Dan Rather Goes Gentle on Clinton; Spared Reagan/Bush Treatment
1) Dan Rather's exclusive
interview with Bill Clinton avoided Chinese espionage, Broaddrick and
Lewinsky, but gave Clinton plenty of time to portray himself as defender
of the Constitution against partisan conservatives. Rather wondered about
Clinton's "feelings" on Kosovo and what he'd do as the
husband of a Senator.
2) A just-released Media
Reality Check fax report: "Suddenly Hawkish on Humanitarian Wars:
Clinton Team Spared Quick-Trigger Negativity of News Coverage of Grenada,
Libya, Panama, Gulf War."
>>> April 1 NQ Delayed. An
unexpected bounty of biased bombast from Dan Rather led me, in the
interest of getting the real bias out to everyone while avoiding
confusion, to delay the CyberAlert distribution of the April Fools edition
of Notable Quotables. The April 1 issue of NQ will be distributed in a
separate CyberAlert later today and it will also be posted on the MRC home
page by late Thursday morning. Go to: http://www.mrc.org
Dan Rather plays nice with Bill Clinton. Forget Chinese espionage or
Juanita Broaddrick or Monica Lewinsky's assertion that Clinton satisfied
her, which undercuts his basis for his claim about not having sexual
relations. No, instead in an exclusive interview CBS News landed, after
some questions about the war in Kosovo, Dan Rather tossed kiss-up
questions, such as light-heartedly promoting the Hillary for Senate
distraction: "Could you describe for me what you believe to be the
responsibilities of the husband of a United States Senator?"
And even some of
his Kosovo questions were hardly tough, as he wondered about Clinton's
"feelings" about the situation: "I'm told by those close
to you that you have a lot of pent up feelings about what's happening in
the Balkans, what we're doing there. Can you share some of that with
March 31, the CBS Evening News aired three sets of highlights from the
interview totaling about six minutes. Later, 60 Minutes II allocated two
segments, more than half the program, to a lengthier showing of the
interview Rather conducted at the White House Wednesday afternoon.
There's a lot
worth taking in here from an unrepentant Clinton who used his CBS air time
to portray himself as a victim defending the Constitution against partisan
conservatives. During the interview:
-- Clinton declared: "I am very careful in
the words I use not to mislead one way or the other."
-- Asked about stopping the bombing in respect to
Easter, Clinton cited Milosevic's killing spree, asserting: "We
can't observe Easter and honor the resurrection of Christ by allowing
him another free day to kill more innocent civilians."
-- He insisted he did not consider resigning
because "I wouldn't do that to the Constitution....I would never
have legitimized what I believe is horribly wrong with what has occurred
here over the last four or five years."
-- Clinton contended: "I do not regard this
impeachment vote as some great badge of shame."
-- When Clinton insisted "I have no
lingering animosity, I don't wake up every day mad at those
people," Rather suggested he has good reasons for ill will:
"You've got to be bitter about some of it."
Now, to the details. Rather began the interview
as shown on 60 Minutes II at 9pm ET/PT with some questions about Kosovo,
starting with the genocide there, whether Clinton has authorized bombing
Belgrade, to "go downtown," as Rather put it. After asking if
any targets have been ruled out, Rather got to one of his few challenging
questions, sort of, suggesting Milosevic could now agree to talk since
he's achieved his goal of cleansing Kosovo of Muslims, "So
doesn't that leave us defeated, or does it?" Clinton replied that
he would not accept the status quo as all the Kosovar people must be
allowed to return to their homes. Next, Rather asked Clinton to react to
the suggestion that members of the military say we're not employing our
full force, that the U.S. is not going all out.
Now we get to the
interesting part. In asking about sending ground troops Rather insisted
Clinton respond to the complaint that he "parses" his words, but
Rather couldn't refrain from setting up the question by gratuitously
saying "everybody acknowledges you have a brilliant mind."
exchange, with Clinton's remarkable retort that "I am very careful
in the words I use" and that complaining about parsing is a trick by
political enemies to divert him from helping the American people, an
argument Rather bought:
all respect, but also directly, everybody acknowledges you have a
brilliant mind, you're an excellent speaker. But sometimes people, and
people who support and like you say well he parses words too closely. What
is is argument, all of that. I want to discuss ground troops in the
context of speaking as directly as you possibly can. When you say you have
no intention to commit ground troops to accomplish the mission in Kosovo,
does that mean we are not going to have ground troops in there no way, no
how, no time?"
Clinton: "It means just what it says. You
know, I'll come back to the point, but you say people say I parse words
too closely. That's what they said about President Roosevelt too and he
made a pretty good President. And when people say you parse words too
closely it usually means they want to ask you a question and get you to
give an answer which is inconsistent with the objective you're trying to
pursue for the American people and so you don't do what they want you to
do. So normally they criticize not for what you're doing but for what
they wish you would do."
Rather: "Fair enough."
Clinton: "Now, I have used those words
carefully. I am very careful in the words I use. Now on the merits of it,
the thing that bothers me about introducing ground troops into a hostile
situation...." He went on to say he's concerned about the
"prospect of never being able to get them out."
(The miracle of
editing. Here's the Clinton answer CBS showed on the Evening News in
response to the same question. After the first sentence CBS plugged in an
answer from somewhere else that did not appear on 60 Minutes: "It
means just what it says. I have used those words carefully. I am very
careful in the words I use not to mislead one way or the other. And the
reason is I think I have embraced a strategy here that I believe has a
reasonably good chance, a reasonably good chance of succeeding....")
Back to 60
Minutes, Rather moved on to the Pope's request that Clinton suspend the
bombing for Easter. Citing Milosevic's killing spree, Clinton countered:
"We can't observe Easter and honor the resurrection of Christ by
allowing him another free day to kill more innocent civilians."
Rather followed up
that this is the most important week in the Judeo-Christian calendar, so
some say it's "obscene" to carry on the bombing. Clinton
maintained he's "acting in defense of the defenseless."
Enough with tough
policy, Rather moved on to Clinton's "feelings," as if they
should have any impact on policy decisions:
"Mr. President, as you always try to do,
you're talking in measured tones. As President of the United States you
have to be careful of what you say. But I'm told by those close to you
that you have a lot of pent up feelings about what's happening in the
Balkans, what we're going there. Can you share some of that with
Clinton let out a
big sigh, took a breath, and proceeded to pontificate about how the world
is "bedeviled" by people unable to get along with people who are
different. Clinton insisted that's the "dominant problem" in
the world today.
How profound. As
if people not getting along and going to war is a new phenomenon.
Following an ad
break, Rather progressed to a more pleasant topic for Clinton: "Could
you describe for me what you believe to be the responsibilities of the
husband of a United States Senator?" Clinton, laughing, explained
that he'd be willing to be a caseworker in Hillary's New York office.
Clinton ruminated about how after Hillary aided
his career for 22 years he will spend the next 22 years helping her,
prompting Rather to seek reassurance: "And you expect to do that
together as man and wife?"
Clinton: "Oh, absolutely."
Up next, instead
of demanding Clinton address what he put the country through, Rather
sympathetically inquired about how "our First Family" is doing:
"Mr. President, you know Americans like to know that the First Family
is okay, that they're doing alright. Given the year plus what you and
our First Family have been through, tell us what you can about how the
three of you are doing." Clinton assured Rather they are "doing
reasonably well" since "we do love each other very much,"
adding that Hillary's trip to Africa has been good for the country.
question: "How about yourself? We're here in a room with pictures
of Lincoln, Washington, Continental Congress. When you look back over this
year plus, what's the moral of it? Does it have a moral?"
Clinton outlined his four lessons: First, every
person must bear the consequences of heir conduct; Second, "the
Constitution works" as it prevented partisan passions from getting
out of hand; Third, the American people "almost always get it
right"; and Fourth, people expect officials to work for them and
those who do will be rewarded.
Rather pressed the
President about whether he ever considered resigning, leading to this
retort in which Clinton portrayed himself simultaneously as a victim and a
heroic defender of the Constitution: "I wouldn't do that to the
Constitution. I wouldn't do that to the presidency, I wouldn't do that
to the history of this country. I would never have legitimized what I
believe is horribly wrong with what has occurred here over the last four
or five years."
Rather posed this seemingly uncomfortable question, but did not follow it
up when Clinton deflected it by using it to denounce his opponents:
"Mr. President, I get a lot of letters, not as many as you do, but I
get a lot of letters from parents who say, some of them say 'Listen, I
like President Clinton, I like what he's doing for the country.' Some
even said 'I'd vote for him again but I don't know what to tell the
children on the worst aspects of what happened last year.' Let's try
to give these parents some help. What can they tell their children?"
Clinton claimed that letters he receives from 11,
12 and 13-year-olds show "some of them, on this very point, offended
that they're being used in that way."
Finally, but not
quite, Rather reluctantly queried:
"Last question, if you'll indulge me. You
agree that whatever you do, however this situation in Kosovo turns out,
whatever else you do in the first paragraph of your obituary is going to
be a reference to what you consider among the worst things that's ever
happened to you. Only President in the 20th century to be impeached, one
of only two Presidents to be impeached. Give me some sense of how you feel
about that within yourself."
Clinton answered with a diatribe showing he has
no remorse and really believes he is a victim: "Well, first of all
I'm not at all sure that's right that it will be in the first
paragraph of the obituary. And secondly, if it is, if the history writers
are honest they'll tell it for just exactly what it was. And I am
honored that something that was indefensible was pursued and that I had
the opportunity to defend the Constitution. That doesn't have anything
to do with he fact that I did something that I shouldn't have done which
I'm ashamed of and which I've apologized for but it had nothing to do
with the impeachment process. And I think that's what the American
people, two-thirds of them, knew all along. And I determined that I would
defend the Constitution and the work of my administration and those who
did not agree with what I had done and were furious that it had worked and
the country was doing well and attempted to use what should have been a
constitutional and legal process for political ends did not prevail. And
that's the way I saw it. I have no lingering animosity, I don't wake
up every day mad at those people."
Rather helpfully chirped in: "You've got
to be bitter about some of it."
Clinton: "I'm not..."
Clinton proceeded to say that he realized that if
he wanted forgiveness had to extend forgiveness, that to be a good
President he had to rid himself of bitterness. He maintained: "I do
not regard this impeachment vote as some great badge of shame, I do not
because I do not, because I do not believe it was warranted and don't
think it was right."
He recalled how
most now believe President Johnson was unjustly impeached and the
proceeding now reflects well on him. The piece ended with this scolding
"I just think that it's past us and we
need to put it behind us and we need to go on. We owe that to the American
people to let it go and all of us owe it to our families and our personal
lives. All the great players here, they need to let it go and go on with
the business of the country."
CBS and Dan Rather
are certainly willing. They not only have moved on past Lewinsky, they
won't move to the next scandal: Chinese espionage.
+++ Watch Rather and Clinton.
Thursday morning the MRC's Sean Henry and Kristina Sewell will post
about a three-minute clip, in RealPlayer format, of Rather's most
felicitous questions to Clinton. Go to the MRC home page or to the MRC's
video page: http://www.mediaresearch.org/news/biasvideo.html
How Rather treated Clinton is a significant departure from how major media
outlets reacted to humanitarian-prompted military action by Presidents
Reagan and Bush, a new fax report researched by the MRC's Tim Graham
demonstrates. Prominent figures in the media characterized those
Presidents as bullies launching misguided and dangerous military
operations that could boomerang on the U.S.
Hawkish on Humanitarian Wars: Clinton Team Spared Quick-Trigger Negativity
of News Coverage of Grenada, Libya, Panama, Gulf War," reads the
title of the April 1 Media Reality Check fax report. You can read it below
or go to the MRC home page where a more graphically-appealing version will
be posted Thursday morning. To read this edition and previous fax reports,
Here's the text of the April 1 edition:
The NATO air strikes against Yugoslavian
targets may be the subject of some confusion, but already the Clinton
administration has been spared the quick-trigger media negativity that's
been common in the first days of several Republican military actions:
When the Reagan administration authorized
the liberation of Grenada, The Washington Post wouldn't call it
liberation. It reported on October 27, 1983: "The United States, its
military conquest of Grenada complete..." Two days later: "The
officials said the Marines would probably depart within a week, leaving an
occupation force of about 5,000 Army soldiers."
-- NBC commentator John Chancellor on
Nicaragua, January 15, 1987: "The Duke of Wellington, one of
England's greatest soldiers, once said 'There is no such thing as a
little war for a great nation'....The Johnson administration became
obsessed with Vietnam, the Kremlin became obsessed with Afghanistan and
the Reagan administration became obsessed with Nicaragua. That led to bad
troubles for the Reagan administration. Big countries have to pick their
fights very carefully. Victory has to be certain in a fight with a small
enemy. If not, things can get out of hand."
-- CBS reporter Wyatt Andrews covering the
Panama invasion, December 21, 1989: "Having launched one of the
largest invasion forces since the days of the Vietnam War, Mr. Bush is
erasing his old image of being timid, but the new question now, almost
overnight, is whether this President is exhibiting signs of being
-- Los Angeles Times reporter Barry Bearak
in a December 18, 1989 news analysis on Reagan's 1986 air raids on
Libya: "Democrats by and large remained uncritical of this occasional
gunplay. After all, Sheriff Reagan mostly fired in the air, harmlessly
busting up the bullies on a weekend drunk. And besides, in the heat of a
national pep rally, any downbeat voice was easily scored as whiny and
-- CBS reporter Bob Simon on the Gulf War,
August 7, 1990: "While Americans say they're moving tonight in
support of little nations, that's not how it will be perceived or
described over here. From the poor people in these little nations,
Americans will hear these old phrases, old accusations: gunboat diplomacy,
imperialism, the arrogance of power."
-- Bryant Gumbel on the August 7, 1990 Today:
"The Persian Gulf crisis is already resulting in higher gas prices at
the pump, exposing the [Bush] administration's lack of an energy policy.
We'll talk of just how much that figures to cost him."
-- Lisa Myers on the August 15, 1990 NBC
Nightly News: "The problem is that slow but steady progress on
energy conservation came to a screeching halt in the mid-1980s, which is a
big reason Iraq has us over a barrel today...What derailed the
conservation effort? Two things: a sharp drop in oil prices, and the
Reagan administration." Myers eight days later: "Almost daily,
the President is out on a gas-guzzling cigarette boat which gets one and a
half miles to the gallon. Saving energy is not something he likes to talk
about.... Energy analysts call the lack of action irresponsible."
-- Gumbel to a Saudi Arabian editor on
August 20: "I need not elaborate on the differences between your
culture and ours, but how much of a threat to the Saudi way of life do you
think the presence of American forces represents?"
-- Dan Rather to Saddam Hussein on August
29, 1990: "Mr. President, do you think this is a Vietnam in the sand
for the United States?"
END fax report
I'll send the
April 1 Notable Quotables at about noon ET. --
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to email@example.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
Send problems and comments to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: email@example.com.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe