Willey's Weak Credibility?; Flowers Found; Emma Thompson: Yes to Clinton
1) The White House
counter-offensive worked as the networks Monday night focused on the
letters and messages left by Kathleen Willey, but skipped her revelation
about Clinton's 1992 come-on.
2) GMA's Lisa McRee wondered
why the public didn't take Gennifer Flowers seriously. Maybe because it
took GMA over six years to interview her.
3) The stars of Primary Colors
enthusiastically back Clinton. Emma Thompson gushed on Letterman:
"Yes!" she would have voted for Clinton, because of his views on
"rights for women."
4) Bryant Gumbel has high
negatives, but CBS doesn't care. He promised no tabloid topics.
Tonight's interviewee: Louise Woodward.
Monday night the White House spin led all the networks as each focused
attention on the letters and phone messages left by Kathleen Willey even
after the incident with President Clinton. The CBS Evening News spent the
most time with anti-Willey material as Bill Plante highlighted how a
Willey friend doubts her honesty, while only NBC's Lisa Myers allowed a
sexual harassment expert to point out that Willey's efforts to remain
friendly with Clinton do not contradict her claims.
ABC featured unique 1992 video of Clinton
hugging Willey and asking for her name. All the networks ran a soundbite
from White House operative Ann Lewis casting doubt on Willey because of
her friendly notes, but only ABC's Sam Donaldson illustrated her
hypocrisy by showing a 1991 clip of her defending Anita Hill for sticking
around Clarence Thomas.
None of the networks uttered a word about
Willey's "chicken soup" revelation on 60 Minutes that, the
night before the 1992 Williamsburg debate with Bush, Clinton invited her
to his hotel room for sex. CNN dedicated a half hour of prime time to
Willey and managed to locate a soccer mom who doesn't care about it.
Only NBC mentioned Johnny Chung's courtroom appearance.
FNC's 7pm ET Fox Report began with a
story from Wendell Goler on the White House reaction followed by a piece
from David Shuster on reaction from Trent Lott, William Ginsburg and Jesse
Jackson. Shuster also raised the issue of Starr looking at Nathan
Landow's role in trying to suppress Willey.
Here's how the other networks handled the
story on the March 16 evening shows, a night all three broadcast anchors
-- ABC's World News Tonight.
Sam Donaldson began the show anchored by Forrest Sawyer: "The
President's defenders here sense real danger in Willey's story,
particularly because of the way she told it on television. Here was a
woman who appeared vulnerable...and sympathetic to many of those who
After showing Clinton's denial, Donaldson
noted that letters to Clinton showed she "spoke admiring of
him." Like the other networks Donaldson reported that "White
House Communications Director Ann Lewis says she's convinced the
President is telling the truth because what she saw on television."
Lewis completed Donaldson's sentence:
"Simply is contradicted by the person I met with who in 1996 was so
positive about the President."
But, Donaldson highlighted a contradiction
missed by the other network reporters: "The letters released today
appear to support Lewis's view. But, when Anita Hill was questioned
sharply about why'd she not charged Clarence Thomas with sexual
harassment until years later, during his Supreme Court confirmation
hearing, it was none other than Ann Lewis who said women would understand
Ann Lewis, October 1991: "We know what
it's like to work for a boss who insults you, who degrades you and yet
you feel you have to go on working, you have to go on working, you have to
go on being friendly."
ABC also uniquely featured video of Willey
and Clinton from 1992. Donaldson explained: "The friendship between
Mr. Clinton and Willey began at this moment in October of 1992 when then
Governor Clinton arrived in Richmond for a presidential candidate's
debate. [video of Clinton hugging Willey] He apparently asked then
Virginia Lieutenant Governor Don Beyer for the name. [video showing Beyer,
can see him mouthing words] Beyer replies, 'Willey, Kathy
Next, Jackie Judd examined Starr's
interest in Willey as he looks into whether efforts to keep her quiet,
such as by Nathan Landow, constitute obstruction of justice. Judd noted a
60 Minutes comment from Willey skipped by the other networks: "Last
night Willey also claimed she felt pressure not to tell her story from
Clinton's own attorney, Robert Bennett..."
Finally, Linda Douglass looked a how women
are reacting: "Nearly seven years ago female member of Congress
marched into the U.S. Senate to demand that male Senators treat sexual
harassment as a serious issue..."
Anita Hill reignited the woman's movement
and Bob Packwood "galvanized" it, Douglass asserted. "Yet
now that there are such charges against a Democratic President who has
championed their causes, Democratic women in Congress are keeping quiet, a
fact not lost on the Republican Senate leader."
Viewers saw a clip of Lott and of former
Congresswoman Pat Schroeder calling Clinton's behavior a "sexual
-- CBS Evening News.
Substitute anchor John Roberts opened the show: "Someone's lying.
President and former White House volunteer Kathleen Willey are giving very
different accounts of an Oval Office encounter four years ago..."
Bill Plante began with the White House
spin: "John, the White House fought back by releasing friendly, even
admiring correspondence from Kathleen Willey to the President dated even
after the alleged incident..."
Following clips of Clinton and Willey, who
said on 60 Minutes it's "time for the truth to come out,"
Plante countered: "But not everyone agrees that it is the truth.
Willey's friend Julie Steele said in a sworn statement that, quote
'Miss Willey never said anything to suggest that President Clinton made
sexual advances towards her,' unquote."
Adding that Starr is also looking at
whether Landow asked Willey to be quiet, Plante quickly returned to doubts
about Willey, citing some of her letters to Clinton thanking him and
asking for a job. Plante concluded:
"And there's more. In that sheaf of
documents there's a phone message dated just two days after the incident
in which the President is told that Kathleen Willey says he can call her
anytime. The President's defenders say that they don't want to slime
Kathleen Willey, their word, but they are, on the other hand, attacking
her credibility, even suggesting that it was Independent Counsel Kenneth
Starr who was behind her decision to go public, a charge which Mr.
Starr's office vigorously denies."
Up next, Bob Schieffer checked in from
Capitol Hill where, he reported, Democrats are not defending Clinton and
Republicans, who have stayed clear, are now condemning Clinton.
For the third and final piece, CBS went to
Richard Schlesinger for a look at how Clinton is losing female support as
NOW President Patricia Ireland has finally criticized Clinton. Schlesinger
suggested "some of her own members are asking what took so long. Why
didn't the leadership ask questions after Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones,
I don't recall any previous CBS stories
on this obvious hypocrisy.
Schlesinger concluded: "More people
are beginning to ask could women, who once made Clinton's presidency,
now break it?"
-- CNN's The World Today
at 8pm ET devoted the first half of the one hour show to the swirl around
Willey. First, anchor Martin Savidge provided the background to the story
and how Willey became known in 1997 because of the Jones suit.
Second, Wolf Blitzer on how the "White
House launched a counter-offensive." Blitzer showcased the letters
"showing she wanted to maintain a friendship with him" and cited
one signed "your number one fan." Before making its next move,
Blitzer concluded, the White House is waiting to see poll numbers.
Third, Pierre Thomas examined who is lying.
"On its face it's a classic case of he said, she said," he
noted before showing conflicting statements from Clinton and Willey.
Fourth, Joie Chen interviewed Washington
Post columnist E.J. Dionne who dissected Clinton's comments.
Fifth, Eileen O'Connor checked in on
soccer moms: "The White House has a dilemma -- how to question the
credibility of Kathleen Willey without doing exactly what women's groups
and Democrats complain was done to Anita Hill in 1991. Republicans who
were critical of Hill wondered why she followed then Supreme Court nominee
Clarence Thomas to another job after his alleged untoward behavior."
After a clip of Ann Lewis casting doubt on
Willey's claim, O'Connor allowed a Republican woman to denounce the
tactic: "There are some on Capitol Hill who see something familiar in
the rhetoric used by the White House."
Senator Susan Collins, (R-Maine):
"It's interesting to me that the Democrats who are making those
arguments against Kathleen Willey are the same ones who condemned those
arguments when they were made against Anita Hill. So at the very least,
they are applying a totally different standard in this case."
But not all women care, O'Connor showed
in leading into a soundbite from one woman on the street: "Mothers
picking up their children from school were troubled, saying all these
unproven allegations, at the very least, shift the focus from important
Sixth, Jonathan Karl delivered a profile of
Seventh and lastly CNN ran a series of
person on the street reaction soundbites.
-- NBC Nightly News.
Claire Shipman started her top of the show piece: "The White House is
employing a familiar strategy: deny Kathleen Willey's story and question
her credibility." Shipman highlighted Clinton's denial, Ann Lewis
blasting Willey and the letters and phone messages, before concluding:
"The White House is saying that the
phone messages, the letters, none of it represents a woman upset by her
encounter with the President. But they are treading carefully with this
witness, though they are comfortable so far it's a case of he said, she
said, they also know Kathleen Willey may prove to be the most credible
witness against the President to date."
Lisa Myers then looked at the political and
legal implications as Willey's story "reverberated across the
Noting NOW President Ireland's new
concern, Myers became the only network reporter Monday night to let a
sexual harassment expert denounce the White House argument about
Willey's subsequent letters and messages:
"And the White House counter-offensive
against Willey drew fire from some sexual harassment experts. They say the
fact Willey later worked at the White House and remained friendly with the
President does not in any way discredit her."
Later, in NBC's "In Depth"
segment, Pete Williams examined he impact of Willey's testimony on
Starr's obstruction of justice case and on the Jones lawsuit.
Even later in the show anchor Brian
Williams took 23 seconds to tell viewers about Johnny Chung's trip to a
Los Angeles courthouse to plead guilty.
Tuesday morning Today and Good Morning America brought on Anita Hill as an
expert on the credibility of sexual harassment victims as the shows looked
at Willey's credibility. But on Monday morning the two shows focused on
the 60 Minutes interview from the night before, devoting most of the first
hour to the Willey story.
Matt Lauer opened Today: "Good
morning. President Clinton is a liar. That's what former Clinton
supporter Kathleen Willey says. In a television interview last night she
claimed the President made unwanted sexual advances toward her and is now
lying about it. But the White House is responding with its own fire today,
Monday, March the 16th, 1998."
Later, interviewing former Jones lawyer Gil
Davis, MRC news analyst Geoffrey Dickens caught this inquiry sympathetic
to he President's predicament: "The people who opposed you before
the Supreme Court were arguing that, hey if we open the door to this type
of a lawsuit so many side issues are gonna come up that were gonna be such
a major distraction to the President he won't be able to carry on his
daily functions. Now isn't there some reason to argue that may be true
at this point?"
Monday's Good Morning America featured an
interview with Gennifer Flowers. MRC news analyst Gene Eliasen picked up
these noteworthy questions from co-host Lisa McRee:
"Reaction to Ms. Willey and her story
stands in stark contrast to the reaction to you and your story, why do you
think that is?"
"Ms. Patricia Ireland of the National
Organization of Women said that last night that she was deeply troubled by
Willey's account. Why didn't feminists rally behind you and Ms.
Well, let me suggest that part of the
answer to both questions is that the media dismissed Flowers in 1992, and
since. Date of the first appearance by Gennifer Flowers on Good Morning
America: March 16, 1998, six years and six weeks after she issued her
allegation about Clinton. She finally made it to Today back on January 25,
a Sunday, but is still awaiting her weekday debut on that show. (See the
February 13 CyberAlert for details on co-host Jodi Applegate's argument
with Flowers about her credibility.)
The actor and actress who play the Bill and Hillary characters in Primary
Colors, the movie premiering Friday based on the book by Joe Klein, are
both enthusiastic supporters of the real Clinton. And they don't care if
the sex charges are true or false.
Co-star Emma Thompson plugged the movie on
Monday night's (March 16) Late Show with David Letterman. Here's the
relevant exchange between Letterman and the British actress:
David Letterman: "From what you know
of what's going on, could you, would you have voted for President
Clinton if you lived, were a resident of this country?"
Emma Thompson, very emphatically:
"Yes! I would, I would for all sorts of reasons, but most especially
sort of rights for women."
Letterman: "Well, isn't that
Thompson: "Yes it is and it
Letterman, turning serious: "But we
have to be very careful because there does remain the possibility that
none of this has happened."
Thompson: "Well, absolutely, I mean
how do we know?"
[Thompson is cut off by audience laughter
prompted by Letterman looking toward audience and frowning, showing he was
only being facetious.]
Thompson: "Oh, you're so
Her co-star John Travolta, who plays the
Clinton character, is also in awe of the real Clinton. In a March 13 USA
Today story Elizabeth Snead relayed: "Travolta, who has met Clinton
twice, once at the White House, came away impressed. 'You get the
feeling it's just you and him in the room. Everyone else disappears and
everything he says is so profound.'"
Travolta won't let facts get in the way
of his image as he blocks out news he doesn't like: "He had 'zero
reaction' when he read about the Monica Lewinsky allegations. 'And I
still have zero interest. It's funny because when I read that 70 percent
of the public felt the same way, I went, 'Oh, well, that's why I
don't care.' I couldn't even tell you the details, that's how
little I care.'"
The perfect panelist for ABC's
Politically Incorrect: someone proud of his ignorance.
Viewers don't like Bryant Gumbel, but CBS doesn't care even though it
just might explain the low ratings for his frequently-bumped show. Back on
March 3, the last time Gumbel's program aired, USA Today ran a story
discussing with Executive Producer Jon Klein its move from Wednesday to
Tuesday night. Inside TV reporter Peter Johnson noted: "Gumbel
registered high viewer 'negatives' during his 15 years on Today, but
Klein says CBS hasn't commissioned any new studies. He assumes Gumbel,
now making $5 million a year, still carries those negatives."
No need I guess to confirm the obvious.
Back on September 25 USA Today carried a story by Johnson on Gumbel's
then-upcoming show. Johnson discovered: "Since joining CBS News this
spring, for a reported $5 million-plus a year, Gumbel has been spreading
his gospel: Eye won't become a 'bottom-feeder' -- a newsmag that chases
the latest scandal or tabloid story for ratings."
Tuesday night at 9pm ET/PT Public Eye with
Bryant Gumbel will feature Gumbel interviewing au pair Louise Woodward.
-- Brent Baker
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to firstname.lastname@example.org."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You DO
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
Send problems and comments to: email@example.com.
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe