Media Reality Check
  Notable Quotables
  Press Releases
  Media Bias Videos
  30-Day Archive
  The Watchdog
  About the MRC
  MRC in the News
  Support the MRC
  Planned Giving
  What Others Say
  Take Action
  Gala and DisHonors
  Best of NQ Archive
MRC Resources
  Site Search
  Media Addresses
  Contact MRC
  Comic Commentary
  MRC Bookstore
  Job Openings
  News Division
  NewsBusters Blog
  Business & Media Institute
  Culture and Media Institute

Support the MRC

 Special Report

Facts Exempt: Network News and Taxes

April 14, 1998
By Tim Lamer, Director, 
MRCís Free Market Project

A recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, reported in the April 9 Wall Street Journal, asked Americans which they would prefer: a candidate who advocates cutting taxes, or a candidate who favors more spending on education and child care. Only 39 percent preferred a tax-cutting candidate, while 55 percent wanted a candidate who would spend more money.

One possible explanation for the relatively low popularity of tax cuts is that they get bad press. Network news reports generally portray tax cut proposals as election-year sops to the wealthy at the expense of the poor. And viewers of the network news probably think there is no philosophical or economic rationale behind tax cuts, since they are rarely told of one.

This is the conclusion of a year-long study of tax coverage by the Media Research Centerís Free Market Project. Researchers analyzed tax stories from March 15, 1997 through March 14, 1998 on ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, and NBC Nightly News. The study found that:

  1. There were 13 stories mentioning the liberal argument that last yearís cut in the capital gains tax would mainly benefit the wealthy. Only four stories mentioned conservative arguments that more middle class investors are entering the stock market every year, and that relieving double taxation would help the economy.

  2. There were 18 stories which mentioned the debate over whether to extend the child tax credit in last yearís budget deal to the non-taxpaying working poor. Only six of those stories mentioned conservative arguments that such an extension would constitute new welfare spending.

  3. In the 58 stories about last year's budget deal, only two pointed out that the deal increased the complexity of the tax code, which ran counter to 1996 campaign promises and to the GOPís supposed agenda of tax simplification. 

  4. In the 38 stories about Internal Revenue Service (IRS) abuses, only two mentioned the conservative argument that the only real way to rein in IRS power is to make the tax code less complicated and more neutral.

  5. Fourteen stories claimed that either the GOP's focus on IRS abuses or the plans in last yearís budget deal to cut taxes were motivated by election-year political calculations. Only one of these stories said the same thing about proposals for new spending.

Complete Special Report




Home | News Division | Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts 
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact the MRC | Subscribe

Founded in 1987, the MRC is a 501(c) (3) non-profit research and education foundation
 that does not support or oppose any political party or candidate for office.

Privacy Statement

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314