Barack Obama’s campaign for the presidency has always rested first and foremost
on his biography: his biracial ancestry, his world-traveling childhood,
his Ivy League education, and his gritty Chicago community organizing.
The Obama campaign encouraged its volunteers to talk to voters about how
they first found Obama to be an impressive personality with a
fascinating life story, not the man who was right on all the substantive
issues.
By that standard, inspirational figures in Obama’s biography should
have been serious subjects of media scrutiny, including Obama’s
self-described spiritual mentor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright. In his 1995
autobiography Dreams From My Father, Obama describes the feeling
he had when he heard Wright preach, a powerful revelation that changed
his life story: "I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging
with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians
in the lion's den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of
survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story." At the
age of 27, inspired by Reverend Wright, he became a Christian.
But what kind of church was Obama choosing? What did Obama’s long
membership in the church say about his faith and his views on race and
America’s place in the world? For more than a year on the campaign
trail, the nation’s traditional broadcast TV networks found that a story
not worth exploring in any depth. Then in mid-March, ABC uncovered Rev.
Wright’s noxious recorded sermons suggesting that America deserved 9/11
and that the federal government created AIDS as a tool of black
genocide. They were not difficult to find: the church sold the sermons
on DVD. The vicious, screaming lectures were widely viewed on YouTube
and discussed on talk radio and cable TV.
The media narrative didn’t scrutinize Obama’s faith, but quickly
synchronized with the Obama campaign line that the virulent video clips
unfairly caricatured the minister (and by association, Obama himself.)
PBS star Bill Moyers lamented that Wright was "assassinated by
soundbites." Few journalists turned the question around and wondered if
America was being unfairly caricatured and if Obama was too tolerant of
the most vicious negative campaigning?
Did the nation’s broadcast networks really play Wright’s remarks to
excess? A Media Research Center study of ABC, CBS, and NBC news
broadcasts from the beginning of the Obama campaign on February 10, 2007
through July 15 reveals that a viewer watching only broadcast TV news
would have received a much more limited (and even censored) version of
Wright’s sermons. The networks largely restricted guest lists on the
subject to liberals and media professionals. The networks all handed
over large gobs of time to candidate Obama on March 18 and 19 when he
addressed Reverend Wright in a "race speech" hailed as "brilliant,"
"extraordinary" and "another great eloquent speech."
This study does not focus on the entirety of the broadcast networks’
Obama coverage in this period of controversy. It focuses instead on a
more concentrated question of how the campaign interpreted the sermons
of Reverend Wright and tried to minimize their impact. Analysts focused
on stories citing Reverend Wright by name, with special attention to
stories which used his soundbites. What analysts found was a set of
networks who were engaged not in a mission to investigate Obama’s
biography, but on a mission to protect Obama’s political viability.
It could not be argued that the Reverend Wright story wasn’t covered.
But it was covered within the confines of a Democratic primary campaign.
While it led to pundits wondering on air if Obama had a problem with
white, working-class voters, the networks largely kept the squabble "in
the family" and did not easily allow Republican critics of Obama to
participate.
Democratic candidates did not make Wright an issue before the media
discovered it. For her part, Hillary Clinton waited for the media to
introduce the topic, and then waited weeks more to declare that she
would have acted differently than Obama and left the church over
Wright’s incendiary remarks.
Throughout this electoral cycle, as media pundits have celebrated
Obama’s faith instead of scrutinizing it, glorified his fluency in
challenging the religious right by discussing faith in the political
realm, offering Democrats a chance to close a "God gap," the networks
waited until almost the entire Democratic electorate had voted to wonder
what kind of substance was filling the "God gap" in Obama’s own mind and
heart. From the substance of Wright’s sermons, that gap was filled with
hatred for America, unrepentant bitterness about racial divisions, and
deep suspicion of an evil empire of a government Obama professed himself
willing and ready to lead.
In the current election cycle, Reverend Wright first arrived in the
national spotlight on Fox News Channel’s Hannity & Colmes back on
March 1, 2007, when Sean Hannity broached the issue of Trinity’s
dedication to a "black value system." Rev. Wright scorned Hannity as a
neophyte who’d never read the masterworks of "black liberation
theology." But it took an entire year for Reverend Wright’s name to
emerge on the broadcast networks.
There were other opportunities to broach the issue. Five days later,
The New York Times reported that Obama disinvited Rev. Wright
from offering a planned invocation at his campaign announcement on
February 10, 2007 due to "the campaign’s apparent fear of criticism over
Mr. Wright’s teachings, which some say are overly Afrocentric to the
point of excluding whites." ABC’s Jake Tapper mentioned the controversy
in passing on the February 11, 2007 World News Sunday: "His
foreign-policy views are just one target for Obama’s critics, who have
questions for the senator about any number of issues, including whether
his church here on Chicago’s South Side, which expresses a message of
black power, is too militant for mainstream America to accept."
On January 15, 2008, Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen
wrote a column decrying how Trinity’s magazine The Trumpet
fulsomely praised Rev. Farrakhan. Obama’s campaign issued a statement
from the candidate. "I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and
strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister
Farrakhan," Obama said in the statement. "I assume that Trumpet
magazine made its own decision to honor Farrakhan based on his efforts
to rehabilitate ex-offenders, but it is not a decision with which I
agree."
But the name of Jeremiah Wright didn’t surface on the Big Three
networks until CBS first broached it on February 28. In campaign terms,
it was very late in the fast-forward primary process, after 36 states
and the District of Columbia had held primaries or caucuses. John
Edwards had suspended his campaign almost a month earlier. The first
story with Wright sermon soundbites aired weeks later, on ABC’s Good
Morning America in mid-March, after another six contests. Before
that, Obama’s church and minister were barely mentioned – and usually as
an Obama defense mechanism.
ABC's Jake Tapper offered Obama’s church-and-minister defense twice
in November and December – but never with a whisper of the name of
Reverend Wright. On ABC's World News with Charles Gibson on
November 16, Tapper offered a generic story on negative phone calls and
e-mails, including suggestions Obama was a Muslim. Obama said: "There
are a variety of nasty e-mails going out. This is similar to the e-mails
that’s, e-mails that have been floating around that says I am, you know,
I’m a Muslim plant who’s planning to take over America, you know?
This would surprise my pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ."
On November 19, Tapper repeated a version of that on Good Morning
America. Tapper also replayed Obama’s "Muslim plant" joke on the
December 5 Nightline.
When Dean Reynolds first broached the controversy on CBS, devoting
about a minute to it on February 28 CBS Evening News, he brought
up Farrakhan, the point of Cohen’s column from six weeks earlier: "Obama
has said the church’s former pastor and his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah
Wright, is like an old uncle who sometimes will say things I don’t agree
with. Among Wright’s pronouncements, that racism is how this country was
founded and how this country is still run. A church-related publication
saluted Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan, a well known
anti-Semite, who in turn has praised Obama's candidacy as recently as
last Sunday."
The Wright-sermon story really broke open on television with Brian
Ross on the March 13 Good Morning America. Employing clips of
Wright sermons that were available on DVDs sold by the church, Ross
revealed several shocking pulpit outbursts from Wright:
The United States, dominated by the Ku Klux Klan? "And they
will not only attack you if try and point out what’s going on in white
America. U.S. of K.K.K.A.!"
The black Republican sellouts. "They live below the sea level.
They live below the level of Clarence, Colin and Condamnesia."
Our own terrorism brought 9/11. "We bombed Hiroshima! We
bombed Nagasaki! And we nuked far more than the thousands in New York
and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye. We have supported state
terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans and now we
are indignant, because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought
right back into our own front yard! America’s chickens are coming home
to roost!"
ABC tried to balance this hard-hitting report by bringing in Obama
campaign religion adviser Shaun Casey for an interview with anchorman
Chris Cuomo. Cuomo asked if Obama would disassociate himself from Rev.
Wright, and Casey quickly began accusing the media of singling Obama
out: "I mean, it's interesting to me you haven’t vetted Hillary
Clinton’s pastor’s sermons. You haven’t vetted President Bush’s pastor’s
sermons. You haven’t vetted John McCain’s pastor’s sermons. So, you’re
not holding them to that standard, which I think is very interesting."
The network coverage that followed was quite sensitive to the idea
that Obama was unfairly singled out on this story. A day later, Obama
put out a statement condemning the featured
Wright bites, but the
networks didn’t see the story as a top story. The next evening’s NBC
Nightly News allocated a mere 22 seconds to Obama’s condemnation of
what fill-in anchor Ann Curry vaguely described as ‘’inflammatory
remarks that his long time pastor made about Hillary Clinton and the
nation." NBC then devoted three minutes to a celebratory piece about how
excited Obama’s childhood friends in Indonesia are about his candidacy,
a story which began and ended with a picture of Obama’s classmates in
front of huge "Good Luck Barry!" lettering.
Snippets of Wright’s sermons drew only 72 seconds of evening-news
coverage in all of March, or an average of 24 seconds per network, less
than one commercial.
The
morning shows carried almost five minutes of Wright clips (297 seconds),
with ABC (whose first story ran 70 seconds of Wright snippets) offering
the most at 128 seconds. The other two networks each ran less than 90
seconds (CBS 82, NBC 87). Versions of Wright’s 2003 "God damn America"
remarks were the most common snippet (although often the soundbite was
clipped to only four seconds long). It appeared five times on the Big
Three evening shows, and thirteen times on the morning shows in March.
Wright yelled that black criminals were victimized by America [see box].
The second most common soundbite was Wright suggesting "Hillary ain’t
never been called a ni**er." (The word was always bleeped.) That was
aired once on each network’s evening newscast, and four times on the
morning programs.
Wright’s most outrageous comments about 9/11 being "America’s
chickens coming home to roost" were spiked by all three evening shows,
as well as by CBS’s The Early Show. None of the network shows
aired Wright’s soundbite on how governments lie and how the federal
government hid the truth about "inventing the HIV virus as a means of
genocide against people of color." (It came on April 13, 2003, in the
same sermon in which Wright yelled "God damn America.") CBS analyst Jeff
Greenfield decried it on the CBS Evening News on March 18, hours
after Sen. Obama’s speech on Wright and race. "How does a guy who spent
20 years with somebody with some notions that seem very bizarre – like
AIDS is a government conspiracy – what’s he doing with that guy for 20
years?" He said the speech itself would not end the controversy. The
next morning on The Early Show, he repeated that critique, saying
of Wright’s AIDS claim, "these are the words of a crackpot."
When the networks weren’t spiking the worst soundbites, reporters
tried to minimize how many people would find them offensive. CBS’s Byron
Pitts even claimed that Wright’s speeches were only regarded by some
people as anti-American. On the March 18 Early Show, directly
after a "God damn America" clip, Pitts suggested these Wright remarks
were merely "comments critics have called anti-American and
anti-white."
The evening news shows on March 18 carried almost six minutes (348
seconds) of snippets from the Obama speech (or roughly five times more
than the Wright bites). The morning shows carried roughly nine and a
half minutes (572 seconds) of sound from the speech, led by CBS, who set
aside six and a half minutes for viewers to enjoy. That total was nearly
twice as much time as the 297 seconds the network morning shows devoted
to Wright soundbites in the entire month of March. CBS Early Show
co-host Maggie Rodriguez oozed: "It’s being called a defining cultural
moment in America. Barack Obama speaks about America’s racial stalemate,
a moving moment, a political risk."
After decades of media scholars complaining about the way the
networks have miniaturized soundbites to seven or eight seconds in
length, the networks let Obama speak in a soundbites that lasted a
minute or more. They attempted to add gravity to the remarks by placing
still photographs over his remarks, including stills of an admiring
Michelle in the audience and old photos of his childhood featuring his
parents and grandparents.
The coverage was not just heavy, but glowing. The speech was
introduced as historic. On ABC’s World News, anchorman Charles
Gibson declared "It may turn out to be the seminal speech of his
presidential campaign....an extraordinary speech." The anchors allowed
Obama to play media critic. Gibson added: "Obama complained about the
endless loop of snippets from Pastor Wright’s sermons, which have been
broadcast over and over." Gibson didn’t see a need to fact-check Obama,
at least in terms of the networks’ very limited appetite for Wright
snippets.
The controversy was described as unfortunate, and Wright’s rants were
a scandal only to some Americans. On NBC Nightly News, anchor
Brian Williams began sympathetically: "This country is currently feeling
its way through something entirely new. This is the first time an
African-American candidate has a serious, some would say likely, shot at
becoming the next President of the United States. So race is an issue in
this year’s campaign, both in a way that's inescapable and in other
ways. The latest controversy has to do with a Chicago minister. He’s
made some comments some find highly objectionable, and he happens
to be Barack Obama's former minister."
In the beginning seconds of the CBS Evening News, anchor Katie
Couric highlighted Obama’s refusal to disown Wright: "Barack Obama
addresses the controversial comments of his pastor, condemning the words
but not the man," followed by an Obama clip: "I can no more disown him
than I can disown the black community."
On ABC, Obama’s refusal to disown Wright was cast as a magnanimous,
even heroic gesture. George Stephanopoulos declared, "By refusing to
renounce Reverend Wright, that was in many ways an act of honor for
Senator Obama." The next morning, Stephanopoulos oozed, "I think it was
a stunning success, as a speech. It was sophisticated, eloquent. Barack
Obama is as a fine a writer as you’ll find in a politician." ABC’s Robin
Roberts announced the results of a poll that found "65 percent of voters
said Reverend Wright’s comments made no difference in the way they view
Obama." Stephanopoulos praised Obama’s courage again: "He did not
renounce someone that he was under great pressure to renounce, even
though he disagreed with his comments. And I think a lot of voters, even
if they’re uncomfortable with Reverend Wright, will respect Barack Obama
for that act."
Stephanopoulos also singled out Obama for his great honesty: "I think
the other intangible here is how voters will respond, not only to the
honesty that Barack Obama showed yesterday, not only the sophistication
he showed in the speech, but also the honor that he showed." ABC
reporter Terry Moran also saw honesty: "Well, as you know, one of the
hardest things to do in American politics, in American society, is to
talk honestly about race. And it’s clear that’s what Barack Obama was
trying to do in that remarkable speech."
Broadcast network interview segments on the Wright remarks and Obama’s
race speech in March were dominated by liberal guests. When the networks
allowed Republican or conservative guests, they praised Obama’s remarks.
CBS especially loaded its reaction panels with nine liberals and just
one right-leaning pundit, pollster Frank Luntz, who contained his
remarks to grading Obama’s stagecraft. NBC allowed six liberals to three
conservatives, including MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough. ABC
offered conservative Peggy Noonan and liberal Donna Brazile one appearance each. In both
interviews, they were paired with NPR’s Juan Williams, who was more
critical of Wright than both women. Overall, the pundit count was 16 to
5.
This guest count does not include the actual staff analysts of the
networks in March, like ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, NBC’s Tim Russert,
or CBS’s Jeff Greenfield. But only Greenfield appeared on a panel with
other pundits. It also doesn’t include officially designated campaign
spokesmen, like Shaun Casey’s aforementioned defense of Obama on ABC
right after the first Brian Ross exposé.
CBS was the most eager network to book guests supportive of both
Obama and Wright. On the March 17 Early Show, CBS interviewed
Rev. Calvin Butts, who announced to anchor Russ Mitchell that he was
"very close" to Wright and proclaimed that black churchgoers should
never denounce their pastors for radical pulpit rhetoric, since it’s
"the practical application of the love of God to everybody." From there,
CBS moved on to a three-liberal panel of guests: Debra Dickerson of the
hard-left magazine Mother Jones, liberal Columbia professor
Randall Balmer, and Bucknell professor and "hip hop scholar" James
Peterson. CBS’s Maggie Rodriguez asked if Wright had crossed any lines
in his statements, and Peterson announced: "I don’t think so." Rodriguez
wondered if Obama should be seen as "guilty by association" with Wright,
Balmer said "I don’t think so...that’s just not a fair thing."
On the March 18 Early Show, CBS offered liberal commentator
Nancy Giles and Democratic consultant Joe Trippi. Rodriguez asked, "How
careful does he have to be today not to denounce Jeremiah Wright
and make black voters angry?" Russ Mitchell added this hopeful question
to the liberal pair: "After the speech today, is the race and gender
issue over?"
On
the March 18 Evening News, Couric offered Debra Dickerson of
Mother Jones, religious-left organizer Jim Wallis, and CBS’s Jeff
Greenfield. Dickerson said Obama was "brilliant." Wallis said Wright’s
career had been unfairly "boiled down to four angry soundbites." He also
declared "The black pulpit is a place of truth-telling about the
experience of black people," an odd quote when applied to AIDS
conspiracy theories. That might explain Greenfield’s subsequent
condemnation of the Wright government-genocide comments.
On the March 19 Early Show, CBS turned to Greenfield and
right-leaning pollster Frank Luntz for analysis. Luntz only discussed
Obama’s speechmaking technique, that he looked too much into the tele-prompter
instead of connecting visually with the audience. Greenfield repeated
his critique of Wright’s AIDS theories. Rodriguez began the segment:
"Consensus seems to be that this was yet another great, eloquent speech
by Barack Obama."
CBS also interviewed Time managing editor Rick Stengel and
(for a third time) Debra Dickerson of Mother Jones, who declared
the speech was "brilliant" and "visionary." Stengel weirdly declared
"It’s kind of amazing we’re reckoning with the fact, wow, we actually
have a black candidate running for president."
Not every liberal spared Reverend Wright (see box), but most did. On
March 15, NBC interviewed radical professor and Obama supporter Michael
Eric Dyson and Melinda Henneberger of the liberal Huffington Post
website. Dyson dismissed Wright’s "so-called inflammatory remarks," and
Henneberger claimed "I actually think it might turn out to be a positive
for Obama in a funny way, because it completely puts to rest this motion
that he’s a secret Muslim." So much for a debate.
Some conservative pundits tried to be non-committal. On the March 18
NBC Nightly News, Joe Scarborough tried to reserve judgment on
the Obama speech’s impact, saying reactions in the news studios weren’t
as important as reactions among Reagan Democrats in industrial towns.
NBC’s other pundit in that segment, Washington Post editorial
writer Jonathan Capehart, swooned over the speech, calling it "a very
important gift the Senator has given the country." By March 21,
Scarborough was telling Today viewers it was "the most important
speech on race since Martin Luther King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech."
On the March 20 Today, NBC brought back Dyson again, and
paired him with right-leaning Michael Smerconish, who condemned his own
talk-show listeners for being skeptical of the Obama speech: "You get an
impression when you watch YouTube for 10 seconds. The speech requires an
investment of time. But I maintained if you make that investment of
time, it removes this issue...he addressed in a very unmuzzled fashion
the questions that I and a lot of other members of white America had
about this problem."
When Lauer asked Dyson if Obama "went after the speech from a
candidate who happens to be black to a black candidate," Dyson replied:
"Well, of course not, because in America one is punished for being
conscious of the racial restrictions that have been imposed
historically, and yet when one seeks to move beyond them, one is ever
trapped by them." NBC also interviewed leftist Air America host Rachel
Maddow on the morning of March 22.
On
the March 19 Good Morning America, columnist and former GOP
speechwriter Peggy Noonan showered Obama with praise [see box].
Surprisingly, NPR correspondent Juan Williams was more critical than the
former Reagan staffer. While he acknowledged it was a good speech, he
noted the Obama campaign was in crisis "over the statements made by
Reverend Wright damning America, suggesting that the government spreads
AIDS among black people. Really outrageous statements, that initially,
you know, he [Obama] said he wasn’t in the pews. Yesterday he said, you
know, I did hear some of these statements, to be honest with you." He
said "I don’t think the Reagan Democrats...they’re gonna buy this as him
disowning himself sufficiently from the kind of rantings of Reverend
Wright."
A few minutes later, as they continued the interview in the 7:30 half
hour, Noonan added that Obama helped himself by refusing to disassociate
with Wright: "I’ve got to tell you, in American politics, there’s too
much throwing people over the side. ‘You said a bad thing, you’re out of
here. You said a bad thing, you’re done.’ He [Obama] said [of Wright],
‘he said a bad thing, there are reasons, you’re wrong, let’s go forward
together.’ I like that better."
Only Newt Gingrich on ABC offered one hard-hitting conservative
critique a month later, on the April 29 Good Morning America, in
an interview largely about other matters with substitute host Barbara
Walters. Gingrich said "I think Reverend Wright’s a very angry person. I
think he’s actually more reflective, as is William Ayers, of the hard
left than he is of African-Americans. And I think he represents a very,
very hardline anti-American viewpoint."
While the networks tried to drop the Wright story (and certainly the
Wright soundbites) out of the campaign narrative, Rev. Wright failed to
cooperate. After weeks of traveling out of the country to let the story
cool, Wright accepted several prominent invitations to comment on the
last weekend of April: a Friday night interview with Bill Moyers on PBS,
a Sunday night address before the Detroit chapter of the NAACP, and most
prominently, a Monday morning discussion at the National Press Club in
Washington.
Without these events, the Wright story would have been left in a
quiet corner. But Wright’s speaking tour spurred greater coverage. In
the last week of April, the networks increased their time devoted to
Wright soundbites: 286 seconds on the evening news and 351 seconds in
the morning. While both these totals fell below the amount of seconds
the networks gave in their promotional treatment of Obama’s race speech,
Wright snippets drew about four times as much time on the evening shows
in April as the Wright soundbite total in March. Wright soundbites
amounted to almost a minute more time in April than they did in March on
the morning programs.
Although the media played along with the Obama campaign spin that
Wright’s beliefs had been caricatured, when Wright was pressed harder on
his most outrageous statements at the National Press Club, he refused to
back down from any of his claims about the evils committed by America –
including that the "terrorism" of the United States caused 9/11, and
that the government conspired to infect blacks with AIDS. Wright’s
National Press Club vitriol demonstrated his positions were not being
exaggerated, but his reiteration of his opinions about an AIDS
conspiracy and America deserving 9/11 went virtually unreported. Three
of the shows featured clips of Wright suggesting America had committed
terrorism (ABC’s Good Morning America, CBS Evening News,
and NBC Nightly News), adding up to 23 seconds.
They each used slightly differing versions of this quote: "Jesus said
‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you.’ You cannot do
terrorism on other people and expect it never to come back on you. Those
are biblical principles, not Jeremiah Wright bombastic, divisive
principles."
None of the networks showed Wright defending his conspiracy theory on
AIDS, citing a book by Leonard Horowitz that charges both AIDS and the
Ebola virus were U.S. government conspiracies. But on the April 29
World News, ABC suddenly featured Obama denouncing "Such ridiculous
propositions as the U.S. government somehow being involved in AIDS."
That was a first for ABC, which had never informed their audience of
this conspiracy theory.
A numerical breakdown of the soundbites shows that much of the April
soundbite time was devoted to soundbites from an hour-long softball
interview of Wright by Bill Moyers on PBS. Moyers helpfully built a
taxpayer-subsidized platform for Rev. Wright to complain about his
victimization in soft tones, much calmer than his screaming sermons.
Between the three network morning and evening shows, there were almost
six minutes of clips from the Moyers show (358 seconds), but only about
two and a half minutes (155 seconds) from the National Press Club.
The networks ran healthy chunks of Wright’s attack on conservatives:
"I think they wanted to communicate that I was unpatriotic, that I’m
un-American, that I’m filled with hate speech, that I have a cult at
Trinity United Church of Christ. ‘And by the way, guess who goes to his
church? Hint, hint, hint.’ That’s what they wanted to communicate."
Moyers asked him how he felt about it, and Wright said: "I felt it was
unfair. I felt it was unjust. I felt it was untrue. I felt that those
who were doing that were doing it for some very devious reasons."
While
reporters acknowledged Wright’s high-profile tour wouldn’t be good news
for Obama’s campaign, these network stories offered no soundbite time
for rebuttals from Wright’s critics. No conservative was allowed to
question the merits (or lack of merits) of the minister’s complaints to
Moyers, or that it was bizarre for him to suggest that his sermons were
not defined by America-bashing, and not full of bitterness and hate.
The PBS remarks encouraged the networks that the story could be
finessed, so the soundbite time was greater. For example, on ABC,
World News devoted 61 seconds to Wright’s comments on PBS, but the
embarrassing National Press Club statements were only shown for 13
seconds. Good Morning America promoted the PBS interview with 69
seconds of soundbites, but used just 35 seconds of National Press Club
remarks. ABC’s combined morning and evening soundbite time added up to
130 seconds for the PBS comments to just 48 for the National Press Club
remarks.
CBS Evening News reversed that trend: 32 seconds for the PBS
interview, and 61 seconds of Press Club soundbites. But The Early
Show, the same program that awarded Obama almost seven minutes of
race-speech sound, devoted 98 seconds to Wright’s "I’m-no-hater" smooth
talk on PBS, and just 16 seconds from the Press Club, a soundbite that
didn’t mention AIDS or 9/11 but almost heroically replayed how Wright
promised Obama "if you get elected November 5th, I’m coming after you,
because you’ll be representing a government who policies grind under
people, all right?" CBS’s combined morning and evening soundbite time
was 129 seconds for the PBS to 77 for the Press Club.
NBC Nightly News also favored the PBS soundbites over the D.C.
speech, 58 seconds to 23, and Today played 40 seconds from PBS and just
one seven-second Press Club soundbite (where Wright lauded Louis
Farrakhan). NBC’s combined morning and evening soundbite time was 98 to
30.
NBC was the only one of the three networks to notice Wright had
mocked John F. Kennedy’s 1961 inaugural address in his Sunday night
speech in Detroit. In both the introduction and a story on the April 28
Today, NBC ran clips of Wright insisting Kennedy said "Isk" not what
your country can do for you instead of "ask," and that while black
children are mocked for bad English, Kennedy was not. Considering their
triumphant treatment of Obama’s endorsement by Ted and Caroline Kennedy
in January, that should have been news on all three networks.
On April 30, ABC’s David Wright saw Obama
painfully losing a father figure as he distanced
himself from Rev. Wright.
On April 29, Barack Obama denounced Wright without officially leaving
Trinity United Church of Christ, but most reporters saw the remarks as a
clean break, and a welcome one. On the NBC Nightly News, Tim
Russert even suggested this break was a historic moment for Obama, who
was forced into a painful corner. "We’ve had examples of eruptions where
someone would have concern about a candidate, an old friend breaking
with him or her, but nothing of this magnitude, Brian, where someone who
is his spiritual adviser decided to take steps and perform, in the words
of Senator Obama, in a way so destructive to Obama’s candidacy that he
had to resort – Obama did – to a public divorce. That’s what we
witnessed today, a public divorce between Senator Obama and his
spiritual adviser. I think it’s unprecedented in American political
history." Obama had to convince Democrats the issue would not be left to
"haunt" Obama – as if the media would be doing any haunting.
Once Reverend Wright left the Press Club and left the spotlight
again, the networks largely dropped the story in May and June. The
Wright story re-emerged briefly at the end of May when Father Michael
Pfleger, a close friend of Rev. Wright and another man Barack Obama
praised as a spiritual mentor, mocked Hillary Clinton from the pulpit of
Obama’s church on Sunday, May 25. To raucous applause and laughter.
Father Pfleger impersonated Mrs. Clinton getting upset over Obama
stealing the presidential nomination way from her: "Oh damn, where did
you come from? I’m white! I’m entitled! There’s a black man stealing my
show!"
The
story originated again on YouTube, not the networks. Days later, all
three networks covered the story on May 30. Once again, it was
newsworthy within a Democratic Party context, since it caused Obama a
headache within his own party, complicating his attempts to wrap up the
race against Mrs. Clinton and start working on winning over her
supporters.
None of the networks noticed the other outrageous anti-American
Wright-like notes in this 47-minute sermon, including Pfleger’s charge
that America’s "been raping people of color" [see box]. The major
networks found attacks on Mrs. Clinton much more upsetting than attacks
on America’s recent record on race relations.
Within 48 hours, Obama’s campaign sent around a letter from Obama
renouncing his family’s membership in Trinity United Church of Christ.
On ABC, the Trinity-divorce story broke late on World News Saturday,
and was called a "bombshell" on Sunday’s Good Morning America,
although the show never devoted a full report to the news, but left it
as an afterthought to Obama’s delegate counts. Saturday night’s newscast
didn’t have a story by a correspondent. It was just anchor David Muir
interviewing Stephanopoulos, who said:
"Well, we know that sources say Senator Obama was actually in
discussions with the new pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, Rev.
Otis Moss, about cutting his ties to the church before this latest
controversy with Rev. Michael Pfleger last Sunday...The decision was
finally triggered by his realization, Senator Obama’s realization, that
he would be held responsible for everything happening in the pulpit of
that church, and that conversely, the church would be responsible for
what was happening in his campaign, and that the intense media focus on
the church has made it something of a circus every Sunday." There were
no reactions from any other candidates or pundits, just Stephanopoulos,
the helpful analyst, noting Obama made the break "so he could kind of
wipe the slate clean going to the general election."
On This Week, Stephanopoulos pressed Obama spokesman Robert
Gibbs: "In April [sic], Senator Obama said of Reverend Wright, ‘I
can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.’ Now he’s
cut all ties to Reverend Wright and left his church. Was it a mistake to
wait this long?" Gibbs said no, and that the decision was "a deeply
personal, not a political decision."
Once again, the coverage was devoid of any criticism from
conservatives or Republicans. The words of "critics" came from media
pundits. On the June 1 NBC Nightly News, reporter Lee Cowan
declared "Critics say he waited too long, that the damage had already
been done and the move now looks largely political." But instead of a
real Obama critic, CNBC political analyst John Harwood helpfully
explained that Obama made the right decision: "Any time a politician
acts to stem a controversy, some voters are going to conclude that it’s
just politics. But for Barack Obama, that was clearly the better option
than to open himself to more of these questions."
The same good-for-Barack tone emerged on the CBS Evening News
that night. The only hint of a critic in the Dean Reynolds story was a
brief snippet of the North Carolina Republican Party ad against Obama.
Anchor Russ Mitchell wrapped up the story with Reynolds: "Dean, as
someone who’s been covering this campaign, politically do you see any
down side to Obama leaving his church at this point?" Reynolds replied:
"Well, it will look like political opportunism to some people who are
not inclined to support Obama. But clearly this was an issue that he
needed to get rid of, if only to deny his opponents a weapon to use
against him."
In today’s rapid-fire political atmosphere of cable news, talk radio,
and the Internet, media analysts can easily make the mistake of
believing that the leading network news outlets were tough on a
candidate because of the general perception of how the entire media –
Old Media and New Media – brought a controversy to the public’s
attention. But voters who sampled only a light menu of news could easily
have missed the depths of Reverend Wright’s outrageous public remarks.No one could find in these stories a scouring scrutiny of Obama’s
membership in his controversial church.
In an April 30, 2007 story in The New York Times, reporter
Jodi Kantor asserted "It’s hard to imagine, though, how Mr. Obama can
truly distance himself from Mr. Wright. The Christianity that Mr. Obama
adopted at Trinity has infused not only his life, but also his
campaign." It’s only hard to imagine the difficulty of Obama’s dilemma
if you cannot imagine a media elite full of journalists who found their
role in the campaign as polishing, glorifying, and making excuses
instead of questioning and investigating.
Founded in
1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education
foundation
that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for
office. Privacy Statement
Media Research Center 325 S. Patrick Street Alexandria, VA 22314