Gore Vs. Bush Mistakes; Reagan Worse Liar Than Gore; Pro-Hillary Character Had Abortion; Bill Maher Unleashed on HBO
1) Best comeback of the weekend.
To Al Hunt's assertion that George Bush is held to a lower standard on
mistakes than Al Gore, Kate O'Beirne shot back that Gore "would have
claimed that he had apprehended the three killers of James Byrd."
2) Little campaign news over the weekend as the terrorist
bombing and violence in Israel have dominated the network news.
3) Newsweek and Time defended Al Gore's penchant for making
things up. Jonathan Alter grumbled: "If these slips had been made by any
other politician, they would have caused barely a peep." Margaret Carlson
claimed: "Gore fell within the margin of political error by scoring 95%
for anecdotal accuracy." Both painted Ronald Reagan as a worse offender.
4) When George W. Bush mis-used the term "honed in
on," the Washington Post added a "[sic]" to bring attention to
his error. But, the Weekly Standard determined, over a dozen top Post writers
have made the same mistake recently.
5) Zero stars from CyberAlert for the new movie, The
Contender. The ending is both preposterous and stupid.
6) Pro-Hillary character has an abortion. Last March on
NBC's Third Watch, while male cops bashed Hillary Clinton, "Officer
Faith Yokas" defended her. In the first show this season Yokas deceived
her colleagues and had an abortion.
7) ABC's Bill Maher declared about Clinton and the Lewinsky
scandal: "I'm glad he lied." Maher predicted: "I think that
in history" it "will be seen as his shining moment, that he stood up
to that witch hunt." Then Maher turned vulgar.
>>> See what you missed. It took us a few months, but the MRC now
has produced a VHS videotape of our December 1999 "Dishonor Awards:
The Decade's Most Outrageous Liberal Media Bias" presentation banquet
at Washington's Monarch Hotel. For a special CyberAlert reader price of
$19.95 now you can watch Michael Reagan and Cal Thomas present awards and
Clarence Thomas accept in jest the "I'm a Compassionate Liberal But
I Wish You Were All Dead Award (for media hatred of conservatives)."
MRC Marketing Director
Bonnie Langborgh has added the video to our online ordering page:
Dishonors video is the top item. Choose a quantity and scroll to the
bottom of the page to click "order it." The normal price is
$19.95 plus $3 shipping, but CyberAlert subscribers get free shipping. In
the "comments" field enter "CyberAlert subscriber" and
then we'll charge you just $19.95. You can use MasterCard, Visa,
Discover or American Express.
You can also
order the old-fashioned way -- by telephone. Between 9 and 5:30pm ET
Monday-Friday, call Kelly Dwyer at (800) 672-1423 ext. 122
For more about the
awards dinner, including video clips of it and a rundown off all the
award-winning quotes, go to:
To read the
CyberAlert summary of the awards, go to:
comeback of the weekend: National Review Washington Editor Kate O'Beirne
to Wall Street Journal Executive Washington Editor Al Hunt.
From Saturday's Capital Gang on CNN:
Al Hunt on Al Gore: "He's not held to the same
standard that Al Gore is held to when he makes mistakes, though, is he,
"No, no. There are different kinds of mistakes. I mean, he said that
all three of the killers of James Byrd have been sentenced to death. Well,
it turns out two had been sentenced to death, one, life imprisonment. But
an Al Gore mistake, he would have claimed that he had apprehended the
three killers of James Byrd, you know, and personally prosecuted them.
It's a different sort of thing, Al."
quiet few days on the campaign news front as the terrorist bombing and
violence in Israel have dominated the network news.
Friday night neither the CBS Evening News or NBC
Nightly News aired a campaign story. ABC's World News Tonight ran a
canned piece on the likelihood of future surpluses. Zilch
campaign-wise Saturday night on NBC Nightly News, the only broadcast
network with an east coast newscast Saturday night. On Sunday, both
ABC's World News Tonight and the CBS Evening News featured stories
on how overseas news has overtaken the campaigns. CBS also ran a story
on the high price of prescription drugs and what each candidate
proposes to do about it.
The Sunday interview shows were also dominated
by the terrorist bombing and Middle East peace challenges, so spent
little time on the presidential campaign.
week Newsweek and Time defended Al Gore's penchant for making things
up in the first debate. Jonathan Alter grumbled: "If these slips
had been made by any other politician, they would have caused barely a
peep." Margaret Carlson claimed: "Gore fell within the
margin of political error by scoring 95% for anecdotal accuracy."
Both painted Ronald Reagan as a worse offender.
Alter insisted Reagan "practically turned falsehoods into an art
form" and Carlson called Reagan "the President who told the
tallest of tales."
Here's an excerpt from the MRC's
MagazineWatch by MRC analyst Paul Smith about the October 16 issues:
A common theme in this week's news magazines was their focus on
Gore's now well-known exaggerations and lies. One of Gore's chief
apologists on this issue, Jonathan Alter of Newsweek, continued his
tortured defense of Gore's misstatements and complains that the
media are spending far too much time and space correcting them:
"Now none of this is the slightest bit unusual in politics. In
fact, if you scan transcripts of presidential speeches, press
conferences and debates over the past half century, they are studded
with fabrications. Some are to protect national security (Ike on the
U-2 in 1960), some are to protect the president's own skin (Nixon,
Clinton) and some are just boasting (Jimmy Carter falsely claimed to
be a 'nuclear engineer'). Ronald Reagan, who once claimed he had
helped liberate Nazi concentration camps, practically turned
falsehoods into an art form. Which brings us to Velcro Al, whose every
misstatement sticks to him. Several of the reports of his lies have
themselves been exaggerated. Take last week. After dozens of trips
with FEMA chief James Lee Witt to other disaster sites, it's
understandable how he might confuse them, and say he had accompanied
Witt to the Texas fires. (In fact, Gore was briefed in Texas by one of
Witt's deputies.) And the embellished story about the Sarasota,
Fla., student who had to stand in class in her overcrowded school was
the result of bad staff work; no one double-checked the original
story. If these slips had been made by any other politician, they
would have caused barely a peep."
Alter's story: http://www.msnbc.com/news/473817.asp
Margaret Carlson's article in Time on "Gore's infuriating
fibs" took Alter's arguments a step further by making the
outrageous claim that Gore's false anecdotes were 95 percent
accurate (if this were the case, why did Gore go on record the next
day admitting he was wrong about going with James Lee Witt to the
Texas fires?) followed by a slap at Reagan and concluded by claiming
Bush is the worse liar of the two:
"Gore served up several juicy targets -- that
standing-room-only classroom in Florida, Winifred Skinner's picking up
cans to buy medicine, his being in Texas during the floods with James
Lee Witt. Bush's truth squad quickly put the word out that Gore had
not gone with Witt but with FEMA's regional director (although he had
gone on 17 other Witt trips to disaster areas). In fact, Kaylie Ellis
isn't still standing at Sarasota High School, but her lab built for 24
is squeezing in 36, and other students are still deskless. Kids at
that other school Gore mentioned are eating lunch at 10 a.m., not
9:30. And when a well-off son appeared to cast doubt on Winnie's need
to recycle aluminum, she reiterated her desire not to take charity
from anyone. In my warped view, Gore fell within the margin of
political error by scoring 95% for anecdotal accuracy, although I
don't want to suggest for a second that his overall affect, especially
the sighing, didn't make me want to shake him....
"For Gore, there's zero tolerance for anything but the literal
truth. Reagan, the President who told the tallest of tales, won his
debate by employing the famous line 'There you go again' against
Jimmy Carter, who told the fewest tales. Reagan claimed he took
pictures of Nazi death camps and was happy like other vets after the
war to be able to finally 'rest up, make love to my wife...,'
though he never left the country....In the end, Gore's fibs, which
have to do with his life, should matter less to voters than Bush's
fibs, which have to do with our lives."
Two other items in MagazineWatch:
-- U.S. News owner Mort Zuckerman worried about
the negative psychological impact of tax cuts on American voters:
"A big tax cut like that proposed by Bush would very likely cause
massive voter unease, raising questions about our ability to sustain
the promise of Social Security for millions of older Americans."
-- Bill Clinton may be a lout, but he sure knows
how to treat his wife on their silver wedding anniversary, reported
To read these two items, go to:
George W. Bush mis-used the term "honed in on," the
Washington Post added a "[sic]" to bring attention to his
error. But, the Weekly Standard determined, over a dozen top Post
writers have made the same mistake recently without any correction or
scolding from Post editors. A week ago, the Post ombudsman took up the
complaint about the paper adding the "[sic]" but she failed
to acknowledge how often Post reporters and editors have made the same
Catching up with this pre-debate item, here's
an excerpt from the "Scrapbook" page in the October 9 Weekly
Except when they want to ridicule someone, reporters (or their
editors) "clean up" the spoken words quoted in their
stories. The stammers and ahems and false starts and missteps of a
speaker -- any speaker -- look um, uh, ah, er, ridiculous in print.
Thus it was a particularly snappish bit of bad manners by the
Washington Post last week to offer the following selection from a
George W. Bush appearance on Hardball:
"I look forward to finding out the facts, but someone is
sweating bullets right now. They're beginning to hone [sic] in on
That sic represents extra exertion by the Post to spotlight a Bush
error. "Hone in," though now acceptable to the permissive
editors of modern dictionaries owing to its frequent misuse, is a
solecism that comes from confusing the verb "to hone,"
meaning to sharpen, with the similar sounding "home in on,"
meaning to approach one's target.
Slate's Scott Shuger took note of the Post's glaring sic in his
column the next day and wondered, "If a candidate makes the same
hones-for-homes mistake as 90 percent of the adult population, should
he be sicmatized?" The answer in this case is obvious: no. The
Posties were behaving badly in subtly mocking the candidate for a
usage error that is rampant in their own ranks.
A quick glance at Nexis shows a veritable honor roll of the paper's
own reporters have failed through the years to achieve the same purity
of expression they now chide Bush for falling short of. Here's a
partial list of Post bylines that have appeared over "honed in
on" in recent years: Thomas Boswell, David Broder, Edward Cody,
Ceci Connolly, Ann Devroy, John Feinstein, Tony Kornheiser, George
Lardner Jr., Myra MacPherson, Courtland Milloy, Liza Mundy, Steven
Pearlstein, Tom Shales, Phyllis Richman, and Jonathan Yardley. (And of
course it's because worthies like this can't get it right that the
dictionary editors have thrown in the towel.)
Post defense reporter Bradley Graham deserves special recognition
for bungling the expression in a March 1999 story on "a new
missile topped with a 'seeker' for honing in on a target." Which
is kind of like homing your blade to a fine edge.
By the way: In the dozens of times the hone/home confusion has been
perpetrated in the pages of the Washington Post -- whether in its own
writers' words or the words of subjects being quoted -- only once,
when it served to make George W. Bush look foolish, was sic inserted.
Not to hone the point too fine: The Post owes Bush an apology.
END Weekly Standard item
The Weekly Standard Web address: http://www.weeklystandard.com
A few days later, Washington Post ombudsman E.R.
Shipp took up the case. Here's an excerpt from her October 8 column:
Some readers thought they'd honed in on what they consider an
annoying predilection of The Post: its liberal tilt. I use the phrase
"honed in on" deliberately because it became, for
conservatives and for grammarians, an issue after it was used in two
Sept. 27 articles about the possibility of spies who are working in
the George W. Bush camp on behalf of Al Gore.
The articles, obviously picking up on a theme of Bush's
malapropisms, chose this way to report what he'd said in an interview
on MSNBC's "Hardball": "I look forward to finding out
the facts, but someone is sweating bullets right now. They're
beginning to hone [sic] in on it." It was that "[sic]"
part that riled some readers, especially because the headline chose a
different formulation: "Homing In on a Campaign 'Mole'?; Bush
Aides Want Gore Computers Seized in Probe of Debate Tape
Mailing." Both the headline and the "[sic]" made Bush
look rather foolish. But they made The Post look even more so.
According to Merriam-Webster's dictionary,
"hone in" means "to move toward or focus attention on
an objective." It's not the best choice of words; "home
in" or even "zero in" are preferred. A Post copy editor
noted: " 'Hone in on' is a misuse of the language, but
unfortunately, it's also a misuse so widespread that it has become
acceptable in some quarters. I'm not surprised it's appeared in The
Post before, but we try to avoid it."
Said a reader: "I guess The Washington Post has decided
they're going to be the word-usage police for the presidential
campaign, and we'll see the term 'sic' more frequently." What
that reader and others detected was a form of editorializing that's
rarely acknowledged but should be. There are any number of occasions
where reporters and editors selectively quote speakers so as not to
make them appear to be illiterate, foolish or worse. There are also
occasions on which reporters and editors go out of their way to point
up the foibles of others.
For Shipp's entire column, go to:
rewards zero stars to the new movie, The Contender. As noted in the
October 13 CyberAlert, a star of the film, Gary Oldman, claimed
DreamWorks had made the final movie cut more pro-Gore and less
balanced that originally intended.
The film is about a Democratic vice presidential
nominee, played by Joan Allen, who is picked to succeed a VP who died
in office. She must go before the House Judiciary Committee chaired by
Republican "Congressman Shelly Runyon," played by Gary
Oldman. (The October 13 CyberAlert referred to him as a Senator, but
in the film the House for some reason handles the confirmation.) The
Oldman character digs up scandalous sexual behavior and uses it to try
to destroy the VP choice played by Allen, Ohio Senator "Laine
I went to see the movie over the weekend and
came away quite unimpressed. Whatever the film had going for it was
ruined by the preposterous and beyond stupid "surprise"
conclusion which I won't give away here since you probably
wouldn't even believe it.
But the film is flawed from the start by a
Hollywood Left point of view in which even right-wing rogues were once
liberal champions. "Congressman Runyon," a right wing
Republican, is scolded by his wife for his "McCarthyistic"
tactics which will mar his legacy of championing a bill to make
"hate crimes" a capital offense.
"Senator Laine Hanson," who was once a
Republican who voted to convict President Clinton, is now a Democrat
who is pro-abortion, an atheist and advocates the removal of every gun
from every home in the country. In a rare pro-conservative moment in
the movie, "Hanson" explains that she voted to convict
because military officers had been punished for affairs.
Don't waste your money on this one.
character has an abortion. Last Spring an episode of NBC's Third
Watch, a drama about cops and paramedics in New York City, evolved
around some cops hanging around the kitchen of a hotel during a
Hillary Clinton-Rudy Giuliani Senate debate. In that show, while the
male cops bashed Hillary, "Officer Faith Yokas" defended her
and criticized Giuliani. "Just admit that you cannot handle a
strong woman," Yokas told her partner. "She's only the
brains behind the whole administration. She deserves credit."
Last week in the season premiere of the Monday
night show, "Yokas" deceived here friends and family and had
an abortion. She had become pregnant at the end of last season and was
upset about it because her husband is an alcoholic. In the October 9
episode she chased a rape suspect into the subway where he whacked her
in the abdomen with a pipe. At the hospital she was told it was too
early too know if any damage had been done to the fetus. But she took
advantage of the situation and told her partner and husband the injury
caused her to lose the baby. As the show ended, however, viewers saw
her lay down on an doctor's table to have an abortion performed.
Third Watch airs at 10pm ET/PT, 9pm CT/MT on
Monday nights. Tonight's show may continue the story line.
To read about the Hillary-Rudy debate show, go
Maher, unleashed. On HBO's The Chris Rock Show over the weekend,
Maher, who hosts ABC's Politically Incorrect, let loose in viewpoint
and language with what he really thinks of the Lewinsky scandal. He
even defended Clinton's quibbling over the definition of the word
Talking about the GOP convention, Maher
remarked: "That was a sham, that thing. The last time Republicans
had that many black people on a stage they were selling them."
But earlier in the interview the was much more
vulgar. WARNING, the following is an accurate transcript, complete
with vulgarities and slang terminology for male genitalia. This is the
last item in the CyberAlert so you can skip it and not miss anything
Referring to the Lewinsky scandal, Maher told
Rock: "I think that in history, I mean you know we're talking
50 years from now, will be seen as his shining moment, that he stood
up to that witch hunt. I don't see that as a big badge of dishonor
time goes on no one's going to give a fuck."
will be seen as what it was, a sort of political act where they
criminalized someone's sex life. The fact that he lied. In mean yes
he lied. Good. I'm glad he lied. He lied about something that
deserves a lie. When he disputed the word is, I was like 'you go
girl!' You tell them that. That was like the shining moment of his
presidency -- to me -- when he was on the grand jury thing, because
that set the bar for liars [motions hand to show high bar]. To be able
to look into their eye and go what 'is' is. You mean 'is she
sucking my dick right now? No, I can honestly say there is no oral sex
going on during the grand jury testimony. While I'm discussing
people sucking my dick, no one is actually sucking my dick.'"
One advantage to Politically Incorrect being on
a broadcast network: We don't have to hear what Bill Maher really
thinks. -- Brent Baker
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to firstname.lastname@example.org."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
Send problems and comments to: email@example.com.
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe