Hot Day Means Global Warming; Giggling Over Al; Las Vegas Lost
1) A couple of hot days in New
York City naturally prompted CBS to worry: "Researchers warn in the
next century global warming could make these dog days a lot more
common." The researcher: EDF.
2) CBS's Bob Schieffer and
Dan Rather agreed that Chinese spying is serious and the Cox Report is
important, but in explaining why it's not a bigger issue with the public
neither acknowledged how little time and priority their shows have given
it.
3) NBC's Claire Shipman
giggled as she admired how an "ever spontaneous" Tipper Gore
surprised "jaded journalists with a racy joke about her husband's
bedtime attire or lack thereof."
4) CNN and NBC previewed the
Las Vegas mayoral election by showing video of casinos like Caesar's,
Bellagio, New York New York and the Mirage, but they are on "the
strip" which isn't in Las Vegas.
1
The breakdown of the Kosovo talks led the three broadcast networks Monday
night with all three running pieces on mental illness prompted by the
White House event on the subject. CBS's Dan Rather announced: "The
hidden human and financial toll of inadequate mental health insurance
coverage was on President Clinton's agenda today." The CBS piece
featured soundbites from Bill Clinton, Tipper Gore and CBS's own Mike
Wallace who participated in the conference.
The hot weather in
the east and the supposed "epidemic of skin cancer" led NBC
Nightly News to run In Depth stories on new government rules for SPF
ratings for "sunscreens." The term "sunblock" is now
improper.
The CBS Evening
News used the hot weather as an excuse to highlight dire predictions about
global warming, giving credibility to a left-wing environmental activist
by failing to properly identify him, passing him off as a
"researcher."
Reporter Randall Pinkston asserted:
"In the east several cities tied or broke
record highs. Cleveland 91, Harrisburg 96, Portland Maine 95 and Newark
New Jersey, a sizzling 99 degrees. Right now in these cities 90 degree
plus readings only happen ten to 15 times a year, but researchers warn in
the next century global warming could make these dog days a lot more
common."
Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund:
"New York, Washington, St. Louis could have as many as eighty 90
degree days a hundred years from now. Dallas could have 130 90 degree
days."
Not bothering to be balanced by getting a view
from any of the majority of scientists who don't buy the dire global
warming theories, Pinkston piled on: "Causing more problems like
those today in Baltimore where un-air conditioned public schools dismissed
100,000 children early."
Oppenheimer: "The very old, the very young,
the very sick and the very poor are at great risk. In Chicago in 1995 five
hundred people died in a heat wave."
Pinkston concluded his one-sided story: "A
heat wave isn't official until it happens for three straight days.
Thankfully, this hot spell should end tomorrow. But with summer just weeks
away, the danger is just beginning."
There's so much
material out there on the other side which Pinkston deliberately ignored
that it's hard to know where to begin, but since many previous
CyberAlerts have already detailed the scientific doubts I won't here
again. The Science and Environmental Policy Project Web site does offer a
convenient page of links to many sites with articles and studies
disproving the liberal line that industry is fueling global warming. Check
out: http://www.sepp.org/othersites.html
2
CBS's Bob Schieffer and Dan Rather both agreed that Chinese spying is
serious and the Cox Report is important, but in explaining their view of
why it's not a bigger issue with the public neither acknowledged how
little time and priority their shows have given it.
In a Saturday
night interview Bob Schieffer said he takes the Cox Report
"seriously," but suggested it is not a topic of public
conversation because "nobody has yet figured out exactly what it is
that the Chinese did." But that's what the Cox Report tried to
outline.
Monday morning Dan
Rather told syndicated radio host Don Imus that China is "an
extremely important story even if the findings of this most recent
committee paper maybe are overstated. Still, this is very important
stuff," though he went on to say Russia is a greater threat. His
concerns about overstating things are matched by his show's May 27 story
trying to discredit the report. (See the May 28 or June 7 CyberAlert for
quotes from Eric Engberg's hit piece.)
-- On CNN's
Larry King Weekend on June 5 King asked Schieffer, in an exchange tracked
down by MRC analyst Paul Smith, "Why has not the Chinese story had
greater impact nationally? Why isn't every coffee shop talking about
it?"
Schieffer replied: "I think it is because
nobody has yet figured out exactly what it is that the Chinese did. I
mean, I have heard some people, I take this report seriously, the Cox
Report and what makes me take it seriously is it was unanimous. You had
the Democrats on that investigative committee agreeing with the
Republicans. There is no question that our security was just awful and
that it should have been improved and that people just weren't paying
attention at these labs and that has to be remedied I think. But I think
people are very sophisticated about this spying business. We've had the
James Bond movies. We've had the Cold War, and all the novels about
spying and I think people think that countries spy on each other now and
that is part of the deal. It's kinda like baseball, if you can get away
with stealing a sign, that's part of the game and I think in a more
serious way, people are not surprised that major powers are trying to spy
and find out national security information."
So it's all part
of a game and isn't so serious? Schieffer presides over Face the Nation
which has devoted the least time of all the Sunday morning interview shows
to the subject of Chinese espionage.
-- On the June 7 Imus in the Morning broadcast on
MSNBC Imus, MRC analyst Mark Drake noticed, ruminated: "I wonder
though in stealing these nuclear secrets at, one of the things I observed
about it was, I don't know if it makes any difference, is at least now
we know what they have, but you know they have what we have but they
don't have a way to deliver it but I mean, but and I hear you, I hear
what you say about them wanting to become a superpower but to what
end?"
Rather explained: "Well, because they see
China's destiny as it was in the past as being the dominant force on the
planet. That's to what end they seek. Yeah, you know we talk about the
Chinese stealing these nuclear secrets and it is, I still think it's
still, you know, an extremely important story even if the findings of this
most recent committee paper maybe are overstated. Still, this is very
important stuff. Less that the Chinese, I mean, no one should be shocked
that the Chinese have been trying to steal our secrets. And I don't
think anybody should really be shocked that they were successful but how
lax we have become about trying to protect our secrets is where the story
is. But with it all, the Chinese still don't have a delivery system. You
know some of their missiles would hit some of the U.S., a few of 'em
maybe. But what no one is talking about is Russia still has thousands of
missiles that are highly capable of hitting this country and a big nuclear
stockpile. So while we've been sort of focused on this problem of the
Chinese stealing our nuclear secrets, I hope somebody will begin to pay
attention to what we do about a rapidly deteriorating Russia as a society
and as a nation, that chaos is working not just around the edges but at
the core there with the country that has thousands of nuclear tip missiles
that are dependable in terms of delivery."
So, let's check
out CBS reasoning. It's a big deal that global warming may lead to a few
deaths in cities from the heat, but it's not such a big deal that only a
"few" Chinese nuclear missiles could hit the U.S., though
they'd kill many more.
It would be easier
to believe Rather really finds the espionage "an extremely important
story" if his CBS Evening News didn't put the Cox Report second the
night it was released, after gun control, and hadn't ignored the story
since May 27.
Speaking of Dan
Rather, the latest column by MRC Chairman L. Brent Bozell details some of
Rather's latest cheerleading for Clinton's team in his radio
commentaries which the MRC's Tim Graham tracked down. "Rather's
Radio Rah-Rahs" begins: "Why is it, I wonder, that Dan Rather is
incapable of keeping his opinions to himself when reporting news? Nobody's
forgotten Rather's warm wishes for Bill Clinton at a CBS affiliates
meeting on May 27,1993: 'If we could be one-hundredth as great as you
and Hillary Rodham Clinton have been in the White House, we'd take it
right now and walk away winners...Thank you very much and tell Mrs.
Clinton we respect her and we're pulling for her.'
"Rest assured Rather's love affair with the
Clintons continues. He's betrayed it twice this year on 60 Minutes II.
First came his cozy post-impeachment interview with the President. Then
this month, Rather repeated the favor for Hillary, gushing over her
possible Senate campaign: 'Once a political lightning rod, today she is
political lightning.'
"Now, with Tom Brokaw and Peter Jennings
riding their fame onto the best-seller list, Rather has arrived with
Deadlines and Datelines, a compilation of his regular CBS Radio
commentaries over the last few years. There's nothing in it from 1999,
which is probably fortuitous. Rather's latest radio commentaries are
perfect companions to his Clinton TV interviews: servile to a
fault...."
To read the rest
of the column, go to: http://www.mediaresearch.org/columns/news/col19990603.html
3
Claire Shipman: Giggling girlfriend or dispassionate reporter? Catching up
with her June 1 profile of Tipper Gore for Today, the answer is giggling
girlfriend as she laughed along when Mrs. Gore suggested her husband
sleeps in the nude. The giggling session occurred in the middle of a
lengthy and glowingly positive profile piece picked up by MRC analyst
Geoffrey Dickens.
Shipman began,
over video of Tipper Gore skiing: "Tipper Gore has never been a
predictable political wife. First of all you have the sense that she's
well, fun. You just know she'd rather be here or rollerblading or running
a marathon than attending a staid Washington function. And in her formal
role she's chosen to champion a less than obvious cause, mental
illness."
After running
through Tipper's admission of depression caused by the serious injury to
her son, an admission Shipman did concede some considered political,
Shipman asserted that she balances Al's reserve. Shipman recalled how
she once took on rock lyrics but today Republicans "grumble"
that she's backed off criticizing the entertainment industry because
Democrats want Hollywood money.
Shipman continued:
"Of course the role she has always played for her husband and one
advisors think is critical now: loosening him up. But she refuses to admit
the obvious."
Tipper insisted All is "handsome, sexy, a
little reserved."
As Shipman and Tipper Gore sat beside each other
as Tipper flipped through a photo album, Shipman relayed: "And ever
spontaneous she manages to surprise even jaded journalists with a racy
joke about her husband's bedtime attire or lack thereof."
It's hard to make out, but as she points to a
photo of Al, Tipper says something like: "He isn't wearing anything
very long when we go to bed".
After Tipper and
Shipman giggle a bit the NBC reporter went on: "You get the sense in
fact that the Tipper and Al love story will become a campaign theme. Some
say a potent, if calculated defense against the moral transgressions of
Bill Clinton. But while the story is becoming well worn it's hard to doubt
the sentiment."
After letting Al Gore describe how he met Tipper,
Shipman asserted: "For the former Mary Elizabeth Acheson that meeting
came to define her life. The two wed young as Gore was heading for a stint
in Vietnam and her budding career as a photographer turned into an
occasional hobby as her husband's political career took off. Tipper is
clearly the emotional center of the Gore family and she has some obvious
ambivalence about the demands of the next year....What kind of First Lady
would she be? Conventional wisdom is a cross between the more traditional
Barbara Bush and the ultra modern Hillary Clinton. Some say she'd at least
be easier to understand."
Elizabeth Drew: "Hillary Clinton is a bundle
of contrasting personalities I think. Soft, hard, sentimental, tough.
Tipper Gore is one person, she's one concrete person. What you see is what
you get."
After Tipper
praised Hillary Clinton, Shipman concluded:
"Right now the Gore team is very much
counting on Tipper Gore's, 'What you see is what you get' brand of
uniqueness, hoping that her appeal will help ease the way on the long
campaign trail ahead."
+++ Watch Tipper
and Claire giggle away and try to make out what Tipper said about Al's
bedtime attire. Tuesday morning the MRC's Sean Henry will post, in
RealPlayer format, a clip of this June 1 Today profile. Go to: http://www.mrc.org
4
Leaving Las Vegas. Actually, leaving out Las Vegas and portraying what
isn't Las Vegas as Las Vegas. (This item has nothing to do with the
usual CyberAlert tracking of liberal bias, but just a glaring bit of
misreporting that I noticed having visited the Las Vegas areas earlier
this year.)
Monday night both
CNN's Inside Politics and NBC Nightly News featured stories previewing
the controversy over how Mob lawyer Oscar Goodman is expected to win
today's mayoral election in the city of Las Vegas, Nevada.
Over video of the
talking statues inside Caesar's Palace casino and matching exterior
shots of the casino resorts she was citing, CNN's Siobhan Darrow
announced: "In the city where statues speak, where you can be in New
York, Paris and Venice in a matter of minutes, understatement is one sin
Las Vegans won't tolerate."
Well, not really.
Caesar's Palace, the New York New York casino and the entire "Las
Vegas strip" to which Darrow was referring are not in the city of Las
Vegas.
NBC Nightly News
anchor Tom Brokaw introduced NBC's story by showing a shot of the Golden
Nuggett, which is in Las Vegas, followed by an aerial shot of the
Excalibur and the Mirage, which are not. In the story, reporter Kelly
O'Donnell walked along "the strip," with the Ballagio sign
behind her, as she misleadingly announced:
"In Las Vegas, image matters. This is the
fastest growing major city in America, a place that's worked hard to
give itself a makeover, to attract more families and new businesses. Oscar
Goodman's critics say making him mayor puts that new image at risk. The
Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial page labeled Goodman a 'barrister to
butchers'...."
At least the
conservative Review-Journal editorial page got some rare national media
attention, but O'Donnell was factually incorrect. She was not walking in
or showing viewers Las Vegas, at least not the city of Las Vegas which is
what matters in a story about an election governed by political
boundaries. She was in an unincorporated area of Clark County.
As the Clark
County Web page informs anyone bothering to understand that political
offices are governed by municipal and county boundaries, not what the Post
Office or Chamber of Commerce calls an area:
"Clark County responds to the needs of
approximately 453,809 citizens residing in the urban unincorporated area.
Sahara Avenue (immediately north of the Sahara Hotel) is the municipal
boundary for the City of Las Vegas. All citizens residing south of this
line receive their traditional urban services from Clark County rather
than from any of the County's municipalities. The entire 'Las Vegas
Strip' is contained within the unincorporated area of Clark County. The
services provided to this vast area include all those functions normally
associated with a city, such as public works, building inspections, fire
protection, street sweeping, parks and recreation, etc."
In other words,
all the famous casinos shown by CNN and NBC -- from the MGM Grand to
Bellagio to Mirage to Caesar's to Mandalay Bay to Bally's -- are not
in the city of Las Vegas, so the Mayor of Las Vegas has nothing to do with
them.
One wonders
whether the reporters are just putting interesting video ahead of basic
accuracy or do they not understand the difference between a city boundary
and a Post Office place name?
What's next, a
story about the New York City mayoral race illustrated by video of Jersey
City? --
Brent Baker
3
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
DO
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
cybercomment@mrc.org.
Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
>>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
|