| Gore's Claims Given Credibility; Another "Conservative" Judge; Morning Hosts Whined About Disenfranchised in Palm Beach 1) After Al Gore's Monday night
  address, ABC's Peter Jennings repeated his pronouncements about
  "wanting to respect the will of the voters," but the night before,
  after Bush spoke, Jennings stressed that though he may "technically"
  be President-elect, "this is certainly not over." 2) Al Gore claimed that Miami-Dade "election
  officials brought the count to a premature end in the face of organized
  intimidation." NBC Nightly News relayed the charge while ABC actually
  noted that "the election supervisor denied he felt threatened." 3) "Gore's lawyers claim Bush's 537 vote
  lead would vanish if all votes in these places were counted properly,"
  declared CBS's Byron Pitts as the broadcast network evening shows treated
  Gore's contest efforts as a credible and reasonable effort. 4) Dan Rather promised "fair" reporting
  just before he asked a Gore lawyer about his route to victory while with a
  Bush lawyer Rather demanded he respond to the assumption Gore is
  "absolutely convinced" that most voted for him "and that the
  proof of that is how hard" the Bush team is fighting "to stop the
  counting." 5) The networks have found another
  "conservative" judge in Florida as both ABC and NBC agreed that's
  the ideology of the judge hearing the Gore election contest case. 6) Only NBC on Monday night gave voice to
  Democrats suggesting it may be time for Gore to concede. Robert Reich raised
  the idea on Monday's GMA, but World News Tonight didn't mention it. 7) An ABC News poll determined most think Al Gore
  should concede and that a big majority would consider Bush legitimately
  elected. Peter Jennings held off on citing the poll numbers until after the
  first ad break on World News Tonight. 8) ABC and NBC morning hosts whined to Bob
  Crawford about how unfair it was not to include Palm Beach County's late
  numbers. ABC's Charles Gibson: "Doesn't it disenfranchise voters in
  Palm Beach County not to take the results that they handed in?" 9) Judge Charles Burton wasn't too upset by his
  work not being counted as he blamed Democrats for delays. The Boston Globe
  revealed Burton once interned for Senator Ted Kennedy. 10) Bryant Gumbel raced to discredit members of
  the U.S. Supreme Court: "Five of the nine justices...came to the job
  during Bush Senior's watch, either as President or Vice President."
  Eleanor Clift charged Bush should be "ashamed" and recalled George
  Wallace in rebuking his criticism of the Florida Supreme Court. 
      >>>
      "Margaret's Flagrant Foul: Feminists find an enemy in the Endless
      Election." In the weekend piece, posted on the National Review Online
      site, the MRC's Tim Graham examined the political agenda of Time's
      Margaret Carlson: "Her solidarity with American womanhood is
      decidedly truncated, excluding all those working women who threaten a
      liberal utopia. For most of the Clinton years, Margaret has seen her
      feminist duty as throwing rose petals before the long march of her
      personal inspiration, Hillary Rodham Clinton....The zenith of Margaret's
      Hillary hagiography came in one of the most preposterous passages of the
      1990s, in a 1993 Vanity Fair profile: 'Valentine's Day at the Red Sage
      restaurant. Even at a romantic outing, the President can be the date from
      hell, talking to everyone but the girl he brung....Finally alone, they
      have 'painted soup' and the lamb baked in herbed bread. They exchange
      gifts and touch each other more in two hours than the Bushes did in four
      years.'" To read the whole article, go to:http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment112500a.shtml
      <<<
  1  After
      Al Gore addressed the nation Monday night, ABC's Peter
      Jennings and George Stephanopoulos repeated his pronouncements about
      "wanting to respect the will of the voters" and value the
      "integrity of democracy" as Stephanopoulos said Gore tried to
      "elevate the tone of the debate," but the night before, after
      George W. Bush's national address, Jennings stressed that though he may
      "technically" be President-elect, "this is certainly not
      over."
     Monday night following Al Gore's 8:55pm ET
      remarks, Stephanopoulos summed up: "Well, we heard this repeat of the
      brief 'every vote has to count,' the votes have been 'incomplete and
      inaccurate.' What struck me though is it was a kind of an ode to the
      voting process and I think he was trying to elevate the tone of the
      debate."Peter Jennings
      agreed: "He said it a couple of times earlier today, wanting to
      respect the will of the voters and that the 'integrity of democracy'
      was here at stake."
 Stephanopoulos
      echoed the spin: "Ignoring votes is ignoring democracy. You'll hear
      that again and again in the coming days."
     But Sunday night, after Bush's short 9:30pm ET
      speech, the MRC's Tim Graham noticed how Jennings emphasized how
      uncertain the race remained as he undermined the import of Bush's
      message: "Governor George W. Bush of Texas speaking from the state
      capital of Austin, giving the brief remarks of a man who unquestionably
      believes he is the President-elect. If by chance, you joined us late, you
      may not know that the Secretary of State in Florida today certified the
      election results for that state, even though in some respects they were
      not fully complete. Palm Beach County, one of the most contested counties
      in the state, did not fulfill or did not finish its complete count on
      time, and so the Secretary of State chose the election numbers from
      November the 14th, the time she tried to certify the election once before.
      So though Governor Bush quotes Thomas Jefferson and says every difference
      of opinion is not necessarily a difference of principle, names a
      transition team led by Dick Cheney, names Andy Card to be a chief of staff
      and says he wants to open a transition office and work with President
      Clinton, this is certainly not over. There are, there is a raft of legal
      challenges both in Florida, at the appeals court in Atlanta, and at the
      Supreme Court of the United States which are going to have to be dealt
      with in some fashion in the week ahead."     Stephanopoulos praised Bush's tactics: "He
      also did something else very smart. He raised a question whether Al Gore
      would actually go ahead with these contests, actually called on Vice
      President Gore to cease and desist. Now will Vice President Gore agree to
      that? Absolutely not. But by creating some uncertainty tonight, it makes
      him a more certain President-elect."Jennings responded: "There is no doubt whatsoever
      that Al Gore is going to contest this in every possible way....So, another
      phase in the presidential war, and it is still very much a war, as you
      will see when you get up tomorrow and see the election challenges filed in
      Florida and a variety of other places as well. But there it is, speaking
      as President-elect tonight, which he is technically. On our election map,
      we now say that Florida has been certified, and therefore won by Mr. Bush.
      It may yet change."
 
 		 2  Miami-Dade
      officials "intimidated" by a raging GOP mob? During his Monday
      night remarks, Al Gore asserted as fact: "In one county, election
      officials brought the count to a premature end in the face of organized
      intimidation."
     None of the broadcast networks mentioned the claim
      in their brief post address coverage. During their earlier evening
      newscasts CBS didn't mention the charge, NBC relayed it while ABC
      actually noted that "the election supervisor denied he felt
      threatened."     After Gore finished Monday night, Dan Rather wrapped
      up a CBS News special report by simply repeating Gore's spin: "Vice
      President Al Gore in Washington saying that many thousands of votes that
      were cast on election day have not yet been counted. He also said this is
      America, when votes are cast they are counted here."     On the November 27 NBC Nightly News, David Bloom
      asserted without any supporting evidence: "In court papers filed this
      afternoon, Gore's lawyers contend that in three Florida counties --
      Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Nassau, quote, 'the vote totals are wrong.'
      Gore arguing that he would have picked up an additional 600 votes in
      Miami-Dade if that county had not illegally stopped its manual recount of
      10,000 disputed ballots, Gore's team blaming that controversial decision
      on quote, 'a campaign of personal attacks' launched by Bush
      supporters."     But on ABC's World News Tonight while reporter
      Bill Redeker repeated the Gore charge that election officials in
      Miami-Dade County "were intimidated by Republican
      demonstrators," he added that "today the election supervisor
      denied he felt threatened."Viewers then saw
      this soundbite from David Leahy: "From their perspective I can
      understand where they might have thought we were intimidated and our vote
      was based on that intimidation. But the fact is that it wasn't. I simply
      made my decision based on the fact that we could not certify in
      time."
 
 		 3  The
      broadcast network evening shows treated Al Gore's contest case as a
      credible and reasonable effort worthy of respectful coverage. All three
      evening shows ran through the Gore team's claims about undercounts and
      missed counts as ABC's World News Tonight led with three stories in a
      row on Gore's various lawsuits. NBC Nightly News devoted a whole story
      to the Gore vote capturing dream numbers. CBS's Byron Pitts added up the
      Gore claims and concluded: "By the Democrats' math, Al Gore should
      have finished at least 1,288 votes ahead of George W. Bush."
     Dan Rather opened the November 27 CBS Evening News
      by giving equal weight to the claims of both candidates, though only Bush
      was certified the winner the night before:"The battle
      moved into a new phase today. Believing he is now President-elect, and
      claiming to be, Texas Governor George Bush kicked his transition team into
      high gear. But Vice President Al Gore said, not so fast. He is challenging
      the election on the basis that there are thousands of votes that have
      never been counted and he will address the nation this evening to explain
      why he is in the courts to contest the
      certification."
     Byron Pitts later delivered, without contradictory
      information, the Gore case: "Gore's lawyers claim Bush's 537 vote
      lead would vanish if all votes in these places were counted properly. The
      manual recount in Palm Beach rejected by the Secretary of State would net
      Gore 215 votes, a partial recount in Miami-Dade would give Gore another
      160 votes. In Nassau County the Gore campaign claims 50 votes for the Vice
      President were discounted illegally. Even more significant, they argue,
      approximately 4,000 contested ballots were never counted in Palm Beach.
      There the Gore campaign estimates a net gain of 800 votes. And the 9,000
      ballots never recounted in Miami-Dade. Here a net gain of 600 votes. By
      the Democrats' math, Al Gore should have finished at least 1,288 votes
      ahead of George W. Bush."     Over on the NBC Nightly News, Jim Avila detailed,
      without considering any dubiousness, the Gore claims. Avila reported, as
      transcribed by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth:"From recounts
      to courtrooms across Florida, today the Gore campaign focuses on three
      counties in a desperate effort to find 538 votes -- enough to win the
      state and the presidency. First stop, Nassau County, northeast corner of
      the state, 51 votes on the line here. In dispute, the election board's
      abrupt decision to file the first machine recount results rather than the
      subsequent hand recount that gave Gore more votes."
 Shirley King, Nassau
      County Supervisor of Elections: "Every vote counts, so why not go
      back and count them?"
 Avila: "Next,
      Palm Beach, 210 votes immediately at stake. In dispute, the election board
      missed the Secretary of State's deadline. The machine original recount
      was certified, costing the Vice President votes. And finally, and most
      important, Miami-Dade. Two issues here. First, 157 new Gore votes tallied
      before the recount was suspended and never added to the Gore column. And
      then the big prize, 10,000 uncounted disputed ballots. These are the punch
      cards on which machines found no presidential votes. They've not been
      counted by hand."
 Prof. Lance DeHaven
      Smith, Florida State University: "The presidential election for the
      year 2000 hinges on whether the manual recount is required in Miami-Dade
      County or not."
 Avila:
      "Miami-Dade not a huge overall margin for Gore here -- 53-46. But
      experts say in a recount Democrats frequently collect the majority of
      disputed votes."
 Smith: "The
      Democrats tend to be the people that are making these errors, and I think
      that's probably so because the Democrats tend to be older. Sometimes
      they're sporadic voters."
 Avila concluded:
      "So how do the numbers add up? Al Gore has a 537 certified vote lead
      to overcome. If he wins his case in Nassau County, the Bush lead shrinks
      to 486. If Gore wins his case in Palm Beach, the Bush lead shrinks again
      to 276. If he wins in Miami-Dade, the Bush lead shrinks to 119. Not enough
      votes for Gore unless the courts rule his way down the line. A political
      struggle in both the courtroom and the counting room the Democrats hope
      will overturn the Florida certified vote and leave Al Gore
      President."
 
 		 4  Whenever
      Dan Rather goes out of his way to promise "fair" and
      "accurate" reporting you know bias is coming. Monday night,
      after just such an assurance, he ran back-to-back interviews with Gore
      lawyer David Boies and Bush lawyer Ben Ginsberg. With Boies, he
      concentrated on the route Boies sees to victory, but with Ginsberg Rather
      demanded he respond to the supposition Gore is contesting the election
      "because he is absolutely convinced" that most Floridians voted
      for him "and that the proof of that is how hard" the Bush team
      is fighting "to stop the counting."
     Rather set up the November 27 CBS Evening News
      segment: "In an effort to bring you more fair, accurate clarity, with
      insight into the historic court cases, I talked late today with two of the
      key attorneys mapping the strategy for their respective sides. First,
      David Boies from the Gore campaign.     Rather's inquiries to Boies, as taken down by MRC
      analyst Brad Wilmouth:-- "Stretch out
      for me a course in which Al Gore could wind up getting Florida's
      electoral votes. To a lot of people, it looks impossible at this
      juncture."
 -- "How does he
      get from where he is, Vice President Gore, to a winning posture in
      Florida?"
 -- "Is it your
      expectation in your heart of hearts that Al Gore will win this
      eventually?"
     Rather moved on to an excerpt of a second interview:
      "I also spoke very late in the day with a key legal strategist for
      the Bush campaign, attorney Ben Ginsberg." Rather's two questions
      for Ginsberg:-- "What's
      the most important thing for the American people to know right now?"
 -- "What about
      the argument, which I'm sure you've heard, that Vice President Gore is
      continuing to contest the election because he is absolutely convinced that
      more Floridians went to the polls to vote for him than did for George Bush
      and that the proof of that is how hard you and others are fighting on
      behalf of George Bush to stop the counting?"
 
 		 5  The
      networks have found another "conservative" judge in Florida as
      both ABC and NBC agreed that's the ideology of the judge hearing the
      Gore election contest case. As you may remember, to use a Peter Jennings
      phrase, the Friday before the Florida Supreme Court issued its activist
      ruling, Jennings assured November 17 World News Tonight viewers:
      "There are seven justices. Six were appointed by Democratic
      Governors. Our legal analyst in Florida tells us that only one of the
      judges is considered to be a liberal, the rest are regarded as moderate to
      conservative."
     Fast forward ten days to November 27. ABC reporter
      Erin Hayes asserted on World News Tonight that the Leon County judge who
      will decide the Gore election contest case, Sander Sauls, has been
      "on the bench for nearly twenty years, conservative, seen by many as
      slow and methodical, he was demoted from a chief judge position." Hayes added: "Once a Republican, Sauls is
      now a Democrat with connections likely to raise questions. On a list of
      his personal references handed out by the court, the name Dexter Douglass,
      a lead attorney arguing this case for Vice President Gore."     NBC's Dan Abrams offered a matching label on the
      NBC Nightly News: "His friends describe him as the perfect judge for
      the case. He's 59-years-old, he's a graduate of the University of
      Florida Law School, he was appointed to the bench in 1989 by Republican
      Governor Bob Martinez, even though he's now a registered Democrat. Those
      who've argued before him describe him as conservative for this
      court."     Nice caveat. 
 		 6  Only NBC
      on Monday night gave voice to any Democrats suggesting it may be time for
      Gore to concede. Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich raised the idea on
      Monday's Good Morning America, but World News Tonight didn't mention
      it.
     David Bloom, however, did pick up on it on the NBC
      Nightly News: "But already some Democrats are questioning just how
      long Gore should fight."Senator Robert
      Toricelli: "The country has to get on with its life and the country
      needs a President."
 Robert Reich:
      "Al Gore would be a far better President than George W. Bush. But at
      some point you've got to say enough is enough."
 
 		 7  An ABC
      News poll determined most think Al Gore should concede and that a big
      majority would consider Bush legitimately elected, but Peter Jennings held
      off on citing the poll numbers until after the first ad break on World
      News Tonight.
     On Monday's show Jennings relayed the findings of
      a post-certification ABC News/Washington Post poll: "We found that 60
      percent of Americans think that Al Gore should concede the election now,
      but only 40 percent think he should do so because the vote count was fair.
      17 percent simply want this to be over with. 76 percent of Americans told
      us they would consider Mr. Bush legitimately elected if he eventually
      assumes office."     Brit Hume highlighted on FNC's Special report with
      Brit Hume Zogby poll numbers about how more fear Gore than Bush will steal
      the election: "John Zogby, one of the few pollsters who picked up the
      late swing toward Gore before Election Day, has picked up another swing
      that will be much less welcome to the Vice President. A Zogby poll found
      that 60 percent think that if Gore ends up winning, he stole the election.
      Only 21 percent feel he will be legitimate. By contrast 47 percent feel
      that if Bush wins, he will be legitimate, with only 30 percent believing
      he stole the election." 
 		 8  ABC and
      NBC morning hosts whined to Bob Crawford about how unfair it was not to
      include Palm Beach County's hand count numbers in the certified numbers
      even though they missed the court imposed deadline which gave them an
      additional week and a half beyond the statutory filing date.
     "Mr. Crawford," pleaded ABC's Charles
      Gibson, "why did you decide not to give Palm Beach County the extra
      time, the just couple of extra hours that it asked for to finish its
      count?" Gibson proposed: "But doesn't it disenfranchise voters
      in Palm Beach County not to take the results that they handed in?"
      NBC's Katie Couric seemed baffled: "I'm not quite sure what the
      rationale was for not extending the deadline?....So how would the
      inclusion of these numbers in Palm Beach compromise the integrity of the
      process?"     On ABC's Good Morning America on Monday morning,
      co-host Charles Gibson, MRC analyst Jessica Anderson noticed, grilled
      Florida Canvassing Board member Bob Crawford:-- "Do you feel
      confident that you certified last night the person who got the most votes
      in the state of Florida, or just the most votes within the deadline?"
 -- "So there's
      no doubt in your mind that George Bush got the most votes in the state of
      Florida?"
 -- "But Mr.
      Klain, the attorney for Al Gore, said just a few moments ago on this air,
      look, there are some votes that haven't been counted once, the undercount
      votes in Miami-Dade."
 -- "Mr.
      Crawford, why did you decide not to give Palm Beach County the extra time,
      the just couple of extra hours that it asked for to finish its count, and
      then decide to throw out their partial recount? I mean, after all, the
      judge had said the votes could come in at 5 p.m. Sunday or 9 a.m.
      Monday."
 -- "But doesn't
      it disenfranchise voters in Palm Beach County not to take the results that
      they handed in?"
 Crawford explained:
      "Not really, Charlie. What Palm Beach County did, they knew the
      deadline was coming. They sent in a certified vote and they had two things
      they sent us. They sent us a certified vote of the machine recount, which
      we already had, then they also sent us a partial manual recount. Had we
      taken the partial manual recount, Al Gore would have been 15,000 votes
      short because it was not a complete count and there's no way we could have
      pieced that back together. So we took the only complete vote we had,
      required under the law, and we certified that, and that's the result that
      we had."
     On NBC's Today, Crawford received a similarly
      tough reception from Katie Couric who was upset by the lack of inclusion
      of the late numbers, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens observed. Her
      argumentative questions:-- "When we
      last spoke you claimed that your aim was to quote, 'produce an election in
      Florida that the state and country can believe is credible.' Do you think
      you've have accomplished that?"
 -- "Let's talk
      about Palm Beach County if we could for a moment, Mr. Crawford. As you
      know that county was denied an extension and submitted its recount results
      at 7:08pm, two hours and eight minutes after the deadline. Now they
      netted, apparently, about 200 votes for Gore but those votes were not
      included in the final tally. Why wasn't that deadline extended to
      accommodate the Palm Beach recount? I know that you met with Katherine
      Harris and Clay Roberts? What was the thinking behind that decision?"
 -- "But that
      was the only choice you had if you were...if you didn't extend the
      deadline. I'm not quite sure what the rationale was for not extending the
      deadline?"
 -- "I was just
      going to read what the Supreme Court ruling also said. 'Because the right
      to vote is the preeminent right and the declaration of rights of the
      Florida Constitution the circumstances under which the Secretary may
      exercise her authority to ignore a county's returns filed after the
      initial statutory date are limited. The Secretary may ignore such results
      only if their inclusion will compromise the integrity of the electoral
      process.' So how would the inclusion of these numbers in Palm Beach
      compromise the integrity of the process?"
 
 		 9  Palm
      Beach County judge Charles Burton wasn't too upset by his work not being
      counted as he blamed Democrats for delaying the process, a point not
      picked up on by the networks Monday night. And the Boston Globe revealed
      Burton once interned for Senator Ted Kennedy.
     ABC's Charles Gibson opened Monday's Good
      Morning America by previewing how "we're going to talk to the
      Chairman of Palm Beach County's Canvassing Board in an exclusive
      interview, and he is pretty angry."     Actually, MRC analyst Jessica Anderson observed, he
      was resigned to reality. After pressing Bob Crawford, Gibson returned to
      Burton, whom he'd interviewed earlier: "I just want to go back to
      Judge Charles Burton, who ran that canvassing board in Palm Beach County,
      for a reaction. What do you basically feel about Katherine Harris and that
      board, that they turned down your extra votes?"Burton explained:
      "I think quite honestly the truthful answer is they could have waited
      and they could have said, 'We'll give you an extra couple of hours,' but
      you know, as he [Crawford] pointed out, it certainly wouldn't have changed
      the outcome. I think there's a couple of important things, though,
      Charlie. I mean, going into this we felt that whatever standard we came up
      with and however we reviewed these ballots, it had to fair, it had to be
      geared towards achieving a fair result, not geared towards achieving a
      certain result. And you know one thing I want to mention, when all is said
      and done, I mean, the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, everybody
      agreed to the standard we had applied in reviewing these ballots, and it
      was only after about four days into it that the Democratic Party went back
      to court to try and, you know, basically have us change that standard
      because I guess they realized they weren't getting enough votes."
     That demand kept him in court for half of last
      Wednesday.     "Newton Native Kept Cool in Drama" read
      the headline over a November 27 Boston Globe story which revealed a fresh
      tidbit about Burton's resume. Reporter Lynda Gorov disclosed:"Burton, the
      canvassing board chairman on whose every decision the presidency, in part,
      hung in recent weeks, is another Florida transplant. Growing up, home was
      Newton. College was Suffolk University. He even interned for U.S. Senator
      Edward M. Kennedy."
     Burton certainly acted a lot less partisan than does
      his mentor. 
 		 10  Bryant
      Gumbel beat Democratic spinners in the race to be the first to discredit
      members of the U.S. Supreme Court because they were nominated by either
      the Reagan-Bush or Bush administration.
     On Monday's The Early Show on CBS, MRC analyst
      Brian Boyd noticed, Gumbel asked law professor Jonathan Turley: "Five
      of the nine justices on the Supreme Court came to the job during Bush
      Senior's watch, either as President or Vice President. Is it insulting to
      even talk of the politics entering into this?"     Newsweek's Eleanor Clift dismissed any such
      concerns on the McLaughlin Group over the weekend as she equated George W.
      Bush with George Wallace:"And the way
      that Governor Bush trashed the Florida Supreme Court. He ought to be
      ashamed. I haven't heard that kind of language since George Wallace and
      Richard Nixon. And frankly if the U.S. Supreme Court now hears this case,
      seven judges on the Supreme Court were appointed by Republicans. Does that
      mean that I think they don't have the country's interest at heart and
      that they're tools of the Republican Party? No, I don't!"
     Let's see what she thinks after they decide. -- Brent Baker   
     
      >>>
      Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
      which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
      donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
      readers and subscribers:http://www.mrc.org/donate
      >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
      blank e-mail to:
      mrccyberalert-subscribe@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
      http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.
      Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
      REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
      After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
      hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
      added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
      link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You 
      DO
      NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
      CyberAlert.
 To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
      cybercomment@mrc.org.
 Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      >>>You
      can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
      subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
      afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
      Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<<   
 
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
 |