Media Reality Check
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  30-Day Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
  Take Action
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  Culture and Media Institute

Support the MRC


What The Media Tell Americans About Free Enterprise

Tell a friend about this site

Tuesday, September 12, 2000

Volume 8, Number 18

Kudos... to ABCís Bob Woodruff

No one likes being stuck at an airport for hours on end, especially when you have someplace else youíd rather be. But there seem to have been an unusual number of delayed or cancelled flights this summer, and thatís got the TV networks (among others) looking around for solutions. Mostly, that means asking why federal bureaucrats havenít cracked down harder on the airlines, but one reporter ó ABCís Bob Woodruff ó actually told his viewers about a "radical" market-based solution.

On CBSís The Early Show last month, reporter Jeffrey Kofman exhibited the prevailing mindset of many reporters when he informed anchor Cynthia Bowers that "last year, the airline industry lobbied hard to kill legislation that would have enacted an airline passenger bill of rights. Instead, the industry came up with a voluntary code."

"Itís clear that code is not working," Kofman continued "Now when they killed that legislation, the politicians did say that if the voluntary code didnít work, they would be back with an airline passenger bill of rights that had real muscle in it, Cynthia." In other words, Kofman assumed tougher regulations could somehow force the market to work correctly.

But on World News Tonight on September 1, ABCís Woodruff uniquely included the free market perspective in his report on solutions to air travelersí woes. He interviewed Alfred Kahn, the Carter administration official who presided over airline deregulation in the 1970s. Kahnís suggestions: charging more during peak hours ("[in] any other free market, those prices would be much, much higher when there is very great demand relative to supply," he explained), and privatizing the air traffic control system.

Although Woodruff did label that a "more radical suggestion," he did not dismiss the notion as crazy talk. He related that such a plan would "leave safety to the government but privatize air traffic control. Critics of the present system say that privatization would increase innovation and the use of new technology." Woodruff then quoted Kahn stating that the current air traffic system is "behind in their technology because they are not free to raise capital."

Government officials have been pointing fingers at the airlines, but is the old hardware of the air traffic control system to blame for some delays? "Today, the airline industry carries three times as many passengers as it did in 1978 at average fares that are 40 percent lower, adjusting for inflation," reported Laurence Zuckerman and Matthew Wald in the September 5 New York Times. "But while the industry was transformed, the air traffic control system has remained virtually unchanged." They also noted that the airline industry blames the old system for more than $5 billion worth of lost time and resources for consumers and industry combined.

"What the FAA hails as modernization," wrote Zuckerman and Wald, "is the technological equivalent of a new coat of paint. The new mainframe computers that form the heart of the air traffic control system are IBM models built in the 1990s that have already gone out of production. The FAA could not buy IBMís newest machines because they would not run Jovial, the 1960s programming language used in the systemís software."

The government runs the air traffic control system, not the private sector, and that means decisions about major investments are decided by politicians and bureaucrats. Kudos to ABCís Bob Woodruff for showing that there are free market alternatives to more government rule-making.

ó Rich Noyes


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314