Media Mudballs Unlikely for Obama Inaugural
  David Gregory, Custodian' of NBC's Biases
  Blackout of Left's "Fairness" Doctrine Push

  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  Special Reports
  30-Day Archive
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  News Division
  Business & Media Institute
  Culture and Media Institute

Support the MRC

Free Adobe Acrobat Reader software required to view PDF files.






 Media Reality Check

For Immediate Release: Tim Scheiderer (703) 683-5004 - Friday, October 29, 2004

Tell a friend about this site

Under Democrats, Slower Growth was Seen as Good News

How Will Media Spin Best Pre-Election
Growth in 25 Years?

    This morning's report of 3.7 percent economic growth in the third quarter was the best pre-election growth rate in at least the last quarter century, better than in 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996 and 2000. Coupled with the creation of nearly two million jobs since the Bush tax cuts took full effect in the summer of 2003, the robust growth should make it impossible for the liberal media to maintain their pessimistic mantra of economic weakness.

    Maybe, or maybe not. On CNN this morning, business reporter Andy Serwer described the numbers as "good news, bad news. The good news is the number was 3.7 percent; that's higher than the second quarter, which was 3.3 percent. The bad news is economists were looking for 4.3 percent."

    Weaker economic growth reports in 1996 and 2000 were painted as good news for the incumbent Democrats. "The economy was slow but steady going into the last quarter," was how NBC's Tom Brokaw characterized a 2.2 percent growth report that came out right before Clinton's re-election in 1996. "Many economists were encouraged by that, because it means inflation is under control and interest rates will stay low."

    Four years later, CBS's Dan Rather was pleased with a 2.7 percent growth rate reported right before the 2000 election. "There is a school of thought that says this is overall good for the economy to keep it from overheating," Rather spun.

    But in 1992, a 2.7 percent growth rate issued right before the election was seen as poor. ABC's Peter Jennings called it "more than economists had projected but, in many cases, less than meets the eye." Reporter Bob Jamieson warned that "many economists say the report is not proof the economy is taking a sharp turn for the better." After that election, revised figures showed that the economy was performing even better than first reports indicated - but by that time, Bill Clinton was already President-elect.



Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314