| Clinton's Buddy Bryant Gumbel; CBS Pushed Bush Drug Question 1) In just two mornings Bryant
      Gumbel has already raised Bush drug charges, tossed softballs to Clinton,
      castigated a conservative actor for his views and bemoaned inaction on gun
      control. 2) No political news on the
      broadcast networks Monday night. On the CBS Evening News Dan Rather
      relayed ominous warnings about the dire consequences of global warming. 3) Last week the Washington
      Post cut off a quote about what happens in a partial-birth abortion and
      the week before, unlike ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC, FNC offered a rare, full
      description. 
 Correction: The November 1 CyberAlert
      inaccurately carried a volume number of three. This year is volume four
      for CyberAlerts. 1   A new network venue in the morning, but the same old liberal Bryant Gumbel
      tossing in his personal views. It didn't take long for Gumbel to abandon
      professionalism and expose his opinions to viewers of The Early Show on
      CBS. On Monday's debut show he castigated the conservative views of actor
      Mel Gibson, complaining: "He's said some pretty outrageous things
      over the years and nobody seems to ever call him on it." This morning
      he regretted the failure of gun control. And on Monday he tossed softballs
      to Bill Clinton, following up only to press the President about George W.
      Bush and cocaine, and ending by inviting Clinton to play golf with him.
      Tuesday morning,
      co-host Jane Clayson handled a live interview with George W. Bush and
      followed up on Gumbel's concern by asking Bush about cocaine charges that
      are "dogging" him.      -- In the 8:30
      half hour of the November 1 show CBS played a taped interview by Mark
      McEwen with Mel Gibson on the set in South Carolina of his upcoming movie,
      The Patriot. MRC analyst Brian Boyd noticed that McEwen told Gibson:
      "You live in Hollywood, work in Hollywood -- liberal town. Some of
      your views aren't as liberal as that town. You're anti-abortion,
      pro-capital punishment, do you ever feel like you're howling in a
      hurricane?"Gibson replied: "Some kind of a dinosaur?
      No, you know you have to have these opinions about these things. I'm
      pretty firm on stuff like that. I don't feel like I'm howling in a
      hurricane. I just try to do my bit the way I think it should be
      done."
      After the tape
      ended Gumbel told McEwen: "I was glad to see you ask him about it,
      because he's said some pretty outrageous things over the years and nobody
      seems to ever call him on it. They kind of think oh that's cute, he's a
      movie star. But some of the stuff he's said is..."McEwen, jumping in: "Well he speaks his mind
      and if you ask him, he backs up everything that he's said."
 Gumbel: "But didn't he say something about
      the homeless also one time, that was a little bit disturbing too."
 McEwen: "Yeah. Sometimes you have to
      remember also with him, he is a very tongue firmly in cheek half the time,
      half the time what he's saying he means. So you have to go through and
      figure out which is which."
      MRC Communications
      Director Liz Swasey used Nexis to discover what homeless quote so upset
      Gumbel. A "people in the news" type column in the Arizona
      Republic back on August 27, 1998 relayed:"Don't depend on Mel Gibson to be
      politically correct. The actor was complimenting Rene Russo, his Lethal
      Weapon 4 co-star, in an interview, describing how she feeds and takes care
      of street people. When asked by Australia's New Weekly magazine what he
      would do for the homeless, Gibson quipped: 'I kick 'em. Spit on them,
      that's me!...And if I can, I try to set 'em on fire!' Advocates for the
      homeless aren't laughing. 'Jest or not, it's such a despicable remark
      under any guise,' Mary Ann Gleason, executive director of the National
      Coalition for the Homeless, told TV Guide's Web site, TVgen.com. Gibson's
      remarks were 'all very tongue-in-cheek,' counters his publicist, Alan
      Neirob."
      Lesson here:
      Gumbel doesn't like any jokes that make fun of his liberal causes.      -- Responding to
      Gumbel's Tuesday question about congressional failure to pass
      "something" in the wake of "the juvenile bloodshed we've
      seen over the past year," CBS reporter Diana Olick answered from
      Capitol Hill: "Well, believe it or not, they actually rank gun
      control pretty low on the scale. Americans really are much more interested
      in education, health care and Social Security."Gumbel lamented: "So it's easier for them to
      just pass on it?"
 Olick: "Yup."
 Gumbel: "It's unfortunate."
      -- Other than one
      reference to how polls show Clinton would be a liability on the campaign
      trail to Al Gore, in Gumbel's interview with Bill Clinton taped Sunday and
      shown Monday, Gumbel tossed a series of softballs and failed to follow-up
      when Clinton claimed credit for just about everything good in the world.      The Gumbel
      interview occurred just days after it was revealed that John Huang
      testified about how James Riady had told Clinton about raising money for
      him and that then-White House aide Harold Ickes had asked Huang to raise
      money for a Democratic congressional candidate, something that's illegal
      for a federal official. (See the October 29 CyberAlert for details.) And
      no reporter has yet asked Clinton about the late September testimony from
      four FBI agents that their probe of 1996 Clinton and Democratic
      fundraising was thwarted. Gumbel raised neither issue with Clinton.      Gumbel opened with
      a couple questions about the plane crash and Oslo summit, including:
      "Is it easier for you to feel a degree of optimism because it's Barak
      involved right now instead of Netanyahu?"      Here are the other
      questions/set up lines Gumbel offered:> "Let's talk politics. The two people
      who have been closest to you for seven years are about to get out there on
      the campaign trail while you stay at home and deal with the issues. Is
      that terribly frustrating?"
 > "Are you going to miss being
      President?"
 > "President's generally get one line in
      the history, if they get one line. JFK was shot. Nixon had Watergate.
      Reagan beat communism. Clinton -- ?"
 Clinton: "Turned the economy around and
      prepared America for a new century."
 Gumbel: "You'd be satisfied if your legacy
      was erasing the nation's red ink?"
 Clinton: "I think that's one of my legacies.
      But I think the real legacy is -- America is genuinely transformed from
      where it was seven years ago. Yes, we've got the strongest economy in
      history. And yes, we're paying off the debt instead of being in debt. But
      we also have cut our welfare rolls in half. We've got the lowest crime
      rate in 30 years. We've got the lowest poverty rate in 30 years. We've
      reversed this wage inequality. All groups are growing. A couple of million
      children have been moved out of poverty. The air is cleaner. The water is
      cleaner. We set aside more land to protect it than any other
      administration except those of Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt. So I think
      that I have been fortunate enough to serve as president at a time of
      dramatic transformation, when we really have -- in the metaphor I used in
      1996 -- built a bridge to the future. And now the American people are
      going to have to decide how they want to walk over it."
      No follow up to
      that, such as suggesting maybe some will remember him for scandals,
      Lewinsky or impeachment. Instead, CBS went to an ad break.      CBS resumed the
      tape replay in the 7:30am half hour:> "With an eye towards those poll numbers
      and more, I talked politics with President Clinton Sunday afternoon. And
      among other things, I got his thoughts on the Gore campaign."
 > "What role do you see yourself playing
      in their campaigns?"
 > "How do you view the polls that have
      suggested that if you're on the campaign trail with them you may be more
      of a liability than a positive?"
 > "Why do you think, turning to the Vice
      President's campaign for a second if I might, why do you think the Vice
      President is having such a difficult time opening up ground between
      himself and Bill Bradley?"
 > "It would seem that at this point that
      whoever prevails will be going up against George W. Bush. In style and
      personality Governor Bush has been characterized as the GOP's version of
      you. Flattering? Offensive?"
      Gennifer Flowers
      maintains that Bill Clinton used cocaine, see the August 20 CyberAlert for
      her recollections as made on FNC's Hannity & Colmes, but Gumbel didn't
      broach that. Instead he asked about George W. Bush:> "Before I leave the subject of Governor
      Bush what's your take on the demarcation line he's drawing on past drug
      use for his personal life?"
 Clinton: "I'm going to leave that to --
      that's up to the public really. The people are in the driver's seat now.
      And the press will express their views and do what they think is right and
      the politicians will express their views and do what they think is right.
      But in the end the public has to be the judge of that."
 Gumbel: "Let me rephrase. In your opinion,
      do you believe previous cocaine use should disqualify someone from sitting
      in this office?"
 Clinton: "My opinion is that the public will
      make a decision. That if -- most people think they ought to know if there
      is some serious problem in someone's background, and if so, how that
      person has dealt with it. The American people tend to be forgiving about
      many things but there are some things they want to know and then there are
      other things they don't want to know. And they may change their minds from
      time to time. But I think that if I get in the middle of this debate, my
      opinion would only be a distraction given the way -- the kind of treatment
      I got from '91 forward from the Republicans and their allies. And I think
      I should stay out of it and let the people make the right decision."
      > Gumbel ended
      by sharing a laugh with Clinton: "Final note. If my research is
      correct you sign papers next week, final papers, on the house in
      Chappaqua. Do you happen to know what's the closest golf course to your
      house in Chappaqua?"Clinton: "I don't, no."
 Gumbel: "Whippoorwill Country Club in
      Armonk. Do you know who is a member there?"
 Clinton: "Are you?"
 Gumbel, laughing: "Yes, sir."
 Clinton, laughing: "I'd be happy to be your
      guest, any time, I'm easy about that."
 Gumbel: "Mr. President. Safe travels."
      +++ Watch this
      last exchange about cocaine and Gumbel and Clinton sharing a laugh about
      cocaine. Tuesday morning the MRC's Eric Pairel will post a RealPlayer
      clip. Go to: http://www.mrc.org      This morning,
      Tuesday, Jane Clayson bizarrely asked Bush, as if it's his fault:
      "Hasn't your ability to raise so much money shut out other candidates
      in the raise, other candidates with good ideas before they ever have a
      chance to have people hear what they have to say?"      Clayson later
      raised the drug issue, fulfilling her premise that it's "dogged"
      him during the campaign: "How do you make this question go away
      Governor or at least answer the question and resolve this once and for
      all?"      Create a media
      that apply the same standard to both sides.      Showing little
      originality, Clayson next posed to Bush the same question in reverse that
      Gumbel had put to Clinton: "Some people call you, Governor, the GOP's
      version of Bill Clinton. Is that flattering to you or offensive to
      you?"Bush replied: "I wouldn't call that a great
      compliment."
      To Gumbel's
      question Clinton endorsed the analogy: "It's certainly not offensive.
      I think he's got -- he's a very accomplished political leader and he's got
      good instincts for where the political center is."      Share your views
      about Clinton. MRC Communications Director Liz Swasey reports The Early
      Show Bulletin Board is running about three-to-one against Gumbel. Just
      click on the Bulletin Board on The Early Show Web page:http://www.cbs.com/network/htdocs/earlyshow/index.shtml
 or: http://marketing.cbs.com/earlyshow/
 
        2  Monday night none of the broadcast network evening shows found any
      political news worth reporting other than a brief note about George W.
      Bush's accident while jogging. Both FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume
      and CNN's Inside Politics ran stories on the controversy over the
      revelation in Time magazine that Al Gore has been paying feminist Naomi
      Wolf $15,000 a month to offer him advice.
      ABC, CBS and NBC
      all featured profiles of the late Walter Payton and all led with multiple
      stories on the EgyptAir plane crash. NBC Nightly News devoted over half
      its newscast to the topic, including an exploration of the possibility of
      terrorism or the involvement of Bin Laden. NBC added a full story on the
      launch by Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines of a "mega-ship," the
      largest cruise ship ever built.      ABC's World News
      Tonight ran a piece on a proposition on the ballot in San Francisco which
      would bar banks from charging non-customers for using their ATM machines
      and in introducing a two-part "A Closer Look" segment Peter
      Jennings asked: "Has high school outlived its value?"      CBS Evening News
      anchor Dan Rather delivered a one-sided and imbalanced panic piece about
      impending doom in the next century from global warming. Focusing on the
      small fishing community on Smith Island in the Chesapeake Bay which is
      growing smaller through soil erosion and rising water, Rather warned:"Smith Island may seem an unimportant relic
      of the past, but in fact it offers a disturbing glimpse into the next
      millennium."
 Stephen Leatherman: "Smith Island's a look
      ahead. It's a precursor of what we expect to happen to other islands in
      the future, to other low-lying islands."
 Rather: "Coastal scientist Stephen
      Leatherman says the rising sea level that's engulfing the island is a
      direct result of global warming. Within the coming century projections
      call for the Earth to warm about six degrees, in turn melting polar ice
      caps and expanding the Earth's ocean."
 Jerry Mahlman, NOAA: "We expect the
      possibility of as much sea level rise as three feet over the next
      century."
 Rather, standing on a beach, intoned: "If
      three feet doesn't sound like a big deal, maybe this will: For every one
      foot the ocean rises 150 feet of the beach gets swallowed up. A three-foot
      ocean rise means everything to that flag pole, 450 feet of Long Island's
      Jones Beach, goes down the drain."
      Rather proceeded
      to pass along the usual forecasts of more intense hurricanes, more floods
      and more heat waves, concluding: "If global warming seems unlikely
      and remote to you, it doesn't to Jennings Evans. He wonders if his will be
      the last of ten generations to live out their lives on Smith Island."      As usual, Rather
      didn't bother with less ominous views from scientists who don't believe
      the liberal global warming theory. The Cato Institute's Patrick Michaels, for
      instance, has just finished a new book titled, Sound and Fury: The Science
      and Politics of Global Warming. Here's how it is described on the cato.org
      Web site:"The popular vision of an approaching
      apocalypse caused by global warming has no scientific foundation, says
      Patrick J. Michaels. Those who warn of a catastrophic greenhouse effect --
      such as Vice President Al Gore -- can justify neither their fears not
      their blueprints for dramatically interfering with the U.S. and world
      economies.
 "Sound and Fury criticizes 'science by sound
      and bite' and congressional show trials complete with testimony that has
      not been peer-reviewed according to scientific standards. Among the
      misconceptions exposed is the claim that most scientists subscribe to the
      apocalyptic vision of global warming. Even Greenpeace's survey of
      scientists who participated in the major United Nations study of climate
      change found that only 13 percent of the respondents believed that failure
      to change our energy use would result in a runaway greenhouse effect.
 "Michaels shows that the slight warming over
      the last century has been far less than the prophets of the apocalypse
      would expect -- throwing the reliabitily of their computer climate models
      into doubt -- that most of it happened before industry's massive carbon
      dioxide emissions began, and that most of the warming is at night, when it
      produces benign effects such as longer growing seasons. In other words,
      the warming that has resulted from natural climatic processes is
      beneficial."
      That's an angle
      you'll never see on the CBS Evening News. 
        3  Fearful of reality. Last week the New York Times was willing to run a full
      quote describing what happens in a partial-birth abortion, but not the
      Washington Post, and the week before while ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC refused
      to describe what happens in what they dubbed a "late-term
      abortion," FNC offered a rare, full description.
      -- In their
      October 28 Washington Bulletin e-mail report for National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com),
      John J. Miller and Ramesh Ponnuru observed a contrast in two October 27
      newspaper stories: PARTIAL TRUTHThe Washington Post doesn't want you to know what partial-birth abortion
      does to a baby. Consider how reporter Joan Biskupic quoted Douglas Johnson
      of the National Right to Life Committee in her article on the Seventh
      Circuit Court upholding Wisconsin's partial-birth abortion ban: "This
      makes it likely that the Supreme Court will rule...on whether Roe v. Wade
      covers pulling most of a living baby feet-first outside of the womb."
 Here's how Jo Thomas of the New York Times
      transcribed the same statement: Johnson expected "that the Supreme
      Court will rule, perhaps next year, on whether Roe v. Wade covers pulling
      most of a living baby feet-first outside of the womb, puncturing her
      skull, and removing her brain." Somehow the Post managed to chop off that
      nasty bit about skulls and brains. Are the sensibilities of its readers
      too delicate to handle this description, which, frankly, could have been
      much more graphic than it was? Or does the Post resort to partial truth
      when it comes to partial birth?      END Reprint of NR
      item      -- While the
      broadcast networks and CNN danced around what occurs in a partial-birth
      abortion, even distancing themselves from the term, FNC uniquely offered
      an accurate description. On the October 21 CBS Evening News anchor Dan
      Rather announced:"For the third time in four years the U.S.
      Senate tonight approved a measure to ban a type of late-term abortions.
      President Clinton says he will veto it, just like the others, if and when
      it gets to his desk. Supporters of the ban refer to these abortions as
      quote 'partial-births.' Opponents say it's all really aimed at reversing a
      woman's legal right to choose whether or not to have an abortion."
      That same night,
      MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth noticed, FNC viewers heard this from Fox Report
      anchor Shepard Smith:"Late term abortions. Have you thought about
      what that means exactly? Well, you're about to hear an unvarnished
      description of the procedure. Some call them partial-birth abortions. At
      any rate, here are the facts. It's a few months or a few weeks before the
      fetus becomes a newborn. Toes and fingers, heartbeat, organs functioning.
      And the doctor begins delivery feet first, and then the skull contents are
      drained. That's what it is. The debate is over when life begins. Are you a
      person when you take your first breath or some time between then and the
      moment of conception?"
      Not the kind of
      disturbing details the other networks want to stress. --
      Brent Baker 
 3 
      >>>
      Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
      which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
      donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
      readers and subscribers:http://www.mrc.org/donate
      >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
      blank e-mail to:
      mrccyberalert-subscribe@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
      http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
      Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
      REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
      After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
      hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
      added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
      link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You 
      DO
      NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
      CyberAlert.
 To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
      cybercomment@mrc.org.
 Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      >>>You
      can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
      subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
      afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<   
 
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
 |