CBS's New Respect for Robertson; Mitchell's Showed Castro Saying Bush "Appointed"; Stossel: "Totalitarian Left" Afraid of Critics
1) To Dan Rather, now that Pat Robertson is being
oppressed by "Big Oil," he has gone from part of the
"self-described religious right," to an "entrepreneur"
who is a victim of "possible market manipulation in the energy
business to maximize profits."
2) A day after Katherine Harris's retort to the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights Dan Rather picked up on it. CBS also ran a
short story on a new dollars-for-pardons charge against Roger Clinton.
3) NBC's Andrea Mitchell had an amiable chat with Fidel
Castro. She relayed how "he told me that the Cuban people last year
were so determined to get Elian back that some extremists even wanted to
send military commandos to the United States." Mitchell showed Castro
mimicking Geraldo: "He was not elected. He was appointed President of
the United States."
4) ABC's John Stossel lashed out at the
"totalitarian left" which wants to "silence critics"
and "frightened" some parents "about me" so they
insisted interviews with their kids be pulled from Stossel's Friday
night special which dares to question the environmental left's
orthodoxy.
1
Pat
Robertson, suddenly a noble businessman to CBS News. Now that he's being
oppressed by "Big Oil." Last year Dan Rather referred to how
"one issue that is sure to come up in the fall campaign that has
already surfaced is Bush cozying up to the self-described Religious Right,
including the Reverends Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell."
But on Thursday's CBS Evening News Dan
Rather expressed new respect with Robertson transformed from part of
"the self-described Religious Right" to being an
"entrepreneur." Rather announced on his June 28 show:
"There's a follow up tonight to CBS News investigations into
possible market manipulation in the energy business to maximize profits.
This could be a remarkable case in point. One time Republican presidential
candidate, TV evangelist and entrepreneur Pat Robertson says just listen
to what happened to him."
Reporter Wyatt Andrews proceeded to outline
Robertson's claim that he's been blocked from buying a shut down
California refinery because unnamed an oil company has blocked his loan by
threatening to pull all its business from the bank. Andrews helpfully
outlined the conspiracy: "If that information is accurate, why would
big oil care? Senator Ron Wyden, who today appeared with Robertson, says
Big Oil is restricting all refinery output to keep gasoline prices
high."
Hmmm. Maybe Robertson's problems have
something to do with how he is unqualified to operate a refinery. And why
is a conservative like Robertson in bed with a left-wing Senator? CBS
didn't explore those angles, though Andrews did concede that current
refinery output of gasoline is at record levels.
2
A day
after Katherine Harris's retort to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
Dan Rather picked up on it. On the June 28 CBS Evening News Rather read
this short item:
"On another continuing post-election
political dispute, Florida Secretary of State, Republican Katherine
Harris, said today that she might indeed run for Congress. This came the
day after Harris blasted the U.S. Civil Rights Commission for being what
she called 'arbitrary and selective,' unquote in a report that was
critical of her role as Secretary of State in the last presidential
election."
Just before that item, CBS ran a brief story
by Bob Schieffer on a new charge that Roger Clinton took $50,000 to get
pardon for a heroin trafficker in the Gambino family, a charge her lawyer
claimed is being made just "to embarrass Bill Clinton."
3
Andrea's
All-Nighter with Fidel. Though the Committee to Protect Journalists in May
named Fidel Castro one of the "Ten Worst Enemies of the Press"
for 2001, NBC's Andrea Mitchell had an amiable chat with him Wednesday
night which was featured on Thursday's Today and NBC Nightly News. Only
in one sentence in her evening report did she mention the lack of
political freedom in Cuba.
On Today Mitchell relayed how Castro insisted
Juan Miguel and Elian were free to stay in the U.S. and how "he told
me that the Cuban people last year were so determined to get Elian back
that some extremists even wanted to send military commandos to the United
States."
Later, on Nightly News, she showed Castro
denouncing Bush: "He was not elected. He was appointed President of
the United States." Sounds like Castro watches Geraldo. And who
exactly "elected" Castro?
-- Today, June 28. MRC analyst Geoffrey
Dickens took down her summary of her session with the dictator, though she
never employed the term: "Well on this first anniversary of Elian
Gonzalez's return home to Cuba the Fidel Castro government is not planning
any big anniversary celebration. But during three hours of conversation
with Fidel Castro that went into the early hours of this morning he told
me that the Cuban people last year were so determined to get Elian back
that some extremists even wanted to send military commandos to the United
States. Castro met me at his offices where he typically works all night.
[Clip of Mitchell shaking hands with Castro: "Thank you for seeing
us."]
"During the Elian crisis that met
orchestrating the campaign to get the child back. But Castro insists that
the boy's father was free to stay in the United States if he had wanted
to. He made the decisions about where to live and returning to Cuba."
-- NBC Nightly News. A few hours later NBC had
time to put together a regular taped report with soundbites from Castro.
As transcribed by the MRC's Brad Wilmouth, Mitchell began by expressing
her typical awe of Castro's hard work:
"It was already getting late when Castro
greeted me at one of his many government offices. It is here that Castro
spends most nights in meetings that usually last until dawn. This night we
talked for three hours, brief by Castro's standards. About to turn 75 in
August, who would replace him? Cuba's next comandante would likely be
Castro's brother Raoul, head of Cuba's armed forces, but only five
years younger than Fidel."
To Castro: "Have you thought, have you
planned about having a younger generation of leaders to carry on your
legacy?"
After some discussion about succession
which Mitchell raised because of Castro's collapse at a rally over the
weekend, Mitchell continued: "Castro has been in office so long,
he's antagonized ten American Presidents. Now he's sizing up George W.
Bush, especially because of Bush's close political and family ties to
anti-Castro voters in Florida."
To Castro: "Do you see any chance of better
relations? Would you see a potential crisis here?"
Castro, through interpreter: "He was not
elected. He was appointed President of the United States. [some cross
talk] It's not his fault he's ignorant."
Mitchell concluded: "Castro was combative
when I asked why he won't hold free elections or release political
prisoners as American Presidents have been demanding for 40 years. In
fact, he says his revolution will outlive him. And the man I saw last
night shows no signs of yielding power any time soon."
You'd think Mitchell might have wondered why
Castro gave her such a free hand when he oppresses other journalists.
Maybe it has something to do with how her stories don't require any
censorship to comply with Castro's standards.
The MRC's Rich Noyes alerted me to how in
May the Committee to Protect Journalists named Fidel Castro one of the
"Ten Worst Enemies of the Press" for 2001. They asserted:
"Fidel Castro's government continues its
scorched-earth assault on independent Cuban journalists by interrogating
and detaining reporters, monitoring and interrupting their telephone
calls, restricting their travel, and routinely putting them under house
arrest to prevent coverage of certain events. A new tactic of intimidation
involves arresting journalists and releasing them hundreds of miles from
their homes. Meanwhile, foreign journalists who write critically of Cuba
are routinely denied visas, and early this year Castro threatened some
international news bureaus with expulsion from Cuba for 'transmitting
insults and lies.' Cuba is the only country in the Western Hemisphere
that currently holds a journalist in jail for his work. Bernardo Arévalo
Padrón continues to serve a six year sentence for reporting critical of
Castro and the Communist Party."
4
ABC's
John Stossel lashed out on Wednesday's O'Reilly Factor on FNC at the
"totalitarian left" which wants to "silence critics"
and persuaded some parents to insist interviews with their kids be pulled
from Stossel's Friday night special which dares to question the
environmental left's orthodoxy.
On Thursday's Good Morning America he
offered a milder rebuke about how he's "upset that activists got to
these parents and frightened them about me." On the June 28 GMA
Charles Gibson asked him, as observed by MRC analyst Jessica Anderson:
"This special has touched off some controversy. Some people came
forward and objected to interviews that had been done with their children,
two months after the interviews had been done, and asked that the
interviews be removed and they have been taken out. Every TV writer in the
country seems to have weighed in on this. Your comment on it."
Stossel: "Well, I'm upset that activists got
to these parents and frightened them about me. I'm upset that we had to
take this out and we've put something in that I think is interesting, but
I can understand why ABC felt that they had to because these are children
and who are we to go against the wishes of the parents?"
For background on this trumped-up liberal
controversy, go to:
http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2001/cyb20010627.asp#4
In Thursday's Washington Post, Howard Kurtz
relayed Stossel's comments on FNC's The O'Reilly Factor the night
before. An excerpt from Kurtz's June 28 story:
ABC's John Stossel hit back at his detractors yesterday, accusing
environmental activists of having "brainwashed" a group of
California parents into insisting that the network pull his interview with
their grade-school children.
Responding to his critics at the Washington-based Environmental Working
Group, Stossel said on Fox News Channel's O'Reilly Factor: "I call
them the totalitarian left. They want to silence people who criticize
them."
Ken Cook, the group's president, dismissed Stossel's comments as
"preposterous," saying: "If anyone's trying to limit debate
it's John Stossel, by suggesting commie lefties are behind this as some
sort of plot....He's a bully and he's finally been challenged."
The heated words followed ABC News's decision to yank the footage of
Stossel interviewing 10 children about environmental issues after the
parents, who had contacted Cook's group, withdrew their consent. The
parents say they were never told that Stossel was involved in the program,
which airs Friday, and that he pushed the students to give the kind of
responses he wanted.
Stossel said he is "not happy" about ABC's decision to
withdraw the footage but that "I see their point. These are
children....If parents don't want their kids on, who are we to force
them?"
But Stossel contended that the parents had been "thrilled"
and changed their mind only after "environmental educators talked to
them. I don't blame them for being scared after what these people probably
said about me....People said, 'He's going to distort. He lies. In the
past, he's faked things.' They make up stories about me and the parents
get scared."...
On the footage that ABC has withdrawn, the children say yes when
Stossel asks whether they thought America is more polluted and the air and
water dirtier than they used to be -- which, as Stossel noted, is untrue.
Stossel then says on the tape: "What sad distortions to feed
children."
In the O'Reilly interview, Stossel accused the school system of
brainwashing students and, in another swipe at environmentalists, assailed
"the extremists who dominate the debate." Environmental
activists, said Stossel, "shouldn't be scaring people the way they
are."
END Excerpt
For all of Kurtz's piece, go to:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54461-2001Jun27.html
On Thursday afternoon the MRC's President,
L. Brent Bozell, issued this statement in a press
release:
ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Media Research Center President Brent Bozell blasted
the ultra-left wing Environmental Working Group for shamelessly
manipulating parents of young children to attack ABC News correspondent
John Stossel over his special on how scare tactics are used to perpetuate
a one-sided view of environmental issues.
"John Stossel has a point of view that is vastly under-represented
on networks like ABC, and his reporting is factual and honest. That's why
the Left can't stand him, and will stoop to anything to get him off the
air. These parents were in the room when their kids were interviewed. They
saw John Stossel interview them. They said nothing for two months. If they
really had concerns they could have raised them then and there with ABC,
but they've instead been manipulated by this left-wing group in search
of an anti-Stossel publicity splash just as his report is about to
air," Bozell said.
"ABC is right to be sensitive to parents' concerns, but when
parents can be so easily manipulated as part of a witch hunt to knock an
honest journalist off the air, it sends a dangerous signal to all
reporters who would dare question the Left's agenda -- on the
environment or any other issue," Bozell said.
"Mr. Stossel's premise is absolutely true as our own exhaustive
research has found: information on environmental issues like global
warming are presented in almost a totally one-sided fashion. As a parent
myself I find it insulting and appalling that both adults and children are
consistently bombarded with advocacy journalism that misleads and
misinforms the very public to which the media are responsible,"
Bozell said.
END reprint of press release
Stossel's special, Tampering with Nature,
airs tonight, Friday June 29 at 10pm EDT/PDT, 9pm CDT/MDT in the 20/20
slot. Washington, DC area cable subscribers will also be able to watch it
at 8pm Saturday night on NewsChannel 8. Today's Washington Post TV
listings reports that Stossel "questions whether warnings about
genetic engineering, human cloning and global warming are overhyped."
The vitriolic reaction from the environmental
left is sure to be overhyped. -- Brent Baker
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You DO
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
cybercomment@mrc.org.
Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
>>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
|