been on their side: 'How could you do this to me?'"
-- Time reporter Julie Johnson, October 18 Washington Week in Review.

"Arlen Specter accused her of perjury. If you read the record, Arlen Specter was the one who distorted what she said. Orrin Hatch even suggested that she got one of her charges by reading The Exorcist, I mean that she was besieged by demons. Orrin should really stick to talking dirty. He does that better. Alan Simpson, for those of us who were too young to know what Joe McCarthy was really like, Alan Simpson showed us. `I have in my pocket two dozen card-carrying smearers against this awful woman,' and then he produced those smears, those bombshells, and they were duds."
-- Wall Street Journal Washington Bureau Chief Al Hunt on CNN's Capital Gang, October 19.


Alan Simpson: Source of All Evil

"The days of Simpson Chic are over. Now he is more often compared to Red-baiter Joe McCarthy. The image of Simpson flinging open his jacket and declaring he had lots of `stuff' against Anita Hill -- while revealing nothing -- was the lowest of many low points in the Clarence Thomas hearings. Any Senator with a sense of history should have said, as attorney Joseph Welch eventually did to McCarthy, `Senator, have you no shame?'....[Simpson] is writing a book about the media -- a little like Stalin discussing intergovernmental relations."
-- Newsweek Washington reporter Eleanor Clift, October 28 news story.

"Senator Alan Simpson, who usually manages to hide his meanness behind an Andy Rooney facade, warned Hill that she would be `injured and destroyed and belittled and hounded and harassed -- real harassment, different from the sexual kind, just plain old Washington-variety harassment.'"
-- Time Deputy Washington Bureau Chief Margaret Carlson, October 21.

"I've been in this town for 21 years, and they play a vicious brand of politics in Washington. Washington can be a mean town. This was as vicious a fight as I've ever seen except it was totally one-sided....When you had Alan Simpson standing up there like Joe McCarthy, reaching in his pockets and saying `I'm getting stuff through faxes, and all over the country,' he sounded just like Joe McCarthy, let's face it. And you had Arlen Specter, who was a prosecutor at one time, saying that she committed perjury, when probably you couldn't find another prosecutor in the country that would tell you that she had committed perjury."
-- Los Angeles Times Washington Bureau Chief Jack Nelson on Washington Week in Review, October 18.

"You had Senators accusing people of perjury; Senator Simpson, `I have faxes, I have letters' -- the closest thing to McCarthy that we've seen. It was not a kinder, gentler Republican panel....George Bush called this a smear before he even heard her. He clearly cannot win on this."
-- NBC News Washington Bureau Chief (and former counselor to Mario Cuomo) Tim Russert on Today, October 14.


Hatch and Other Republicans: Source of All Evil

"Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), whose painstaking smear of Hill had been one of the uglier aspects of an inordinately ugly ordeal, rose yesterday to repeat gratuitously many of the innuendoes against Hill on the Senate floor."
-- Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales, October 16.

"Lee Atwater must be smiling somewhere. His fellow Republicans haven't forgotten how to go for the jugular, as demonstrated during their `investigation' into Anita Hill's charge that she was sexually harassed by Clarence Thomas. The Republicans showed just how dirty and effective their throw-all-the-mud-you-can act can be. (William Kennedy Smith's defense team might want to think about hiring Orrin Hatch of Utah for Smith's upcoming rape trial.)"
-- Boston Globe business reporter Joan Vennochi, October 16.


It's Bush's Fault

"The spectacle, however, really began with Mr. Bush's choice of Judge Thomas who, for all his virtues, was no more qualified for the Court than Dan Quayle was to be Vice President....

"But it was Mr. Bush who carried politics too far. By trying o pack the Court with conservatives and by seeking to predetermine rulings on the most important issues before the nation, he robbed would be justices of their protective dignity and the Court of if its judicial impartiality and majesty. He took the Court into the political pit and, predictably, ignited an ugly political brawl. For justice now, he must be made to choose another Justice."
-- New York Times columnist and former national security affairs reporter Leslie Gelb, October 13.

"I think it's mind-boggling and appalling that the Republicans and the Administration would regard this debacle as partisan political triumph and I suspect that they too will pay a price for their smugness....George Bush could have done something to improve the nomination process himself by coming up with a more credible and impressive nomination to begin with."
-- Time Editor-at-Large Strobe Talbott on Inside Washington, October 19.


The Court's Future

"Whatever happens to the nomination of Clarence Thomas, this Supreme Court is going to stay extremely conservative. If Mr. Bush were to follow Eisenhower's example, he could nominate a Democrat, even a liberal Democrat and that one vote wouldn't affect the rulings of the Court. No political damage, the President wouldn't have to change his political stripes. But millions of Americans would know that they had a friend on the highest court. The country's confidence in its institutions would increase. Ike showed the way. George Bush could do it."
-- NBC Nightly News commentator John Chancellor, October 10.

"This case has enormous implications for the almost 500 other once-segregated school systems still under court supervision. Given the Court's increasingly conservative makeup, it also could end the era in which the Court has led the fight against racial injustice in this country."
-- NBC reporter Lisa Myers, October 7 Nightly News.

"Under Rehnquist, the Supreme Court no longer sees itself as the defender of civil rights and civil liberties, the champion of the individual. Gone is the Court majority that breathed new life into the Bill of Rights, dismantled Southern segregation, disciplined police who violated the rights of citizens, removed religion from the public schools, pushed a President into resignation, and swept aside the laws forbidding women to end their pregnancies."
-- Los Angeles Times Supreme Court reporter David Savage in the Los Angeles Times Magazine, September 29.


Hammer Hands Hatch & Homicide Help

"Looking at this hearing as it got under way this morning, one had the impression that in terms, strictly in the narrow sense between Senators, that Orrin Hatch sort of played the part of Mike Tyson. Before Senator Biden could sort of get off his stool, Hatch was at him, all over him, and decked him."
-- Dan Rather after the Hatch-Biden argument following Thomas' opening statement, October 11.

"Either Clarence Thomas is lying or Anita Hill is lying. Now, if the FBI can't determine who's lying between the two, let's have some homicide detective out from Phoenix or New York City to spend a few days on this."
-- Dan Rather to Senator DeConcini during a Saturday morning hearing break, October 12.


Supreme Court Sports

"Saints over Eagles: So you want the real deal on what happened with Clarence and Anita Hill? Here it is: She extended her hand to introduce herself to him, and he thought she said, `I need a thrill.' Clarence, being the gentleman that he is, sheepishly tried to accommodate her with a graphic rap about animal porn. Next thing you know, it's 10 years later and everyone's doggin' the dude. All over a simple misunderstanding."
-- From Hondo's football picks in The New York Post, October 11.


-- L. Brent Bozell III; Publisher
-- Brent H. Baker, Tim Graham; Editors
-- Nicholas Damask, Sally Hood, Marian Kelley, Tim Lamer; Media Analysts
-- Jennifer Hardebeck; Circulation Manager


Tell a friend about this site


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314