"Too Close to Call"?; Sour on "Interminable Campaign"; "Gore!" an Actress Shouted on the Tonight Show; Dan Rather's Broken Promise
-- Extra Edition
1) The networks predicted a very
close race. "It's too close to call," insisted NBC's Tim Russert.
CBS's Dan Rather claimed "it could be one of the closest presidential
elections in U.S. history." NBC's Katie Couric saw "the closest,
least predictable presidential election in four decades."
2) ABC's Peter Jennings opened Monday night with a sour spin
on the process as he cited the end of the "interminable campaign."
3) Actress Gillian Anderson used her election eve Tonight Show
appearance to exhort: "For woman, for children, for seniors... Gore!
Gore!" Actors Julia Louis Dreyfuss, Ben Affleck, Helen Hunt, Martin Sheen
and Glenn Close campaigned for Gore.
4) ABC gave Ross Perot air time Monday morning to explain why
he backed George Bush, but Diane Sawyer argued with him about the accuracy of
his criticism of Al Gore and dismissed the endorsement as pique at Gore for
beating him in the NAFTA debate.
5) Pre-election magazines. Only Time noticed the NAACP ad, but
ignored the key anti-Bush line. To voting for Bush, ex-U.S. News Editor Roger
Rosenblatt ridiculed: "Are you kidding?" Newsweek's Jonathan Alter
worried a Bush presidency will be "subcontracted to...corporate
interests." Bill Turque huffed that "not a shred of evidence"
shows Gore dangled his Gulf War vote for TV time.
6) Dan Rather promised "the most accurate presidential
election night returns." Four years ago CBS reported Senator Bob Smith
lost because he's "very conservative." He's still a Senator.
1
If
it's a blowout or not very close, remember the day before the election
network predictions of a race, in Tim Russert's words on Monday's NBC
Nightly News, that's "too close to call." CBS's Dan Rather
predicted "it could be one of the closest presidential elections in
U.S. history" as "this election could still go either way."
NBC's Tom Brokaw saw "a race to the wire with polls so close they
tell us only that neither man is breaking away." Earlier in the day
on NBC's Today, Katie Couric insisted: "It's the closest, least
predictable presidential election in four decades."
CBS announced Monday night, November 6, that its
latest poll put Bush up by four points, but NBC had Gore up by two points.
ABC did not report any poll numbers.
-- CBS Evening News. Dan Rather opened the
broadcast: "In a matter of hours polls open and voters will go to the
polls to decide who will be the next President of the United States, the
first new President of the 21st century. And at this hour there are
indications it could be one of the closest presidential elections in U.S.
history. That is why the theme of this day was: Get the voters out."
Rather outlined CBS's newest poll: "If you
have any doubt that every vote counts, look at this: A CBS News
pre-election poll out this election eve indicates Bush leads Gore by just
four percentage points among likely voters nationally [46 to 42 percent].
In the all important state by state battle for 270 electoral votes, CBS
News estimates that 24 states in red may give Bush 209 electoral votes. In
blue are the 12 states and DC expected to give 181 votes to Gore. Fourteen
states, with 148 electoral votes, are up for grabs, so this election could
still go either way."
Bob Schieffer later cautioned: "This is going
to be so close we may see one presidential candidate win the popular vote
and lose the election because the other man gets the most electoral
votes."
-- NBC Nightly News. Tom Brokaw began the show by
asserting: "On the eve of the first election of the 21st century, it
comes down to this: A race to the wire with polls so close they tell us
only that neither man is breaking away. Over the weekend the NBC News/Wall
Street Journal poll had Governor Bush leading the Vice President by three
points [47 to 44 percent]. But today's MSNBC/Reuters overnight tracking
poll shows a slight lead for the Vice President [48 to 46 percent."]
-- NBC's Today. Monday morning, MRC analyst
Geoffrey Dickens noticed, Katie Couric led the show: "Good morning.
It's still too close to call. Election day is less than 24 hours away and
a handful of states are still in play. States that will determine whether
Al Gore or George W. Bush is elected President of the United States. With
so much uncertainty both men have miles to go before they sleep today,
Monday, November the 6th, 2000."
Couric soon contended: "It's the closest, least
predictable presidential election in four decades. Just look at these
latest polls. This morning's NBC/Wall Street Journal poll finds Governor
Bush leading 47 percent to 44 percent, just within the poll's margin of
error. And the latest MSNBC tracking poll from John Zogby also out this
morning finds the race at 47 Bush, 46 Gore. Another statistical dead heat.
All of which has strategists and aides huddled over the maps of the
country this morning, figuring out just how their man can get to the 270
electoral votes, it takes, to win the White House, Matt."
2
ABC's
Peter Jennings is glad the "interminable campaign" is over. He
opened Monday's World News Tonight with a sour spin on the process:
"Here we are on the last night of the interminable campaign.
Politicians are flogging themselves through one more day while the
reporters who cover them and the campaign workers with them are beginning
to think a little less about the national interest and more about finally
getting off the bus."
3
Actor
activism for Gore. Barbra Streisand is not the only left-wing celebrity
using her stardom to aide the Al Gore campaign and the Rosie O'Donnell
Show wasn't the only program Monday to showcase a celebrity promoting
Gore. Last night on NBC's Tonight Show, X Files star Gillian Anderson
shouted "Gore! Gore!"
In addition, several actors traveled over the
weekend and last night with the Gore entourage to warm up crowds and help
get out the vote efforts.
Anderson, who plays FBI agent "Dana Sculley"
on Fox's The X Files, wrapped up her election eve Tonight Show
appearance by urging viewers to vote for Al Gore. Her voice rising to a
shout, she hinted at dire consequences if Bush wins and exhorted:
"Woman have to get out there. For woman, for children, for seniors.
Get out there. You have no idea. It's going to be bad. Gore! Gore!"
Only the band's pre-commercial break music cut her off.
In a World News Tonight story on turnout efforts,
ABC's Aaron Brown on Monday night reported: "Actor Jeff Goldblum
was working for Al Gore in Pittsburgh, TV President Martin Sheen and Rob
Reiner were working Memphis."
Entertainment Tonight's Mary Hart showed actors
Julia Louis Dreyfuss, Ben Affleck, Helen Hunt and Martin Sheen campaigning
for Gore in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania over the weekend. ET played a clip of
Dreyfuss, best-known as "Elaine" on Seinfeld, shouting:
"Vote for Al Gore Tuesday!" Affleck took a nice shot at Bush:
"It's hard for me to have a respect for a guy who never held a job
until he was 40."
Shortly before 1am ET this morning, C-SPAN showed
live coverage of Affleck, Robert DeNiro and Glenn Close bashing Bush as
they warmed up a Miami Beach crowd just before Gore arrived.
4
ABC gave
Ross Perot some air time Monday morning to explain why he endorsed George
Bush, but Diane Sawyer argued with him about the accuracy of his criticism
of Al Gore. When he recounted how other Senators remembered that Gore sold
his pro-Gulf War vote to the side which gave him the best TV time, she
countered that other Senators maintain "he backed the Gulf War
because he felt it was right."
As noted in the November 4 CyberAlert, Perot's
surprise Bush endorsement, made on Thursday night's CNN Larry King Live,
was obliterated by the Bush drunk driving story. It did not get one second
Friday night on ABC, CBS or NBC after only passing mentions Friday morning
on ABC and NBC while CBS's The Early Show skipped it altogether.
Monday morning, ABC's Good Morning America brought
Perot aboard in the 8am half hour, observed MRC analyst Jessica Anderson.
Sawyer set up the segment: "Texas billionaire Ross Perot featured
prominently in the last two presidential elections, running as a third
party candidate in '92 and in '96, won a total of 29 million votes. But he
has kept a low profile throughout this campaign, only to emerge now and
endorse George W. Bush of his state Texas, and he's here to tell us
why."
Perot took on Gore's dishonestly: "Let me
give you an example. In the Senate, just before he became Vice President,
he decided whether or not to vote for or against the Gulf War based on how
much time the Republicans would give him on television."
To which Sawyer
countered: "Well, Ross, I've got to interrupt you there because, as
you know, there are a lot of people who've heard this charge before, come
forward, including Senator Dale Bumpers, and said that's not true, that he
did it because, and in fact it was a decision made against the majority of
his party and he backed the Gulf War because he felt it was right."
Perot: "But he
also went to Alan Simpson and Bob Dole, and this is a fact, and told them
he'd only do it if they gave him prime time and a certain amount of time.
He continued to negotiate until the last minute. That's not the way you
send people off to fight and die. Let's take a second one. He was
responsible for administering a $20 billion fund that was given to Russia
to help the Russian people. It went to foreign speculators and the mob in
Russia, and the Russians later laughingly said, 'We really conned them.'
Now this is not a man with the skills to be President of the United
States."
Sawyer insisted a bit later: "Alright, again,
I'm not intervening on behalf of anybody here."
Perot: "Sounds
like you are, but go ahead. We'll have a good debate."
Sawyer: "I've
got to raise some of the questions that have been raised by others over
the weekend. Somebody said, first of all, that you don't like Al Gore
because you had a debate with him on Larry King Live about NAFTA and
indeed, he won the debate and you never forgave him that."
Perot: "That is
not even a factor. It's not even a factor, and you're the first to bring
it up."
5
MagazineWatch
about the pre-election November 6-dated editions published last week.
To read this analysis online, go to:
http://archive.mrc.org/magwatch/mag20001031.asp
Here's the table of contents of the October 31
edition of MagazineWatch, about Time, Newsweek and U.S. News, followed
by the text of the items compiled by the MRC's Tim Graham:
1. Only Time noticed the NAACP ad which features James Byrd's
daughter saying George W. Bush "killed" Byrd "all over
again" by vetoing a new "hate crimes" law. But reporter
Viveca Novak left that line out.
2. In their last chance to influence the voters, Newsweek tilted
readers leftward in their "Voters Panic Guide," and former
U.S. News editor Roger Rosenblatt lectured the undecided: "Are
you kidding?" Undecided voters "focus on nonsense. They tilt
toward Bush in the debates out of some adolescent response to
powerlessness and ineptitude."
3. Rush and Ralph are wrong? Time's Steve Lopez cynically
rebutted a passionate Bush voter's assertion that "Rush is
right." Newsweek's Jonathan Alter warned Nader voters they
could create a Bush presidency, which "will be essentially
subcontracted to exactly those corporate interests that Naderites
believe are threatening our democracy."
4. In balancing one-page articles on the candidates' political
pasts, Newsweek's Howard Fineman suggested Bush was rolled by Texas
Democrats, while Bill Turque huffed that "not a shred of
evidence" shows Al Gore dangled his Gulf War vote for more TV
time.
5. Time's Clintonite columnist Margaret Carlson swooned that
between Bill and Hill, "there seemed to be something more than
naked ambition at work." In U.S. News, Roger Simon found Tipper
Gore, who told people not to vote as if the election were The Dating
Game, is replaying the Kiss at rallies.
-- 1. Only Time noticed the NAACP ad which features James Byrd's
daughter saying George W. Bush "killed" Byrd "all over
again" by vetoing a new "hate crimes" law. But Viveca
Novak left that line out. She explained: "The music is ominous,
the footage grainy: a pickup truck with Texas plates, a chain tied to
the bumper, something unseen hooked to the other end as the truck
pulls away. The voice is that of James Byrd Jr.'s daughter, recalling
her father's 1998 death and George W. Bush's refusal to back a new
hate-crimes bill. The kicker: 'We won't be dragged away from our
future.'"
After the 1988 election, Time fulminated that Lee Atwater's
"crypto-racist" Willie Horton ads "fouled the civic
atmosphere of politics." He is still the magazine's poster boy
for late hits: "Atwater, the late maestro of hardball politics,
had rules about down-and-dirty campaign advertising, chiefly this: If
you have to do it, do it late. So right on schedule, gut-punching ads
hit the airwaves last week in the handful of ground-zero states as
both parties, and their sympathetic special-interest groups, worked to
boost turnout among the faithful -- or drive it down."
Novak didn't seem to press the NAACP for comparisons to Willie
Horton, or ask whether lumping Bush in with racist murderers was fair:
"The Byrd ad, running in 10 states where black voter turnout
could make the difference, is part of a $2 million-plus campaign by
the NAACP National Voter Fund. The group said it had always planned to
replace the ad with a less graphic version. But Heather Booth, the
group's executive director, makes no apologies. 'Sometimes the truth
hurts,' she says."
From there, Novak moved on to the conservative ads, the small-buy
"Daisy" ripoff ad and the "Americans Against Hate"
ad linking Gore to Al Sharpton. "Not to worry: The other side has
something shocking of its own."
-- 2. In their last chance to influence the voters, Newsweek tilted
readers leftward in their "Voters Panic Guide," while the
Time and U.S. News voter guides were more carefully balanced. Not all
the Newsweek items were tilted, just three in particular, on foreign
intervention, defense, and gun control:
On foreign intervention, Newsweek's Michael Hirsh worried Bush
"wants to withdraw from NATO peacekeeping, scrap the
Comprehensive Test Ban treaty and install a major missile defense
program, moves that would likely estrange Washington from its key
allies. Gore, meanwhile, has tried to redefine the entire
national-security agenda, stressing the social and economic
instability that might come from environmental disaster, AIDS, or the
gulf between rich and poor nations. But he sets no clear priorities --
perhaps because it may be impossible to do so in the post-cold-war
era."
On defense, John Barry insisted "Bush's charge that the
Clinton administration has sent underfinanced divisions to meet
overstretched commitments...is largely a myth. Claims of a threefold
increase in deployments under Clinton come from a misread
congressional report." Barry concluded that "Whoever wins,
the military faces cuts....Here Bush appears the radical. Looking to
predicted advances in computers, sensors, and communications, he would
'skip' a generation of weapons and instead push toward the truly
revolutionary generation after next. That, says Gore, would be to
gamble on uncertain future technologies."
On guns, Matt Bai continued his string of badly disguised jeremiads
for gun control. He focused largely on Bush's positions and
"his cozy relationship with the National Rifle Association. As
governor, he signed a law that allows citizens to carry concealed
weapons, then expanded it to permit guns in churches and
hospitals." Bai concluded with liberal despair that no one could
satisfy his itch for progress: "No matter who's elected, the
prospects for any real progress aren't promising. Congress hasn't
even been able to nail down an agreement on the need for background
checks at gun shows. Bush won't force the issue. And there's
little chance that Gore could wage a fight for gun licensing during a
first term, let alone get it passed."
Time featured battling one-page commentaries arguing for Bush and
Gore: for Bush, former speechwriter Peggy Noonan; and for Gore, former
U.S. News editor Roger Rosenblatt, who oozed contempt for Bush or
anyone dumb enough to support him: "I mean no disrespect to the
Undecideds or the occasionally Decideds, or to the non-Republican
faithful who have come to the conclusion that George W. Bush should be
President of the United States. But, are you kidding?" He
lectured that undecided voters "focus on nonsense. They tilt
toward Bush in the debates out of some adolescent response to
powerlessness and ineptitude. They tilt away from Gore because he
appears to know that he's intellectually superior to and more
civic-minded than his opponent. He is. My fellow Americans: It's not
about likability. It's about who keeps the checklist, who flies the
plane."
Rosenblatt's snooty superiority isn't any more likable than
Gore's.
-- 3. Rush and Ralph are wrong? Time reporter Steve Lopez visited
with undecided voters in central Florida. The only passionate
supporter of a candidate he found couldn't wait to vote for Bush.
"I listen to Rush Limbaugh all the time...And Rush is right. Do
you know what I mean? Rush is right."
Lopez responded: "No, Matthew. Don Fletcher is right.
'Kakistocracy. Are you familiar with that word?' Fletcher asked
while nursing his coffee at the Bill O' Fare. 'It means government
by the worst elements. We've got a failed drug war the candidates
won't talk about, and we bombed an aspirin factory in Sudan because
Bill was [dallying with] Monica. It doesn't matter whether you vote
Republican or Democratic. Nothing will change because the government
is run by big-money interests.'"
Sounds like a pair of Nader voters.
They better hide from Newsweek's Jonathan Alter. He mildly
suggested St. Ralph was committing ideological suicide. He began with
an idea of what attracted Newsweek's hiring team to him: "When
I was 22 years old, I spent the summer of 1980 working for Ralph Nader.
My job was to write part of a book about the campaign that year. (I
was responsible for chronicling third-party candidate John Anderson.)
For all of our lacerations of Jimmy Carter, we understood that a vote
for Anderson was a vote for Ronald Reagan. Even then, I disagreed with
Nader on several issues (starting with his unshakable faith in lawyers
and regulators). But I developed a deep respect for his leadership of
the consumer movement. Last year, when several lists were published of
the most important Americans of the 20th century, Nader's name was
rightfully included. Bill Clinton's was not."
That was the end of the nice talk. Alter lays it one the line:
"Naderites should have persuaded their man to run in the
Democratic primaries...Instead, he risks being marginalized by angry
fellow progressives and remembered by history as a spoiler. That would
overshadow all he has accomplished."
Alter warned that a Bush presidency would do great damage to
liberalism, just as Reagan did: "Nader voters are under the
illusion that a Bush era is somehow harmless to them -- a mere
interlude to rally their cause. Many were in grade school when Reagan
was President and forget the consequences for progressive causes. It
would be one thing if Bush were brilliant but lazy -- thick but
hardworking. But he is neither brilliant nor hardworking, which means
that the presidency will be essentially subcontracted to exactly those
corporate interests that Naderites believe are threatening our
democracy. That reminds me of the logic of those who extended the
Vietnam War, courtesy of Nixon and his unwitting allies on the left:
'We had to destroy the village in order to save it.' America has
tried that, Ralph. It doesn't work."
-- 4. In balancing one-page articles on the candidates' political
pasts, Newsweek's Howard Fineman suggested Bush was rolled by Texas
Democrats, while Bill Turque huffed that "not a shred of
evidence" shows Al Gore dangled his Gulf War vote for more TV
time. Fineman explored a tax-cut bill that Bush had to water down:
"Bush and Bullock (who died in 1999) remained fond friends. But
it was clear to observers who was boss. Visiting the governor's
office on another matter, Bullock smiled and pointed to his allies in
the room. 'Governor, we're going to screw you on this one,' he
said. Bush chuckled, got up from his chair and walked to the corner of
the office. 'Well, you're going to have to come over here and kiss
me first,' Bush joked. Bullock laughed, but didn't move, and got
his way in the end.
Fineman's colleague and Gore biographer Bill Turque played
defense for Al Gore with a story on Gore's thoughtful, hawkish
decision to back the Gulf War. There's no messy focus on his touting
"Iraqgate" allegations against President Bush in 1992 as
"worse than Watergate," or the gutting of his own 1992
arms-dealing bill in a secret deal with Russian prime minister Viktor
Chernomyrdin. Turque played up Gore's savvy Gulf War vote, adding
late in the piece with a huff: "One thing Gore didn't look for
was a deal with Republicans. Sen. Alan Simpson has long alleged that
Gore offered his vote in exchange for a prime speaking slot. But there
is not a shred of evidence to support the charge."
-- 5. Time's Clintonite columnist Margaret Carlson is mystified
Gore is hiding the Genius of Our Time: "Too bad Al Gore has put
his party's most potent weapon in a lockbox. Too bad for Democrats
there's a 22nd Amendment that keeps Clinton from running again; in a
speech after the debates, Clinton gave a far more lucid rebuttal than
Gore, and without the sighing. His job-approval rating surpasses
Ronald Reagan's in his final days."
Hold tight on the roller coaster ride in Margaret's mind. The
woman who rhapsodized in 1993 that the Clintons "touch each other
more in two hours than the Bushes did in four years" went sour on
Bill in 1998, urging Hillary to throw his stuff out on the lawn. Now,
it's back to inklings of Love Story: "Clinton wiped away a tear
at the height of the festivities while Hillary feigned surprise with
the trademark raised eyebrow and shocked 'Oooh' when spotting a
familiar face in a room full of them. Yet, against all you think you
know, when they hugged, there seemed to be something more than naked
ambition at work." Please.
She concluded with very early cheers for President Hillary:
"Just as Bush is avenging his father's defeat, Clinton may see
his best chance of redeeming himself not with a Gore in the White
House, but with a Clinton."
On the subject of marital displays, Tipper Gore announced at a
Democratic rally that people shouldn't vote for Bush because
"this isn't The Dating Game." But it's the Gore camp
that's gone back to playing the Lovebird Card, discovered U.S. News
reporter Roger Simon: "At most stops, he is introduced by his
wife, Tipper, who goes through a list of concerns designed to appeal
to women while also raising the fear of what will happen if
Republicans gain the White House. 'We have to protect the right to
choose,' she says. 'We need more money for breast cancer research.
They will take us backward into the Dark Ages.' She then points out
how her husband volunteered for military service in Vietnam and, while
running for
President, also managed to attend all of their son's football
games. At the end, she introduces Gore, who hugs and kisses her. This
time, however, as Tipper is speaking, Gore steadily advances on her to
the enormous delight of the audience. 'I'm ready!' he shouts.
Tipper turns around and gives him both a startled and bemused look.
'Oh, yeah?' she says. Gore plants an open-mouth kiss on her as the
crowd goes wild. Tipper breaks away from his clinch to turn back to
the microphone, and Gore shouts, 'It wasn't long enough!' Tipper
wisely leaves that line alone and says to him, 'We don't have time!
We need every vote!'
At least back in the Dark Ages, we weren't subject to
stage-managed tongue hockey. -- Tim Graham
END Reprint of MagazineWatch
6
Dan
Rather signed off Monday's CBS Evening News by promising:
"Don't forget to vote tomorrow. Then join CBS News for the most
experienced election coverage and analysis in the business and, over
the last 50 years, the most accurate presidential election night
returns."
Oh, really? On election night 1996 CBS News
announced that New Hampshire Senator Bob Smith had lost and blamed his
trouble on being "a very conservative Senator in a state that's
becoming more moderate." In fact, he won. But before CBS realized
that, Bob Schieffer explained the loss, as recounted in the November
7, 1996 CyberAlert:
"I think
that most Republicans considered Bob Smith, the New Hampshire
incumbent, perhaps, one of their most vulnerable incumbents. This is a
very interesting case Dan, he's a very conservative Senator in a state
that's becoming more moderate. Most people on the national scene will
recall him as the one that fought against abortion over the past 3 or
4 years and always brought all those graphic photos out to the Senate
floor. But in our polling, our exit polling today we found that the
moderate voters, 61 percent of them said that they voted for Dick
Swett. This is a state that is simply becoming more moderate. When we
ran this poll I think that almost half of the people in New Hampshire
told us that they now consider themselves moderate. This used to be a
very conservative state but it got too moderate, I guess, for Bob
Smith." CBS has a whole night to make more bad calls tonight. -- Brent Baker
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
DO
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
cybercomment@mrc.org.
Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
>>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
|