| Excusing Gore's Tenn. Plight; More RAND Ranting; Media Skipping Gore's Secret Russia Deal; Bush a "Serial Killer"
      -- Extra Edition 1) ABC, CBS and NBC Wednesday
  night rationalized Gore's Tennessee plight. ABC's Jim Wooten: "It
  isn't a case of a prophet being without honor in his own land....Tennessee
  is a genuine two party state." NBC's Claire Shipman insisted:
  "Experts say, in fact, it's not a state a Democrat would naturally
  win." 2) ABC and CBS highlighted the RAND report critical of
  Bush's education record. ABC even played a clip of a new Gore ad it
  inspired. Both showed Gore asserting Texas students have "serious
  learning deficits," but FNC's Jim Angle pointed out how the report says
  Texans "did better than students in other states." 3) FNC's Brit Hume observed the network bias in jumping on
  the anti-Bush RAND report: "The big three broadcast networks could not
  get enough of it." 4) GMA and Today dedicated 7am segments to RAND. Charles
  Gibson: "This morning, George W. Bush on the defensive after the RAND
  think tank reports that his Texas education miracle is a myth." 5) Gore's secret deal with Russia finally worth 17 seconds
  to one network evening show, but only as evidence of political chicanery. On
  FNC, Fred Barnes argued the media's lack of focus on the Russia story
  compared to the RAND report demonstrates media bias. 6) MSNBC's Brian Williams wondered if George W. Bush might
  pick a "Souter-type Justice" instead of an
  "ultraconservative"? 7) BET's Tavis Smiley to Geraldo Rivera: "As far as
  I'm concerned, Bush in Texas is nothing more than a serial killer." 8) Which former 60 Minutes correspondent asked a Mets catcher:
  "So you spend a lot of time on your knees. Have you ever considered
  interning at the White House?" 
  1  "It's
      been at least 20 years since a U.S. presidential election has been so
      close so close to election day," declared CBS Evening News anchor Dan
      Rather Wednesday night before stories on the tight races in states each
      candidate had been expected to win easily: Bush in Florida, Gore in
      Tennessee. NBC also ran back-to-back pieces on the two states while ABC
      looked only at Gore's troubles in Tennessee.
     CBS and NBC blamed Bush's Social Security plan for
      his problem in Florida while none of the three evening shows faulted any
      Gore policies and instead rationalized his Tennessee plight. ABC's Jim
      Wooten assured viewers: "It isn't a case of a prophet being without
      honor in his own land....It's just that Tennessee is a genuine two party
      state." NBC's Claire Shipman insisted: "Experts say, in fact,
      it's not a state a Democrat would naturally win." She even balanced
      a Mason-Dixon poll, which put Bush ahead in the Volunteer State, with a
      very unusual citing of an internal Democratic poll which supposedly found
      Gore ahead.     The Cole investigation led the ABC, CBS and NBC
      broadcasts Wednesday night, October 25.     -- ABC's World News Tonight did not cite any
      Tennessee poll numbers. Jim Wooten traveled to Carthage, Tennessee where
      he found Bush and Gore dead even in the state. Gore campaigned in
      Tennessee Wednesday and Wooten recalled how Bush was there Tuesday
      "asking his favorite sarcastic question, where exactly is home for
      the Vice President?"Bush in front of a cheering crowd: "He may win
      Washington, DC but he's not going to win Tennessee."
     Wooten conceded that message has
      "resonance" and he ran soundbites from two local men, one who
      thought Gore has been in DC for too long and another concerned with
      Gore's association with Clinton. But Wooten cautioned: "It isn't
      a case of a prophet being without honor in his own land or even here in
      his own town. It's just that Tennessee is a genuine two party state and
      has been for a long, long time. And so although Al Gore has never lost an
      election here, he's never had a landslide either."     -- CBS Evening News. Dan Rather reported how a CBS
      News/New York Times poll put Gore ahead in Florida by 46 to 42 percent.     Bill Whitaker checked in from Florida:
      "According to the CBS poll, Jeb's popularity doesn't rub off on
      brother George. The troops leading Al Gore's advance in the polls:
      Senior citizens who by a healthy ten points favor Gore's plan for Social
      Security and prescription drugs."     Whitaker played a clip of John McCain warning a
      crowd that Gore wants to scare seniors. Whitaker explained how northern
      Florida is solid for Bush, the south for Gore, so Bush is concentrating on
      central Florida where he's bashing Gore's Social Security plan.     Bush on stage: "He's got a plan called Social
      Security plus. Social Security plus $40 trillion of debt down the
      road."Whitaker adopted
      Gore campaign language as he warned: "But Bush's Social Security
      plan is part of his problem here. By wide margins seniors say a partially
      privatized plan like Bush proposes is a risky idea."
     Next, John Roberts looked at Gore's problems in
      Tennessee where he's never lost in 24 years and Bush is
      "relishing" an upset win. Roberts noted how Gore has been forced
      "to divert precious time and money" from elsewhere to his home
      state, but "he rejects the notion of weakness, saying the state has
      gone back and forth for years."Gore on a plane:
      "It's always a state where you have to campaign hard. And you know
      there's nothing new about that."
 Bruce Oppenheimer of
      Vanderbilt University agreed: "This is closely divided partisan
      state. There's a hard-core Republican base, there's a hard-core
      Democratic base. It would be silly to think that it is an automatic."
     Roberts moved on to Gore's attack on Bush's
      education plan (see item #2 below for details), before concluding:
      "For the Vice President Tennessee is about far more than just eleven
      electoral votes. It's a personal battle. His father suffered a serious
      Senate defeat here 30 years ago and Gore does not want to be the first
      presidential candidate to win the White House while losing his home state
      since it happened to Woodrow Wilson in 1916."     -- NBC Nightly News. Tom Brokaw announced: "In
      the presidential race tonight, with less than two weeks to go now, both
      candidates are forced to spend time in states they should have had safely
      in the win column months ago. It is that tight tonight. According to
      today's MSNBC/Reuters tracking poll, Gore is maintaining his lead over
      Bush, but that lead narrowed from three points to two in the last 24
      hours. And in the crucial battleground state of Florida, two statewide
      polls today also show just how tight this race is. One poll done for the
      Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel shows Bush with a five-point lead over Gore,
      46 to 41 percent, but another poll by the American Research Group shows
      Gore up by four points in Florida, 49 to 45 percent."     David Gregory looked at Bush's challenge in
      Florida where he brought in his
      "best weapon," John McCain, to reach undecided voters in a bus
      tour along the central Florida I-4 corridor.     From Tennessee, Claire Shipman next assessed
      Gore's situation where she found he concentrated on a get out the vote
      message. She noted how a Mason-Dixon poll found Bush ahead 46 to 43
      percent, "but an internal
      Democratic poll has Gore up 47 to 45."Shipman justified
      Gore's plight: "Experts say, in fact, it's not a state a Democrat
      would naturally win."
 Fred Yang,
      Democratic pollster, backed her up: "The South as a whole in the last
      couple of elections has gone Republican."
 Shipman provided
      evidence: "The state's Republican Governor and two Republican
      Senators have been a boost to Bush, but Gore aides say, Tennessee will, in
      the end, support its native son."
     She concluded by noting that the last presidential
      candidate to lose his home state was George McGovern in 1972. 
 		 2  For the
      second straight night, ABC and CBS on Wednesday highlighted the RAND
      report critical of Bush's Texas education record. ABC even played a clip
      of a new Gore campaign ad which uses the RAND numbers to attack Bush.
     Both played a soundbite of Al Gore asserting
      Bush's emphasis on teaching to a test has left Texas students "with
      serious learning deficits." But only FNC's Jim Angle corrected
      Gore's claim as he pointed out how "the new paper only argues that
      students in Texas didn't do as well as originally claimed, but still
      says they did better than students in other states."     In his CBS Evening News story on Gore's day in
      Tennessee, quoted in item #1 above, John Roberts relayed: "In an
      appeal to partisans and swing voters alike, Gore today hammered Bush on
      his claims to have elevated student test scores. He pointed to that RAND
      Corporation report debunking the Governor's so-called Texas Miracle as
      so much myth."Gore in speech:
      "This is the bottom line. We cannot afford to just teach kids how to
      take a state tests while leaving them with serious learning
      deficits."
 Instead of assessing
      that claim, Roberts concluded his story: "For the Vice President
      Tennessee is about far more than just eleven electoral votes. It's a
      personal battle...."
     On FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume, however,
      Jim Angle played the same Gore soundbite, but then informed viewers:
      "'Leaving them with serious learning deficits' isn't quite
      accurate. The new paper only argues that students in Texas didn't do as
      well as originally claimed, but still says they did better than students
      in other states. The Bush campaign also got some help today in refuting
      the new critique. The Education Trust, a liberal education group, issued a
      statement calling the RAND study 'incomplete' and 'misleading' and
      it said that something important is indeed happening in Texas."     ABC's World News Tonight dedicated a whole story
      to evaluating the Texas situation. But first, anchor Peter Jennings
      conveyed Gore's spin, though Jennings' words were a bit jumbled:
      "Mr. Gore spent the day concentrating on Mr. Bush's education
      record in Texas -- a researcher at the RAND Corporation criticized
      yesterday on the subject of testing children. Democrats rushed a political
      ad into production to beat up on Mr. Bush."Ad announcer over a
      shot of the ad video: "Now the new RAND study reports the achievement
      gap for Texas students is widening. There is serious question about the
      validity of scores on state tests."
 Jennings: "Mr.
      Gore has been hard at it too."
 Gore in a speech:
      "We cannot afford to just teach kids how to take a state test while
      leaving them with serious learning deficits."
 Jennings:
      "Well, the Bush campaign has dismissed the criticism and cited an
      earlier RAND study which was much more positive."
     Reporter Bill
          Blakemore then examined the Texas record, as transcribed by MRC
          analyst Brad Wilmouth, and found evidence to support the contentions
          of Bush fans and detractors: "The controversy is the new RAND
          issue paper, which finds that when Texas students take their state's
          test, they do a lot better than when they take the leading test given
          nationwide."Stephen Klein,
          author "Rand Issue Paper": "The statewide test scores,
          we feel, is not necessarily presenting an accurate picture of true
          improvement of the students in reading and mathematics."
 Blakemore:
          "And there have been complaints that the Texas test is too easy
          and that Texas teachers spend too much time preparing kids just to
          pass that test."
     Elsa Duarte-Noboa, San Antonio teacher: "We
          have school districts here in Texas who have focused so much on
          test-taking skills that they're not teaching the curriculum, and
          that's very scary."Blakemore:
          "But the Texas education commissioner says that a study RAND
          published in July is far more significant."
 Jim Nelson,
          Texas Commissioner of Education: "If you look at the previous
          report, it talked in length about the progress of Texas, the
          achievement of Texas."
 Blakemore:
          "And indeed, that RAND study based only on the nationwide test,
          did show that between 1992 and 1996, Texas fourth-graders scored among
          the best in the country in math, and African-American fourth graders
          better than peers in all other states. Mr. Bush did not become
          governor till 1995, but he is given credit by many for continuing
          reforms that were started by others and for keeping education a
          priority. But how could both RAND studies by true? Education analysts
          say it's a matter of grade levels, that the tests show this:"
 Professor Martin
          Carnoy, Stanford University School of Education: "The gains in
          Texas are concentrated at the lower level, and that once they get up
          to the middle grades and the high school grades, that in fact they
          don't get these gains, particularly for the lower income kids."
 Blakemore
          concluded: "In most states, you'll find controversy over
          testing and over statewide versus national results. In an election
          year where a candidate is also the Governor, it's especially
          sensitive."
 
 
 			 3  Media
          bias in hyping the RAND report, at least by the networks, highlighted
          by FNC's Brit Hume. In the "Political Grapevine" segment
          of Wednesday's Special Report with Brit Hume, he observed: "That RAND Corporation document that challenged George W. Bush's
          education record was not a study, as news reports claimed, but as
          we've heard, is a so-called issue paper whose author by the end of
          the day Tuesday was describing it as a mere, quote 'hypothesis.'
          But the big three broadcast networks could not get enough of it
          anyway. CBS News called it a quote, 'shot to the heart' of the
          Bush campaign, and all three networks ran extensive stories on it,
          noting only in passing that the paper contradicted an earlier, much
          more extensive report, from RAND itself."
     Indeed, for details about this coverage, see the
          October 25 CyberAlert which included a full recitation of Bill
          Whitaker's CBS story quoted by Hume:http://archive.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20001025.asp#1
 
 		 4  "This
          morning, George W. Bush on the defensive after the RAND think tank
          reports that his Texas education miracle is a myth," ABC's
          Charles Gibson declared at the top of Wednesday's Good Morning
          America in previewing a second straight morning of coverage for the
          RAND paper. Minutes later Gibson revealed how he had adopted Gore
          campaign spin in that opening, as he asked a RAND researcher:
          "There's already a Gore campaign ad out quoting the lead
          researcher on this study as saying this shows the Texas miracle in
          education is a myth. Is at overstated or is that what the study
          finds?"
     NBC's Today also devoted a 7am half hour
          interview segment to the "controversial report questioning the
          success of Governor Bush's signature issue, education. The study cast
          doubt on the validity of rising test scores in Texas." (Worth
          noting: MRC analyst Brian Boyd informed me CBS's The Early Show did
          not mention the RAND report either Tuesday or Wednesday morning.)     Gibson announced on GMA after the opening music:
          "Our lead story is education, this study that put education in
          the spotlight on the campaign trail. The RAND Corporation has put out
          a report which really deconstructs George W. Bush's education record
          in Texas, says it's not as strong as they have claimed in the past,
          refutes an earlier RAND Corporation study that said Texas was
          outperforming the nation. So we're going to talk to the Bush
          education advisor and one of the researchers on this study a little
          bit later."     Setting up the interview segment, Gibson
          asserted: "The Bush campaign is decidedly unhappy about a new
          study that suggests the so-called Texas education miracle is not what
          it's cracked up to be. The study by the RAND Corporation, a private
          think tank, a think tank once touted by Bush because of an earlier
          study, has now found the record-breaking scores of blacks and Latinos
          in Texas are not a result of a better education but just the result of
          intense drilling to pass the state's standardized test."     GMA first played for viewers Bush's reaction
          as recounted the day before to Ted Koppel for a Nightline story.     Gibson talked with RAND researcher Brian Stecher,
          to whom he first asked the question quoted above about whether it's
          a "myth"? Stecher avoided a direct answer and reiterated the
          new RAND numbers about how they found scores in the Texas test are up,
          but scores on national tests have not gone up while the gap between
          whites and blacks has improved in the Texas test but not in the
          national one.     Gibson also interviewed Bush education adviser
          Margaret LaMontagne, who got time to dispute the RAND report.     Over on NBC's Today, MRC analyst Geoffrey
          Dickens noticed, Matt Lauer previewed the program: "The polls say
          this presidential race is still as tight as it can be and now there is
          a potential bump in the road for the Bush campaign."Katie Couric:
          "That's right. A new study out giving them a real headache."
 Lauer:
          "That's right, a new report from a non-partisan organization says
          that many of Governor George Bush's claims of improvements in
          education in the state of Texas, specifically improvement in test
          scores may be overblown. This would call the whole so-called, 'Texas
          Miracle' into question but there are also questions about the report.
          We'll have the latest on that."
     Of course, it's not the "study"
          which is giving the Bush campaign "a real headache," it's
          the decision by Today and other network shows to make it the biggest
          news of the day.     Lauer set up the subsequent interview segment:"On Close
          Up this morning, the politics of education. Just two weeks before an
          incredibly tight presidential election a non-partisan think tank, the
          Rand Corporation, has released a controversial report questioning the
          success of Governor Bush's signature issue, education. The study cast
          doubt on the validity of rising test scores in Texas and has been met
          with a swift rebuttal from the Bush campaign. Stephen Klein is one of
          the authors of the study and Margaret LaMontagne is Governor Bush's
          senior education adviser. Good morning to both of you. Mr. Klein let
          me start with you. Let, let's get through the controversy of this. The
          report seems to deflate some of the claims made by the Bush campaign
          on the improvement in education in Texas. What exactly did you find in
          this report?"
     Lauer's other questions: "So are you, are
          you saying that the Bush people are inflating the numbers, are they
          trumping up the numbers or are they misinterpreting what their numbers
          tell them?"     -- "Before I get to Miss LaMontagne, what
          was the reason for going back and looking at this? Because didn't the
          Rand Corporation release a report in July that pretty much backed up
          the Bush campaign's claims?"     -- "And we'll talk about timing in a
          second. Ms. LaMontagne what do you think about this report? Obviously
          it says that some of the claims made by Governor Bush do not seem to
          hold water....Now let's go, let's go, let's go through that. Let's see
          if we can dispute that. Go ahead."     -- "Ms.
          LaMontagne, what about the improvement or the shrinking of the gap
          that Mr. Klein talked about and Governor Bush has talked about
          repeatedly in this campaign between students of color and students,
          and white students? How has that been documented in, in the Bush
          campaign and do you think you can, you can, back up those
          statistics?"     -- "What about
          the timing here, Mr. Klein? I mean obviously we are two weeks before a
          presidential election that is extremely tight. This has been called a
          signature issue for the Bush campaign. It does, I mean it does call
          into question why would this report come out now?"-- "When
          was the report ready?"
 -- "So no
          one's been asking you to hold this report at all?"
     -- "Ms. LaMontagne, the Gore campaign is
          coming out with an ad I think you've seen already today that will
          challenge the Bush findings on education. Will the Bush campaign
          continue to stick to these numbers?" 
 		 5  Gore's
          secret deal with Russia finally worth 17 seconds to one network
          evening show, but only as evidence of political chicanery. And on FNC
          Fred Barnes argued the media's lack of interest in the Russia story,
          while pounding away over the RAND report, demonstrates media bias.
     Peter Jennings read this short item on
          Wednesday's World News Tonight: "Presidential politics reached
          Capitol Hill today. When have they not? Republicans held hearings
          which may embarrass Mr. Gore. Senators said that Mr. Gore violated
          U.S. law by making secret deals about Russia's arms sales to Iran.
          The White House says no laws were broken. House members questioned the
          Education Secretary today about the money he spends on travel. His
          office called the charges partisan."     That took Jennings 25 seconds to announce, 17
          seconds of which was consumed by the Gore-Russia part. But that was
          the first broadcast network evening show mention yet of a story broken
          on the front page of the October 13 New York Times and advanced by a
          couple of front page Washington Times stories last week. Last week and
          Wednesday night FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume delivered full
          stories. (Space precludes me from running any excerpts from those
          newspaper stories with the specific details, but I'll try to get
          some of the details into the next CyberAlert.)     This morning, October 26, Good Morning America
          co-host Charles Gibson did raise the issue with Al Gore. More on that,
          too, in the next CyberAlert.     Wednesday morning, CBS's The Early Show, MRC
          analyst Brian Boyd noticed, also gave the matter a few seconds as news
          reader Diana Olick noted:
          "Questions about a secret arms deal and Vice President Al Gore.
          Today a Senate panel investigates Gore's role in a deal allowing
          Russia to sell arms to Iran. Some former high level Republican
          officials say the 1995 agreement should have been fully disclosed to
          Congress. A Gore official said it was and calls the charges
          political."     The Weekly Standard's Fred Barnes contrasted
          media interest in the potential Gore scandal with its focus on the
          anti-Bush RAND report. He contended on the October 25 edition of
          FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume, as transcribed by MRC analyst
          Brad Wilmouth:"As you
          say, Brit, it's not really a study. It's just sort of a report.
          It's extremely tendentious and argumentative. But it does raise, it
          actually raises a legitimate point while saying that indeed Texas
          students did perform well above the national average on math, and they
          did at least the national average level on reading and writing and so
          on, so it doesn't say that Texas did poorly. The only thing it says
          is well maybe the Texas students didn't do quite as well as they
          did...on their own Texas test, or quite as well as was reported in
          that other RAND study.
 "But here
          is the thing that's the most interesting to me, and that is the
          reception by the press. In other words, this was treated as a dagger
          to the heart of the entire Bush program and so on. They treated this
          as some explosive new report, when it's basically a press release,
          some explosive new report that destroys all Bush's claims on
          education. Now look, the press is gonna write about this thing because
          education is something that, it is a big issue for Bush in the
          campaign, but compare it to this: The New York Times has an
          extraordinarily well-documented story about how Gore made a secret
          deal with Vice President Chernomyrdin of Russia that allowed Iranians
          to get years of weaponry, including a submarine, in violation of an
          American law that Gore had sponsored while in Congress. And yet that
          has no legs at all with media, though it strikes at also something
          that Gore is basing his campaign on, his experience in foreign policy.
          Now I say the press, in this one, made way too much out of the Bush
          story and not nearly enough out of the Gore story."
 
 		 6  Overwrought
          labeling. Might Bush pick a "Souter-type Justice" and not an
          "ultraconservative"?
 MRC analyst Paul Smith caught this question from MSNBC's Brian
          Williams to former Senator George Mitchell on the October 24 News with
          Brian Williams:     "Senator, let's talk about the Supreme
          Court for just one moment. Do you think there is a wind and a nod
          effort by Republicans to signal to moderates that George W. would not
          pick an ultraconservative Justice but would pick a Souter-type Justice
          for the Supreme Court? 
 		 7  Geraldo
          Rivera found someone more extreme than himself, a star of another
          cable network's evening interview show, who told Rivera: "As
          far as I'm concerned, Bush in Texas is nothing more than a serial
          killer."
     That charge came from Tavis Smiley, host of BET
          Tonight on the Black Entertainment Television channel. MRC analyst
          Geoffrey Dickens noticed how Smiley opined during the October 24
          Rivera Live on CNBC:"There are,
          there are some issues on which if you are a voter of color, certainly
          if you are an African-American, you have a hard time choosing. For
          example, both of these guys support the death penalty. As far as I'm
          concerned, Bush in Texas is nothing more than a serial killer. But we,
          but we cannot expect that much more out of, out of Gore, because this
          guy supports the death penalty as well."
     What a conundrum. 
 		 8  Thought
          only male reporters would make crude allusions to Monica Lewinsky's
          fellatio services to Bill Clinton? Former 60 Minutes correspondent
          Meredith Viera did it Wednesday on The View, the ABC daytime show she
          quint-hosts with Barbara Walters and three other woman.
     On the October 25 show, Joy Behar asked Paula
          Jones to describe Bill Clinton's "distinguishing
          characteristic." She held up her finger at a particular angle.
          After an ad break, The View played a tape of Viera at Shea Stadium
          talking on the field to Mets players. Her question to catcher Vincent
          Valinotti:"You're a
          catcher, right? So you spend a lot of time on your knees. Have you
          ever considered interning at the White House?"
     Not a question you'd get from Morley Safer. -- Brent Baker   
     
      >>>
      Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
      which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
      donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
      readers and subscribers:http://www.mrc.org/donate
      >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
      blank e-mail to:
      mrccyberalert-subscribe@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
      http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
      Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
      REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
      After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
      hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
      added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
      link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You 
      DO
      NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
      CyberAlert.
 To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
      cybercomment@mrc.org.
 Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      >>>You
      can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
      subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
      afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<   
 
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
 |