top


CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996
| Tuesday April 11, 2000 (Vol. Five; No. 63) |
Back to Today's CyberAlert | Free Subscription

 

Cuban-Americans Bashed; CNN Chief Clinton’s Overnight Guest; "Stupid" ABC

1) A liberal denounced the Miami Cubans in a CBS Evening News story before a Castro henchman asserted that the Cuban-Americans used "a little boy just to satisfy their mean and narrow political interests." But those impugned got no time to respond.

2) Monday night NBC’s Jim Avila finally let a dissident note that not all is wonderful in Cuba. Avila still insisted "Cuba is proud of its 98 percent literacy rate and free health care," but he admitted "there are few computers and virtually no Internet."

3) Regulation night on the CBS Evening News. "There are renewed calls for Congress to step in and rein in" the "out of control" airlines. CBS also highlighted how a Senator claimed the "funeral industry is poorly regulated," so "closer scrutiny may be needed."

4) Most unusual take of the night. CBS’s David Martin noted how the Osprey "was revived" during the Clinton years. "Now the aircraft the Pentagon could not kill has ended up killing 19."

5) ABC trumpeted how Mikhail Gorbachev is moving "from his red past to work for a greener future" as he cleans up the "legacy" of the Cold War he worked to end.

6) CNN President Rick Kaplan and his daughter were Clinton’s overnight guests in the White House, but Kaplan maintained: "I do not feel embarrassed, ashamed or compromised in any way."

7) "No one is that stupid," ABC News President David Westin insisted in denying they had Leonardo DiCaprio interview Clinton. Now he’s admitted they did. The NY Times revealed DiCaprio and Chris Cuomo "introduce the segments, basically as co-hosts."

8) Paul Bedard of U.S. News pointed out how "the $52 million spent on independent prosecutor Kenneth Starr's" probes "probably paid for itself" via taxes from books. And the media made money too.


     Corrections: The April 10 CyberAlert dropped Eleanor’s last name, as in "Newsweek’s Eleanor of the McLaughlin Group." That should have read "Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift on the McLaughlin Group." (She asserted that "to be a poor child in Cuba may in many instances be better than being a poor child in Miami.") The same issue quoted NBC’s Jim Avila on how Elian’s mother worked "in Cuba’s specially built foreign tourist haven, Baradaro." A reader kindly pointed out the correct spelling: "Varadero." The April 7 CyberAlert quoted CBS reporter Jeffrey Kofman, from in front of Elian’s Miami home, relaying: "When Juan Miguel started speaking this morning on television they watched with rapped attention..." That should have read "rapt" attention.

1

Fidel Castro may indeed have won the battle for Elian and public opinion, but CBS’s Randall Pinkston decided to use a story making that point to allow a U.S. liberal and a Cuban communist to denounce, without rebuttal, Cuban-Americans who fought to keep Elian in Florida. "The Miami Cubans...handled themselves in such a questionable manner," viewers heard in one soundbite while in another a communist asserted that the U.S. citizens used "a little boy just to satisfy their mean and narrow political interests."

    CBS Evening News anchor John Roberts introduced the April 10 story by saying the Elian fight has given Castro a "rare victory." From Havana, Pinkston opened his piece by relating how no parades or celebrations are planned for when Elian arrives. Pinkston declared: "In the battle for public opinion Castro has already won."
    Viewers then heard from liberal advocate Wayne Smith, identified on-screen as with the Center for International Policy: "I think Castro’s score is quite high. He was able to use the Elian case to rally public opinion in Cuba."
    Pinkston identified Smith, but failed to note his political perspective: "Wayne Smith, former chief of the U.S. interest section in Havana, thinks Castro’s opponents are their own worst enemies."
    Smith: "I think the big loser, quite clearly, were indeed the Miami Cubans who handled themselves in such a questionable manner."
    Pinkston piled on, introducing a Cuban official: "And the Cuban government has seized this opportunity to take aim at what has become an easy target."
    Ricardo Alarcon, President, Cuban National Assembly: "Now you see them in action, using a little boy just to satisfy their mean and narrow political interests."

    CBS didn’t let any of those impugned to respond, but Pinkston at least allowed: "Not that Castro hasn’t used his own people for Cuba’s political interests. This demonstration space [standing in front of rows of seats in an outdoor plaza] was constructed after Elian’s rescue with seating for thousands of government-sponsored protesters. But Castro, known for his political savvy, realizes scenes like this airport sendoff must stop. [video of Castro with Juan Miguel] He must take the high road when Elian comes home."
    Alarcon: "The most important thing for him is to return to a normal life. That implies privacy to mourn, to cry for his mother."
    Pinkston to Alarcon: "No big parades?"
    Alarcon: "No big parade or small parade."
    Pinkston concluded: "While this appears to be a victory for Castro it was an easy one. For the first time in 40 years he had support from the most unlikely source: the U.S. government."

    A proud moment for all Americans. With reporting like this in which the anti-communists are "mean" and the communist thug is "savvy," it’s no wonder Castro won the PR fight. He not only has the U.S. government on his side; he has the U.S. media too.

2

After a week of touting the privileged "good life" awaiting Elian in Cuba, Monday night NBC’s Jim Avila finally allowed a dissident to note that not all is perfect in paradise. Avila, however, couldn’t stop promoting the Cuban PR line about how "Cuba is proud of its 98 percent literacy rate and free health care," though he conceded "there are few computers and virtually no Internet."

    (And, inspired by interest in Avila’s reporting, such as how Rush Limbaugh on Monday read several Avila quotes cited in Jeff Jacoby’s column, the MRC has posted a video clip of Avila’s infamous April 4 story. Details at end of this item.)

    Monday’s NBC Nightly News opened with Avila’s "exclusive" report from Havana on how an "American source" in meetings with the father told Avila the father has offered to go to Miami to pick up Elian. He would not go to the house, Avila related, but be reunited at an airport and then take Elian back to Bethesda, Maryland. Avila cautioned: "But here’s the catch: If the State Department refuses the visas he’s requested for a support group of Elian’s friends, teachers and psychiatrists, Gonzalez says he will return to Cuba immediately with his son."

    NBC then jumped to Avila’s taped report in which he reported that a low key welcome home is planned in Cuba without parades. He added that Elian’s school mates have been told to treat him as a classmate, "not a national hero."

    Avila forecast Elian’s life ahead: "But when the excitement ends, what then for Elian? Cuban dissident Miriam Leba (sp?) thinks Elian should return home, but warns that he will be subject to a government convinced communism is the only answer."
    Leba: "Since you almost start walking until you finish school you are told what to say and how to think."
    Avila: "And while Cuba is proud of its 98 percent literacy rate and free health care, there are few computers and virtually no Internet."
    Leba: "And there’s a great lack of medicine, lack of books and also the facilities are in very bad shape."

    Back on live, Avila concluded by stressing: "Tonight the Cuban government vehemently denies" Gonzalez is willing to go to Miami as the Cuban regime wants a reunion outside of Florida.

    +++ Watch Avila’s reporting from Cuba. As noted above, on Monday MRC Webmaster Andy Szul went back and posted a video clip of a portion of Avila’s April 4 NBC Nightly News story. This is the piece about the "Cuban good life" quoted extensively by Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby on Monday and highlighted by Rush Limbaugh on his radio show the same day. In it, Avila claimed:
    "Elian’s future here likely to be the Cuban good life, lived by Communist Party elite with perks like five free gallons of gasoline a month for the family, a Cuban tradition called ‘La Jaba,’ the bag, which includes extra rice, beans, cooking oil and sundries like deodorant, shampoo, razors and shaving cream, about $15 a month worth of basics. Plus, invitations reserved for the party elite to cultural events, sports, discos and restaurants, access to the best medicine, expensive drugs like heart cures not available to everyone in Cuba."

    To watch a piece of Avila’s story via RealPlayer, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20000405.asp#2
    Or go to: 
http://www.mediaresearch.org/videobias/vidbiaswelcome.asp and scroll down to the "4/5/00" video.

    Finally on this item, an update on the pronunciation of Avila. The second syllable is "ih" and the third "la," but as a reader pointed out and I confirmed by listening again to Avila, he does not pronounce his first syllable like the beginning the word avenue but like the first syllable in Ave, Maria. So it’s Ahv-ih-la. Let’s say it altogether now: Ahv-ih-la.

3

Regulation night on the CBS Evening News. Bob Orr concluded an April 10 story on public dissatisfaction with the airlines by highlighting how "there are renewed calls for Congress to step in and rein in" an "out of control" an industry. Minutes later CBS allocated a full story to a Senate hearing on how "investigating Senator Charles Grassley says the $12 billion funeral industry is poorly regulated, and the horror stories he heard today suggest why closer scrutiny may be needed."

    -- "Passengers don’t need a survey to know that air travel can lead to horror stories," Bob Orr asserted in relaying the results of a poll of airline passengers which found complaints up 130 percent in 1999. Orr concluded:
    "The airlines have promised to do better. Some have added more leg room, and all have vowed to be friendlier. But with delays already ahead of last year’s record pace, there are renewed calls for Congress to step in and rein in an industry some see as out of control."

    -- Bob Schieffer began his story on anecdotes about funeral experiences, as transcribed by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth, by announcing:
    "It is the experience none of us wants but most eventually face, burying a loved one, an experience sometimes made worse, Senators were told today, by unscrupulous funeral operators who prey on grieving relatives. Although funerals cost more than ever -- average price is more than $7,500 -- investigating Senator Charles Grassley says the $12 billion funeral industry is poorly regulated, and the horror stories he heard today suggest why closer scrutiny may be needed. This one time funeral operator testified by satellite from prison how high pressure salesmen sometimes sell prepaid funerals by making old people feel guilty."

    After another witness testified about a woman who paid an operator $132,000, Schieffer continued: "And the high priced coffins and other gear don’t always work. This woman broke down telling how her grandmother’s remains spilled out of a faulty coffin into a mausoleum."

    Following the three anecdotes, Schieffer allowed a moment for the other side: "An industry spokesman called the incidents isolated and reacted sharply."
    Robert Harden, National Funeral Directors Association: "We would have hoped that these hearings today would have been a little less biased than they were. I think it’s very unfair the funeral service is being painted with this broad brush which is just not true."
    Schieffer concluded: "Whatever the case, Senator Grassley urges people to shop around, ask plenty of questions, and be very careful what you sign."

    Speaking of Republicans advocating more regulation and/or spending, on Monday’s NBC Nightly News Lisa Myers checked in with a piece on how seniors protested in Sacramento over having to pay for their own prescriptions. After highlighting a couple who are paying $6,000 a year and "are outraged and frightened," she recounted a new HHS study showing those without insurance pay 15 percent more for drugs because they don’t benefit from the discounts arranged by insurers.

    So, conservatives in Congress naturally oppose creating another entitlement? Wrong, as Myers soon showed: "Drug costs have become such a huge political issue that politicians, as shown in this TV ad, sponsor bus rides to Canada where some drugs cost half as much."
    Montana Democratic political ad: "Across America people are beginning to listen to one Montanan’s crusade to lower prescription drug prices."
    Myers: "Finally, after months of rhetoric and prodding by the President, Congress is beginning to move toward giving seniors some relief. House Republicans unveiled their plan this week."
    Rep. Bill Thomas, R-California, boasted of wanting to spend more than Clinton: "We’ve placed more dollar amounts on the table than the President has. This Republican Congress said $40 billion over the next five years would be devoted to this product."

    What exactly is the difference between a House Democrat and a House Republican?

4

Most unusual take of the evening, CBS’s David Martin concluding his April 10 CBS Evening News story on the crash Sunday in Arizona of an Osprey, a combination plane and helicopter:
    "During the Bush administration, the Pentagon tried to kill the Osprey program, but it was revived by the Clinton administration. Now the aircraft the Pentagon could not kill has ended up killing 19 marines."

5

Mikhail Gorbachev, "environmentalist activist." Sunday night ABC trumpeted Gorbachev’s efforts to save the planet: "As leader of the Soviet Union, Gorbachev worked with Presidents Reagan and Bush to end the Cold War. Now he's working on cleaning up its legacy."

    World News Tonight anchor Carole Simpson set up the April 9 piece, as transcribed by MRC analyst Jessica Anderson:
    "Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev has traded in his hammer and sickle for a green cross. At a summit this weekend in Minneapolis, Gorbachev confronts his past as a cold warrior in his new role as an environmental activist. ABC's John Yang reports."

    Yang began: "Mikhail Gorbachev used to travel the globe meeting world leaders, discussing affairs of state. Back then he was warning about the threat of nuclear warfare. What a difference a decade makes. Now he's sounding different alarm. 'I feel that the environment is the number one global problem on the agenda of the 21st century,' he says.
    "Gorbachev became the first President of Green Cross International in 1993, nearly two years after stepping down as Soviet President. As a politician, he had shown some interest in environmental matters, but not much."
    Nicholas Robinson, Pace University Law School: "It wasn't something that was at the heart of values that motivated him. He's a political reformer. He's not an environmental warrior."
    Yang: "That all changed in 1986 with Chernobyl. 'Definitely Chernobyl dramatized my understanding of environmental problems,' he says. 'There was Gorbachev before Chernobyl and Gorbachev after Chernobyl.' As leader of the Soviet Union, Gorbachev worked with Presidents Reagan and Bush to end the Cold War. Now he's working on cleaning up its legacy. 'The United States and the Soviet Union each spent trillions of dollars for the arms race,' he says. Now they need billions to destroy nuclear weapons and clean up the environmental aftermath."
    Yang concluded: "That is one of his new projects as he moves from his red past to work for a greener future."

    ABC’s story reminded me of a "The Week" section item which ran in the May 3, 1993 edition of Time magazine:
    "What do you do for an encore after ending the Cold War and reversing the arms race? That’s the latest assignment for Mikhail Gorbachev, having assumed the presidency of the International Green Cross, a new environmental organization..."

    Can’t beat that for a Gorbasm, a Rush Limbaugh term not heard recently.

6

CNN President Rick Kaplan, who stayed overnight in Clinton’s White House while at ABC News, spent another night there with his daughter last Thursday night after the Radio and Television Correspondents’ Association dinner, USA Today disclosed. But Kaplan doesn’t see anything wrong with it.

    In his "Inside TV" column for April 10, USA Today’s Peter Johnson revealed:

CNN president Rick Kaplan, who took some heat when he worked at ABC News for staying overnight at the White House during President Clinton's first term, spent another night there Thursday -- after Clinton roasted ABC News over "Leogate."

"No, I do not feel embarrassed, ashamed or compromised in any way, shape or form," Kaplan said Friday, after sleeping in the Queen's Room while daughter Alexis, 21, slept in the Lincoln Bedroom.

Generally speaking, it's an ethical no-no for journalists to get too cozy with people they cover. But Kaplan, a former Nightline, PrimeTime Live and World News Tonight producer, said Clinton's gesture won't affect CNN's coverage of him.

"Everyone has relationships," Kaplan said. "We met each other before either of us knew we'd amount to anything. He doesn't expect anything from me, and I don't expect anything from him." 

Kaplan, a Clinton friend for 30 years, said the president gave Alexis an "amazing" 2 ˝-hour White House tour. "It was extremely nice of him to do it. In the waning months of his presidency, I felt, 'What the heck?'"

    END Excerpt

    Let’s examine Bill Clinton’s priorities. He didn’t have enough time to give Leonardo DiCaprio a tour of White House energy saving efforts, but did have enough time to spend two-and-a-half hours with a 21-year-old woman. Shocking. The Radio and Television Correspondents’ Association dinner did not end until 10:30pm. Factoring in 15 minutes travel time back to home base, that puts Clinton with Alexis until at least 1:15am.

    For more on Kaplan’s efforts to help Bill Clinton and his political activism, check out these past CyberAlert items:

    -- For how he in February 1992, while at ABC News, advised Clinton on how to respond to the Gennifer Flowers story, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/1997/cyb19970806.asp#1

    -- For excerpts from a Vanity Fair profile which detailed how Kaplan killed negative stories at ABC about Clinton, hired Hillary, once worked for a Democratic candidate and thinks those who see liberal bias are "liars," go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/1998/cyb19980114.asp

    -- For how Kaplan once insisted of Clinton, "I know he wasn't Slick Willie, and not a scourge," go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/1998/cyb19980207.asp

    -- For how Kaplan complained that Ken Starr is "putting obsession ahead of the best interests of the nation" while Bill Clinton has had "extraordinary" achievements, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/1999/cyb19990614.asp#4

    Kaplan’s right. The White House stay didn’t "compromise" him. He was compromised long ago.

7

After a week of denial, on Friday ABC News President David Westin conceded his network did send actor Leonardo DiCaprio to the White House to conduct an "interview" with President Clinton for an ABC special tied to Earth Day. In an April 1 e-mail responding to a Washington Post story about the interview, Westin had insisted: "We did not send him [DiCaprio] to interview the President. No one is that stupid." Apparently they are that stupid at ABC News. In that e-mail Westin maintained that "all roles of journalists must be played by journalists (duh!)."

    In Monday’s USA Today Peter Johnson relayed Westin’s new version of events: "In hindsight, Westin said, he erred in what he said in an original e-mail on the subject to staffers last week. In it, Westin said ABC had planned to have DiCaprio and the President chat while touring the White House....It turns out, Westin said Friday, that ‘we had worked with DiCaprio to prepare some very substantive, policy-oriented questions,’ which did, in fact, amount to an interview. ‘It doesn't matter whether you're walking or sitting,’ Westin said."

    Johnson added: "He said ABC should not be judged on its editorial process with the special, but what ends up airing."

    Not quite the standard ABC applies to politicians when the network focuses on the evils of the process of campaigns and fundraising and not on the legislative results.

    No matter who asked the questions, it looks like ABC is putting together a special tilted to the left, maybe even totally one-sided. DiCaprio is Chairman of the Earth Day 2000 festivities scheduled for the Mall, so a news operation with any integrity would not use him in a reporting role or give him an unchallenged platform. But Jim Rutenberg reported in an April 10 New York Times article pointed out to me by MRC Communications Director Liz Swasey: "As it stood this weekend, both Mr. DiCaprio and the correspondent Chris Cuomo introduce the segments, basically as co-hosts."

    Rutenberg also disclosed that "Paul Friedman, Executive Vice President of ABC News, said producers ‘allowed Mr. DiCaprio to ask the President why global warming did not get the same attention as deficiencies in health care.’" Rutenberg noted that DiCaprio asked Clinton "about the Kyoto environmental accord" and outlined how:
    "In another segment, others say, Mr. DiCaprio, who has been designated Chairman of the Earth Day 2000 celebration, was taped sitting on a rock by a pond he used to visit as a boy, discussing the depletion of the frog population there. The production is said to all have an MTV feel and features short segments about global warming and related environmental issues photographed from Alaska to Atlanta."

    Rutenberg passed on a complaint from Rudy Bednar, Executive Producer of the special: "He said the criticism, both in the organization and outside, has been unfair. ‘It's like the Moral Majority condemning a film and you ask them, 'Have you seen it?' and they say 'no,’" Mr. Bednar remarked."

    Okay, I’ll judge what ends up airing. If ABC News presents a balanced and fair look at environmental issues then it will give just as much time and credibility to global warming skeptics as to its advocates, just as much time and credibility to those spelling out the harmful impact of any global warming solutions pushed by liberals as to the benefits claimed, just as much time and credibility to conservative environmental experts to counter liberal claims of doom and just as much time and credibility to market-oriented solutions to any environmental problems as to advocacy for additional government regulation.

    Yeah, I’m probably dreaming if I think ABC News has the integrity to produce that kind of show. But I’ll give them a chance.

8

A contrarian take on the cost of the Starr investigation so often decried by media figures: Taxpayers benefitted and the media made a lot of money off the Lewinsky scandal. In the Washington Whispers section of the April 17 U.S. News & World Report, Paul Bedard unmasked:

Sure it was expensive, but the $52 million spent on independent prosecutor Kenneth Starr's probe of Whitewater, Travelgate, and Monica Lewinsky probably paid for itself and maybe scored a profit for taxpayers via tax revenues generated from book and video sales and TV specials. Unofficial tabulations of money made in the marketing of Whitewater and Monicagate alone are in the tens of millions of dollars, and the tax take should easily top Starr's budget, say tax pros. "It's difficult to imagine that the government received less than $52 million off private-sector spin," says Pete Sepp, vice president of the National Taxpayers Union.

Consider: ABC reportedly made $30 million–up to 35 percent taxable–on its Lewinsky interview; gobs of Clinton scandal books have sold well; Lewinsky profited through sales of handbags and flacking for Jenny Craig; lawyers made millions; cable TV fed off the scandal; even C-SPAN sold tapes. "It's probably one of the most bizarre public-private ventures ever," says Sepp.

    END Reprint of item

    Refreshing to see an effort in a mainstream publication at countering the usual liberal media mantra on an issue. -- Brent Baker


 

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314