6/02: NBC Suggests Bill O'Reilly Fueled Murder of Dr. George Tiller
  6/01: NBC's Williams Cues Up Obama: 'That's One She'd Rather Have Back'
  5/29: Nets Push 'Abortion Rights' Advocates' Concerns on Sotomayor
  5/28: CBS on Sotomayor: 'Can't Be Easily Defined by Political Labels'

  Home
  Notable Quotables
  Media Reality Check
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Entertainment
  News
  Take Action
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  Eyeblast.tv

Support the MRC



www.TimesWatch.org


 

CyberAlert. Tracking Media Bias Since 1996
| 1:55 pm ET, Friday September 22, 2000 (Vol. Five; No. 175) |
 

Two items this afternoon: GMA Hit Lieberman from Left on Guns Before Mentioning Hollywood Hypocrisy; Media Reality Check: "Family Ties to Occidental Petroleum Spiked While Al Bashes GOP 'Big Oil Ticket'" -- Back to today's CyberAlert

     Today on ABC's Good Morning America Charles Gibson pressed Democratic VP candidate Joe Lieberman from the left on gun control before he was hit from the right on how he's gone soft on Hollywood.

     On the September 22 show Gibson posed five questions, the first three about Al Gore's proposal to tap the strategic oil reserve. Gibson's first query: "The Vice President now proposing releasing some of our strategic petroleum reserves to combat rising oil prices that are going to make this such an expensive winter. Why shouldn't that be seen as just a blatant political move?"

    Gibson followed up: "But Senator, when this was raised -- and it was cold last winter -- when it was raised in February during the primary season, the Vice President said it was a bad idea. His quote was, 'All OPEC would have to do is cut back a little on the supply and they'd wipe out any impact from releasing oil from the reserve.' Why was it a bad idea in February and a good idea now?"

    And Gibson pressed a third time on the same issue: "I remember there were debates in Congress when the petroleum reserve was formed and a lot of members said, 'I hate to see this happen because I know politicians down the road will use it for political advantage to manipulate prices, whereas it really is intended to be simply for national security emergencies,' and their concerns have now come true."

    Then Gibson moved on to two other criticisms of Lieberman, but MRC analyst Jessica Anderson noticed that Gibson put a higher priority on a liberal complaint highlighted on the front page of Friday's Washington Post: "Major newspaper story this morning calling in question your real feelings about gun control. You have been strong in your statements about the necessity for gun control. The story pointing out you have taken several steps, that you have taken several steps to protect gun makers in Connecticut. Do your actions belie your words?"

    With time running out he squeezed in a mention of a conservative concern: "And let me ask you for just a 15-second answer because we're out of time. I hate to do this, but your friend Bill Bennett, with whom you have fought sex and violence in the entertainment industry, says you've gone soft because they're big contributors to the Democrats."

    GMA truly was "out of time." Exactly 19 seconds into Lieberman's reply, about how Bush and Cheney have done nothing about the marketing of sex and violence to kids, the ABC computer cut him off mid-word and went to a commercial.

 

The text of a MRC Campaign 2000 Media Reality Check written by Tim Graham and distributed by fax this afternoon: "Why No Talk of Gore's Big Oil Connection? Protesters of Gore's Family Ties to Occidental Petroleum Spiked While Al Bashes GOP 'Big Oil Ticket'"

    The highlight box asked: "If the media were a nonpartisan band of truth-detectors, would they let Al Gore tar others for their Big Oil connections without at least noting his?"

    The text of the rest of the September 22 Media Reality Check:

Oil became the big story yesterday on the campaign trail, but reporters continued to ignore any anti-Gore background music. Last night, ABC's World News Tonight led with reporter Terry Moran on how Gore "was casting himself as the champion of beleaguered consumers and Governor Bush as a pawn of the oil industry." Gore declared: "I will not go along with an agenda that is of Big Oil, by Big Oil, and for Big Oil." Moran concluded that the Gore campaign welcomes the issue "if only to point out to voters that both Governor Bush and Dick Cheney hail from the oil industry."

Utterly missing from Moran's report and almost all of the last eight years of Al Gore media coverage was any scrutiny or criticism of Gore's own ties to Big Oil: his father's long-time relationship with Occidental Petroleum, and its owner, Soviet agent Armand Hammer. But Moran has covered this story before. Back on March 6, Moran covered left-wing protests of Gore for ignoring Occidental's drilling in Colombia, which they say threaten the U'wa Indian tribe.

Moran reported: "After Gore's late father left the U.S. Senate, he was named to the board of Occidental. Financial records show the Vice President is the executor of his father's estate, which holds as much as $500,000 worth of Occidental stock. That means Gore could ultimately benefit from the company's operations in Colombia. Plus, Occidental is a major Democratic Party donor, giving nearly $500,000 in soft money since 1992."

Moran concluded: "Gore refused several requests to speak with ABC News about the U'wa, and his family's holdings in Occidental....But as the demonstrators dog him and Occidental begins drilling in Colombia, Gore's public silence on the issue leaves him open to the charge that for all his speech-making on the environment, he won't put his money where his mouth is." Why would ABC find this story worth airing in March, but not worth noting now?

Gore's interest in Occidental has had real policy implications. The liberal Center for Public Integrity complained in its book The Making of the President 2000 that in 1997, thanks to pressure from Gore, the Energy Department sold its interest in the Elk Hills oil field in Bakersfield, California. Ironically, they noted Elk Hills was one of the oil fields involved in the 1920s Teapot Dome scandal, which led to the resignation of Interior Secretary Albert Fall. In 1973, Richard Nixon tried to lease Elk Hills to boost domestic oil production. The Reagan administration repeatedly proposed selling it. "But where Fall, Nixon, and Reagan had failed, Gore succeeded," the book noted. "It was the largest privatization of federal property in U.S. history, one that tripled Occidental's U.S. reserves overnight." (pages 142-144 and 149-152).

The left-wing anti-Occidental protesters, led by Amazon Watch and the Rainforest Action Network, have dogged Gore's campaign trail, including just this week. The Washington Times reported hundreds of protesters shut down his campaign office in Olympia, Washington on Tuesday, and ten people were arrested during the seven-and-a-half hour protest. The Drudge Report linked today to news that Karenna Gore was heckled at the University of Missouri on Wednesday.

Why did ABC ignore the CPI slant now? After all, their book comes with a blurb from Diane Sawyer: "The Center for Public Integrity is the real thing. Groups of dedicated people who remember that journalism is about grit and guts and stamina and razor-sharp instincts. They are, thank heaven, here to stay." But ABC's razor went dull on Gore, the Oxy Proxy.

    END reprint of Media Reality Check

    For more on Moran's September 21 story and how the other networks covered oil last night, go to:
http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20000922.asp#1 -- Brent Baker

 


     >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate

     >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to: mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com
. Or, you can go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters. Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com." After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You DO NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to CyberAlert.
     To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
     Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.

     >>>You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org. Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314