6/02: NBC Suggests Bill O'Reilly Fueled Murder of Dr. George Tiller
  6/01: NBC's Williams Cues Up Obama: 'That's One She'd Rather Have Back'
  5/29: Nets Push 'Abortion Rights' Advocates' Concerns on Sotomayor
  5/28: CBS on Sotomayor: 'Can't Be Easily Defined by Political Labels'

  Home
  Notable Quotables
  Media Reality Check
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Entertainment
  News
  Take Action
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  Eyeblast.tv

Support the MRC



www.TimesWatch.org


 

The 2,408th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996
10:15am EDT, Friday May 11, 2007 (Vol. Twelve; No. 81)

 
Printer Firendly Version

Tell a friend about this site


1. Iraq Combat & Civilian Casualties, Blair a 'Political Casualty'
The broadcast network evening newscasts, reflecting the focus of the media's approach to British Prime Minister Tony Blair's announcement that he will step down on June 27, framed their reviews of his ten-year tenure around the unpopularity of his decision to join the U.S. in the Iraq war. On CBS, however, Elizabeth Palmer uniquely found time to recall how Blair won in 1997 by "dragging Britain's old left-wing Labour Party to the political center" and she cited a couple of other achievements. Nonetheless, like ABC and NBC, CBS included the obligatory citation of how the British press derided Blair as "Bush's poodle," a derogatory characterization also highlighted on Thursday's morning shows. NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams saw great meaning in Blair's decision as he cited Blair's resignation as one of the "concussions from the war in Iraq" which reflected "the political cost of an unpopular war," asserting: "There are combat casualties of the war in Iraq, there are civilian casualties. Today we saw a political casualty, Tony Blair stepping down."

2. Hillary's Moral Purpose for Newsweek: Tolerating Bill's Adultery?
This week's Newsweek cover story on political courage ("Wanted: A New Truman") is truly baffling. Evan Thomas has a strange way of assessing what marks courage in our presidential contenders. He easily acknowledges that John McCain's long tenure as a prisoner of war trumps everyone else. But he wrote: "All the candidates will use their life stories to show a sense of moral purpose." How did Hillary display her sense of moral purpose? You may not believe it, but Thomas claimed: "Hillary Clinton had a stark moral choice: whether to stay with her husband when President Clinton's philandering with Monica Lewinsky was exposed. Her decision to stand by him could not have been easy." Inside the media-Democrat complex, moral courage is not displayed by condemning adultery. It is displayed by tolerating adultery and maintaining political viability for the party in power -- not to mention nicely setting up your own senatorial and presidential campaigns down the line.

3. Only Dem Voting Against War After 9/11: 'No Lefty Flame Thrower'?
Liberal newspapers like the Washington Post will try to drag every Democrat into the mainstream, even the radical ones. On Thursday's "Federal Page," reporter/columnist Lois Romano told the tale of Rep. Barbara Lee of Berkeley, the only member of the House so radical that she voted against a military response to 9/11. The headline put her in the current vogue: "A Voice Against Presidential War-Making Now Leads A Chorus." Romano described how she's getting standing ovations in the Democratic caucus for her pragmatism: "Don't get her wrong; she says she will never vote for any measure that funds this war, including the one that could come for a vote today. But she is credited by Democrats with being able to balance principle and pragmatism...Lee, 60, is soft-spoken and is no lefty flame thrower. The daughter of a veteran of two wars (whom she still calls 'Colonel'), she says she is not a pacifist."

4. ABC's GMA Touts Environmentalist Who Boycotts Toilet Paper
On Thursday's Good Morning America, the ABC program touted a liberal New Yorker who is so concerned about the environment that he refuses to use toilet paper. GMA devoted eight and a half minutes of the May 10 show to promoting the cause of Colin Beaven, a man who, in addition to his bathroom stance, refuses to buy anything in packaging, won't use transportation, even elevators, and insists that all his food be grown within 250 miles. According to liberal weatherman Sam Champion, who admiringly recounted Mr. Beaven's story, "The rules may seem a little extreme." A little? Co-anchor Diane Sawyer talked to the environmentalist in a follow-up segment and gushed over Beaven's bizarre, minimalist lifestyle: "And so good for you. Yeah. What you were saying about the way it concentrates your mind to be free of concern about a lot of the things in your life. It really makes sense to me." AUDIO&VIDEO See & Hear the Bias - Audio & Video Clip Archive


 

Iraq Combat & Civilian Casualties, Blair
a 'Political Casualty'

     The broadcast network evening newscasts, reflecting the focus of the media's approach to British Prime Minister Tony Blair's announcement that he will step down on June 27, framed their reviews of his ten-year tenure around the unpopularity of his decision to join the U.S. in the Iraq war. On CBS, however, Elizabeth Palmer uniquely found time to recall how Blair won in 1997 by "dragging Britain's old left-wing Labour Party to the political center" and she cited a couple of other achievements. Nonetheless, like ABC and NBC, CBS included the obligatory citation of how the British press derided Blair as "Bush's poodle," a derogatory characterization also highlighted on Thursday's morning shows.

     NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams saw great meaning in Blair's decision as he cited Blair's resignation as one of the "concussions from the war in Iraq" which reflected "the political cost of an unpopular war," asserting: "There are combat casualties of the war in Iraq, there are civilian casualties. Today we saw a political casualty, Tony Blair stepping down." NBC's Keith Miller observed that "Tony Blair was perhaps the best Prime Minister America never had. But at home, the press labeled him 'Bush's poodle' and his approval rating plunged." From London, ABC's David Wright declared: "People here ridiculed him as 'Bush's poodle.' The Iraq war has been albatross for Blair, dragging down his approval ratings and drowning his hopes for a positive legacy." CBS anchor Katie Couric announced that "Blair's role as the President's ally ended up costing him dearly."

     [This item was posted Thursday night on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

     (In the morning on Thursday, as recounted by the MRC's Justin McCarthy in a NewsBusters item, the three major networks covered news of British Prime Minister Tony Blair's resignation with the left-wing "Bush's poodle" line. On Good Morning America, ABC's David Wright asserted: "Bill Clinton's sidekick became George Bush's poodle, or so they see it here." On Today, NBC's Dawna Freisen noted, "he became, of course, America's closest ally but that came at a price here at home. He was eventually derided here as America's poodle." CBS's Sheila MacVicar stated on The Earky Show: "But at home, Blair has been labeled Bush's poodle, at too willing ally who led his country into Iraq." MacVicar relied on the expertise of Simon Hoggart of The Guardian, a left wing British publication and hardly an objective source who charged: "It's Iraq that's really going to be his legacy. The information, the intelligence, it was all gussied up, it was all tweaked. We were misled, frankly.")

     Partial transcripts of the May 10 evening newscast coverage of Blair:

     # NBC Nightly News. Anchor Brian Williams led by framing the day's news: "Today it was possible to feel the concussions from the war in Iraq on both sides of the Atlantic. In this country, President Bush, for the first time, said he is willing to give the Democrats some of what they want. And across the Atlantic in the United Kingdom today, the man who has supported George Bush more steadfastly than any other ally, Tony Blair, today announced he is through as British Prime Minister. Today was about the political cost of an unpopular war as our own Tim Russert first reported on this broadcast last night, the President now has real trouble in his own party. And with the damage now piling up, now the talk begins about a possible Plan B for Iraq. We have reports here tonight from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington and 10 Downing Street London..."

     Introducing the Blair story, Williams contended: "There are combat casualties of the war in Iraq, there are civilian casualties. Today we saw a political casualty, Tony Blair stepping down."

     Keith Miller's report from London included this: "Popular in the United States, Tony Blair was perhaps the best Prime Minister America never had. But at home, the press labeled him 'Bush's poodle' and his approval rating plunged."
     Lord Douglas Hurd, former Foreign Minister: "He misled us into a wrong and foolish war and that's what a lot of people, certainly myself, will remember as the main feature of his premiership."


     # ABC's World News. Anchor Charles Gibson: "In London today, a major announcement. Tony Blair has said that he will step down as Britain's Prime Minister on June 27th. He has been the President's staunchest ally for the war in Iraq. But that has cost him much of his popularity."

     David Wright reported from London: "Not since Margaret Thatcher has America had such a good friend in Downing Street. But Thatcher was always seen as the Iron Lady, very much her own woman. Blair was the junior partner. People here ridiculed him as 'Bush's poodle.' The Iraq war has been albatross for Blair, dragging down his approval ratings and drowning his hopes for a positive legacy."


     # CBS Evening News. Katie Couric set up the story: "President Bush is losing his best friend on the world stage. Tony Blair announced he is stepping down as British Prime Minister effective next month. The President called him a 'remarkable person.' But Blair's role as the President's ally ended up costing him dearly."
     Elizabeth Palmer relayed the most information beyond the topic of Iraq: "...His career was blighted, says Matthew Parris, by one key blunder:"
     Matthew Parris, The Times: "Iraq, Iraq, Iraq. It must haunt him through his dreams now and it will for the rest of his life."
     Palmer: "Before the bad dreams, though, there was a honeymoon that began with a landslide victory Blair won by dragging Britain's old left-wing Labour Party to the political center. Tony Blair, the idealist with a conscience, brokered a peace agreement in Northern Ireland and convinced Western leaders to stop Slobodan Milosovic's campaign of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. But when the world changed, Tony Blair's fierce idealism did not...
     "In spite of huge anti-war demonstrations at home, Blair volunteered British troops as America's main ally in Iraq. It earned him a standing ovation in Washington....But a new nickname at home: 'Bush's poodle.' And it probably cost him his job. But today, Tony Blair tried one more time to justify himself...."

 

Hillary's Moral Purpose for Newsweek:
Tolerating Bill's Adultery?

     This week's Newsweek cover story on political courage ("Wanted: A New Truman") is truly baffling. Evan Thomas has a strange way of assessing what marks courage in our presidential contenders. He easily acknowledges that John McCain's long tenure as a prisoner of war trumps everyone else. But he wrote: "All the candidates will use their life stories to show a sense of moral purpose." How did Hillary display her sense of moral purpose?

     You may not believe it, but Thomas claimed: "Hillary Clinton had a stark moral choice: whether to stay with her husband when President Clinton's philandering with Monica Lewinsky was exposed. Her decision to stand by him could not have been easy." Inside the media-Democrat complex, moral courage is not displayed by condemning adultery. It is displayed by tolerating adultery and maintaining political viability for the party in power -- not to mention nicely setting up your own senatorial and presidential campaigns down the line.

     [This item, by Tim Graham, was posted on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

     Thomas also implied that Hillary showed courage in "her refusal to apologize for her pro-war vote in the Senate in the fall of 2002 as a matter of principle." When it came to Barack Obama, Thomas argued he demonstrated his political courage by standing up to liberal bloggers who scorn him as a centrist. John McCain's faced down Vietnamese captors and is boasting of fighting Osama bin Laden to "the gates of Hell," but Obama is courageous for standing up to the Daily Kos crowd. He's also brave for starting out modestly in Chicago politics before he started making millions in book royalties:
     "Barack Obama was an early opponent of the war at a time when most Democrats were still with Bush. Favorably compared to Bobby Kennedy, Obama does have an air of authenticity -- he writes his own books and seems to speak from the heart. Giving up a corporate job in Manhattan, he went to work in Chicago as a low-paid community organizer. He will take on liberal bloggers who criticize him as too centrist. But there is a something of the raging moderate about Obama: he never sticks his neck so far out that he can't pull it back in."

     Thomas didn't mention that Barack Obama was an obscure state senator in Illinois in 2002. The reader would be forgiven for assuming he was a high-profile Washington figure at that time.

     Thomas had first turned to Romney when he started on the moral-purpose line. It's not surprising that he used the paragraph to pluck out young Romney's memories of drunken frat boy George W. Bush:
     "All the candidates will use their life stories to show a sense of moral purpose. After partying at Stanford, Romney says, he found purpose on a Mormon mission to France and came back to finish college at Brigham Young. At Harvard Business School, Romney says he 'didn't hang out much' with his schoolmate George W. Bush. 'I was married at the time with two or three children,' he told NEWSWEEK. Bush was a single guy in his 'young and irresponsible' period...I longed for the chance to get at the books and study and learn.'"

     For the Thomas article in the May 14 Newsweek, "The Truman Primary," go to: www.msnbc.msn.com

 

Only Dem Voting Against War After 9/11:
'No Lefty Flame Thrower'?

     Liberal newspapers like the Washington Post will try to drag every Democrat into the mainstream, even the radical ones. On Thursday's "Federal Page," reporter/columnist Lois Romano told the tale of Rep. Barbara Lee of Berkeley, the only member of the House so radical that she voted against a military response to 9/11. The headline put her in the current vogue: "A Voice Against Presidential War-Making Now Leads A Chorus." Romano described how she's getting standing ovations in the Democratic caucus for her pragmatism: "Don't get her wrong; she says she will never vote for any measure that funds this war, including the one that could come for a vote today. But she is credited by Democrats with being able to balance principle and pragmatism...Lee, 60, is soft-spoken and is no lefty flame thrower. The daughter of a veteran of two wars (whom she still calls 'Colonel'), she says she is not a pacifist."

     [This item, by Tim Graham, was posted on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

     For Romano's May 10 article: www.washingtonpost.com

     At least Romano described her as a "liberal Democrat." But she excluded evidence that might suggest that Barbara Lee votes like the official House pacifist. A reader might conclude that Lee's only opposing war in the Bush era because she doesn't trust this President to wage war. But in 1999, Lee was the only Democrat to oppose President Clinton's plan to drop bombs in Serbia over the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. You could learn this because the Washington Post also offered a sympathetic profile of Barbara Lee's courage after the 420-to-1 roll call in 2001.

 

ABC's GMA Touts Environmentalist Who
Boycotts Toilet Paper

     On Thursday's Good Morning America, the ABC program touted a liberal New Yorker who is so concerned about the environment that he refuses to use toilet paper. GMA devoted eight and a half minutes of the May 10 show to promoting the cause of Colin Beaven, a man who, in addition to his bathroom stance, refuses to buy anything in packaging, won't use transportation, even elevators, and insists that all his food be grown within 250 miles.


| |
More See & Hear the Bias

     According to liberal weatherman Sam Champion, who admiringly recounted Mr. Beaven's story, "The rules may seem a little extreme." A little? Co-anchor Diane Sawyer talked to the environmentalist in a follow-up segment and gushed over Beaven's bizarre, minimalist lifestyle: "And so good for you. Yeah. What you were saying about the way it concentrates your mind to be free of concern about a lot of the things in your life. It really makes sense to me."

     No word on whether Sawyer will be opting to forgo toilet paper.

     [This item, by Scott Whitlock, was posted Thursday, with video, on the MRC's blog. The video will be added to the posted version of this CyberAlert, but in the meantime to watch the video and audio clip, go to: newsbusters.org ]

     During the introduction, the GMA host appeared to be in awe of the man who calls himself "No Impact Man."

     Diane Sawyer: "Well, I always loved the idea that if you took the planet Earth and divided the land by everybody on it, each of us would have four acres, four acres of our own. We're custodians of them. So what do we want to do with ours? Would you be like the couple we're about to meet who used to have our styrofoam cups, our 18,000 plastic bags in a lifetime, decided to change all that, to do something about it. In fact, they did it in such a radical way, we read about it in the New York Times and our mouths dropped open. And Sam Champion is going to tell you their story."

     By way of comparison, take a look at how Mr. Beaven describes himself on his Web site: "A guilty liberal finally snaps, swears off plastic, goes organic, becomes a bicycle nut, turns off his power, composts his poop and, while living in New York City, generally turns into a tree-hugging lunatic who tries to save the polar bears and the rest of the planet from environmental catastrophe while dragging his baby daughter and Prada-wearing, Four Seasons-loving wife along for the ride." See: noimpactman.typepad.com

     Somehow, the word "liberal" didn't appear in the GMA segments. If this man isn't a left-winger, who is?

     Weatherman Champion toured the apartment of the Beaven family and recounted how they deprive themselves of modern amenities: "From the outside, mornings at the Beaven household look pretty ordinary. Breakfast, brushing their teeth and getting 2-year-old Isabella ready for daycare. But if you look a little closer, there's no morning paper, no morning television, no coffee. That's right, no coffee. Coffee isn't grown locally, so it's off limits. Colin Beaven is leading his family through a year long experiment seeing if they can live their lives without creating any waste, and therefore having no negative impact on the environment."

     Champion, who once hosted a segment that wondered if global warming will kill billions, described the bizarre endeavor as a "serious experiment": "This is a serious experiment for a family. I mean, to put your, to put your family into this."
     Beaven: "The fact is that everything we have done has actually helped us as a family."
     Champion: "The rules may seem a little extreme. Nothing new, nothing in any packaging. No food that isn't grown or made within 250 miles, and no transportation, even public transportation, even elevators. And, oh yeah, no toilet paper."

     In a subsequent piece, Diane Sawyer did ask Beaven if his friends think he's insane, but mostly stuck to highlighting how admirable his actions were. She began by requesting to see the solitary napkin that the New Yorker uses to...clean himself:
     "And joining us now is the writer, and self proclaimed 'No Impact Man' Colin Beavan. He's got that book coming out next year. The first time I met you, you showed up, had your own cup, because you always had your own cup to get refills of anything that people have. You have your own sort of napkin you carry around? Where is it?"
     Colin Beaven: "I carry a cloth so that we don't have to use paper towels. You know, when we go to the restroom, I can dry my hands or, you know, various, napkins in restaurants."

     After encouraging Beaven to talk about how the experiment "has been great for your life," Sawyer broached the delicate issue of what the family uses instead of toilet paper. Apparently, this wasn't an issue for morning television: "Now, I know everybody wants to know what you do instead of toilet paper. I'm not going to tell them. I'm going to let them go online and search this out for themselves. Let me just say it's the Bedouin solution. If you don't know what that is, you're on your own out there."

     Finally, in a truly odd moment, the ABC anchor complimented the liberal environmentalist and marveled over how Beaven and his family will soon be going without electricity. (And, no. At no point did Sawyer seem to grasp the irony of what an electricity-free lifestyle might do to GMA's ratings.):

     Sawyer: "And so good for you. Yeah. What you were saying about the way it concentrates your mind to be free of concern about a lot of the things in your life. It really makes sense to me. But, you're now, what, about five and a half months in. Next step is to get rid of electricity, and live by daylight alone? In New York City?"
     Beaven: "Saturday there's a switch in my apartments which is the circuit breaker for the whole apartment. And we're having a little party for our friends and we're going to click the switch off. So, yeah, so, as far as lights are concerned, we may have one or two solar powered lights for getting around a little bit in the night, but mostly by daylight."

     The experiment is to last a year. According to that timetable, the Beaven family, which includes a two-year-old daughter, will be without electricity in December, in New York City. Some might find that alarming, but not Diane Sawyer. She closed by promising that GMA would check in with Beaven throughout the year. The ABC host touted his upcoming book and also noted that the program would be on the look out for any back-sliding: "Cannot wait for the book to come out as well. And to see what you learned at the end of this and if you go back. If you go back, we'll be watching."

-- Brent Baker

 


 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314