CBS: Clinton Broadcasting Service; Jefferson "Clintonized"; Predictions Scorecard
1) Monday night CBS featured
soundbites from Al Gore, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, but none from a
Republican. ABC stressed a "voter backlash" against the GOP ads
and how Republicans have been "too hard" on Clinton.
2) NBC: If Jefferson
"could end up on Mount Rushmore and the $2 dollar bill despite being
sexually active with a subordinate, it might put Mr. Clinton's
conduct...in a different light."
3) CEPAS: CyberAlert Election
Prognosticator Accuracy Scorecard: Race by race predictions from Capital
Gang, McLaughlin Group and Fox News Sunday. Margaret Carlson predicting
Faircloth's loss: "It's a great moment because you want the Jesse
Helms and Lauch Faircloth people out of there."
>>> November 2 Notable Quotables,
the MRC's bi-weekly compilation of the latest outrageous, sometimes
humorous, quotes in the liberal media, is now up on the MRC home page
thanks to MRC Webmaster Sean Henry and research associate Kristina Sewell.
Topic headings include "Tripp the Terrorist"; "Ken Starr is
Jezebel?"; "Kneepad Nina Blows GOP Away";
"Conservatives Incite Murder"; "NBC Touts President
Peacemaker"; and "A Limbaugh Parody Far Beyond Larry King's
Grasp." <<<
Correction. An October 29
CyberAlert item on Keith Olbermann referring to Senator Lauch Faircloth as
"one of the junior Grand Wizards of the vast right-wing
conspiracy," misidentified his state. It's North Carolina not South
Carolina.
1
Election eve concerns and hopes as seen by Democrats are what broadcast
network viewers saw Monday night. (Every network but CNN, which led with
the impending election, went first Monday night with the storm-caused
disasters in Central America.)
The CBS Evening
featured soundbites from Al Gore, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, who
excoriated the "extremist" Republican agenda, but found no time
for a syllable from a Republican. ABC's World News Tonight stressed a
"voter backlash" against the GOP ads and how a new poll found
most think Republicans have been "too hard" on Clinton. NBC
focused on the plight of Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold: "Wisconsin
has become a national test case for campaign finance reform." (NBC
Nightly News also featured a full report on the Thomas Jefferson news,
arguing that it might help Clinton's cause. Details in item #2.)
FNC highlighted
some Democratic nastiness, the charge that Republicans plan to intimidate
black voters, and also showed how Democrats are running ads equating
Republicans with racism. CNN's The World Today checked in on four Senate
contests and provided an inside look at the Christian Coalition's
efforts to inform voters.
Here are some
highlights from the Monday, November 2, evening shows:
-- ABC's World
News Tonight displayed some of the problems caused by the walk-out by the
unionized technicians. The show opened with the World News Tonight logo in
the middle of the screen over Peter Jennings' face and Jennings'
microphone was not always on during the show, so he had an echo. But
that's nothing compared to the constant problems on Monday's GMA
observed by MRC analyst Jessica Anderson, including the inability to run
the on-screen graphics system.
John Cochran
checked out the last day of campaigning and how both sides are trying to
turn out the vote. Cochran asserted:
"...Everywhere campaigns were still trying
to gin up voter interest in an election where so many Americans are turned
off and may not turn up at the polls tomorrow. For weeks Newt Gingrich has
traveled around the country trying to ignite voter turnout for
Republicans. He will finish with a rally tonight. The latest ABC poll
shows there may be a small voter backlash at Republicans because of their
new anti-Clinton ads. Fifty percent of likely voters say Republicans in
Congress are too hard on the President. That's up five percent from a
week ago."
Cokie Roberts then
told Jennings: "As we look, we at ABC look, at the House races right
now, we are seeing a tiny Republican pick-up of maybe two seats."
-- CBS Evening News. Dan Rather delivered this
less than upbeat assessment:
"The first-ever, billion-dollar mid-term
congressional election is snarling to a close. Voter turnout tomorrow,
especially in a few crucial tight contests, could tip them to Republicans
or Democrats and that in turn could effect Congress's impeach the
President investigation."
Bob Schieffer predicted: "With one day to go
our best estimate is that the Republicans will pick up one to three new
Senate seats and four to nine additional House seats...."
After running through a list of close races
Schieffer allowed Al Gore to predict a "good, big and strong
turnout" that "will exceed expectations."
Schieffer concluded: "Look for Republicans
to make very modest gains, but to come no where near the kind of sweep
being talked about in the wake of Ken Starr's report on the
President's problems."
Next, from the
White House Scott Pelley focused on how the scandals kept Clinton from
public rallies as he only attended fundraisers this campaign season. He
spent Monday, Pelley explained, trying to get the black vote out. Pelley
illustrated with a clip of Clinton on BET: "Do they want more of the
last eight months of partisanship or would they like more progress? Do
they want us to have more Washington politics as usual or would they like
the people of America to be the center of our focus?"
Hillary is more in
demand this year, Pelley reported, before playing a clip from her
appearance Monday for Chuck Schumer in New York: "So when he fights
he's not fighting for some extremist Republican agenda. He's fighting
for a New York agenda that will improve the quality of life of
people."
Incredibly, after
three straight Democratic soundbites and not one syllable allowed from a
Republican, Rather nonetheless promised: "CBS News's clear,
understandable, in-depth coverage of the election results will start when
the polls begin closing..."
In depth on one
side.
-- CNN's The World Today led with election eve
stories from Gene Randall on the D'Amato/Schumer battle and Candy
Crowley on the Boxer/Fong contest. Anchor Joie Chen played a soundbite of
Bill Clinton on the importance of voting before John King in Indiana
provided an inside look at how the Christian Coalition distributes voter
guides, places computer-generated phone calls, and targets direct mail.
Later in the hour,
Jonathan Karl checked in on North Carolina's Faircloth/Edwards Senate
race and David Ensor looked at Kentucky's fight between Bunning and
Baesler.
-- FNC's Fox Report. Jim Angle provided a piece
on how Clinton is trying to get blacks to vote, completing five interviews
on Monday. Angle then warned: "But just when you thought this
election couldn't get any nastier the White House suddenly accused
Republicans of trying to keep black voters from the polls through
intimidation."
Following clips of Joe Lockhart and Clinton Angle
turned to RNC Chairman Jim Nicholson, and then added: "Nicholson
pointed to Democratic ads that he said equate voting Republican with
racism, such as this radio ad from the Missouri Democratic Party."
Ad clip: "When you don't vote you let
another church explode."
Next, Carl Cameron
examined all the factors involved in Tuesday's election and Eric Shawn
highlighted the D'Amato/Schumer race: "It's the race that gives
mud wrestling a good name." Co-anchor Jane Skinner mentioned the
Jefferson/Hemings findings before Heather Nauert and Ellen Ratner
delivered their predictions.
-- NBC Nightly News featured two reports in its
In Depth segment. First, Kelly O'Donnell on the Boxer/Fong Senate race
in California. O'Donnell actually described Boxer as "one of the
Senate's most liberal Democrats."
Second, Gwen Ifill
focused on the media's campaign finance reform hero, Senator Russ
Feingold of Wisconsin whom, she asserted, may lose because he won't
accept any soft money. Ifill propounded: "Wisconsin has become a
national test case for campaign finance reform. If Feingold doesn't win
tomorrow the Democrats will lose a Senate seat and any chance of ending
the political money chase, a money chase that once would have seemed
unseemly in Wisconsin, the land of clean campaigns."
To her credit, unlike ABC's Dean Reynolds on
October 22, Ifill pointed out that Feingold has benefitted from $779,000
in outside money spent against Neumann, mostly from environmental groups.
2
Thomas Jefferson was one wild and crazy guy and that should help Clinton
by making people realize Clinton's just like a Founding Father. All
three Monday morning shows featured stories and interview segments, which
linked the revelation to extricating Clinton, on the study in the journal
Nature showing that DNA tracking proves it very likely that Jefferson
fathered a son with his slave, Sally Hemings. On a CBS's This Morning
historian Joseph Ellis maintained: "I think he's going to help Bill
Clinton in his impeachment hearings." He told Today's viewers:
"There might be some conservative Republicans that call for us to
tear down the Jefferson Memorial and say that Jefferson's been Clintonized."
But Today's Matt Lauer pointed out that Ellis signed a petition to end
the impeachment process.
Monday night
NBC's Bob Faw argued that if Jefferson can be on Mount Rushmore
"despite being sexually active with a subordinate, it might put Mr.
Clinton's conduct with a certain intern in a different light." On
CNBC's Upfront Tonight Geraldo Rivera promised: "We'll expose
Thomas Jefferson's Sallygate."
First, the
November 2 NBC Nightly News story and then on to the morning shows. Bob
Faw explained how the test results showed that Jefferson is the father of
Hemings' youngest son, Eston. Faw then ruminated about how the
disclosure might help Clinton:
"Jefferson's defenders say the tests
merely show a mortal who sinned, a great man with ordinary weakness, a
real human being.... And if the test results mean Jefferson is now
regarded as what one scholar calls 'a '90s kind of guy,' the White
House must be smiling. After all, if Bill Clinton's favorite President
could end up on Mount Rushmore and the $2 dollar bill despite being
sexually active with a subordinate, it might put Mr. Clinton's conduct
with a certain intern in a different light."
Joseph Ellis, historian: "It gives Clinton
additional cover and makes it more difficult to be as critical of this
kind of behavior."
Faw concluded: "It might not explain how
someone who owned slaves could write the Declaration of Independence, but
historians agree it does reveal another self-evident truth: that heroes,
even Presidents, aren't saints. They're flesh and blood."
After the same
story ran on CNBC's Upfront Tonight, Geraldo Rivera added:
"Amen."
-- ABC's Good Morning America. MRC analyst
Jessica Anderson noted this joking opening from Kevin Newman: "Now a
story about a President, a woman young enough to be his daughter, and DNA
tests that show they probably had an affair. In this case, the President
is Thomas Jefferson. DNA evidence now concludes that America's third
President probably fathered at least one child with a slave named Sally
Hemings. Now that has shocked some historians, but not our guests this
morning."
-- CBS This Morning. Thalia Assuras interviewed
Jefferson descendant Julia Jefferson Westerinen and historian Joseph
Ellis, who tied the finding to Clinton, as transcribed by MRC analyst
Brian Boyd: "Well, I think Jefferson has impeccable timing. He always
has, he emerges at moments. I think he's going to help Bill Clinton in his
impeachment hearings. I think this news suggests that the kind of personal
sexual relationships of Presidents has a long pedigree. But I also think,
I agree with Julia, I think that he is coming back to us to tell us that
we have always been and are again now one people."
-- NBC's Today. Matt Lauer allowed Ellis to go
at length about the similarities between Jefferson and Clinton, but he
also highlighted the liberal politics of the historian in this interview
excerpt transcribed by MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens:
Matt Lauer:
"Let's fast forward to 1998 and what's going on in Washington right
now. Obviously Thomas Jefferson is the favorite Founding Father of our
current President for namesake. How does it impact the way we view the
past transgressions of Bill Clinton?
Joseph Ellis: "I think there are some rather
stunning comparisons between Jefferson and Hemings and Lewinksy and
Clinton. The age difference between them is about the same. They both were
Presidents at the time. And I think that this is going to land on Clinton
and the impeachment hearings in a way that's going to make impeachment
less likely."
Lauer, in a point not mentioned later in the day
by Faw, observed: "Let me just point out one was married at the time
the other was a widower at the time."
Ellis: "Right. Jefferson would not be
accused of adultery at all."
Lauer: "But why do you think it's going to
help Bill Clinton on the eve of impeachment inquiries?"
Ellis: "There might be some conservative
Republicans that call for us to tear down the Jefferson Memorial and say
that Jefferson's been Clintonized. But most people are gonna say Jefferson
is more human. President's have been doing this for as long as American
history. And whenever anyone in American history has bet against Thomas
Jefferson he's eventually lost."
Lauer: "William Safire in the New York Times
this morning writes an article and says that guys like you, the timing of
this historical spin on this scientific evidence is intended simply to
help Bill Clinton."
Ellis: "Well not for me. I'm not necessarily
a Bill Clinton fan. I'm trying to tell you that Bill Clinton happens to be
one of the luckiest American politicians in the late 20th century."
Lauer: "Were you one of the people over the
weekend though that signed something based on a group called Historians in
Defense of the Constitution calling for people not to go forward with
impeachment hearings?"
Ellis: "Yes. I believe that this impeachment
does not meet the threshold that the Constitution requires."
Lauer: "So you do have an agenda on the side
that is, that could look, be seen as parallel to this situation."
Ellis: "But I certainly didn't generate this
DNA study at this time and neither did Bill Clinton."
Lauer: "So in the long run though you think
that Bill Clinton now may be seen as a more human leader in comparison,
especially, when we look at Thomas Jefferson as being 'human' and not a
god."
Ellis: "I think it gives Clinton additional
cover and it makes it more difficult to be as critical of this kind of
behavior."
3
The first bi-annual CyberAlert Election Prognosticator Accuracy Scorecard.
With the assistance of MRC analysts Geoffrey Dickens and Paul Smith, below
I've put together a list of predictions issued this past weekend on the
three shows with panelists who were willing to risk humiliation: the
October 31 Capital Gang on CNN, November 1 Fox News Sunday and the
McLaughlin Group of the past two weekends, though the numbers and
predictions below are based on how the McLaughlin panelists revised their
predictions for their October 31 broadcast.
So, print this out
and Tuesday night as you watch the election returns you can grade each
political prognosticator. (Not all panelists are listed for each race
since the three shows did not all look at the same races.)
Capital Gang
panelists: columnist Bob Novak, Time reporter and columnist Margaret
Carlson, National Review Washington Bureau Chief Kate O'Beirne, Wall
Street Journal Executive Washington Editor Al Hunt and columnist Mark
Shields.
McLaughlin Group
panelists: Host John McLaughlin, Newsweek reporter and columnist Eleanor
Clift, Reader's Digest editor Michael Barone, columnist Pat Buchanan,
and former Gingrich Press Secretary and current George columnist Tony
Blankley.
Fox News Sunday
panelists who made predictions: Washington Post-affiliated writer and FNC
analyst Juan Williams and Weekly Standard Executive Editor Fred Barnes.
First, the overall
Republican gains predicted on Capital Gang and McLaughlin Group:
House |
Novak: |
+8 |
Carlson: |
+8 |
O'Beirne: |
+7 |
Hunt: |
+7 |
Shields: |
+5
or fewer |
McLaughlin: |
+13 |
Clift: |
+6 |
Blankley: |
+7 |
Barone: |
+8 |
Buchanan: |
+12 |
Senate |
Novak: |
+5 GOP |
Carlson: |
+2 GOP |
O'Beirne: |
+3 GOP |
Hunt: |
+2 GOP |
Shields: |
0/no
net change |
McLaughlin: |
+5 GOP |
Clift: |
+2 GOP |
Blankley: |
+4 GOP |
Barone: |
+3 GOP |
Buchanan: |
+7 GOP |
Governorships |
Shields: |
+3 |
Novak: |
+4 |
Carlson: |
+2 |
O'Beirne: |
+4 |
Hunt: |
+2 or
fewer |
McLaughlin: |
+3 |
Clift: |
+2 |
Blankley: |
+2 |
Barone: |
+3 |
Buchanan: |
+4 |
Second, some
predictions in the tight Senate races. (I know the X's below won't
necessarily line-up in your e-mail, but this should provide a graphically
easy to scan look at who predicted who, even if the columns are not even.
Actually, if you put it into 12 point "Courier New" it should
look perfect.) Democrats in the first column, Republicans in the second.
California |
|
Boxer
|
Fong
|
O'Beirne |
|
X |
Hunt |
X |
|
Shields |
|
X |
Novak |
|
X |
Carlson |
X |
|
McLaughlin |
|
X |
Clift |
X |
|
Barone |
X |
|
Blankley |
|
X |
Buchanan |
X |
|
Barnes |
X |
|
Williams |
X |
|
Kentucky |
|
Baesler
|
Bunning
|
McLaughlin |
|
X |
Clift |
|
X |
Barone |
|
X |
Blankley |
|
X |
Buchanan |
|
X |
Williams |
X |
|
Barnes |
|
X |
Nevada |
|
Reid |
Ensign |
McLaughlin |
X |
|
Clift |
|
X |
Barone |
X |
|
Blankley |
|
X |
Buchanan |
|
X |
New
York |
|
Schumer |
D'Amato |
Carlson |
X |
|
O'Beirne |
|
X |
Hunt |
X |
|
Shields |
X |
|
Novak |
X |
|
McLaughlin |
|
X |
Clift |
X |
|
Barone |
|
X |
Blankley |
|
X |
Buchanan |
|
X |
Barnes |
|
X |
Juan Williams |
|
X |
North
Carolina |
|
Edwards
|
Faircloth
|
O'Beirne |
X |
|
Hunt |
X |
|
Shields |
X |
|
Novak |
|
X |
Carlson |
X
("It's a great moment because you want the Jesse Helms
and Lauch Faircloth people out of there." |
|
McLaughlin |
|
X |
Clift |
X ("I think
Faircloth loses. He's been a terrible Senator, out of touch with
the voters.")
|
|
Barone |
X |
|
Blankley |
X |
|
Buchanan |
|
X |
South
Carolina |
|
Hollings |
Inglis |
McLaughlin |
X |
|
Clift |
X |
|
Barone |
X |
|
Blankley |
X |
|
Buchanan |
|
X |
Washington |
|
Murray |
Smith |
McLaughlin |
|
X |
Clift |
X |
|
Barone |
|
X |
Blankley |
X |
|
Buchanan |
|
X |
Wisconsin |
|
Feingold
|
Neumann |
O'Beirne |
|
X |
Hunt |
|
X ("Neumann, and
I regret that.") |
Shields |
X |
|
Novak |
|
X |
Carlson |
|
X |
McLaughlin |
|
X |
Clift |
|
X |
Barone |
|
X |
Blankley |
|
X |
Buchanan |
|
X |
Third, two
gubernatorial contests:
California |
|
Davis |
Lungren |
Carlson |
X |
|
O'Beirne |
X |
|
Hunt |
X |
|
Shields |
X |
|
Novak |
X |
|
Maryland |
|
Glendening |
Sauerbrey |
O'Beirne |
|
X |
Hunt |
X |
|
Shields |
X |
|
Novak |
X |
|
Carlson |
X |
|
Do you see a
pattern here amongst all the shows? Those in the news media predict fewer
Republican wins than do the conservative commentators.
-- Brent Baker
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You DO
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
cybercomment@mrc.org.
Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
>>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
|