6/02: NBC Suggests Bill O'Reilly Fueled Murder of Dr. George Tiller
  6/01: NBC's Williams Cues Up Obama: 'That's One She'd Rather Have Back'
  5/29: Nets Push 'Abortion Rights' Advocates' Concerns on Sotomayor
  5/28: CBS on Sotomayor: 'Can't Be Easily Defined by Political Labels'

  Home
  Notable Quotables
  Media Reality Check
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Entertainment
  News
  Take Action
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  Eyeblast.tv

Support the MRC



www.TimesWatch.org


 

The 1,531st CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996
Monday July 7, 2003 (Vol. Eight; No. 124)

 
Printer Firendly Version

Tell a friend about this site


1. Most Homeless Ever, Numbers "Not Seen Since Great Depression"
Last week CBS and NBC simultaneously discovered a new crisis of a supposedly record number of homeless families. "There are now more homeless families on the street than ever before," reporter Lee Cowan declared on Thursday's CBS Evening News. Cowan also hyperbolically claimed: "There are more homeless families now in Manhattan than since the Great Depression." Not to be outdone, NBC's Hockenberry insisted on Friday's Dateline that the homeless in New York City are now "in numbers it's estimated not seen since the Great Depression." Although NBC had promoted a look at "an American nightmare: The new homeless," two of Hockenberry's "homeless" families had homes. One man was just afraid of falling behind on mortgage payments and losing his large suburban home; another man earned $38,000 but decided to live in a motor home. And his homeless woman walked around talking on a cell phone.

2. NBC Sends Engel Back to Iraq Where He Finds Anti-U.S. Sunnis
NBC News has sent Richard Engel back to Iraq, and just as he had conveyed during his days with ABC News in Baghdad during and immediately after the war, he found only disillusionment and disgust with the U.S. amongst the Iraqi people. In Balad he talked to pro-Hussein Sunnis, but still took seriously their claims to have been disappointed in the lack of follow through on U.S. promises. Engel relayed how one man complained: "We are the ones carrying out the resistance because the Americans lied to us when they said they'd improve our economy and bring us aid."

3. Gibson's Bedroom Sported Anti-War Poster, He Couldn't Be Prez
ABC's Charles Gibson and his wife just love anti-military and anti-war posters. Last October, Gibson, whose wife runs a private school for girls, boasted: "My wife has a sign on her office wall and it says, 'Won't it be a great day when the Air Force has to hold bake sales to get a new bomber and the schools have all the money they need?'" Then last week on CNN's Larry King Live, Gibson recalled how he and his wife "used to have a little framed sign hanging in our bedroom, my wife and I, that said: 'War is not good for children and other living things.'" He also disqualified himself from the presidency as he revealed that he could never send soldiers into battle or order the use of nuclear weapons.

4. Columnist Samuelson Notes Media Bias in Prescription Coverage
You read it here first. In his nationally syndicated column last week, Robert Samuelson pointed out how "coverage of the drug benefit has virtually ignored the issue of long-term costs" as "press skepticism focuses on the stinginess of the new benefit." Samuelson elaborated: "Reflecting journalistic conformity, The Post and the New York Times both ran front-page stories on June 26 in which retirees complained that the yet-to-be-passed drug benefit was inadequate."


 

Most Homeless Ever, Numbers "Not Seen
Since Great Depression"

     Last week CBS and NBC simultaneously discovered a new crisis of a record number of homeless families, though neither cited proof for the dire warnings other than the self-interested claims of homeless advocacy groups.

John Hockenberry     "There are now more homeless families on the street than ever before, up an estimated 19 percent," reporter Lee Cowan declared on Thursday's CBS Evening News, the night before Independence Day. "There are more families homeless in New York City now than at any in the last 20 years," echoed NBC's John Hockenberry on the July 4th Dateline dedicated to the "new homeless." Matching that, Cowan maintained: "There are more homeless families now in Manhattan than since the Great Depression." Not to be outdone, Hockenberry insisted the homeless in New York City are now "in numbers it's estimated not seen since the Great Depression."

     That's diversity in broadcast network news in action.

     Both stories suffered from fatal flaws which undermined their premises.

     Cowan's story, which related the same uncorroborated claims about New York City as had a New York Times story from the day before, also highlighted the case of an Atlanta couple whose baby died of malnutrition while the three lived in an abandoned house. In high-dudgeon, Cowan asked a homeless advocate: "Does it surprise you that in this day and age we're having children in a city like Atlanta dying of malnutrition?" Cowan's story featured a soundbite from an Atlanta shelter director, but the very same woman told the Atlanta Constitution that her shelter had space available and could have taken in and fed the family.

     NBC devoted the entire Dateline to Hockenberry's recounting the plight of four families. NBC's promo had asserted, as quoted in the July 2 CyberAlert: "They had good jobs, making good money, but now they've lost almost everything. An American nightmare: The new homeless. All new Dateline Friday." And Hockenberry promised a look at "a new true face of homelessness in America. Today's homeless are families."

     But there was a slight problem with NBC's claim about the "new homeless": two of the four families were never homeless and the other two were never forced out onto the street. One of Hockenberry's dire cases involved a family man in the Cleveland area who lost his job and was afraid of losing his large suburban home, but he never did. Another was a man, with a wife and two kids, who earned $38,000 a year yet lived in a motor home. And of the two families forced into the emergency housing system, one was hardly typical. As Hockenberry related his tale of woe, "Eric's eviction was the result of a double-whammy: Unemployment and cancer. At the age of 49, debilitated by chemotherapy for leukemia, he was unable to keep up with his rent. Eric had to beg for shelter from relatives. He was humiliated."

     And just to pour on the victimization, making the case perfect for television, his 16-year-old son was a schizophrenic who commits suicide.

     Now, a fuller rundown of the CBS and NBC stories:

     -- CBS Evening News anchor John Roberts set up the July 3 story: "In the current economy, a home of any kind remains an unattainable dream for hundreds of thousands of Americans. CBS News correspondent Lee Cowan has their compelling story."

     Cowan began by passing along claims of self-interested advocates: "In any American city, on any given day, the nation's economic downturn can be measured by those down on their luck -- and that population is on the rise. There are now more homeless families on the street than ever before, up an estimated 19 percent."
     Brenita Jackson-Brown, Executive Director of the Genesis Shelter in Atlanta: "Homeless looks like a young mother with a baby in her arms and a two-year-old tagging along beside her. That's what homeless looks like in this country."
     Cowan, with the liberal "Urban Institute" as the source listed on screen: "One survey found that out of the 800,000 people who are homeless in the United States, 200,000 are children in homeless families. And the number of those families requesting help is the steepest in a decade. New York City is just one example. Lines for soup kitchens are getting longer and longer. In fact, there are more homeless families now in Manhattan than since the Great Depression."

     The Urban Institute did not provide the most homeless since the Great Depression theme, something that's impossible to measure, so it must have come from the man in Cowan's next soundbite, Patrick Markee of the Coalition for the Homeless: "Back in the '80s the typical homeless family was a single mom who was on welfare. Today we're seeing more and more of the working poor being forced to turn to emergency shelter."
     Cowan: "This Atlanta couple was one of them. He had lost his job, she had just given birth to their son. But every shelter they tried was full, so they ended up in an abandoned home."
     Enestae Kessee, father: "I sold my rings to even get food."
     Cowan: "It didn't work. Their baby died of malnutrition, 25 days after he was born."
     Bonita Williams, mother: "They told me he wasn't breathing still, and I wanted him to wake up. I told him, I said, 'It's your Momma. Wake up for Momma,' and he wouldn't do.'"
     Cowan to Markee of the Coalition for the Homeless: "Does it surprise you that in this day and age we're having children in a city like Atlanta dying of malnutrition?"
     Markee: "Sadly, no. Every city across the country is reporting rising demand for emergency shelter among families with kids, and rising demand for emergency food."
     Cowan ominously concluded: "And with record numbers of homeless families expected to flood shelters this summer, 10,000 just in New York alone, it's likely to get worse before it gets better. Tonight, for one family, it's hard to imagine how much worse it can get. Lee Cowan, CBS News, New York."

     Cowan didn't bother to mention how the parents face a cruelty to children charge or how the very same woman from the Genesis Shelter which he featured had told the Atlanta Constitution that they had space for the family. Constitution reporters Saeed Ahmed and Tasgola Karla Bruner wrote in a July 1 story:
     "Brenita Jackson-Brown, director of the Genesis Shelter, which serves homeless families with babies 3 months old or younger, said her office had received more than a dozen calls.
     "'They're asking how could this happen and what can they do to keep it from happening again,' she said.
     "Genesis had space in its shelter and could have accommodated the parents had it been contacted, Jackson-Brown said.
     "The state Division of Family and Children Services said the agency had no record of the family. Officials said a common fear is that if homeless parents reveal their condition, their child could be taken from them." See: www.ajc.com

     Cowan's liberal advocacy in the guise of a news story seems to have been prompted by a July 2 New York Times "Metro" section story dissected last week by Clay Waters of the MRC's TimesWatch.org. That Times Watch analysis:

Reporter Andrea Elliott's front-page story for Wednesday's Metro Section, "Record Number of Homeless, But City Says It's Prepared," accepted hook, line and sinker the liberal worldview on homelessness.

Elliott wrote: "The weak New York economy has also played a role [in the homeless problem]. A shortage of low-wage jobs and low-cost housing has fueled the surge in the homeless, said city officials and advocates for the homeless."

Some housing analysts argue that a major reason for New York City's shortage of low-cost housing is its restrictive rent-control regulations and zoning policies. But Elliott entirely ignored that view, quoting only city bureaucrats, "homeless advocates" and those seeking shelter, all of whom have a vested interest in making the problem of homelessness appear as bad as possible.

Elliott claimed: "The seasonal surge of homeless families is accompanied this year by a floundering economy and the highest number of homeless people in shelters -- more than 38,000 -- since the city began tracking numbers in the early 1980s, with roughly double the number of homeless children and families compared with five years ago....A shortage of low-wage jobs and low-cost housing has fueled the surge in the homeless, said city officials and advocates for the homeless."

But figures on urban homelessness are notoriously unscientific, invariably based on estimates from city officials with a vested interest in increased funding. As Times Watch demonstrated back on May 29, The U.S. Conference of Mayors has claimed hunger and homeless have been rising ever since the conference issued its first report back in 1987. From 1987 to 2002, the Mayors have reported an average increase in demand for emergency shelter of a staggering 14% a year.

     END of TimesWatch.org Excerpt

     For New York Times reporter Andrea Elliott's July 2 story, in which she never went so far to make comparisons to the Great Depression: www.nytimes.com

     For the online version of Cowan's story, with a link to video of it: www.cbsnews.com

     For a picture and bio of Cowan: www.cbsnews.com

     -- Stone Phillips set up the July 4 Dateline hour: "It's not just independence we celebrate on July 4th. It's the birth of the American dream, the idea that you can start from nothing and with hard work, high hopes and a little luck build a good life for yourself and your family. But for millions of Americans the dream is simple and all-too elusive, four walls and a roof, a place to call home. Tonight, a year in the lives of four families chasing their American dream. Will they find it?"

     John Hockenberry began: "What if the things we tell ourselves about the homeless are just myths. That they are bums, crazy, lack motivation? What if they are families, working people? What if they are people struggling like the rest of us to make their dreams come true? Tonight we're going to show you a new true face of homelessness in America. Today's homeless are families. And the families you will meet have done everything right and yet there's no place for them. Still, they struggle to find a home."

     The four families profiled by Hockenberry, a liberal refugee from NPR:

     # A woman in New York City who works as a clerk in an office, has two kids and no husband in sight, and struggled for a year with the NYC housing bureaucracy as she went in and out of their emergency housing system while waiting for a subsidized unit.

     Hockenberry saw more government spending as the answer, not ridiculous rent control which suppresses building, as he lamented: "Although the city has recently funded 4,000 new subsidized apartments, there are more families homeless in New York City now than at any in the last 20 years."

     After a year, the woman got a subsidized apartment.

     Oh, and during the year while without a home Dateline's video regularly showed her walking around talking on a cell phone.

     # A man in Cleveland, a machine tools salesman who lost his job. His wife has a part time job and they have three kids, but are behind on the mortgage payments for a big colonial house. But he finds a new job, they don't lose the house, and the wife is now taking college classes.

     During that segment, Steve Buka [sp?] of the Cleveland housing court asserted: "My understanding is even during the Depression in the '30s we weren't seeing this kind of volume."
     Hockenberry added: "In Cleveland, Housing Court Chief Magistrate Steve Buka says he's never seen this many people losing their houses."

     # A computer technician in Santa Cruz, California, aka Silicon Valley, who moved there to get a job and makes $38,000 annually at the University of California as a computer technician. But he lives in a motor home with his wife and two kids because he can't afford the high price of local housing. There was no sign the wife works.

     # A single father in NYC who went to Vassar, was a biologist, had two kids -- ages 10 and 16 -- and was evicted. Hockenberry related the tale of woe: "Eric's eviction was the result of a double-whammy: Unemployment and cancer. At the age of 49, debilitated by chemotherapy for leukemia, he was unable to keep up with his rent. Eric had to beg for shelter from relatives. He was humiliated." The 16-year-old son had schizophrenia and after the family was evicted he committed suicide.

     Over video of the teen's grave, Hockenberry charged: "Jason Wilson's suicide produced another re-examination of homeless policy in New York City. There were pledges to clean up the feared Emergency Assistance Unit, and promises of more housing. But an epitaph might read: 'Here lies one less homeless person in the City of New York. There will be many to replace him, in numbers it's estimated not seen since the Great Depression.'"

     The Dateline NBC Web page confirms that NBC relied on homeless advocates:

On Dateline NBC Friday, correspondent John Hockenberry reported on a family's struggle to overcome homelessness. Here are homeless organizations that worked with Dateline on the story:
* National Coalition for the Homeless: 202-737-6444
* National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, a Washington-based advocacy organization: 202-638-2535

     NEW YORK CITY
* Coalition for the Homeless: 212-964-5900
* Partnership for the Homeless: 212-645-3444
* Fifth Avenue Committee: 718-857-2990

     CLEVELAND
Catholic Charities -- Cleveland diocese: 216-696-6525

     SANTA CRUZ
* Homeless Services Center of Santa Cruz County
115 Coral St.
Santa Cruz, CA 95060-2104
831-458-9525
* Families in Transition: 831-458-7125

     END Excerpt from Web site

     That's online at: www.msnbc.com

 

NBC Sends Engel Back to Iraq Where He
Finds Anti-U.S. Sunnis

     NBC News has sent Richard Engel back to Iraq, and just as he had conveyed during his days with ABC News in Baghdad during and immediately after the war, he found only disillusionment and disgust with the U.S. amongst the Iraqi people.

     In Balad he talked to pro-Hussein Sunnis, but still took seriously their claims to have been disappointed in the lack of follow through on U.S. promises. Engel relayed how one man complained: "We are the ones carrying out the resistance because the Americans lied to us when they said they'd improve our economy and bring us aid."

     Engel also found that "because of the daily attacks, the Americans have begun searching homes for weapons, antagonizing farmers who never cared one way or another about Saddam." He then passed along how one proclaimed: "Now I want to fight a jihad against the Americans."

     Brian Williams set up Engel's piece on the July 4 NBC Nightly News: "Now to that fighting in Iraq. Still pockets of tough resistance and some fierce firepower out there. Another American family today received the very worst possible news after a U.S. soldier was killed. And as NBC's Richard Engel reports tonight, at times it appears Iraq is going back in time."

     Engel over a crowd of yelling men: "These people cheer, 'Bush, Bush, listen well. We all love Saddam Hussein.'"
     Man: "I like Saddam Hussein."
     Engel: "They are Sunni Muslim, like Saddam, and they want him back, claiming he'll end the post-war chaos in Iraq, put the power back on, and stop inflation. This man says, 'We support the former government even though it was a dictatorship.' I asked this man, 'What do you mean by thumping your chest?' He proudly says, 'We are the ones carrying out the resistance because the Americans lied to us when they said they'd improve our economy and bring us aid.'
     "And they are attacking. In Baghdad, a sniper killed an American soldier guarding the Iraqi museum. Sixty miles north, near the Iraqi city of Balad, Iraqis fired a mortar shell into this huge airbase, home to thousands of American servicemen. Two were seriously injured. Nearby, a U.S. convoy leaving this outpost was ambushed. American soldiers here say they killed 11 of the Iraqi attackers in response to what appear to have been three coordinated assaults."
     Staff Sergeant Chris McDaniel, Army's 3rd Infantry Division: "Bad guys. I don't know who they are. They shoot at me. I shoot back."
     Engel: "The three ambushes happened here along this road. Soldiers involved say between 45 and 50 Iraqis started firing RPGs and shooting at them from both sides of the road. The entire engagement lasted eight hours. Because of the daily attacks, the Americans have begun searching homes for weapons, antagonizing farmers who never cared one way or another about Saddam."
     Engel relayed for some more men: "'They even inspected my wife,' he says."
     Engel: "He says, 'Now I want to fight a jihad against the Americans.'
     Engel: "The Americans raided Ali Khariba's home near Balad five nights ago, searching for rocket launchers. They didn't find any. Today, Khariba is angry about what happened. The growing frustration of Iraqi farmers like Khariba could be ominous, because the United States needs the support of people like him. Richard Engel, NBC News, Balad, Iraq."

     If they could only earn the support of Engel.

     This story matches the themes of Saddam loyalty and anti-U.S. attitudes Engel stressed in his stories for ABC. To refresh your memory:

     -- The "baby milk factory" of 2003. In 1991 Peter Arnett, then with CNN, gullibly hyped Iraqi claims that U.S. bombing had destroyed a "baby milk factory." On ABC on Saturday (March 22), ABC's freelancer, Richard Engel, obligingly highlighted video, from his official tour of bomb damage, of "a community center that had been hit by five separate rockets." To add a bit of emotion, his video included a look at empty children's swings swinging nearby. See: www.mediaresearch.org

     -- Richard "Peter Arnett" Engel relayed on World News Tonight how "6,000 Arab and Muslim volunteer suicide bombers" have arrived in Baghdad. Arnett had a "baby milk factory," Engel has a "maternity hospital." He asserted: "Iraqis are growing increasingly enraged by the mounting damage to civilian sites -- including this maternity hospital." Engel went to the streets to gather public opinion: "I asked this man if he thinks the war is about liberating him from Saddam's brutal regime. 'Liberation?' he asked me. 'Who asked for America to liberate us?'" Peter Jennings suggested that the Iraqi claim of "almost 700 civilians killed in the country since the U.S. invaded" last month "may be low." See: www.mediaresearch.org

     That item features a picture of Engel in Baghdad.

     -- ABC's Engel in Baghdad Finds Disillusion and Disgust with U.S. Barely 48 hours after U.S. forces arrived in Baghdad, ABC's Richard Engel decided that chaos in the streets meant "time may be running out" for the Americans. "There is a growing sense of disillusionment" amongst Iraqis Engel contended. Engel showcased the views of Iraqis who denounced the U.S. One woman demanded: "Did the Americans come to protect us or to kill us?" And Engel quoted a man who charged: "Now we know that America came to occupy us. They came to steal our oil and our riches and then to leave." CBS's Dan Rather, in contrast, arrived in Baghdad and found the people glad to have been liberated and appreciative of the U.S. www.mediaresearch.org

 

Gibson's Bedroom Sported Anti-War Poster,
He Couldn't Be Prez

     ABC's Charles Gibson and his wife just love anti-military and anti-war posters. Last October, Gibson, whose wife runs a private school for girls, boasted: "My wife has a sign on her office wall and it says, 'Won't it be a great day when the Air Force has to hold bake sales to get a new bomber and the schools have all the money they need?'" Then last week on CNN's Larry King Live, Gibson recalled how he and his wife "used to have a little framed sign hanging in our bedroom, my wife and I, that said: 'War is not good for children and other living things.'"

     During his appearance on the July 2 Larry King Live, to promote his ABC special airing tonight on the Columbia disaster, the co-host of Good Morning America also disqualified himself from the presidency as he revealed that he could never send soldiers into battle or give the order to launch nuclear weapons.

     For more on the discussion about the school over bombers poster, see the October 3, 2002 CyberAlert: www.mediaresearch.org

     The relevant comments from Gibson on the July 2 Larry King Live on CNN last Wednesday:

     -- "I grew up in the Vietnam Era, which is probably one of the signal events of my life and I think affected everybody of my generation. And we used to have a little framed sign hanging in our bedroom, my wife and I, that said, 'War is not good for children and other living things,' and I believe that. So no, I don't like covering war and I hate to see them occur."

     -- "I can't think of anything that would be harder in the world to do than to send young kids out to fight and perhaps to get killed. And the commanders when I went over to the Gulf region said, 'well, look, essentially it's the decision of the President.' And then I thought, 'yes, it really is.' And what a God awful awesome responsibility that is to send kids into battle. I couldn't do it. I couldn't do it."...

     "Just while we're on the subject -- I've never been part of a presidential debate. But I've always wanted in one of those debates to ask what is the most elemental question, which is that you have a guy -- it's not as critical now as it was when I was growing up in the Cold War. But you have a guy, if you're President of the United States, walking around behind you with a little briefcase that has the codes in it. And I've always wanted to say, 'Could you say, yes, fire, go and commit nuclear weapons to killing literally millions of people? Could you do that?' I couldn't. You know? I just couldn't do it. And I don't know what it is in somebody that would be strong enough, I guess, if that's the word, to be able to do something like that."

 

Columnist Samuelson Notes Media Bias
in Prescription Coverage

     You read it here first. In his nationally syndicated column last week, Robert Samuelson pointed out how "coverage of the drug benefit has virtually ignored the issue of long-term costs" as "press skepticism focuses on the stinginess of the new benefit."

     Samuelson elaborated: "Reflecting journalistic conformity, The Post and the New York Times both ran front-page stories on June 26 in which retirees complained that the yet-to-be-passed drug benefit was inadequate."

     Sound familiar? From the June 27 CyberAlert:
     ABC, NBC, the New York Times and Washington Post on Thursday delivered another round of complaints that the proposed new Medicare prescription benefit doesn't go far enough. ABC's Linda Douglass decided that "many will be disappointed" since "many seniors will be surprised to learn how much they will still have to pay out of pocket." On Today, Matt Lauer grilled Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist from the left, pressing him about "this donut hole in coverage." Lauer demanded: "If I'm a senior and I'm paying my, my monthly premium why should I have to then fork over all the money during that, that gap period?" Front page New York Times and Washington Post stories relayed whining from selfish and ungrateful seniors who want others to pay their expenses. See: www.mediaresearch.org

     An excerpt from Samuelson's column, as published in the July 2 Washington Post:

....Who will pay for all this generosity? Our children, and their children. Under present policies, Social Security and Medicare spending will rise about 75 percent by 2030, projects the Congressional Budget Office. Our children will pay higher taxes, face higher budget deficits or receive fewer other government services. New retiree benefits or tax preferences increase the burden. There are questions of generational justice; high taxes or deficits may also hurt economic growth.

What we have needed -- and have not gotten -- is a rewriting of the generational compact, reflecting new social realities (longer life expectancies, more retirees, more private retirement savings). No president has addressed the issues candidly and risked the resulting unpopularity. We ought to be discussing how much people should pay for their retirement and what the public safety net should cover. But there's been no demand, especially among baby boomers, for candor.

The press amplifies the indifference. Somehow the mainstream press -- led by baby boomers -- regards new retirement benefits as "progressive" and dissociates them from higher future taxes or deficits. Coverage of the drug benefit has virtually ignored the issue of long-term costs. Experts at the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute and the American Enterprise Institute have strongly criticized the congressional plans. Their views have received scant attention. Press skepticism focuses on the stinginess of the new benefit. Reflecting journalistic conformity, The Post and the New York Times both ran front-page stories on June 26 in which retirees complained that the yet-to-be-passed drug benefit was inadequate....

     END of Excerpt

     For Samuelson's column in its entirety: www.washingtonpost.com

 

     * Upcoming guests this week of note scheduled to appear on NBC's Tonight Show: On Tuesday night, actor James Woods, who has expressed tough views on terrorism and liberals; and on Wednesday night, NBC's Brian Williams.

-- Brent Baker

 


 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314