| Critics "Claim" Finance Excesses; Today's Gloomy Prediction for Bush; Gumbel's Show 10% Below This Morning
      -- Back to today's CyberAlert 1) Campaign finance excesses in
  1996 by Clinton-Gore are not an established fact to ABC's Jack Ford. There
  are just "critics" who complained about "what they claim were
  campaign finance excesses." 2) A gloomy forecast for Bush from NBC's Today. Katie Couric
  speculated about "if Gore wins Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and
  Wisconsin does he win the election?" Russert affirmed: "Yes, the
  race is over. Absolutely." 3) Media Reality Check. "NBC: Helping Hillary on GOP Cole
  Calls; Today Co-Hosts
  Upset at New York Phone Calls, But Blind To Democratic Anti-Bush Calls in
  Michigan." 4) CyberAlert Bonus: What didn't fit in the fax. Until they
  were able to use against Lazio the GOP's phone calls about the Cole
  incident, CBS and NBC had ignored the ties between the Muslim group and
  Hillary Clinton. Katie Couric argued with Hilary about how she shouldn't
  have returned the Muslim money. 5) A year after CBS replaced This Morning with The Early Show
  starring the $5 million-a-year Bryant Gumbel, ten percent fewer people are
  watching than tuned into the former show. 
 1  Campaign
  finance excesses in 1996 by Clinton-Gore are not an established fact, ABC's
  Jack Ford presumed in a question he posed to Al Gore. There are just
  "critics" who have complained about "what they claim were
  campaign finance excesses."
     MRC analyst Jessica Anderson caught the wording of
  Ford's questioning in a taped piece he filed for Tuesday's Good Morning
  America about how Bush and Gore define leadership. In the piece Ford announced
  his questions and then ran the responses from one or both candidates. Ford's
  questions to both, unless otherwise indicated:     -- "What is your definition of leadership as it
  applies to the presidency?"     -- "Tell us about a time in your life, a decision
  you made, a position you took where you stood firm, despite some very strong
  opposition that could have cost you personally or politically."     -- "What moment in your life when you had to make a
  decision, exercise leadership, do you think was morally and personally most
  difficult for you?"     -- To Bush only: "What does a decision, such as the
  one you made to stop drinking, teach the American public about your
  leadership?"     -- To Gore only, the campaign finance question:
  "Critics have said that during what they claim were campaign finance
  excesses that you had the chance to exercise moral and political leadership by
  stepping up then and saying, 'We've gone too far here,' but you didn't. How do
  you answer that?"     -- To Bush only: "Critics have said, when they're
  talking about leadership, that a component of leadership should be experience,
  and they have said that you have not had experience on the federal level or in
  foreign policy. How do you answer that?"     -- To both: "Who in your life did you learn the
  most from about leadership?" 
 		 2  NBC's
  Katie Couric and Tim Russert this morning stressed the worst case scenario for
  George W. Bush. Couric speculated about "if Gore wins Florida,
  Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin does he win the election?" Russert
  affirmed: "Yes, the race is over. Absolutely." Russert cited poll
  numbers showing Gore well-ahead in Florida, a must-win for Bush.
     MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens took down the
  Couric-Russert conjecture about whether Bush can win if Gore picks up some
  battleground states:     Russert: "Well let's go to the board and take a
  look. First is Florida, Katie. We now show Al Gore up 11 points in Florida.
  The Gore people say they're up but not by that much. The Bush people say
  that's wrong that they're up. The L.A. Times, today has Bush up four in
  Florida. But our track has Gore up 11 in Florida. Missouri, Bush still up, but
  just one point, Katie. And we'll talk about that and what the entrance of Mrs.
  Carnahan, the widow, could have on the presidential race. Pennsylvania, Gore,
  now up three. Bush had been leading in that state by two, Gore now up three.
  Michigan, Gore up but one. That's dead even. Tennessee, Bush up five. He had
  been up 11 points. That's narrowing a little bit. Al Gore's home state.
  Wisconsin, Gore now up eight. Another slight gain for Al Gore."Couric: "So if you
  look at that list Tim, if, if Gore wins Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and
  Wisconsin does he win the election?"
 Russert: "Yes the
  race is over. Absolutely, Katie. We have been talking repeatedly how important
  it is for George W. Bush to win Florida to go along with Texas. Just like Al
  Gore has New York and California. George Bush cannot afford to lose Florida,
  Michigan and Pennsylvania. Al Gore would then win the electoral college and
  win the election."
 
 		 3  NBC's
      Today interviewed Hillary Clinton on Monday and Rick Lazio today, but both
      New York Senate contenders were pressed about outrage over Republican
      campaign messages. Yet Today has never mentioned the anti-Bush scare
      phones into Michigan or he NAACP ad, a new Campaign 2000 Media Reality
      Check has documented.
     Titled, "NBC: Helping Hillary on GOP Cole
      Calls; Today Co-Hosts Upset at New York Phone Calls, But Blind To
      Democratic Anti-Bush Calls in Michigan," the report by the MRC's
      Tim Graham was distributed by fax this afternoon. To see it as an Adobe
      Acrobat PDF file, go to:http://archive.mrc.org/realitycheck/2000/pdf/fax1031.pdf
     Before getting to the text, here's the pull-out
      box text from the middle of the page: Hillary's Ads Distort: Who Cares?     THE SCRIPT: "O.K., let's take a look at Rick
      Lazio's friends. A [New York] Daily News investigation just revealed
      that the home-building industry has kicked in a million dollars to
      Lazio's campaign. And Lazio has tried to help them weaken safety and
      construction standards...."SCORECARD:
      "...The breathless tone of the commercial should be enough to give
      viewers pause. Its review of this part of Mr. Lazio's housing record is
      a flat-out distortion meant to confuse viewers about Lazio's record in
      the House at a time when he has increasingly cited it to justify his run
      for the Senate." - New York Times reporter Randal C. Archbold
      critiquing a Hillary commercial, October 30.
     Now the text of the October
      31 Media Reality Check: NBC's Today interviewed Hillary Clinton on Monday and Rick Lazio
      today. But both New York Senate contenders were asked about outrage over
      Republican campaign messages. Yesterday, Katie Couric began with a softball: "I know that you
      were outraged last week, Mrs. Clinton, about a telephone campaign by the
      New York Republican party that told voters you took money from quote, 'A
      Mideast organization, Mideast terrorism group, the same kind of terrorism
      that killed our sailors on the U.S.S. Cole.' That telephone campaign has
      ended, a GOP spokesman said, not because of your criticism that it was
      politicizing a tragedy but because the script had run its course. What's
      your reaction to that?" Matt Lauer took up the outrage with Lazio this morning: "There's
      been accusations going in both directions of negative campaigning. It's
      gotten a little bit dirty. The gloves have come off. But this week it
      seems to have gotten out of hand. The Republican state committee has been
      making phone calls to voters -- they say they stopped this now, by the way
      -- in some way insinuating that Mrs. Clinton is accepting support from a
      group that may, that may, have some connection to the tragic attack to the
      U.S.S. Cole. Isn't that outrageous?...But it is coming out of the state
      Republicans' campaign and you know about this." Lauer pounded away: -- "The group you're talking about is the American Muslim
      Alliance, is that right? Who also endorsed Governor Bush for President,
      and he wholeheartedly accepted that endorsement." (Bush returned
      their money.) -- "Let me go back to the phone call for a second, because here's
      what the callers are saying to voters: 'Mrs. Clinton took money from an
      organization that openly brags about its support for a Mideast terrorism
      group.' And here's the part that gets a lot of people: 'The same kind of
      terrorism that killed our sailors on the U.S.S. Cole.' Now that's
      obviously exploiting a national tragedy for political gain." -- "What you're doing is you're saying that it's not coming out of
      your campaign. But you're not backing away from it at all!....Mrs. Clinton
      has demanded an apology. You're not apologizing." The Early Show on CBS also interviewed both candidates in the last two
      days. Bryant Gumbel didn't ask Mrs. Clinton about the Cole calls, but
      Jane Clayson asked Lazio today: "Do you regret that that phone
      campaign happened?" While CBS and NBC sharply questioned the tone of the GOP's messages,
      neither of their morning shows has reported on or questioned recent
      Hillary Clinton ads (see box). Neither has reported on or questioned
      Democratic phone calls in Michigan suggesting George W. Bush's policies
      on nursing homes led to the death of a Texas man in 1995, or the NAACP's
      ad suggesting Bush killed James Byrd "all over again." While
      pundits worry about the impact of last-minute negative ads, they also
      might worry about the impact of selective media coverage that only
      scrutinizes and finds outrage in Republican messages.     END Reprint of Media Reality Check 
 		 4  A
      CyberAlert Bonus: Tim Graham wrote up what he couldn't fit into the
      one-page fax report, specifically, how until they were able to use against
      Lazio the GOP's phone calls about the Cole incident, CBS and NBC had
      ignored the ties between the Muslim group and Hillary Clinton.
     Last week neither CBS nor NBC reported on Mrs.
      Clinton's decision to return the Muslim activist donations, a story which
      broke last Thursday, or provided any context to a rather complicated
      controversy. It began last Wednesday, when Larry Cohler-Esses of the New
      York Daily News reported: "An American Muslim group whose leader backs the Palestinians'
      right to use 'armed force' against Israel has raised thousands of dollars
      for Hillary Rodham Clinton's Senate campaign. The American Muslim Alliance says it sponsored a $500-a-ticket
      fund-raiser in Boston in June at which $50,000 was raised. Clinton
      confirms she attended and accepted a plaque from the alliance citing her
      work for human rights, but argues that another group sponsored the event. As First Lady, the Daily News has learned, Clinton also held several
      White House Muslim holiday receptions to which individuals opposed to the
      Mideast peace process and Israel's existence were invited. One of the guests, Abdurahman Alamoudi of the American Muslim Council,
      later boasted, 'We are the ones who went to the White House and defended
      what is called Hamas.' The State Department has designated Hamas a terrorist organization. A
      Clinton campaign spokesman said today that a $1,000 contribution by
      Alamoudi has been returned. "     END EXCERPT     Based on that story, Lazio told Clayson on CBS's
      The Early Show this morning: "I think if you look at the underlying
      facts of what happened, you see that Mrs. Clinton invited people to the
      White House who espoused terrorism and violence as a political tool."
      Clayson asked incredulously: "You really believe that?...You really
      believe she invited those people to the White House?"     Lazio responded: "I think there's no doubt.
      It's been in the papers." Clayson began the negative-ad section of
      the interview by demanding: "I want you to respond to some numbers. A
      new CBS News/New York Times poll shows...("I hate numbers, I hate
      polls," protested Lazio.) Well, listen to this one, because it says
      people think you are attacking Mrs. Clinton more than explaining your
      positions. In fact, 60 percent think you're attacking, 27 percent think
      you're explaining, exactly the opposite almost for Mrs. Clinton. Does it
      seem that way to you?"     For a look at the latest CBS/New York Times poll
      questions, go to:http://cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,245083-412,00.shtml
     On the 26th, the New York Daily News questioned Mrs.
      Clinton's claims that she didn't know the $50,000 fundraiser in Boston was
      hosted by the American Muslim Alliance: "She said a plaque she was
      pictured accepting from the group at the event was given to her as she was
      leaving -- and she responded by smiling for a photo with the man who gave
      it to her. The American Muslim Alliance's name was embossed in large type
      on the plaque. Clinton said she routinely accepts such plaques -- then
      stores them away. 'I've been given literally thousands of plaques,' she
      said."     Now -- after years of touting Mrs. Clinton's
      encyclopedic memory for details, testifying on her health care plan before
      Congress without notes -- can the media sell Hillary as absent-minded and
      averse to detail? Neither CBS nor NBC asked her about that, despite the
      fact that Couric on Monday questioned Mrs. Clinton about being too hasty
      to refund the American Muslim Association money:"This all stems, of course, from a $50,000
      contribution from the American Muslim Alliance, that you returned last
      week after learning that the group's leader was quoted as defending the
      Palestinian's right to take up arms against Israel. Now this group, the
      American Muslim Alliance, is saying its views have been distorted by both
      sides and by returning the money you're pandering to the Jewish vote in
      New York state."
     Couric followed-up: "And yet members of the
      American Muslim Alliance are upset because they feel that you didn't meet
      with them. So they had an opportunity to clarify their views on certain
      positions. And they are saying, basically, just because they are support
      the Palestinians doesn't mean they are supporting terrorism."     Couric pressed again: "But don't you think it
      might've been helpful for you to find out exactly what this group was
      condoning or promoting before giving them back the money?"     Lazio tried to tell
      Lauer this morning that Mrs. Clinton misled federal authorities about her
      Muslim activist donations. "When the Clinton campaign was caught, and
      that's the important thing here, they only do something, they only correct
      their problems when they get caught. They, they were, they were caught
      because they filed on their Federal Election Commission return, their
      disclosure form, the American Muslim Council, but the American Museum
      Council in an attempt to sort of cover up the fact that they were
      receiving support from people who were supportive of terrorism."     Late in a Sunday story
      on the GOP Cole calls, The New York Times noted: "Mr. Lazio's
      campaign, meanwhile, moved yesterday to turn the attention back to Mrs.
      Clinton, noting that in her filing with the Federal Election Commission,
      she misidentified Abdurahman Alamoudi, a board member of the American
      Muslim Council, who gave her $1,000."Officials of
      that group also say they do not support terrorism, but Mr. Alamoudi has
      been quoted in interviews as making statements sympathetic to Hamas. In
      the F.E.C. filing, the Clinton campaign listed him as a member of the
      'American Museum Council.' A news release put out by Mr. Lazio's campaign
      quoted Governor Pataki as assailing Mrs. Clinton, saying, 'Mrs. Clinton
      should say why she filed this under the American Museum Council, and
 not the American Muslim Council.'"
     Neither CBS nor NBC
      asked Mrs. Clinton about that. 
 		 5  The
      MRC must continue to watch CBS's The Early Show to catch all the bias
      from Bryant Gumbel and Jane Clayson, but a year after CBS spent $30
      million building them a street-side studio in Manhattan, the new Gumbel
      vehicle is attracting ten percent fewer viewers than did the old This
      Morning show, a program considered a failure in need of replacement.
     In Monday's USA Today Peter Johnson reported:
      "CBS's The Early Show celebrates its first birthday this week, with
      CBS News brass saying it's a better news show than predecessor," but
      "viewers don't agree: Early, anchored by former Today host Bryant
      Gumbel and Jane Clayson, has 10 percent fewer viewers" than did This
      Morning.     Johnson added to the bad news for CBS: "Key
      demographics used to sell ads -- women 18 to 49 and women 25 to 54 -- are
      flat. And Early's 2.1 average rating for the past year is well below the
      2.6 that CBS promised advertisers."     Johnson speculated: "That will not please CBS
      affiliates, which CBS News brass persuaded this summer to be patient.
      Early, into which CBS pumped $30 million to revamp, had 2.1 million
      viewers last week. NBC's Today had 6 million, and ABC's Good Morning
      America had 4.2 million."     Let's hope the
      affiliate managers can convince the CBS executives that they can produce a
      better show that more people will watch if it's sans Gumbel.     Reminder: Al Gore will be on NBC's Tonight
      Show tonight and on the daytime syndicated Queen Latifah Show on
      Wednesday. -- Brent Baker
        
     
      >>>
      Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
      which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
      donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
      readers and subscribers:http://www.mrc.org/donate
      >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
      blank e-mail to:
      mrccyberalert-subscribe@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
      http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
      Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
      REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
      After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
      hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
      added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
      link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You 
      DO
      NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
      CyberAlert.
 To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
      cybercomment@mrc.org.
 Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      >>>You
      can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
      subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
      afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<   
 
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
 |