"Extremely Conservative" Cheney; Alter Defended Gore Gaffe; Bernard Shaw's Record
-- Back to today's CyberAlert
1) NBC's Today refused to
describe Joe Lieberman as liberal, but this morning Tim Russert tagged Dick
Cheney as "extremely conservative" while also listing specific votes
he cast long ago.
2) "Oh God, man, listen to you! This is
disgraceful," Don Imus upbraided Newsweek's Jonathan Alter for
defending the "grain of truth" in Gore's claim he accompanied
FEMA's chief to a Texas fire.
3) MRC Media Reality Check. "Lieberman Respects
Farrakhan: No Story? After Eight Days, Most of the Press Still Missing,
Despite Question to Clinton, Fox's Grilling of Daley."
4) VP debate moderator Bernard Shaw insisted he's "an
old-fashioned journalist who believes in being fair, balanced and
accurate." Check out examples of his liberal crusading and then evaluate
we go again with the media refusing to label Joe Lieberman as liberal but
eager to tag Dick Cheney as "extremely conservative" while also
highlighting specific votes of he cast long ago that they find objectionable.
On today's Today, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens
noticed, Katie Couric briefly discussed with Tim Russert how in tonight's
debate Dick Cheney will probably ask why Al Gore decided to "pad his
resume" with fabrications about the FEMA fire trip and the high schooler
forced to stand.
Then, after not having applied any ideological label to
Lieberman, Couric inquired: "Dick Cheney's past voting record, his
congressional voting record, which is quite conservative, is likely to come
under fire as well."
"Absolutely. His votes against Head Start, his votes against education,
against Medicare, against gun control."
Couric piped in:
Russert added it to his
list: "ERA, Equal Rights for Women. You'll see Joe Lieberman very
delicately insert those all through the course of the debate because Dick
Cheney was an extremely conservative Congressman, there's no doubt about
That's right, Cheney was "against
education." A pretty disappointing presentation by the usually better
As pointed out in CyberAlerts back in August, Lieberman
has a pretty liberal record. His ratings:
ADA 1999 liberal rating: 95 percent
ACU 1999 conservative rating: 0
NTU 1999 pro-taxpayer: 8 percent
(NARAL) abortion rights: 100 percent
The August 16 CyberAlert recounted:
Journalists insist on describing Joe Lieberman as a "centrist," a
"moderate" or "a conservative," but a review of his actual
voting record proves otherwise. As columnist Bob Novak wrote last week,
"the news media description this week of a centrist, moderate or even
conservative misrepresented a party regular who more often than not is a
Indeed, Novak pointed out that "while Lieberman's comments
occasionally infuriate the National Education Association, the teachers' union
rated his 1999 voting record at 90 percent. That compares with a 100 percent
report card by the National Abortion Rights Action League."
Lieberman has earned a lifetime "Liberal Quotient" of 77 from
Americans for Democratic Action (ADA). As a way of comparison, House Majority
Leader Dick Gephardt has 71 percent lifetime approval from the liberal group.
In 1999, Lieberman garnered 95 percent from ADA while the American
Conservative Union (ACU) gave him a zero. His lifetime ACU: just 19 percent.
The National Taxpayers Union found Lieberman is "a card-carrying
tax-and-spend liberal" who in 1999 voted for spending and regulation more
than "Senate liberals" such as Paul Wellstone and Barbara Boxer.
For examples of how the networks and newspapers
mislabeled Lieberman when Gore named him, go to this item in the August 16
CyberAlert and scroll down to the middle of the article:
castigated Newsweek's Jonathan Alter this morning for defending Al Gore's
claim that he traveled to Texas with FEMA chief James Lee Witt to check fire
MRC analyst Paul Smith caught the exchange on the MSNBC
simulcast of the Imus in the Morning radio show. Imus recounted how Gore
"said he had accompanied James Lee Witt down there. Well, it turns out
not only did Witt not go but Gore didn't go, but did go to Texas but it was
for a fundraiser."
Alter argued: "He got a briefing at the airport.
It's a stretcher, you know. It's like all these other ones where there is
a grain of truth to it and he really didn't-"
Imus: "Well, there
wasn't any grain of truth to that. Where was the grain of truth?"
Alter: "Well, he
got a briefing on the fires, you know-"
Imus: "Oh God, man,
listen to you! This is disgraceful."
The latest Campaign
2000 Media Reality Check titled, "Lieberman Respects
Farrakhan: No Story? After Eight Days, Most of the Press Still Missing,
Despite Question to Clinton, Fox's Grilling of Daley."
In an addendum below after the text of the Media Reality
Check, the MRC's Tim Graham noted how when Jack Kemp four years ago praised
the Nation of Islam's "message" of economic empowerment for the
black community, Democratic Jewish leaders condemned him but are silent now.
Now to the text of the October 5 Media Reality Check
researched and written by Tim:
On September 27, eight days ago, the first press reports revealed that
Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Lieberman said he would be willing to
meet with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has called Judaism,
Lieberman's faith, a "gutter religion."
In an interview with April Ryan of the American Urban Radio Networks,
Lieberman said, "Look, Minister Farrakhan said a few things earlier in
the campaign that were just not informed. But I have respect for him, and I
have respect for the Muslim community generally."
Where's the furor? The story first came on Wednesday from the
Philadelphia Inquirer's Jodi Enda and hit the Knight-Ridder national wire.
USA Today mentioned it. Ryan questioned President Clinton about it in a
briefing aired live on CNN. Clinton seemed surprised: "I didn't
understand. What did you say about Joe Lieberman and Louis Farrakhan?"
When Ryan explained that "Joe Lieberman told me yesterday" that he
would meet with Farrakhan, Clinton only said, "Well, if anybody has got
the standing to do it, he certainly does."
That night, Ryan appeared on Fox's O'Reilly Factor. Host Bill
O'Reilly asked if she challenged Lieberman on his statement. She said yes:
"He said, but it's time for us to come together. And he's trying to win.
That's basically what it is. He wants to win an election and the
African-American vote is crucial."
Last Thursday, the story was picked up by UPI and the Associated Press in
the tenth paragraph of a story on the upcoming "Million Family
March." On Friday, the Anti-Defamation League, whose earlier criticism of
Lieberman for religious talk on the stump drew all-network coverage, warned
Lieberman would be "legitimizing a bigot."
It hit television on Sunday. On NBC's Meet the Press, Tim Russert asked
Rick Lazio if he'd meet with Farrakhan. (He said no.) On Fox News Sunday,
Tony Snow asked Gore campaign chairman Bill Daley about Lieberman. "Does
he do that with the Vice President's blessing?" Daley said no,
"Joe makes those decisions on his own. He obviously doesn't have to get
approval from Al Gore to have meetings."
On Monday, AP reported its first full story on Lieberman's remarks, based
on criticism from RNC Chairman Jim Nicholson. On Tuesday, Washington Post
columnist Richard Cohen wrote about it, concluding, "It would be hard now
for Lieberman to repudiate Farrakhan, but it would be harder still for us to
respect someone who will not."
But now, eight days in, let's list who is still missing on this story:
The New York Times. The Los Angeles Times. The Washington Post news pages.
Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report. CBS. CNN's newscasts.
NBC's newscasts. ABC arrived this morning. Are the media being tough on both
sides? Can a press corps that celebrated Lieberman's faith now ignore it?
END Reprint of Media Reality Check
The report distributed by fax this afternoon featured a
pull-out quote box reciting Diane Sawyer's questions to Lieberman's wife
Hadassah on today's Good Morning America, the first broadcast network
morning or evening show mention of the matter:
-- "There has been
criticism from the Anti-Defamation League of Senator Lieberman's statement
that he would be willing to meet with Louis Farrakhan, head of the Nation of
Islam, and indeed he was quoted as saying 'I have respect for him.' And
this is a man who several years ago called Judaism a 'gutter religion.'
How do you feel about that personally?
-- Sawyer followed up:
"Again, I think of the haunting thing you have said about hearing your
mother wake up in the middle of the night, crying in fear because of her
experiences during the war. Is it possible for you to say you have respect for
Mrs. Lieberman supported
Tim Graham provided this additional information for
CyberAlert that was squeezed out of the print version:
One source of this Jewish criticism of Lieberman comes
from JewishWorldReview.com. Editor Binyamin L. Jolkovsky noted in his latest
"It was only a few
years ago that another vice presidential hopeful announced that he wanted to
meet with Farrakhan. Republican Jack Kemp praised the Nation of Islam's
'message' of economic empowerment for the black community and said he
would have liked to speak at the Million Man March.
"At the time, the
National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) was quick to pounce. (This is the
same NJDC that was caught last week releasing a falsified transcript of
Lieberman's remarks to Don Imus on the subject of intermarriage in an effort,
no doubt, to work damage control for Lieberman and discredit JWR.)
"As reported in the
Sept. 13, 1996 number of Forward, a national Jewish newspaper, NJDC's
executive director, Ira Forman, described Kemp's actions as making a 'deal
with the devil.' "Kemp's hoped-for dialogue with Farrakhan, he added,
was the 'height of political naivete.' NJDC's deputy executive director,
Stephen Silberfarb, went further. According to the Baltimore Sun, he said:
'The Jewish community does not differentiate between the message and the
messenger. It's like allowing Adolf Hitler to take the podium."
Double standard, anyone?
To read Jolkovsky's full article, go to:
tonight's vice presidential debate, CNN's Bernard Shaw will serve as
moderator. He's best remembered around debate time for asking Michael
Dukakis if he would support the death penalty if his wife were raped and
murdered. MRC Communications Director Liz Swasey rounded up a few of our
favorite Bernard Shaw quotes, in case people might think he's a closet
In an AP story today Shaw assured: "I'm an
old-fashioned journalist who believes in being fair, balanced and accurate,
and those principles color everything I do."
Judge for yourself:
-- May 26, 1992: On a CNN special on ozone depletion
titled "Hole in the Sky," Shaw sounded like Al Gore, singling out
the human race as a cancer on the planet:
"This is a story
about human folly. Mankind's attempt to engineer a better place to live, to
improve upon nature with inventions such as refrigeration, foam packing, and
electronics. But the man-made chemicals used in pursuit of the good life have
put all life on earth in jeopardy. The chemicals have punched a hole in the
sky." Shaw concluded: "Already, there's a moral to the story, and
that is nature may not always be able to recover from the abuses of modern
-- August 20, 1992: During GOP convention coverage, Shaw
took exception to Dan Quayle:
"Very frankly, I am
very puzzled by one paragraph, one sentence in the Vice President's speech on
page six. In a very petulant voice, and listen to the words: he said, `To
Governor Clinton I say this: America is the greatest nation in the world and
that's one thing you're not going to change.' Implying that Clinton is some
kind of guerrilla, saboteur, or what have you. That's my reaction to that line
Ken Bode, I don't know about you. It implies something that, it seems that
he's saying you're not as American as I am, your blood is not as red as
-- July 19, 1994: On Inside Politics, Shaw asked
Democratic consultant Bob Squier: "Have the Republicans pulled a snow job
on the American voters by making them believe Bill Clinton has raised their
-- On election night, 1994: Shaw sounded like he needed
the "Battle Hymn of the Republic" under this speech disguised as a
question to Pat Buchanan: "Two years ago the American voters gave Bill
Clinton a mandate for change. He went to Washington, sought to create change.
He had internal problems with his staff, he had external problems. There were
questions about his personality, his character, et cetera. But I don't think
anyone can question that this man and his staff sought what was best for the
United States. Tonight, it is clear voters coast to coast in this country have
said 'We want a change.' Now Republicans had voted this Democrat to be
virtually, or described him as a monster. My question is essentially this:
Where did he go wrong? What did he do so wrong that was against the American
body politic, considering that he loves this country as much as you and I
-- February 25, 1997: On Inside Politics, Shaw asked
Rep. Dan Burton about the record use of the Lincoln Bedroom for fundraising:
"How can you keep a straight face when you talk about this President, who
is a Democrat, inviting people to the White House -- big, heavy rollers,
contributors -- when the same thing was done by Republican Presidents?"
-- January 25, 1998: Four days after the Monica Lewinsky
story broke, Shaw suggested President Clinton might be a victim like Richard
"A final thought on
what you have seen and heard in this edition of Impact. A breaking news story
is never the full picture. Remember speculation that Middle Eastern terrorists
bombed the Oklahoma City Federal Building? In fact, Americans did it. Remember
first reports that Princess Diana was hounded to death by the paparazzi? In
fact, we learned that the man driving her speeding limousine was drunk. And
that investigation is not over. Remember Richard Jewell highly suspected in
the Olympic park bombing? In fact, the FBI apologized for targeting the wrong
man. And now we are in the middle of another breaking story; the President and
his accusers. All the facts are not in.""
-- March 28, 2000: Shaw was amazed by author Peggy
Noonan and her book The Case Against Hillary Clinton. "This quote. Quote:
'She is too corrupt for New York. She is too cynical for the place that gave
birth to Tammany Hall.' Now, really, Peggy!" Shaw also asked her in
disbelief: "Are you saying the journalists covering her are patsies?
They're not professional?"
For more quotes from this interview and to watch a
RealPlayer excerpt of Shaw arguing with Noonan, go to:
-- Brent Baker
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to email@example.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
Send problems and comments to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: email@example.com.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe