| Only GMA Confronted Gore With Gaffes; Lehrer Scolded For "Pro-Life"; Gore "Most Positive I Have Seen"; Letterman Top Ten
      -- Back to today's CyberAlert 1) Wednesday morning only ABC's Charles Gibson asked Gore
  about his make-believe Texas trip, while NBC's Tom Brokaw tripped himself up
  trying to question Bush's budget facts. 2) MRC Campaign 2000 Media Reality Check: "Tall-Tale Al
  Gets Ignored or Excused on TV; Only ABC Asked About Witt, and Stephanopoulos
  Found 'No Big, Big Lies or Grand Distortions.'" 3) Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales scolded debate
  moderator Jim Lehrer for using the phrase "pro-life," which he
  claimed no "reputable journalistic organization" would allow. 4) Tim Russert complimented Gore's debate demeanor.
  "When you look at the Al Gore of last night he was much more disciplined,
  much better behaved, if you will, in terms of staying on message and avoiding
  any kind of condescension or in any way being impolite to his opponent. Quite
  the contrary." 5) GMA's Antonio Mora seemed surprised that voters had a
  different take on the debate than the liberal media, whom he called
  "professional observers." 6) Actor Martin Sheen, who plays "President Josiah
  Bartlet" on NBC's The West Wing, is starring in a new anti-George Bush
  TV ad for Handgun Control, Inc. just as his show returns to NBC with a
  two-hour season premiere tonight. 7) Letterman's "Top Ten Ways To Make The Gore/Bush
  Debate More Exciting." 
 1   ABC's
  Good Morning America, CBS's The Early Show and NBC's Today all ran
  interviews with George W. Bush that were taped after last night's
  presidential debate, and all interviewed Al Gore live this morning. Most of
  the questions focused on the two candidates' personal reactions to the
  debate, not following up on the policy statements each made.
     By morning, a number of Gore misstatements had been
  discovered, but none of the interviewers raised them with the Vice President
  save ABC's Charles Gibson, who seemed to blame Republicans when he asked the
  Vice President: "They're already indicating that they're going to go
  after you today for, for revising history in ways, saying that you have
  questioned his [Bush's] qualifications in the past, not just his policies,
  and also questioning whether you actually went with James Lee Witt down to
  Texas to go to those fires in Parker?"     Last night, Bush had answered a question about meeting
  unexpected challenges in office by relating how he visited regions of his
  state that had been devastated by fire. Although the discussion had moved on
  to intervention in financial markets, Gore re-visited the topic with this
  gratuitous pat on his own back: "I want to compliment the Governor on his
  response to those fires and floods in Texas. I accompanied James Lee Witt down
  to Texas when those fires broke out. And FEMA has been a major flagship
  project of our reinventing government efforts. And I agree, it works extremely
  well now."     That wasn't true, it turned out, but neither NBC nor
  CBS bothered to ask Gore about why he would go so far out of his way to make
  such a statement, although Today's Katie Couric twice asked Gore what Bill
  Clinton told him in a post-debate phone call.     Today also showed an interview with Bush conducted by
  NBC's Tom Brokaw last night in Boston. Brokaw tried to challenge Bush's
  facts, but only showed his own lack of expertise with federal budget
  projections.     "Almost everyone who's an authority in this area
  says that both you and the Vice President are way too optimistic when we talk
  about this $25 trillion surplus," Brokaw demanded. "That there is a
  very good possibility we'll never get to that number."     Projections are for a $4 to $5 trillion surplus; $25
  trillion is the total projected revenues for the next ten years, of which Bush
  wants to return $1.3 trillion to taxpayers. So Brokaw's right when he says
  "there is a very good possibility we'll never get to that number." 
  2  The text of
  the MRC's Campaign 2000 Media
  Reality Check report distributed by fax this afternoon. The MRC's
  Tim Graham compiled the issue titled, "Tall-Tale Al Gets Ignored or
  Excused on TV: Only ABC Asked About Witt, and Stephanopoulos Found 'No Big,
  Big Lies or Grand Distortions.'"
     "Gore's Vanishing Class Size Crisis" read
  the headline over the pull-out box quote:"I would not permit
  any students to stand. We have 2,480 students on a practically brand-new
  campus. In my opinion, it's one of the top high schools in the nation right
  now. We don't have any portable classrooms. All of our students are in regular
  classes and we have 900 computers, 600 Internet sites. We'd never allow a
  student to have to stand up during class." -- Sarasota, Florida principal
  Daniel Kennedy refuting Gore's tale of overcrowding to CNSNews.com.
     Now the text of the rest of the afternoon Media Reality
  Check for October 4: Washington Post reporter John F. Harris claimed this morning that in the
  Bush-Gore debate, "Neither fulfilled the negative stereotypes about
  himself." But Harris hadn't heard of the Al Gore tall tales that
  emerged within 12 hours of the debate. Gore's campaign admitted Gore did not travel to a Texas disaster area
  with Federal Emergency Management Agency head James Lee Witt as he boasted
  last night. The Gore camp didn't return calls for CNSNews.com's story that
  Gore was wrong about over crowding in a Sarasota, Florida school. CBS's The Early Show and NBC's Today failed to raise these
  stories with Gore or anyone else this morning, although ABC's Charles Gibson
  asked Gore about Witt on Good Morning America. (The CBS News Election Unit
  noted the Witt tall tale last night in an "Accuracy Report Card" on
  CBS.com.) Gibson blamed the Republicans for the emerging falsehood: "They're
  already indicating that they're going to go after you today for, for
  revising history in ways, saying that you have questioned his qualifications
  in the past, not just his policies, and also questioning whether you actually
  went with James Lee Witt down to Texas...?" Gore looked away and mumbled: "Well, I was there in Texas. I think
  James Lee went to the same, went to the same, uh, fires, and I've made so
  many trips with James Lee to these disaster sites. I was there, in Texas, in
  Houston, with the head of the Texas Emergency Management folks, and with all
  of the Federal Emergency Management folks. If James Lee was there before, or
  after, then [shrugs shoulders], you know, I got that wrong then, but uh, it
  was basically a compliment to the way our FEMA team had handled things, and it
  was in the context of a compliment to the Governor for the way he handled it
  for the state of Texas." Later, Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos discussed the ABC "truth
  squad" on the debate. Despite Bush telling Gibson that Gore was wrong to
  claim Bush's tax cut would "spend" more on the top one percent of
  taxpayers than on health, prescription drugs, education, and national defense
  combined, Sawyer claimed, "We heard Governor Bush just say that Vice
  President Gore was right on the amount that he'd be spending for the richest
  Americans." After Stephanopoulos explained how "the facts bear out Vice President
  Gore" on his claims against Bush's prescription drug plan, Sawyer
  asked: "Major issues about truth, then, from our truth squad?"
  Stephanopoulos claimed Gore's invented Texas story was no big deal:
  "Gore exaggerated a little bit. You saw him backtrack on whether or not
  he was really with James Lee Witt in Texas last night. He also misstated when
  he said that more than half of Bush's tax cut went to the top one percent in
  the country, when in fact, the Bush campaign came back and said it was about
  44 percent, but there were no big, big lies, or grand distortions." Exaggerated a little bit? How about made up out of whole cloth? How do you
  "backtrack" on an event that didn't happen?     END Reprint of Media Reality Check 
  3  Washington
  Post TV critic Tom Shales scolded debate moderator Jim Lehrer for using the
  phrase "pro-life," which he claimed no "reputable journalistic
  organization" would allow.
     In his October 4 review of debate coverage, Shales was
  especially peeved that Jim Lehrer broke out of the media's politically correct
  paradigm on abortion: "Lehrer committed another blunder when he said to
  Bush, 'You're pro-life.' Generally, reputable journalistic organizations do
  not use this term to refer to those opposed to abortion. Would Lehrer have
  turned to Gore and said, 'You're anti-life'? He should know
  better."     The liberal Shales also displayed disappointment with
  Gore: "Al Gore did 'win' in terms of points made and impression
  presented. He conveyed more stature, authority and poise than Bush and had a
  better grasp of a wider range of material. And yet he also, at times, came
  across as his own toughest opponent with his tendency toward hauteur,
  superciliousness and the condescending tone he sometimes uses when speaking to
  viewers. Someone should play Madonna's old song 'Papa Don't Preach' for Gore
  before each of his presidential appearances. He can be as prissy and bossy as
  a cranky granny." 
  4  Last night
  NBC's Tim Russert refrained from issuing broad assessments, but on this
  morning's Today show he called Gore's performance the "most
  positive" he has ever seen from the Vice President this year, and
  defended the Vice President's irritating interruptions and audible sighs,
  saying "that's just a tendency he has."
     Co-host Matt Lauer brought up the question of Gore's
  demeanor, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens observed, telling Russert:
  "Pundits and voters, Tim, are gonna pick apart every little aspect of
  this from the clothing to the body language to what you heard. And what you
  heard a lot from Al Gore were these audible sighs. When George Bush, Governor
  Bush was talking. Was that a mistake for Al Gore? Does he have to be more
  careful of that in the next two debates?"     Russert responded: "I do think so. He did the same
  thing in December with Bill Bradley. It's just a tendency he has. Some people
  interpret it as being condescending and almost being so much above his
  opponent. But when you look at the Al Gore of last night he was much more
  disciplined, much better behaved, if you will, in terms of staying on message
  and avoiding any kind of condescension or in any way being impolite to his
  opponent. Quite the contrary. It is the most positive I have seen Al Gore in
  any debate setting, certainly during this campaign debate cycle."     If that's really the case, we'd hate to see Al
  Gore's dark side. 
  5  Good Morning
  America's news reader Antonio Mora noticed that the voters who were brought
  together for the media's focus groups didn't have the same reaction to the
  debate as did the network all-stars.
     In a conversation shortly before 8am with Mora and
  co-host Charles Gibson, Diane Sawyer brought up that "you know, we've
  had a lot of people criticizing the press for leaning one way or the other in
  this campaign, and you were saying that you noticed a difference last
  night," she said, turning to Mora.     Mora explained: "I noticed last night, as we were
  listening to all of the different pundits on different channels -- I was
  flipping around, don't tell Peter that -- but I noticed that everybody
  seemed to think that Al Gore had dominated the debate and had sort of been the
  stronger presence. And then you start listening to the focus groups, and it
  seemed as if they were hearing something different than what the professional
  observers were hearing. I found that very interesting."     For his part, Gibson argued that "Antonio's right
  about the focus groups, but yet some of the instant polling last night also
  had people saying that Vice President Gore had won, so I don't know."     Yes, it's certainly "interesting" that
  voters don't have the same pro-Gore sympathies that pundits like
  Stephanopoulos put on display last night, but it's even more interesting
  that a network personality would acknowledge that he and his colleagues are
  out of step with the public they claim to represent. 
  6  The season
  premiere of NBC's drama The West Wing airs tonight, Wednesday October 4,
  just days after actor Martin Sheen, who plays Democratic "President
  Josiah Bartlet," debuted in a new anti-George Bush TV ad produced by
  Handgun Control, Inc.
     In a September 28 Associated Press dispatch, Laura
  Meckler of the AP's Washington bureau, reported: "In a new TV ad, a
  pretend President weighs into a real-live campaign. And like his character,
  Martin Sheen is siding with the Democrats."     She explained: "Handgun Control Inc. is spending
  about a half million dollars to air a new campaign commercial featuring Sheen
  talking about Republican George W. Bush's record on gun control."     Sheen is in it for the political as Meckler learned he
  "donated his time" and "also made a second Handgun Control spot
  that does not mention any candidate."     With an American flag as the backdrop, in the ad Sheen
  speaks into the camera and announces:"Hello, I'm
  Martin Sheen. Between now and election day at least 2,000 Americans will die
  from gunfire. Should the next President be the candidate of the gun lobby?
  Should he have signed a bill that allows hidden handguns in churches,
  hospitals and amusement parks? Should he be someone of whom the NRA has said,
  that if he is elected they'll be working right out of the Oval Office?
  That's Governor Bush's record."
     Sheen then directs viewers
  to this Web address:www.bushandguns.com
     Mecker noted that "Sheen's commercial will air in
  Cleveland, Milwaukee and St. Louis, all large cities in states that are
  important to the presidential election." But I've seen, it in either
  local or national buys, on Washington, D.C. TV stations, including during
  Tuesday's The Early Show on CBS affiliate WUSA-TV.     The West Wing will pick up tonight with the outcome of
  the season-ending shooting of the presidential party outside the Newseum. The
  two hour premiere will air at 9pm ET/PT, 8pm CT/MT.     For a RealPlayer video and a rundown of a plot line from
  near the end of the season, on how the show took a bizarre twist into very
  tolerant social liberalism with "President Bartlet" promising to
  help a prostitute gain admittance to the bar, yet in the same episode he fired
  an ambassador for having an affair, go to:http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20000517.asp#6
     For a summary of another liberal plot on an earlier and
  links to several other episodes with liberal themes, as well as one with an
  anti-liberal sub-theme, go to:http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20000510.asp#5
 
  7  From the
  October 3 Late Show with David Letterman, the "Top
  Ten Ways To Make The Gore/Bush Debate More Exciting." Copyright 2000 by
  Worldwide Pants, Inc. Late Show Web page address: http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/
 10.Replace pitchers of water with pitchers of gin9.Extra points awarded to candidate who gets in best "your mama is so
  fat..." joke
 8.Large screen behind candidates shows baseball playoff game in progress
 7.Two candidates, one suit
 6 .When George W. Bush mispronounces a word, a Texas prisoner gives him an
  electric shock
 5.The loser spends a week in boot camp for troubled teens
 4. Candidate's answer must match what Charles Nelson Reilly wrote on his card
 3.Give 'em a pair of nunchakus and let them settle it like men
 2."Name the world leaders" is good, but strip "Name the world
  leaders" -- even better
 1.Are you kidding -- it couldn't be more exciting
     And from the Late Show Web page, a few of the "Top
  Ten Extras," entries that didn't make the final cut: -- Have them discuss real issues that matter, like what happened
  to the McDonald's McDLT?-- After every correct answer, Gore gets to make out with Tipper
 -- Have Gore say he invented the electric chair, watch Bush go nuts
 -- Before every answer, candidates must take a big hit of helium
     At least that would give
  Gore something to do other than sigh and grunt. 
      
  
      
      
  
      -- Brent Baker
      with morning show analysis by  Rich
      Noyes  
     
      >>>
      Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
      which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
      donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
      readers and subscribers:http://www.mrc.org/donate
      >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
      blank e-mail to:
      mrccyberalert-subscribe@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
      http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
      Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
      REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
      After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
      hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
      added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
      link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You 
      DO
      NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
      CyberAlert.
 To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
      cybercomment@mrc.org.
 Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      >>>You
      can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
      subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
      afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<   
 
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
 |