Media Mudballs Unlikely for Obama Inaugural
  David Gregory, Custodian' of NBC's Biases
  Blackout of Left's "Fairness" Doctrine Push

  Home
  CyberAlert
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Entertainment
  News
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Links
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  Internships
  News Division
  Business & Media Institute
  CNSNews.com
  Culture and Media Institute
 
  TimesWatch.org
  Eyeblast.tv

Support the MRC

Free Adobe Acrobat Reader software required to view PDF files.



www.TimesWatch.org

 

 

 

 

 

top
 Media Reality Check

For Immediate Release: Katie Wright (703) 683-5004 - Monday, January 20, 2003

Tell a friend about this site


MRC Study: Big Three Networks, News Magazines Ignored Popular Pro-Life Initiatives in 2002 

Out of Touch, Out of Time for Pro-Lifers

     The national media highlight large Washington rallies when the cause is the impending death of Iraqis. But when thousands of people march against the impending death of unborn babies, that's another story. If the media once again hew to their largely pro-abortion political beliefs, Wednesday's March for Life will be quickly passed over as a publicity stunt. Because in 2002, the networks routinely remained out of touch with news developments that pleased pro-life activists.

  • January 31: HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson announced a rule to allow states to cover eligible unborn children under the State Children's Insurance Health Program. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero on NBC. On World News Tonight, ABC's Peter Jennings passed over it quickly that night: "abortion rights" supporters "don't want the Bush administration to classify fetuses as human beings." In a full story on CBS Evening News, John Roberts noted it would "play well with conservatives," but that "abortion rights advocates see it in sharply different terms, what they call an assault on women's rights under the guise of compassion."

  • April 17: The House of Representatives passed the Child Custody Protection Act. It would outlaw the transportation of underage girls out of states that require parental notification or consent for an abortion so they can have an abortion without their parents' knowledge. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero.

  • July 22: The White House announced that the United States will withhold its allocation of $34 million to the United Nations Population Fund, arguing that the U.N. agency has supported forced abortions and the punitive one-child policy of communist China. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero. 

  • July 26: The House passed a new bill banning partial-birth abortion authored by Rep. Steve Chabot of Ohio. Chabot introduced the bill on June 19 and held hearings on July 9. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero.

  • August 5: President Bush signed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, which simply stated that any baby mistakenly born during an abortion has all the rights of any other living human being. The bill was inspired by stories that hospitals like Christ Hospital of Oak Lawn, Illinois performed "live birth abortions," setting babies aside to die. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero.

  • September 25: The House of Representatives passes the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act, which would prevent the denial of federal funds to hospitals which choose not to perform abortions. A House Energy and Commerce health subcommittee held hearings on July 11. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero. 

  • December 4: The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the appeal of a 1998 case, NOW v. Scheidler. The National Organization for Women asked that the RICO [Racketeers Influenced and Corruption Organizations Act] statute be applied to actions by pro-life demonstrators, including Chicago activist Joe Scheidler, for conspiracy and extortion to stop abortion clinic business. The court agreed to hear the case on April 22. 2002 coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC? Zero.

     National news magazines didn't do any better. The HHS unborn-child declaration drew a brief paragraph in U.S. News & World Report, but nothing in Time or Newsweek. None of the three covered the UN funding fight in print, or NOW v. Scheidler. The House bills mentioned above drew nothing. Were these not news? Or were they left out because they put abortion advocates at a public-relations disadvantage? -- Tim Graham

 

L. Brent Bozell III, Publisher; Brent Baker, Rich Noyes, Tim Graham, Editors; Geoffrey Dickens, Jessica Anderson, Brad Wilmouth, Brian Boyd, Ken Shepherd, and Patrick Gregory, Media Analysts; Kristina Sewell, Research Associate; Liz Swasey, Director of Communications. For the latest liberal media bias, read the CyberAlert at www.mrc.org.

 

 


Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314