Media Mudballs Unlikely for Obama Inaugural
  David Gregory, Custodian' of NBC's Biases
  Blackout of Left's "Fairness" Doctrine Push

  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  News Division
  Business & Media Institute
  Culture and Media Institute

Support the MRC

Free Adobe Acrobat Reader software required to view PDF files.






 Media Reality Check

For Immediate Release: Katie Wright (703) 683-5004 - Wednesday, November 28, 2001

Without Major Media Presence In Afghanistan, Peter Arnett Predicts "GIs In Afghanistan...Will Be Totally Forgotten"

Would Have Sacrificed Troops In '91, But Wants a Scoop In '01 Terror War

     The latest gimmick on CNN's NewsNight with Aaron Brown is for Brown to quiz a "mystery guest" whose identity is not revealed to the fretful anchor until the moment he or she appears on the air. Last night's surprise guest was ex-CNNer Peter Arnett, who was there to declare the Pentagon's war zone rules limiting journalistic access are "not justified." 

     Arnett, on his way to Afghanistan to report for something called the "Broadcast News Network," self-servingly told Brown that it would be good for the presently "anonymous" soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who are fighting if he could work alongside them: "I watched CNN coverage tonight. The only American I saw was Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense," Arnett argued. "These GIs in Afghanistan now, who are totally anonymous, will not be remembered, but Donald Rumsfeld and maybe a couple of generals will come out and do major speech tours and benefit from the work that all these soldiers are doing. They will be forgotten.

     For the record, while journalists did not accompany the small teams of Special Forces who have been deployed in Afghanistan for the past several weeks, they were aboard U.S. aircraft carriers, and a small number of reporters are with the U.S. Marines who have established a base in southern Afghanistan during the past few days. 

     As for Arnett's desire to help American troops, he appeared on CNN's Crossfire on August 2, 1991, a few months after the Gulf War. Co-host Pat Buchanan asked what Arnett would have done if, while he was stationed in Saddam Hussein's capital, "there was information you could have gotten out that could have saved scores, hundreds of American lives?

     "I wouldn't have transmitted that information," Arnett declared. "I would not have gotten that information in the first place, but I would not have transmitted it. I was in Baghdad because I was a correspondent for CNN, which has no political affiliations with the U.S. government, thank goodness." 

     Ten years ago, Arnett was so "neutral" that he didn't care if hundreds of "anonymous GIs" died, but he now insists that media access to the battlefield will only help today's heroes get the public attention they deserve. Arnett doesn't need to worry - America already knows who its real heroes are.   -- Rich Noyes







L. Brent Bozell III, Publisher; Brent Baker, Rich Noyes, Editors; Jessica Anderson, Brian Boyd, Geoffrey Dickens, Patrick Gregory, Ken Shepherd, Brad Wilmouth, Media Analysts; Kristina Sewell, Research Associate; Liz Swasey, Director of Communications. For the latest liberal media bias, read the CyberAlert at


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314