Gumbel Blind to Gore's Race-Baiting; Rosie O'Donnell Played Barbra's Anti-Bush Diatribe
-- Back to today's CyberAlert
1) Media Reality Check. "What
If Bush Called His Opponent 'Evil'? Vice
President's Outrageous Rhetoric Is Largely Unrebuked During Campaign's
Final Hours." CBS's Bryant Gumbel interviewed Al Gore Monday morning
but didn't mention how Gore had likened Bush to an evil, slave-holding
2) Morning show questions to Al and Tipper Gore. Gumbel posed
a tough one to Al Gore, recounting how Gore claimed, "I need your help to
take this country back." Gumbel wondered: "Back from whom?"
3) Rosie O'Donnell today played the complete pro-Gore
diatribe from Barbra Streisand, which 20/20 had only shown in part. The singer
proclaimed: "Let's face it, this is a war against bigotry, against
discrimination of every kind -- racism, sexism, anti-Semitism and
4) New "MediaWatch" columns on National Review
Online by the MRC's Tim Graham: "Turn out the Lights: Gore's breaking
media hearts"; "Too Kind to Kin? The double standard in using
politicians' kids" and "Barbra's Bust: Lining up behind the
Gumbel blind to Gore's race-baiting and over the line negativity. Picking up
on coverage of two Saturday Gore remarks -- about how "good overcomes
evil" and how Bush's promise to appoint "strict
constructionists" to the Supreme Court reminded him of how when the
Constitution was written that same approach meant "some people were
considered three-fifths of a human being" -- were ignored by Bryant
Gumbel in interviewing Al Gore this morning while NBC's Matt Lauer asked
about one remark and only ABC's Charles Gibson demanded he defend both.
Clarification: This morning's CyberAlert noted how
neither remark was mentioned on the two broadcast network evening shows which
aired in the east Sunday night, ABC and NBC. I've since learned that while
he made the "three-fifths" comment Saturday night, he uttered the
"evil" comment Saturday morning, not Sunday morning. However, a
check of Saturday's NBC Nightly News, the only broadcast network show not
bumped by college football, determined that while Chip Reid showed clips from
the prayer breakfast he did not play the "evil" comment.
Now to the Campaign 2000 Media Reality Check by the
MRC's Rich Noyes. Distributed this afternoon, it's titled, "What If
Bush Called His Opponent 'Evil'? Vice President's Outrageous Rhetoric Is
Largely Unrebuked During Campaign's Final Hours."
To see it as a life-like Adobe Acrobat PDF file, go to:
First, here's the pull-out quote in the middle of the
Is This What Brazile Meant By Gore's "Sense of Style and
"I believe, as I stand here in Memphis, that America has a rendezvous
with redemption. I believe that we are moving toward the nation that we are
intended to be. But we've got work that lies just before us, and we've got to
recognize the obstacles that need to be cleared away, and they too are
obstacles of the spirit. Deep within us, we each have the capacity for good
and for evil. I am taught that good overcomes evil if we choose that outcome.
I feel it coming. I feel a message from this gathering that on Tuesday we're
going to carry Tennessee and Memphis is going to lead the way."
-- Al Gore, speaking at a prayer breakfast, Nov. 4
Now the text of the November
6 Media Reality Check:
At the end of his losing presidential campaign in 1992, President George
Bush caught a lot of flak from the networks for calling Al Gore "Ozone
Man" and declaring that "my dog, Millie, knows more about foreign
affairs than these two bozos." Network correspondents were appalled that
the Democratic ticket would be likened to a pair of clowns.
Trailing in the final pre-election polls, Gore this weekend likened his
opponent to an evil, slave-holding racist, but few TV reporters had the same
outrage they manifested eight years ago.
-- Gore begged worshipers at a Memphis prayer breakfast to support him.
"Good overcomes evil if we choose that outcome," he said, and
"Tennessee and Memphis is going to lead the way." Gore denied that
he meant to say that George W. Bush was evil, FNC's Jim Angle later
Broadcast coverage? NBC's Chip Reid covered the prayer breakfast on
Saturday's Nightly News, but skipped over the "evil" comment.
While it was a topic of discussion on the Sunday morning interview shows,
neither ABC nor NBC mentioned the comment Sunday night. Gore appeared on all
three Monday morning shows via satellite from Iowa; ABC's Charles Gibson and
NBC's Matt Lauer both asked Gore about that line, but CBS's Bryant Gumbel
-- Later in Pittsburgh, Gore pushed the idea that Bush would subjugate
African-Americans: "When my opponent, Governor Bush, says he'll appoint
strict constructionists to the Supreme Court, I often think of the strictly
constructed meaning that was applied when the Constitution was written -- how
some people were considered three-fifths of a human being."
Neither CBS nor NBC touched the three-fifths comment this morning, nor did
any of the evening news programs bring it up last night. But ABC's Gibson
asked Gore: "Do you really, honestly think that Governor Bush would take
us back in civil rights 225 years?"
-- Gibson also voiced bewilderment that Gore should be trailing at all.
"When you look at this objectively," he told the Vice President,
"the incumbent party is dealt a very strong hand here. We have full
employment in the United States, we have unparalleled prosperity in terms of
wealth created, we have low interest rates, we have low inflation, we have few
perils to our nation overseas. So you were dealt a very strong hand coming
into this election, and yet it's still close. Why?"
On Today, Katie Couric consulted Doris Kearns Goodwin, NBC's resident
historian, about the hardships of defeat. "It'll be much harder for Gore
because he has to say goodbye to his staff, he has to leave his house, he has
to leave the place where he's been in such a long period of time." She
added, "At least Mr. Bush is going home to the house that he's had. He's
going back to a job. He'll have structure in his day."
Sunday's Washington Post quoted Gore manager Donna Brazile as saying that
by the third debate she knew "Al Gore was quite ready to finish this race
with a sense of style and grace." Reporters should ask Gore if it's
really classy to brand your opponents evil racists.
END Reprint of Media Reality Check
bonus: All the questions posed this morning to Al Gore in his final
pre-election morning show interviews. George Bush declined network
Bryant Gumbel did pose one interesting question to Gore:
"You campaigned in Tennessee this weekend, I'm confused about something,
you told people that, I'm using your words here, 'I need your help to take
this country back.' Back from whom?"
Otherwise, see if you sense that the networks stars
think Gore's campaign might be a lost cause.
>ABC's Good Morning America. Charles Gibson's
inquiries to Gore and Tipper under an umbrella in Waterloo, as transcribed by
MRC analyst Jessica Anderson:
-- "So with all that as set up, joining us now,
Vice President Al Gore and his wife Tipper from one of the final stops on the
campaign trail, Waterloo, Iowa. And by the way, we should mention again we
also asked Governor George W. Bush to join us personally this morning, but he
declined our invitation. Mr. Vice President, 24 hours from now, people are
going to be voting, so what one thing can you say at this point that will
totally change the political landscape?"
-- "This is breathtakingly close election. Can you
give me three states you're going to particularly closely watch tomorrow
-- "Let me ask you both, and I'll start with you,
Mr. Vice President, why is this election so close? When you look at this
objectively and as people looked at it six months ago, the incumbent party
dealt a very strong hand here. We have full employment in the United States,
we have unparalleled prosperity in terms of wealth created, we have low
interest rates, we have low inflation, we have few perils to our nation
overseas. So you were dealt a very strong hand coming into this election, and
yet it's still close. Why?"
-- "Mrs. Gore, what would you say to that
-- "Mr. Vice President, you have used very strong
rhetoric in the last weekend of this campaign. You said in a Memphis church on
Saturday, and I'm quoting you now, 'I am taught that good overcomes evil if we
choose that outcome.' Is this election about good versus evil in your
-- "Also on the subject of civil rights, in that
same address, you said that your opponent had shown indifference to the
dragging death of James Byrd, the black man who was dragged to death in the
state of Texas, and you said that your opponent would appoint Supreme Court
justices who would take us back to a time reminiscent of when blacks were only
three-fifths of a human being, going back to the original language of the
Constitution. Do you really honestly think that Governor Bush would take us
back in civil rights 225 years?"
-- "Mrs. Gore, quick question. What about this
election has surprised you more than anything else?"
> CBS's The Early Show. Bryant Gumbel's questions
to the Gores, as transcribed by MRC analyst Brian Boyd:
-- "Mr. Vice President, let me start with you if I
might. I saw where you said yesterday you are feeling confident about
tomorrow. On what evidence are you basing that confidence?"
-- "You've seen the poll numbers, the New York
Times/CBS poll actually showed the Governor widening his lead over the
weekend, why aren't you more troubled?" [poll graph of Bush leading 47 to
-- "You mentioned President Clinton by name for the
first time in a while in Philadelphia yesterday, how should we interpret
-- "Mrs. Gore, I don't want to leave you out of
this and you are hardly unbiased in this, but what are you feeling out
Tipper Gore: "I feel energy and momentum and I'm very
excited about that. I think people are beginning to tune in and they
understand that the job of President is serious business and we need a very
serious and committed guy who has leadership experience."
Gumbel: "Is that to
say you think that Governor Bush is not qualified for the job?"
-- "How do you view President Clinton's statement
last Thursday that a vote for your husband is the next best thing to a third
-- "Mr. Vice President, when you campaigned in
Tennessee this weekend, I'm confused about something, you told people that,
I'm using your words here, 'I need your help to take this country back.' Back
-- "Mr. Vice
President, you made a point this weekend also of seeing that your
opponent's statement that Social Security was not a federal program was
more than just a slip of the tongue. Was it to your mind evidence that
he's not qualified?"
Al Gore: "I
have refused to make a judgement about his qualifications because I think
that's the proper role for the voters to-"
your ads make the judgment and so does your running mate."
-- "In our final seconds before we let you get
out of the rain, any final words this morning for those Nader
> NBC's Today. Matt Lauer's queries, as
transcribed by MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens.
-- "On this final morning before election day
Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper are in Waterloo, Iowa. Mr. and
Mrs. Gore good morning to you. I can see it's raining a little bit for you
there. Let me ask you Mr. Vice President. Tomorrow's the day you've been
working toward your whole life, without sounding, too dramatic. In terms
of sheer butterflies and nerves how are you feeling today?"
-- "But the race has come down to a razor
thin margin. I mean you have to be feeling some butterflies on this day
before election day."
-- "Mrs. Gore is it possible that this is more
nerve-wracking for you than it is for your husband?"
-- "Vice President Gore let me ask you about a
couple of topics. You spoke at a prayer breakfast recently and you talked
about that you'd been taught that good can overcome evil, if we choose
that outcome. And you had the feeling that we were about to choose that
outcome. Were you suggesting that you're good and, and Governor Bush is
-- "You talk about issues. Over the
weekend some polls were taken that show the revelation of George Bush's,
George W. Bush's drunk driving arrest 24 years ago is going to have little
or no impact in this election, then would you say that's a good thing,
that you're happy that voters aren't concentrating on the past, they're
looking to the future?"
-- "This has been a heavyweight fight Mr. Vice
President. You and Governor Bush have traded punches, you've given it out,
you've taken it. What would you say to your opponent on this day before
-- "Mrs. Gore real quickly. What would you say
to Mrs. Bush this morning?"
last-minute Gore campaigning. On Friday's 20/20 Barbara Walters didn't
show enough of Barbra Streisand promoting Al Gore to satisfy Streisand or
Rosie O'Donnell. So on her syndicated daytime show today, O'Donnell
played Streisand's on-stage polemics for Gore announced at a recent
Gore-Lieberman fundraiser, only the first 44 words of which were shown by
In her Friday 20/20 interview of Streisand, Barbara
Walters allowed Streisand to defend Bill Clinton and then outlined the
liberal views behind her backing of Gore. She played this clip of
Streisand on stage in front of Gore: "The first three reasons to vote
for Al Gore are the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court.
Our whole way of life is at stake when you consider that the next
President will make three or even four appointments during his term."
For more on the forum 20/20 provided Streisand and
for a video clip of it, go to where MRC Webmaster Andy Szul has posted a
But those 44 words weren't enough for O'Donnell,
Timna Tannrrs of Reuters reported Sunday in a story highlighted by the
Drudge Report: "A close friend of Streisand, O'Donnell offered to air
the endorsement of Gore after Streisand expressed disappointment with an
interview conducted by Barbara Walters, where the singer's political views
"'She did the
interview with Walters because of their long-standing friendship and on
the condition that she run the speech she gave at the Democratic
Convention after Gore's nomination,' a spokesman for Streisand said.
produces Walters' 20/20 interview show, decided to use only 44 words of
her speech, the spokesman said, followed by a clip of Republican candidate
George Bush in his first debate with Gore, addressing Streisand's
Today, Rosie O'Donnell played video of Streisand
singing "Send in the Clowns," followed by Streisand's full
diatribe. O'Donnell set up the excerpt: "Tomorrow is election day.
She had some thoughts on this election. I thought I'd share them with
you, too. Take a look."
O'Donnell's clip began where 20/20 started, but
continued for another 1:15. Here it is from the start, as transcribed by
MRC analyst Jessica Anderson:
three reasons to vote for Al Gore are the Supreme Court, the Supreme
Court, the Supreme Court. It's true. [applause] Thank you. Our whole way
of life is at stake when you consider that the next President will make
three or even four appointments during his term, and I shudder when I
think of how a more conservative Court could put at risk all the things we
hold dear: our civil rights, women's rights, disability rights, privacy
rights, consumer rights, workers' rights and reproductive rights. I, for
one, don't want to return to the days before Roe vs. Wade, when women
had to endanger their lives with back alley physicians [more applause].
Let's face it, this is a war against bigotry, against discrimination of
every kind -- racism, sexism, anti-Semitism and homophobia -- and we need,
we need Justices who will ensure our equal rights and not turn the clock
back on decades of social progress."
Friday, National Review Online has posted three fresh pieces of campaign
coverage analysis by the MRC's Tim Graham. Working backward from today:
-- Monday's "MediaWatch" report.
"Turn out the Lights: Gore's breaking media hearts." It began:
"Network morning shows were trying to keep hope alive today for Al
Gore as time runs out, but their hearts weren't quite in it. They want to
portray the race as 'tick-tight' in Dan Rather lingo, but they sound
like they don't really believe it. You could dub it 'Don't Demoralize
Democrat Turnout Day.'"...
To read the rest, go
-- Sunday's piece. "Too Kind to Kin? The
double standard in using politicians' kids." Graham opened the
article: "Who's more dangerous on the road? A 30-year-old man
crossing the blood-alcohol limit driving too slowly in the middle of the
night, or an 17-year-old boy driving 97 miles per hour on an interstate
highway in broad daylight?
of danger are not the standards of news judgment. The Thursday eruption
over George W. Bush's old DUI arrest of 1976 quickly trumped the amount of
TV time most other fall campaign issues or controversies received within
the first 24 hours. But the 17-year-old boy arrested for wild speeding is
Al Gore III, driving back to Washington from the Outer Banks of North
Carolina on August 12, 2000. Clearly Young Al is not supposed to be a
public figure. Clearly it would seem beyond the pale for any political
operative or hard-charging talk-radio host to blame his dad for doing a
rotten job of the boy's upbringing. But is it fair to spike the
unfavorable news angles -- especially when a presidential nominee's child
breaks the law -- and then celebrate the child, or more precisely,
celebrate the parenting of the child,
on a different day? The Clintons and the Gores have both benefitted
politically from exploiting their children in a way that invites
backhanded compliments from sympathetic journalists...."
To read the rest, go
-- Saturday's report. "Barbra's Bust:
Lining up behind the Democrats." It began: "Newspapers,
including the New York Post, spread the news a few days ago: ABC's 20/20
had made a deal with the diva Barbra Streisand for an interview three
nights before Election Day to press her case for the public to vote for Al
Gore. Why would ABC News promote their plans to make another stale
celebrity endorsement part of their 'news' magazine show? In every
election cycle, the denizens and dilettantes of Hollywood line up behind
To read the whole
article, go to:
Just one more night of media coverage before the
vote begins. -- Brent Baker
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to firstname.lastname@example.org."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
Send problems and comments to: email@example.com.
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe