Home
  CyberAlert
  Media Reality Check
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  30-Day Archive
  Entertainment
  News
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
  Take Action
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  TimesWatch.org
  Culture and Media Institute

Support the MRC

top
 MediaNomics

What The Media Tell Americans About Free Enterprise
 

Tell a friend about this site

October 1998

 

If Bad Here, Why Not Worldwide?
News Weeklies Note Moral Hazards of Hedge Fund Bailout, But Not of IMF Bailouts

With the Fed-engineered bailout last week of the hedge fund Long Term Capital Management (LTCM), the press suddenly discovered the concept of "moral hazard." This term refers to the effect bailouts of bad investments have on future investment decisions: With the precedent of bailouts in their minds, investors are more likely to take imprudent risks.

While all three of the major news weeklies picked up on this theme with LTCM, most still havenít connected it with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and its role in bailing out investors worldwide.

"Washington and Wall Street buzzed last week with outraged talk of Ďmoral hazard,í and for once it didnít have anything to do with Bill Clintonís sex life," writes John Greenwald in the October 5 Time. "Instead people were talking about the danger created when government backing for private lenders encourages them to take bigger risks ó in search of bigger rewards." According to Greenwald, the "fear is that the Long Term Capital bailout could encourage banks to make still more risky loans, confident that the government wonít let them get into trouble."

The October 5 Newsweek also notes the moral hazard aspects of the LTCM bailout. It quotes former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Wayne Angell, who said, "The appearances of this are just horrible. We complain about Russia and Japan and their insider dealings, and then the Fed comes along and seems to be helping out every reckless fat cat." Newsweek also quotes Lawrence Tisch, whose family owns the Loews conglomerate and competes against those covered by the too-big-to-fail doctrine. "His problem," according to the magazineís Wall Street Editor, Allan Sloan, is that "giant competitors can take excessive risks while Loews accepts lower returns because it has to be prudent."

Not to be left out, U.S. News & World Reportís Phillip J. Longman and Jack Egan reported, in the October 5 issue, that many "Wall Street observers are alarmed by the precedent the New York Fed may have set by brokering the LTCM bailout." They quoted an investor who said, "The Fed, which is supposed to protect the sanctity of the dollar, is now stepping in to bail out hedge funds," and wondered, "Who will be next, the Beardstown Ladies?"

But all of this acknowledgment of moral hazard hasnít, by and large, led the news weeklies to apply it to the IMF. Only one story over the past four months ó a September 28 U.S. News & World Report article by Longman and Egan ó mentioned moral hazard in relation to the IMF. "In effect, while the IMF punishes ordinary citizens by imposing various austerity measures, it protects even the most foolhardy foreign speculators from the consequences of their own mistakes," they write. "As a result, critics argue, the agency winds up encouraging more overinvestment and the speculative booms and busts that go with it."

But the lesson the two draw is not that international institutions should first do no harm, but that they should be given more power. Some experts, they report, are calling for "a global New Deal ó a set of new institutions that would save global capitalism from itself by taming its excesses." Without quoting opponents of such ideas, they lament that with regard to the creation of such new institutions, "strong leadership, at least from the United States, isnít in the cards."

But at least they mentioned moral hazard in relation to the IMF. Most other reporters still havenít gotten that far. If a bailout of a high-profile hedge fund in the U.S. sends the wrong signals to investors, then wonít IMF bailouts overseas do the very same thing?

ó Rich Noyes

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314