Democratic Convention Editions,
Campaign 2000 Media Reality Check
Friday, August 18:
AM Edition
Thursday, August 17:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Wednesday, August 16:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Tuesday, August 15:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Monday, August 14:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Republican Convention Editions,
Campaign 2000 Media Reality Check
Friday, August 4:
AM Edition
Thursday, August 3:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Wednesday, August 2:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Tuesday, August 1:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Monday, July 31:
AM Edition ;
PM Edition
Videos
-
08/16/2000:
Good Morning America delivered a sympathetic interview with Hadassah Lieberman and didn't press on politics.
for more details
-
08/16/2000: ...But ABC quizzed Lynne Cheney about the GOP platform: "So is this really open, compassionate, tolerant party?"
for more details
History of Liberal Bias
in Coverage of Republican and Democratic National Conventions, 1988-1996
The Media Research Center has analyzed liberal media bias in television coverage (ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and PBS) of the Republican and Democratic National Conventions since 1988.
This page presents an overview of MRC’s findings in two important areas — frequency of use of ideological labels (such as conservative or liberal) and agenda of questions correspondents posed to convention participants — for all networks combined, by
year.
To access this data for individual networks, click on a your desired network from the Network By Network Analysis below. And for even more information, be sure to check out MRC's newest Special Report,
"Four Campaigns, Eight Conventions... But Just One
Spin."
Use of Ideological Labeling
Tagging political parties,
platforms and candidates with ideological labels becomes an
issue of media bias when anchors and correspondents apply
labels in an imbalanced manner. And that is exactly what the
networks have done in covering national political
conventions since 1988: overall, Republicans were labeled
"conservative" twice as often (346 times) as
Democrats were labeled "liberal" (171 times),
while Democrats were labeled "moderate" more than
twice as often (123 times) as Republicans (58 times).
Agenda of Questions
Posed
Balanced reporting requires that correspondents periodically don Devil’s advocate hats. One of the most effective ways of doing this is to pose challenging questions to interviewees — to ask conservative/Republican-agenda questions of Democrats and liberal/Democratic-agenda questions of Republicans.
Yet the data show that since 1988, networks have failed miserably in asking an balanced number of challenging questions of representative of both political parties: overall, Republicans were asked challenging (liberal/Democratic-agenda) questions more than three times as often (202 times) as Democrats were asked challenging (conservative/Republican-agenda) questions (60 times).
Network
By Network Coverage
Convention
Coverage (by Network):
Campaign 2000
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Campaign & Convention 2000 Media
Bias Videos
Back to Campaign 2000 Home Page
Home | News Division
| Bozell Columns | CyberAlerts
Media Reality Check | Notable Quotables | Contact
the MRC | Subscribe