For Immediate Release: Keith Appell (703) 683-5004 -- Wednesday, March 17, 1999
Vol. Three, No. 11
Potential Chinese Warhead Threat Gets Less Morning and Evening Coverage Than the Monica Book
Which Beret to Wear During Incineration?
Last year, The New
York Times broke the story that two defense contractors were kept from prosecution by
the Clinton White House despite giving China technology that advanced their ballistic
missile guidance systems, missiles that could be aimed at the American mainland. But the
networks were less than impressed. After more than six weeks of ignoring the story, the
networks barely budged when Clinton fundraiser Johnny Chung told the Justice Department he
gave the Democratic National Committee thousands of dollars from China's People's
Liberation Army.
From May 15 to June 5, 1998, the network evening shows offered 15 full stories
(featuring reporters in the field) on Chinagate, but 38 full stories on the Monica
Lewinsky scandal. In the same time period, the network morning shows aired 40 Monica
stories to six on the China scandal. In three weeks, CBS and NBC each aired only one
morning report on Chinagate.
On March 6, 1999, The New York Times landed another shocking scoop:
"Working with nuclear secrets stolen from an American government laboratory, China
has made a leap in the development of nuclear weapons: the minatiurization of its
bombs."
Put the two together -- miniaturized nuclear warheads on improved ballistic missiles --
and you have an American security nightmare. So did the networks leap at this horrendous
security breach? No. In the first nine days of the story, the Big Three aired only 11
evening stories. The morning shows were worse, airing only six full news reports and one
interview in the first ten mornings. As the China story sat unaddressed, ABC had time for
a half-hour on weight loss. CBS asked O.J. Simpson lawyer Johnnie Cochran about his
upcoming appearance on the CBS soap Guiding Light. Two networks urgently
discussed the 40th anniversary of the Barbie doll. The few China stories are
easily outnumbered by ABC's pre- and post-Monica interview hype segments alone.
When the networks did touch the story, it came flattened by skepticism. Only NBC's Today
aired an interview (after two days of interviews with Lewinsky co-author Andrew Morton).
On March 9, Katie Couric helped Energy Secretary Bill Richardson make excuses: "Isn't
there a possibility that China could have done this on its own?" Anne Thompson's
March 11 NBC Nightly News report suggested the U.S. has nothing on Wen Ho Lee,
the Taiwan-born scientist fired last week.
In their first reports, the news magazines played down espionage and played up
partisanship. U.S. News & World Report's headline read "Bulls in the
China Shop: Republicans gore Clinton over China's espionage effort." The Internet
update Time Daily carried the headline "China Spying Issue Threatens to Turn
Into Partisan Battle." Tony Karon began: "Is post-Lewinsky Washington basking in
bipartisan bonhomie? Not likely. Chinese espionage is quickly shaping up as the next
partisan skirmish." Newsweek noted: "Republicans eager to score
political points on foreign-policy issues prepared to release parts of a blistering
700-page report alleged a vast Chinese effort to spirit high technology out of the United
States." Can a growing nuclear threat be dismissed as a partisan food fight? The
Chinese elite hopes so. -- Tim Graham
L. Brent Bozell III, Publisher; Brent Baker, Tim Graham, Editors;
Jessica Anderson, Brian Boyd, Geoffrey
Dickens, Mark Drake, Paul Smith, Media Analysts; Kristina Sewell, Research
Associate. For the latest liberal media bias, read the
CyberAlert at
www.mrc.org. |
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe
|