E-Mail Bounced by Nets; ABC's Clinton Retraction; Shriver's Edelman Glorification
1) Not a word Friday morning on CBS or NBC about e-mail.
ABC's GMA gave it 17 seconds. CBS's Bob Schieffer didn't ask Henry
Waxman about it and a federal judge is dubious about the Justice probe.
2) Peter Jennings retracted an ABC story about how much
Clinton's sightseeing cost taxpayers: "Mr. Clinton has spent the great
bulk of his time trying to...reduce the danger in the region of nuclear war.
And his efforts have been very well received." Really?
3) Maria Shriver abused her role as Today co-host to boost a
liberal friend. She promoted the "incredible" Marian Wright
Edelman's liberal crusade for government action on kids and guns.
4) GMA gave a platform to the organizer of the anti-gun
Million Mom March: "You say you got the idea of doing this on Mother's
Day because of a story you heard once about mothers uniting during the Civil
War. Tell me about that."
5) ABC's Jack Ford repeatedly pressed John McCain about
another bid in 2004 and questioned how he could support Bush, who "some
have said...has mortgaged the soul of the Republican Party to the, the right
6) The latest MediaNomics: "TV Reporters Ignore Gore
Gaffe on Economy," on how the networks have failed to correct Gore's
false claim about a Bush-era depression; and "Networks Add Fuel to the
Furor Over High Gas Prices," on how gas prices are not high.
7) On the McLaughlin Group Tony Blankley noted how the
broadcast networks refused to inform viewers of McCain's attack on Gore.
Sunday night, actually Monday morning in the east, American Beauty won the
Academy Award for the "Best Picture." Check out MRC Chairman L.
Brent Bozell's take on the film. To read his Creator's Syndicate
column on the liberal movie, descriptively titled "American Beauty: A
Moral Inversion," go to:
House e-mail scandal story in the morning on CBS or NBC and a piddling 17
seconds on ABC. Two Sunday interview shows briefly raised the topic, but
CBS's Face the Nation missed an opportunity to question the ranking
Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee which had held a hearing
on the subject on Thursday.
That hearing featured White House computer
contractors and supervisors and the same day the Justice Department
announced a probe of the matter, but two of the three broadcast network
morning shows on Friday skipped the story despite top of the front page
play in the Washington Post and New York Times.
NBC's Today, instead, dedicated a hunk of time to
the fifth installment of Katie Couric's week-long interview with the
Ramsey's as well as a promotional interview conducted by substitute
co-host Maria Shriver with Marian Wright Edelman. CBS's The Early Show
ran a full story during the 8am news update about the controversy over the
House chaplain. (See item #3 for more on this interview.)
MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth timed this brief item read
by Antonio Mora, during the 7:30am news update, at 17 seconds:
Department is investigating whether subpoenaed e-mail missing from White
House computers was hidden intentionally. The White House blames human
error and a computer glitch. Republicans charge the messages were
concealed because they deal with fundraising by Vice President Gore and
other matters under investigation."
Sunday morning ABC's This Week broadcast from
Jerusalem and held its roundtable to the Middle East peace process and the
Pope's visit. CBS's Face the Nation brought aboard Henry Waxman, the
top Democrat on the House Reform Committee, but not to discuss e-mail.
Host Bob Schieffer only asked him about his efforts to have Congress give
the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco.
On NBC's Meet the Press moderator Tim Russert
posed one question about e-mail to guest Trent Lott. Fox News Sunday's
roundtable opened with a discussion about the e-mail after moderator Tony
Snow had earlier in the show asked Speaker Dennis Hastert about it.
Hastert suggested the Justice probe may be aimed at bottling up the matter
until after the election
Hastert's concern matches that of federal judge
Royce Lamberth, as relayed in a front page story in Saturday's
Washington Times by Jerry Seper. He began his March 25 story:
judge yesterday ordered the Justice Department's campaign finance task
force to tell him in person why he should delay a pending 4-year-old
'Filegate' lawsuit while the department investigates missing White
Judge Royce C. Lamberth, who questioned the administration's 'track
record' in conducting investigations of various White House scandals,
ordered Justice Department officials to meet with him behind closed doors
Thursday to discuss a pending government motion in the matter.
Lamberth said prior investigations turned out to be 'bogus' and told
Justice Department lawyer James Gilligan, who represents the Executive
Office of the President, that he faces 'an uphill battle' to convince
him the delay is necessary...."
The front page of Saturday's Washington Post
featured a time line summary of events in the e-mail scandal, including
how technicians kept alerting higher-ups to the problem but no action was
taken and the extent to which Al Gore's e-mail was never archived.
Here's an excerpt from the March 25 story, "A Glitch Grows Into A
Scandal: E-Mail Problem May Dog Gore," by John F. Harris and Ruth
How odd, White House computer technician Daniel "Tony" Barry
recalled thinking to himself. In January 1998, he was told to scour the
database for e-mails concerning a former intern named Monica S. Lewinsky.
While searching for documents that had been subpoenaed, Barry came across a particular batch of correspondence
that seemed to qualify -- an apparent exchange of missives between
Lewinsky and her friend Ashley Raines, a White House employee. The curious
thing was that the White House computer archive had saved only one side of
what plainly was a back-and-forth conversation. For some reason, only the
e-mails coming from the White House -- not those entering the White House
system from outside -- were archived....
As has come to light in recent days, programming errors in two
different computer systems have produced two sets of missing documents. On
the Executive Office of the President computer, incoming e-mail for 500
White House officials, including top aides to the President, was not
properly recorded in a computer archive. The glitch meant that e-mails
were missing for a 33-month period that could have included material
relevant to 1996 fundraising abuses and the Lewinsky scandal.
On Gore's computer system, White House lawyers say they discovered last week, neither internal e-mails nor those
coming from outside were properly recorded for Gore and some aides from
1994 onward. That means, potentially, that large numbers of e-mails
produced by Gore or senior aides were never reviewed to see if they
contained material relevant to congressional and Justice Department
inquiries into campaign fundraising. The problem involves a White House
archiving system, known as ARMS (Automated Records Management System) set
up in 1994 to comply with the legal requirement that White House e-mails
-- like other documents -- be preserved for historical purposes. But in
the age of scandal, the system has become as much a document production
tool to respond to investigators' subpoenas as it has a resource for
It was in conducting a search in response to one of those subpoenas
that Barry first stumbled on problems with ARMS. The fact that the system
had only picked up part of the relevant e-mails was dismissed as a
computer "hiccup," as White House counsel Beth Nolan described
it in a statement.
Six months later, in June 1998, Northrop Grumman Corp. employee Yiman
Salim, assigned to a team managing the White House computers, was the
first to discover that the hiccup was a symptom of a major programming
error. Incoming e-mail messages were not being scanned by the system
because uppercase rather than lowercase letters were used in part of the
computer code: MAIL2 instead of Mail2....
At Burton's hearing Thursday, several employees of Northrop Grumman,
which managed the e-mail recording system, said White House officials
Laura Crabtree Callahan and Mark Lindsay told them, in what they perceived
as threatening terms, that they were not to discuss the computer problems
with anyone. Callahan and Lindsay denied making threats, though Callahan
said she told the workers "this was a situation we needed to be
careful of, because it was sensitive."
But the error persisted. Documents released by Burton's committee
depict Barry's growing anxiety about the matter. "I am growing
increasingly concerned about the seeming lack of movement on the Mail2
problem," Barry wrote in a September 1998 memo. "Do you know
where the holdup is? We have known about this problem for four months now
and not a single record has been passed to ARMS." Two weeks later,
Barry again wrote that he had heard nothing. "I need to know, for my
own sanity, exactly what my role in this project should be."....
However knowledgeable the White House was about other computer problems,
officials say it was not until late last week that they realized even more
serious complications with e-mail from the Vice President's office. For
Gore, a computer-savvy politician who has boasted of his involvement in
the early stages of the Internet and is an avid user of e-mail, the matter
has perhaps the most ominous political implications.
That is because the missing e-mails involving Gore and some 20-plus
members of his staff include not only incoming missives -- as is the case
with the Clinton office -- but also messages written by Gore and his
The problem has its roots in the Gore staff's conclusion, early in the
administration, that its computers were inadequate and that they should
set up their own separate system. When the archiving system was set up to
archive and retrieve White House e-mails, existing vice-presidential
office e-mail accounts -- including Gore's
-- were not subjected to the new recording system because, according
to the White House account, computer technicians believed that replacing
old e-mail accounts with new ones might cause a disruption in service.
As a result, when Gore's office was deluged with Justice Department and
congressional subpoenas for fundraising information after the 1996
campaign, the archiving system did not find any documents. According to
Nolan, Gore's lawyers believed that vice-presidential office e-mail was
being archived. "Quite plainly, this understanding was not
Again, however, some of the documents show that at the very least technicians at the White House knew of the
problem. A September 1998 memo from Barry said that, while the archiving
system contained a "records bucket" for the vice president's
office, only mail that had crossed over into the main White House system
was being retrieved....
White House called and ABC News jumped. On Friday's World News Tonight,
which he anchored from Jerusalem, Peter Jennings made this unusual
"We need to
clarify something that was said on the broadcast last night. As you know,
we're mostly on the road this week, first in India and now in the Middle
East. Last night we reported from Washington on the expense of the
President's trip to India and the drain on Air Force assets. The White
House takes issue with our characterization that the President has
'spent days of protected sightseeing' in India. Those were the words.
The White House makes a good point. Mr. Clinton has spent the great bulk
of his time trying to improve U.S.-India relations and reduce the danger
in the region of nuclear war. And his efforts have been very well
Jennings was referring to a March 23 story by John
McWethy about how the trip cost $50 million, mostly for the use of 77 Air
Force transport planes, though the words Jennings repeated were from
anchor Kevin Newman's introduction.
As for Clinton's efforts being "very well
received," compare that assertion to the first sentence of a March 22
Washington Post story from New Delhi: "India rejected President
Clinton's calls for further curbs in its nuclear program today in the
main round of high-level talks during Clinton's four-day visit
Today co-host Maria Shriver cheered on the liberal crusade of Children's
Defense Fund President Marian Wright Edelman, whom she dubbed
"incredible." On Friday's show Shriver eagerly relayed
Edelman's statistics without any skepticism, urged Edelman to criticize
Clinton from the left and prompted her to tell viewers how they can assist
Plugging the March 24 appearance, Shriver gushed to
co-host Matt Lauer:
the Children's Defense Fund will release its annual report today. And the
figures in it are shocking and disturbing. They say one in five American
children live in poverty. 13.5 million kids in this country are poor.
Marian Wright Edelman, the incredible head of that organization will be
here to tell us today what can be done about it. And she firmly believes
that mothers, in particular, across the country can get involved in this
fight and should get involved because everybody's children are all of our
If you haven't puked yet, there's more as taken
down by MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens.
Shriver started the subsequent interview by
repeating Edelman's claim about 13.5 million kids in poverty and how 74
percent live in working families, proclaiming: "These statistics were
shocking to me, disturbing. One out of every five, thirteen and a half
million poor children. But perhaps most troubling was that you said that
you don't think people care about the issue."
Edelman blamed prosperous times, which prompted
Shriver to fret: "What's the answer to that? You were telling me
before we went on that we need a movement in this country but people
don't seem to be focused on it."
Shriver's next question: "You talk about this
is the prosperous time. And this administration talks constantly about the
booming economy and their record on the economy. Has this administration
let down the children of America?"
think they have not led. They've got an enormous opportunity to end child
poverty now that welfare is off the table. This administration ought to
insure every one of those children health care. Ought to insure that we
end child poverty, not just welfare that adequate child care has gotten
this year. And that every child gets a head start. We've got the capacity
if our President and Congress and Governors would lead."
Shriver soon expanded her promotion of Edelman's
liberal agenda: "You also call in this report. It's a call to arms
really for America's mothers to get involved in the gun debate. Silence
the NRA. Get involved. You say it is all of our fights!"
agreed: "It is all of our fights that a child is killed by guns every
two hours. It cuts across race and class. Our children are not safe. And
until the mothers and the grandmothers and other women stand up and say we
will not stand for the killing children! And we're gonna protect children
over guns. Will we begin to not let the NRA be in charge of our nation's
policies on guns?"
should be involved. Everybody should be involved. But no, I think mothers
who bear and nurture children and who have that extra responsibility have
got to say, 'Just enough! We will no longer look on the killing of our
"You have been in this fight for a long time. Out there on the front
lines talking about it. Do you find a more receptive audience today? Do
you feel that you're talking to deaf ears?"
As if she hadn't already done enough to promote
Edelman's cause, Shiver last asked: "Very quickly, someone's
watching this interview right now wants to get involved, wants to do, what
do they do?"
You don't really appreciate Katie Couric until
she's replaced by such a ding-dong who is probably clueless about her
bias. Doesn't everyone love Uncle Ted and Marian?
++ Since this is such an idolizing interview that
really should embarrass anyone with respect for journalism inside NBC
News, Monday morning the MRC's Kristina Sewell and Andy Szul will post a
RealPlayer clip of it. Go to: http://archive.mrc.org
representatives get grilled on the morning shows (see the March 21
CyberAlert for a recent example), but those who wrap their liberal
political agenda in motherhood and apple pie get a free ride. Just check
out how ABC's Good Morning America last Thursday treated the organizer
of the upcoming anti-gun Million Mom March set for Mother's Day.
GMA substitute co-host Elizabeth Vargas provided a
long advertisement for the march in the guise of an interview, observed
MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth. Vargas introduced the March 23 segment:
"On the heels
of yet another shooting rampage at a Texas church last night, we have a
woman with us this morning, a typical mom you might say, who has made it
her mission to stop the bloodshed. You remember the Million Man March?
Well, this woman is the organizer of the Million Mom March against gun
violence, and it is scheduled for Mother's Day May 14th. Joining us now
is Donna Dees-Thomases. Donna, good morning. Good to have you here. You
actually got the idea for this march, you say, by watching the television
coverage of a shooting at a Los Angeles daycare center. Tell me about
The other "questions" posed by Vargas:
-- "Within a
week of watching this television coverage, you had, in fact, set up a Web
site, recruited friends, and applied for a marching permit. Why a
calling it the Million Mom March. Is it limited just to moms?"
-- "Now you
are not arguing for a ban on handguns. In fact, you are actually arguing
for a very moderate sort of control, greater control of handguns currently
out there, correct? Can you outline what it is you're arguing for?"
-- "Have you
actually thought out specific, for example, waiting times, cooling off
periods, and that sort of thing, or are you just leaving that up to
Congress, so to speak?"
control is such a notoriously profoundly contentious issue in Congress and
across the country. What do you realistically hope to accomplish?"
-- "You speak
of the gun lobby. Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association said,
quote, 'The President and Vice President have a strategy here. The
pollsters and consultants are telling them scare suburban women on this
issue.' Do you feel manipulated?"
-- "You have
actually taken great pains with this march not to politicize it. I
understand you've been telling some candidates for different offices,
perhaps even Hillary Clinton, that we'd like your support but from the
sidelines, thank you, we don't wanna politicize this."
-- "One last
question. You say you got the idea of doing this on Mother's Day because
of a story you heard once about mothers uniting during the Civil War. Tell
me about that."
Jack Ford used an interview with John McCain to portray George W. Bush as
some sort of extremist, noting how "some have said he has mortgaged
the soul of the Republican Party to the, the right wing
conservatives." And Ford wondered about a possible return of the
Straight Talk Express in 2004.
Ford opened the taped interview, shown on the March
24 Good Morning America, by raising a strategic error: "As observers
are now looking back at your campaign and analyzing it, many are pointing
to the speech you gave prior to the Virginia primary where you criticized
Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, and they're saying that was a serious
mistake that hurt you badly among regular Republican voters. As you look
back at it, do you think now that that was a mistake?"
After asking "Why have you not come out and
forcefully endorsed Governor Bush?", Ford wondered how McCain could
possibly back someone as right-wing as Bush: "Governor Bush does not
support your, your signature campaign reform proposals. Governor Bush has
proposed much more significant tax cuts than you feel are appropriate. He
ran a campaign that you were not happy with. Some have said he has
mortgaged the soul of the Republican Party to the, the right wing
conservatives. If all of that is true, how then could you step forward and
embrace him and support him?"
Ford soon revealed his hope: "You have said a
number of times you had no interest in running for the vice presidency.
Are there any circumstances that would cause you to reconsider that
Ford pressed: "In the year 2004, will we see
John McCain yet again as a presidential candidate?" McCain said
it's hard to plan that far ahead, which prompted Ford to yearn:
March 24 MediaNomics, a report from the MRC's Free Market Project (FMP),
is now online. The articles researched and written by FMP Director Rich
-- TV Reporters Ignore Gore Gaffe on Economy. TV
reporters usually love to publicize any gaffes made by presidents or
presidential candidates. In Houston on March 11, Vice President Al Gore
incorrectly stated that the Bush-Quayle administration's economic record
included "the worst depression since the Dust Bowl days of the
1930s," but there hasn't been a single word of criticism from any
of the networks.
-- Networks Add Fuel to the Furor Over High Gas
Prices. Gasoline prices have risen by more than 20 cents per gallon this
year, and many network reporters have responded by calling the price
increases a "crisis" for the American economy. But sensational
TV coverage has obscured the fact that gas prices have merely returned to
a level consistent with historical averages, and that prices have been
trending lower for most of the past 80 years.
To read these stories, go to:
Two weeks ago, in plugging the last issue of
MediaNomics, I suggested those interested in this type of analysis of
economic reporting sign-up for e-mail notifications about the latest
articles and studies from FMP. That spurred about 80 sign-ups. Those who
didn't sign-up before still can help to again fill the in-box. Send a
message to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
update for the "You Read It Here First" file: On McLaughlin
Group over the weekend Tony Blankley noted John McCain's attack on Al
Gore over campaign finance reform, then pointed out: "The networks,
broadcast news networks, didn't cover his attack on Gore which certainly
For details about the lack of coverage by ABC, CBS
and NBC of the McCain comments highlighted by CNN and FNC, go to the March
22 CyberAlert. --
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to email@example.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
Send problems and comments to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: email@example.com.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe