Media Mudballs Unlikely for Obama Inaugural
  David Gregory, Custodian' of NBC's Biases
  Blackout of Left's "Fairness" Doctrine Push

  Home
  CyberAlert
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Entertainment
  News
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  Culture and Media Institute
 
  TimesWatch.org
  Eyeblast.tv

Support the MRC

Free Adobe Acrobat Reader software required to view PDF files.



www.TimesWatch.org

 

 

 

 

 

top
 Media Reality Check

For Immediate Release: Katie Wright (703) 683-5004 - Thursday, July 19, 2001


Anchor Silent On Story Featured On CBS's Early Show, Face the Nation, and Weekend Evening News

Rather's Bizarre Boycott of Condit Scandal

     Dan Rather apparently feels every CBS News program, with the exception of the Monday through Friday CBS Evening News with Dan Rather, has shown a lack of journalistic restraint by reporting on the official police investigation into the disappearance of Chandra Levy, who until recently was the girlfriend of married Democratic Congressman Gary Condit.

     Rather broke his own highly-publicized silence on the case on Wednesday, grandly proclaiming that after eleven weeks "there is news tonight of national note in the case of missing person 24-year-old Chandra Levy." CBS's Jim Stewart then reported that some FBI investigators told him that Washington, D.C. police had focused too much on Condit's potential role in the former federal intern's disappearance.

     Last night's Evening News report seemed designed to bolster Rather's argument that the Condit story had received too much media attention: "Justice Department sources say there is also growing uneasiness among prosecutors over the public spectacle the case has become," Stewart proclaimed. "Prosecutors are said to be particularly unhappy over the multiple press appearances local police make each day with essentially nothing to report."

     At no time on last night's broadcast did CBS reveal the fact that Condit is a Democrat, following the pattern established by other network news programs during the first several weeks of this story. Last week, MRC reported that only 14 of the 179 network news stories that had been aired through July 11 mentioned Condit's Democratic ties.

     But until last night, Rather hadn't mentioned Condit at all. This morning in an appearance on WFAN's Imus in the Morning radio program, which is simulcast on MSNBC, he continued to distance himself from journalists who have covered the Condit story: "First of all, the facts are so few. You know, we've got rumors, speculation, gossip, innuendo, and, you know, we decided, I decided to try to exercise some restraint. You know, maybe we should have done something with it. I don't think so."

     "If the Congressman were accused, much less charged, he'd be entitled to presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt in a court of law," Rather continued. "I still think there is the real danger that an innocent person could be convicted in the court of public opinion on the basis of rumor, gossip and speculation."

     Yet Rather insisted, "I have no argument with these other journalists who have made other judgments."

     "Other journalists" would include those at CBS's The Early Show, who have run a total of 50 stories on Condit's scandal since mid-May. It would include Bob Schieffer and the producers of CBS's Face the Nation, which discussed the Condit story on July 8 and July 15. And it would have to include Rather's colleagues who produce the Saturday and Sunday editions of CBS Evening News, whose weekend broadcasts have contained half a dozen Condit stories.

     Imus asked Rather if he had shown a similar reluctance to report sexual harassment charges leveled against GOP Senator Bob Packwood back in 1992, and Rather seemed to repudiate his own past coverage: "I think the Packwood thing was another feeding frenzy and unfortunately we took part in it in a way that I wish we hadn't." The scandal forced Packwood to quit the Senate in 1995.

     Condit has been questioned by the police three times, his apartment searched, his DNA submitted to police, and his own attorney held a televised news conference to reveal the Congressman's polygraph results. Is there anyone in America who honestly believes that, if Condit were a conservative Republican, Dan Rather would have remained quiet for eleven weeks?  -- Rich Noyes

 

 

 

 

 

 

L. Brent Bozell III, Publisher; Brent Baker, Rich Noyes, Editors; Jessica Anderson, Brian Boyd, Geoffrey Dickens, Patrick Gregory, Ken Shepherd, Brad Wilmouth, Media Analysts; Kristina Sewell, Research Associate; Liz Swasey, Director of Communications. For the latest liberal media bias, read the CyberAlert at www.mrc.org.

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314